Conservative City lack stomach for another fightback

3 Mar

Dagenham & Redbridge 1

Saunders 71

Bradford City 0

Saturday 3 March, 2012

It’s when your football team lets you down in the areas you expect them to be strong that the ultimate betrayal is felt.

Matthew Saunders had put Dagenham & Redbridge 1-0 ahead with a stunning free kick – but with 19 minutes still to play, weeks of watching Bradford City stage late fightbacks and always battle to the end left you feeling confident they would be able to come back. Sadly on this occasion, weapons were laid down and defeat ensued.

Perhaps it was just one setback too many for a squad which has had to battle against deficits so often this season; maybe it was down to the fatigue of playing a 5th game in 19 days. Whatever it was, we got no late rally and few credible moments where it looked like a draw could salvaged. It was a 20-minute period of play as wretched and as spirit-lacking as anything we’ve witnessed all season.

Defeat can be accepted, but not the white flag.

Collectively, the body language of the players was poor during the closing stages. Other than the commendable centre back Andrew Davies – who was thrown up front for the final 20 minutes – no one in the attacking third of the pitch was willing to accept responsibility of being the catalyst. When in receipt of possession, players would look to pass the onus onto someone else, rather than swing the ball into the box or have a shot. That was worrying.

It was too half-pace. Lone striker Craig Fagan was replaced with four minutes to go. Perhaps he was as baffled as the rest of us by this, but he failed to notice his number had been called up for a good few seconds until Nahki Wells went over and told him. He then walked off very slowly, eating up precious time by seemingly wanting to make clear his disappointment at being taken off. Three minutes into the four added on for stoppages, Matt Fry was under slight pressure when chasing a loose ball and opted to boot it out of the stand, rather than at least try and work it to a team mate so City could have one last attack.

We’ve not seen such a lack of courage from City for a number of months. And it’s to be hoped such a poor reaction to adversity was simply a bad day at the office, rather than a hint of darker things to come over the next few weeks.

For the majority of the afternoon this looked like a game the Bantams could win if they stepped up the tempo another notch. Dagenham didn’t seem as rough and physical as they have in recent years, but still presented plenty of problems from set pieces that required Davies and Luke Oliver to be at their best. Fry’s inclusion for the injured Marcel Seip looked welcome given his extra height. And though there some close calls, it seemed defensively the Bantams were solid enough to lay on the platform for a third straight away success.

Lee Bullock had been brought in to play the hole behind Fagan in the absence of Michael Flynn and David Syers, and he let no one down. We had all expected the more attacking Will Atkinson to take on this role, but the extra solidness Bullock offered his midfield colleagues when City didn’t have the ball was a worthy trade for a reduction in flair. Bullock had the first half’s best chance when he headed a Kyel Reid cross narrowly over the bar. Earlier the club’s longest-serving player saw another header blocked by Dagenham keeper Jonathan Bond, while on half time Davies had a stabbed effort at goal blocked by a defender.

For the first half of the second 45, City looked to be shading it. Reid was once again a handful; even though there was a feeling he was being relied upon too much by team mates, who also failed to provide enough support to give him the option of a short pass. Fagan ran a lot and tried to make clever runs over the top. Ritchie Jones was once again in outstanding form alongside the dependable Ricky Ravenhill.

Then came the Dagenham goal, and the sudden elevation in the level of urgency required caught out the Bantams. They just couldn’t muster the energy levels and composure to come back. It was desperate and aimless long balls, when at 0-0 passing moves had found some success. The play just lacked intelligence and thought.

Despite the need to bring on Wells, taking off Jones was a mistake for me – as he was the one player looking capable of charging from box-to-box. The still-frustratingly-average Deane Smalley was earlier taken off, with replacement Atkinson offering more quality on the ball. The forgotten Andy Haworth also came on; but the game was up and Jon McLaughlin had made three excellent saves at 1-0 vs Bond having nothing to do.

The referee James Linington – sigh, seriously, do we have to complain about a referee yet again? – played into Dagenham’s stop-start time-wasting tactics by penalising City players for any physical contact with a Dagenham opponent; but compared to recent dreadful performances we’ve seen from officials, it’s hard to blame him for defeat with any credibility. This was a game we let slip through our hands, when we should still be in the mindset of fighting for our lives.

Dagenham’s improved away facilities included the dressing room and tunnel being located by the City fans, which was always going to guarantee a magnified supporter reaction when they departed the field. Those fans who rushed to the very front attempted to applaud City as they trooped off directly in front of them, but very soon others had gathered round to yell abuse at Parkinson over his “boring” tactics and at the players for their underwhelming efforts. I swear I heard a faint chant of “you’re not fit to wear the shirt” too.

On days like this it’s difficult to muster the enthusiasm to defend the players, but the fickle manner in which Parkinson is being treated by many fans has to condemned. He was slated last Saturday, lauded on Tuesday and now a quick glance at the Official Message Board this evening was abruptly ended by noticing a thread titled “How long does Parkinson have left?”. We simply should not go down this route of placing a manager under pressure. It is unthinkable that we fans could be demanding that a search for another manager starts up soon, yet again.

There is much for Parkinson to contemplate for sure. His conservative tactics didn’t pay off today when the game was there to be won at 0-0, and without Flynn and Syers there must be doubts about whether it is wise to persist with 4-4-1-1 in the two home games that occur this week. But the safety-first approach is slowly leading us to safety, and afternoons as frustrating as this will hopefully be looked back upon as minor bumps in the road.

Not a time to panic, but a big week for Parkinson in terms of ensuring City don’t slip back into previous bad habits.

City: McLaughlin, Kozluk, Oliver, Davies, Fry, Reid, Jones (Wells 74), Ravenhill, Smalley (Atkinson 60), Fagan (Howarth 86).

Subs not used: Annerson, Mitchell.

About these ads

One Response to “Conservative City lack stomach for another fightback”

  1. wayne lovatt March 4, 2012 at 11:03 am #

    When I look at the selection and team shape yesterday , I do wonder if from an attacking point of view , bullock in the hole behind fagen was for his attacking abilities????.
    I think not tbh.

    My thoughts are its more of a case of let’s not get beaten than let’s go out and win this game.

    On the bk of our best win away from home for 10 years , I felt Parky would give atkinson his chance after his performance at barnet.

    I was totally shocked that bullock was playing in the hole and my only thought was its more 4-5-1
    And were going to try and swamp the midfield or bully is doing a man marking job on a certain dagenham player

    Although from your report bully didn’t let anyone down and gave his all to the cause as you always expect and get from bully.

    Yes you need to match the physical side of dagenham , but surely you need enough attacking threat and creativity to win football matches.

    Taking Jones off and fagen (who walked slowly before jogging off when we are 1-0 down)
    Isn’t the sort of changes you would expect when we are chasing the equalising goal???.

    A friend of mine who went to dagenham was very disapointed as you would expect.

    But the thing that stuck in my mind was what he said to me after the match!!.

    Does he not trust smalley in the James Hanson centre forward role???.

    Isn’t that smalleys natural position where he scored 12 goals for chesterfield.

    Why play a few players out of position when he has in the squad players that can cover those positions and are natural.

    I couldn’t answer him.

    It one defeat and shouldn’t be in anyway taken out of context to our firm of late.

    It going to be very interesting what type of formation, Parky will choose against accy and oxford.

    These two home games id really like to see us play 4-4-2 .

    Let’s see what smalley can provide upfront with either fagen, wells,Hannah (who seems to be the forgotten man at valley parade).

    In midfield why not play atkinson on the right hand side ????.

    Jones and ravenhill are as good partnership in lge 2 .

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,743 other followers

%d bloggers like this: