Majority rules

3 Feb

NV2G9609

By Jason McKeown

Back in October 2002, Terry Yorath was coming under increasing pressure in the Hillsborough hotseat, after one victory in 10 games. And as his Sheffield Wednesday side were five minutes away from going down to yet another defeat – at home to Millwall – the former Bradford City manager was approached in the dugout by a female supporter who said, “Terry, you are a nice fellow but do the best thing for this club and quit.”

The following morning, Yorath resigned.

Without wishing to generalise all female footballer supporters as nicer than us male counterparts – although that would be my experience – there is something about this lady’s choice of words which suggests that she was a more-than-reasonable person, far removed from the more angry abuse that Yorath was been subjected to from other Wednesday supporters. Yorath admitted that “her words haunted me throughout the night”. Probably due to the realisation that her comment meant the manager had not simply lost the backing of those quick to turn on any manager, but the quiet and sensible majority also.

After another defeat on Saturday, Bradford City manager Phil Parkinson has been the subject of some supporter calls to be sacked. “One win in 19 games” is the matter-of-fact reason, plus “terrible signings” from last summer. These people are full of panic about the Bantams’ slide towards what could be a relegation battle, and have concluded that the answer is to remove the man who got the club into League One in the first place.

I despair about these comments – and other similar views aired following a decent draw against Preston midweek – because they just seem so utterly ludicrous. The idea that we ignore three seasons of clear progress by the manager and focus merely on 19 matches is no way of making a fair evaluation. And with every single player at the club either signed or retained by the manager, it is over-simplified to state that Parkinson has not recruited well.

In my view, we should be expecting Parkinson to deliver season-upon-season improvement within the constraints of the playing budget he operates under. The 13th-place position that we currently occupy might be slightly below some expectations, but it is still progress on last season and it comes during a time of transition. The number one target this season – one yet to be achieved – is to avoid relegation. After so many years struggling to get out of League Two, an instant return to the basement division would hugely damage morale and be difficult to recover from.

This season is about setting up camp, and then going from there.

We can talk about the slide of one win in 19, but that is only part of the picture and in no way can be used to make as big a call as swapping managers. And if we do widen the outlook much further and delve into the club’s inglorious recent history, the number of times that changing a manager was attempted and failed beggars belief as to why anyone would propose it as the solution right now.

We have gone through a lot of managers – some poor it must be said, others treated harshly – to find success in Parkinson. Indeed, only two months into his reign there were strong calls for him to be sacked – where we would be now if the club had listened then? We must hang onto Parkinson and remember what an asset he is, rather than gambling in the hope we could do better.

Last summer, the club handed Parkinson and his coaching staff three-year contracts as reward for the considerable progress the club had made in two years under their stewardship. It was, in my eyes, completely the right thing to do and a rather big statement of intent. That the folly of short-term thinking, which too often has blighted Valley Parade, was a thing of the past. That we were going to give the manager breathing space to continue building, with the security of knowing that club strategy was not going to be dictated by the form guide.

Economic expert Stephanie Flanders recently said about the improved UK outlook. “In the lead-up to recessions, we always make the mistake of thinking the good times will last forever. And then, when things turn nasty, we usually make the same mistake all over again – thinking the bad times will last forever as well.” For me, that sentiment can readily apply to football supporters and particularly the situation at Valley Parade over the past 12 months.

When this season began so well, we did believe that the good times were going to last forever. And now, some people are making the same mistake all over again. Believing that City will fail to win another match this season or that they are doomed to relegation or that they will in two years go out of business or whatever. All because of the here and now.

If Parkinson has proven one thing time and time again as manager of this football club, it is that he can turn around difficult situations. You think back to his first season where our Football League status was under serious threat. Or recall the late, late play off surge of last season that began long after many of us had given up. Parkinson has found the answers to the slumps – albeit not always as quickly as we would like – and there is no reason to believe he isn’t capable of doing so this time.

