| Colchester United 1 |
| McDonnell 90+9 |
| Bradford City 1 |
| Cook 30 |
By Jason McKeown
They just left him there. All by himself. A lone, solitary figure at the back post, standing in space that no one had thought to cover.
Jamie McDonnell wasn’t wearing camouflage, but the threat he posed somehow went undetected. The only person to spot him, it seemed, was corner taker Arthur Read. The Colchester midfielder sent over a perfect cross, leaving the 20-year old McDonnell with all the time and space he needed to produce a late, late (blimey it was late!) equaliser.
Two points dropped is an understatement. Bradford City were seemingly there. The engine on the team bus warming up ahead of the 214-mile journey home. The time was 4.57pm when Colchester equalised, and what little football there was taking place elsewhere in the UK had pretty much finished. It should have been over here too. City were ready to toast a win and leap back into the play offs. But then McDonnell swooped to completely change the mood.
What a sickener. And yet ultimately it was self-inflicted. From the regular City time wasting that triggered a considerable 10 minutes of stoppage time, to the non-existent marking in the 99th minute. McDonnell was stood centrally when the corner was about to be swung over, before darting undetected into vacant space. It’s no secret City operate a zonal marking system that means no one had a designated job to track McDonnell. But how do you end up in a situation where every single player is back to defend, and yet no one is covering the space at the back post. Just careless. And very, very costly.
And it was a setback, just as it seemed City were getting their act together again. The Bantams performance here was improved on the dismal showing at Fleetwood, without setting any pulses racing. They looked more solid, more balanced and more robust. They didn’t dazzle in the fading Autumn sunlight, but they looked decent value for the three points. Winning ugly, if not exactly creating memories. Carving out the sort of victory that is the cornerstone of teams who are successful.
The fun bit had come from Andy Cook – who else? – when he opened the scoring on the half hour. Not a lot was happening at either end, but Colchester had just started to exert a bit of pressure. City went and won a corner, which Bobby Pointon played short to Jamie Walker. The Scot charged into the box and played a low cross into the danger area, which Lyle Taylor cleared. Pointon seized on the loose ball and pinged another low cross into the middle. It hit a home player, and fell perfectly into the path of Cook.
You can only admire the way Cook reacted so quickly to what was half an opportunity, and the emphatic nature of the finish that gave Colchester keeper Matt Macey no chance. That’s Cook’s 81st goal in a City shirt, leaving him just six short of Dean Windass in the all-time Bantams goals list. Enjoy fourth spot in the list while you can, Deano, because in a few weeks time you’ll be moving down a place.
It also took Cook to 11 goals for this season – a total that he didn’t reach until 22 December last time out. Further evidence, then, that Cook is back to his absolute best this season, after a slight dip in goal return over 2023/24. But make no mistake, it’s an over-performance. He now has nine goals from an xG (expected goals) of 6.4. What this means is he’s netted three more goals than the quality of the chances that he has been provided with this season suggests he should have.
Last season, Cook achieved 17 league goals from an xG of 18.2 – meaning he was basically on par for the amount of goals he’d be expected to have scored, from the chances City created for him. In 2022/23, Cook’s memorable 28-goal haul in League Two came from an xG of just 17.9. We are seeing clear evidence of Cook returning to that type of over-performance this season. And that is very exciting.
But it’s not without its worries. Cook’s goal was City’s only shot on target in Essex. No other Bantams player has more than two league goals this season, with the quest to find a second striker capable of hitting the back of the net still proving fruitless. Olly Sanderson was tried alongside Cook here – his first league start since the Harrogate defeat in September – but he struggled to have any great impact (zero shots).
Graham Alexander seems to have no plan here other than to keep shuffling his cards. Oliver, Kavanagh, Smith, Sanderson. Shuffle. Go again. At some point, someone’s going to grasp the opportunity, aren’t they? Hmmm.
At 1-0 up, City didn’t need to be a great attacking threat. But ultimately their failure to get a second goal cost them dearly. Alexander is trying all sorts of different things to get the Bantams to become a more potent attacking force – including the recent misguided team selection at Fleetwood, where he overloaded the XI with attacking players without enough thought on how they would win the ball – but outside of Cook, it’s just not happening. Even Jamie Walker and Pointon aren’t delivering the goal returns they were last year.
That’s a problem, but the greater balance Alexander deployed at Colchester was at least welcome. They got back to the tried and tested 3-5-2, with Jack Shepherd’s return from suspension meaning Lewis Richards could shift to left wing back. Cheick Diabate’s fall from grace post-Doncaster is looking more long-term. And given the decline in the Exeter loanee’s form even before then, his demotion to the bench is probably merited.
Colchester had an awful lot of the ball, but City were more compact and organised out of possession. Until the silliness right at the end, they looked really comfortable throughout. Sam Walker barely had anything to do on his return to a club he spent five years keeping goal for. Brad Halliday isn’t an obvious right centre back but is doing admirably. Neill Byrne is quietly proving to be a good signing. Richie Smallwood continues to look effective.
It wasn’t that Colchester didn’t carry a threat. Early doors Harry Anderson produced some great skill to beat Shepherd and run at goal, only to shoot just wide. They probably should have had a penalty just on half time when Smallwood challenged Taylor in the box and didn’t seem to get any of the ball. Perhaps the slightly unnatural way Taylor fell to the floor dissuaded referee Carl Brook from pointing to the spot. But if this had been the other way around, we’d have been howling for a pen.
Taylor looked lively throughout, and benefited from a second half Colchester change that saw Samon Tovide brought on to partner him up top. Tovide out-muscled Halliday at one point to run at goal, with Walker standing up to make the block. Perhaps the best chance of the lot was when Anderson got free centrally and ran at Walker. Just as he shaped to shoot and surely score, Jay Benn appeared and produced a brilliant tackle to stop him. Superb work, Jay.
Not that this was a game of heavy Colchester pressure. These chances were sporadic. For long periods, nothing happened. The game was dull. Stop, start. Scrappy. No great momentum for either side.
There’s something about Colchester vs City games. They’re never classics are they? 14 years ago, we did come out the wrong end of a thrilling 4-3 FA Cup tie here. But including this draw, 11 of the last 15 meetings between the two clubs have seen two goals or fewer (including four 0-0s). What i’m saying is, this isn’t a fixture Sky Sports should ever bother rushing to televise, outside of its new streaming service.
For the longest of times, that didn’t really matter to City. They were winning. Looking reasonably in control. Not going all out to secure the outcome, but not looking in serious danger of conceding to a team who were winless since 23 September, and who have only chalked up two league victories all season.
And yes, there was concern when Richards had to go off injured (it looked bad as he needed to have oxygen), leading to a reshuffle at the back. Equally, it wasn’t great to see so much stoppage time go up on the board. But still, they were looking fine. Some pretty good game management. Running down the clock. Getting ready to enjoy a return to the winning feeling.
If only they hadn’t just left him there, unmarked to score.
Conceding so late sours everything. It leaves City outside of the play off spots, with some trickier fixtures coming up. And though the improvements seen here offer up signs of better days ahead, it remains another frustrating period of stuttering form. Which is becoming wearily familiar.
In the 12 months since Graham Alexander took charge at Valley Parade, City’s league form has been full of extremes. He started with back to back defeats. Then four wins in a row. Followed by eight games without a win. Five without defeat. Four straight defeats. Nine games unbeaten. One win in seven. Three successive wins. And now four without a win.
It is streaky form. Some periods of genuine excellence. Other spells that are wretched. Fleetwood aside, this current winless run hasn’t been terrible. But habitually taking so long to recover from a set back is threatening to undermine City’s promotion hopes.
There has been just one occasion under Alexander that City have been on an unbeaten run, lost a game and then immediately bounced back to win their next one (the Carlisle victory that followed losing at Grimsby, earlier this season). When there’s a bad day at the office, the one after tends to be disappointing too. And sometimes, the one after that.
If we were to analyse a key reason why Phil Parkinson succeeded in the Valley Parade hotseat, and why Stuart McCall ultimately didn’t, it was how quickly each got their City charges to recover from set backs. In McCall’s first and third spells as manager, one defeat would very often turn into a long losing run. In contrast, Parkinson had this commendable ability to get the players to bounce back from a bad loss, so it didn’t derail the season. (And yes, that absolutely didn’t always happen.)
Right now, Alexander stands somewhere between the two. Much of the way he speaks and operates reminds you of Parkinson. But if he can’t instil the same levels of resilience in this current City team, he seems destined to fail.
Ultimately City had a confidence knock against Doncaster three weeks ago. They took that into their next league game at Fleetwood, and though they moved in the right direction here at Colchester, it still lingers – and it cost them. It means City have taken just two points from the last 12 available, just as they took two points from 12 in late September.
It’s hard to see how City can succeed if they remain so streaky. We can be confident of many good days to come this season. But the limitations of the squad suggest there will be difficult moments too. More defeats. So they’ve got to unlock the ability to bounce back fast, stop being so over-reliant on Cook over-performing his numbers, and remember to mark the space at the back post.
________________________________________
Thanks for your support. If you like to follow us on social media, you might like to know that we are now on Bluesky and Threads. Feel free to follow us!
We will continue to use Facebook and X/Twitter too. But we’re certainly no Elon Musk fans.
Categories: Match Reviews
A return to winning ways, though Bradford City are still labouring to rediscover the higher gears
Bradford City rediscover their convictions to take a credible point at Bolton
The Bradford City form drop off continues as they lose again
The first notable setback of Bradford City’s season as Brewers end home invincibility
Until something changes with Sparks and or Gent leaving nothing will change at Bradford City. New managers come and go with no change in results. The recruitment is poor and the argument about quantity over quality remains. Gent must be the first one to go next week. If Stanley get a result against City next week the toxicity shall grow with the supporters.
The ultimate frustration is that it would not take much to walk this very poor division.
Whether the promised Rupp investment has actually happened is open to debate..If it has then its slipped undee the radar of most supporters.
The inference was that Rupp would underwrite additional money towards the player budget.
Thar does not seem to have happened and quantity rather than quality seems to have been the clubs aim.
In addition the increase in interest, attendance and communication by Rupp has not happened.
Its easy therefore to think that the last time we heard from our owner was just prior to a season ticket sales campaign.
You can fool some of the people some of the time but not most of the people all of the time.
With the January window just over the horizon does the club have the vision to grab this season by the throat and have a real stab at getting out of this division.
Was at the game. Colchester were very, very poor and look likely to struggle again this season. Appalling that City came away with only the 1 point, there can be no excuse for letting in such a lame and late equaliser. Must do better. A lot better.
Just seen video of the equaliser – City’s marking and positioning for the corner was abysmal, worse than a pub team.
I have just watched the GA post match interview, he bemoans letting the game slip and giving 2 points away.
This is not his analysis post today’s game but uncannily when we last played at Colchester 10 months ago !
The issues he raises of not seeing out a game and being over reliant on Andy Cook ( who scored that day ) suggest we are not learning from our mistakes and unfortunately not making the progress we had hoped . A very big 6 weeks is on its way, the quality of the league has reduced but our position has not improved .
The quality from City today was unbelievably poor. After we scored, we just sat back and tried to defend the lead. There was no urgency, no ambition to try to get a second goal and of course it came back to “bite” us. I don’t see any improvement from last season. So disappointing.
I’ve been fully behind GA but must admit I’m quicky realising he’s going the way of Ten Haag..this sums it up for me: “Cook’s goal was City’s only shot on target in Essex.” One shot on goal? Against a team in 21st? Forget about anything other than mid-table Bantams comfort…do us all a favour and fold it now before it gets relegated next season. So so bored of everything this team is associated with, ie, losing. This fanbase deserves so much more.
The performance today was poor. City were poor. With 36 