Sack Parkinson now and goodness knows what it would cost to pay up his and Steve Parkin’s two-and-a-half years left on their contracts. And for what reason? To win a couple of matches? To make sure of League One status? Both these things can, and I believe will, happen under the manager.

We need to stop limiting the outlook to only the next few weeks. We have a manager who has proven himself capable of delivering long-term improvement, which has taken City up the Football League ladder. That three-year contract is, in my view, a timeframe to get the Bantams knocking on the door of the Championship. Giving up on that three-year plan on the basis of a 19-game run of poor form makes absolutely no sense to me.

But it doesn’t really matter, because as Terry Yorath would no doubt testify to, the views of a tiny minority deserve to be treated in that context. Just because some people can shout louder than others, it does not mean their opinion holds more sway or merit.

The fact is the vast majority of City fans – whilst understandably unhappy with recent results – are still firmly in support of Parkinson. There’s an appreciation for the great things he has done for us, and memories of the unhappier times, before his arrival, offer perspective. There’s a sensible understanding, from many, that there have been mitigating factors behind recent results. That performances have in the main being okay, and that the changes Parkinson needs to make will take time to completely implement – a summer squad rebuilding is inevitable.

Most importantly, there is an acceptance that we are currently largely where we expected to be last summer. The way in which we have got to this point might not be desirable, and there is disappointment that what appeared to be genuine top six hopes have evaporated. But the overall picture – judged against a three-year plan – offers plenty of reasons to feel encouraged.

Undoubtedly there are issues for Parkinson to grapple with and all is far from perfect, but that shouldn’t translate to the extreme of putting his job under pressure – and shame on anyone who thinks that is the best way forwards. We’ve waited too long to get to where we are today, and Parkinson is absolutely the right man to trust in continuing that journey forwards.

About these ads

15 Responses to “Majority rules”

  1. Hovispride February 3, 2014 at 5:29 pm #

    Yet more sense spoken. The short-term ism of some folk is staggering. I hope they never go through a bad patch at work following a period of unrivalled success expecting any empathy.

    What some people fail to remember is the remarkable start we made to the season before our team fell to bits with injury. I’m sure everyone is concerned at the moment, but a couple of wins in February will put everything right.

  2. wayne February 3, 2014 at 5:46 pm #

    I’ll second that if I may Jason.

    Yes, current form is that of a team fighting relegation and yes I’m disappointed how results have gone. I’m like any other supporter in turning up and expecting three pts.

    However, I look at the structure of the club now. Not just in results, but there’s also harmony between the management and the directors. Am I concerned about relegation, of course! It’s taken loads of years to get out of the bottom tier of league football and I wouldn’t want a return. Sacking PP would be disgraceful, it’s not on the agenda, it can’t be.

  3. Russ Spence February 3, 2014 at 6:20 pm #

    Once again a sensible comment given what I can only describe as levels of hysteria from some quarters. Our current form, although not all we’d wish for, is I think, only bad if you concentrate on the headline “no win in 19 games”. In that period we’ve lost only 4 times since beating MK Dons on the 23rd November, and of those wins, 2 games were only by 1 goal, with only Notts County & Wolves beating us by a greater margin.

    It has been said often, but how many fans would have taken 13th in February if offered the spot in August?

    So have we progressed? I’d say yes, & to sacrifice this on the altar of what? Short termism? In earlier years, the “sack the manager” advocates could suggest at least a couple of possible options, now we don’t even seem to have that. After some discussion this weekend someone finally suggested Brian McDermott (who technically is still in a job, if only for a couple of days), the best previous option was “there’s plenty of managers out of work, Parkinson was out of work before we hired him”.

    So the best way for City to avoid the problems of the past is to repeat them, but without even a clear view of the future…?

  4. Jake February 3, 2014 at 6:30 pm #

    What is hard for me is all the draws……… Taking more gambles at the back end of matches could make a huge difference, potentially losing a point to gain 3.

  5. Nick Beanland February 3, 2014 at 7:26 pm #

    Good article but even writing it gives a degree of credibility to the morons who cry ‘Parky out’. Using social media brings with it the danger of exposing yourself to the empty vessels who make the most noise. Let’s say 100 people are calling for PP’s head on Twitter, Facebook or wherever else – that equates to 0.7% of our average home support, which is basically a statistical irrelevance.

    Solution part 1 – rely on the feeling you get from the 13,000 who go to VP, which means any sensible fan knows PP absolutely has our support.

    Solution part 2 – unfollow/block the morons.

  6. Simon Scott, Manx Bantams February 3, 2014 at 7:34 pm #

    Well said. Parkinson is clearly a top manager who can serve at a higher level. He proved his ability last year, not just the cup but in his plan to bounce back from the cup final and get a tied team into the play offs. A bit of luck and the new signings fitting with the best of our core team is all we need. The aim has to be to secure a top half position and progress next year

  7. Thomas Hague February 3, 2014 at 7:47 pm #

    A few good wins and we are talking about play-off’s again. I for one last year had written the team off in mid February but look what happened. I’m not saying it will be you never know do you?

  8. Thomas Hague February 3, 2014 at 7:56 pm #

    I also think that fans are disappointed with the style of play. We as a team have good forward and skilful play in our lockers but we are hell bent on playing the ball long to James. If only we could go back to August and the style we were playing in then. The supporters want that as they know we can play that way. Come on Phil, entertain us!

  9. BantamJo February 3, 2014 at 8:36 pm #

    Spot-on with that article, Jason.

    Impatience seems to be the current curse on football across all tiers.

    Our team are a unit that play for one another – a team spirit instilled by Phil Parkinson, which I admire greatly. I have every faith in him and this current team. The wins will come.

  10. Steve February 4, 2014 at 11:05 am #

    Good article…some of the comments on social media sites are ridiculous – the one positive from these negative comments on the social media sites is the amount of positive comments from those backing PP when criticising a negative opinion. – it far outweighs the negative ones.

  11. Andrew Davey February 4, 2014 at 3:20 pm #

    Parky the man. Loving the players he is attracting to the club.

  12. Sean Carroll February 4, 2014 at 7:32 pm #

    I think Phil Parkinson would be the first to admit that last years signings were not the best. Last years results though were fantastic, you have to be very very lucky to get everything right, Phil is a fine manager, It had got to the stage prior to Parkinson becoming manager as to whether BCFC would ever get out of that terrible league we were in, but he did it by putting together a fine squad of players capable on their day of beating the very best teams in the country. BCFC are in a decent position even after the poor run we’ve had, I believe the players added to the squad last month will help cement our place in this division this season. There really should be no panic as that is counter productive. Stick with the team and they will produce the results to keep us safe, get frustrated and that makes getting positive football results much much harder. A simple message to all BCFC supporters, stay positive!!!!

  13. Roger February 5, 2014 at 11:22 am #

    Excellent article, as always, Jason. It’s also good to read all the replies which are well conveyed and sensible unlike those you see on postings elsewhere!

  14. John February 5, 2014 at 3:58 pm #

    Good old Stephanie, bless her! She’s not as funny as her dad though! http://youtu.be/1vh-wEXvdW8

  15. Dennis February 5, 2014 at 5:33 pm #

    A well argued piece, Jason. We football supporters do tend to have short memories and are quick to point the finger at the manager when things go temporarily awry. But like all managers, PP can only operate within the resources he has been provided with. Whilst I am not convinced personally about some of his own signings and have questioned his tactics on occasions, he continues to impress me with the progress he is responsible for, both on and off the pitch.

    One criticism of the piece however is your point here ….

    ‘That three-year contract is, in my view, a timeframe to get the Bantams knocking on the door of the Championship. Giving up on that three-year plan on the basis of a 19-game run of poor form makes absolutely no sense to me.’

    I disagree with you on the critical point. According to ML’s own words, the outcome of the 3 year plan (announced when PP extended his contract in May 2013) should be promotion to the Championship and not just knocking on its door. I trust that PP will be provided with the resources by the owners to do just that

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 2,514 other followers

%d bloggers like this: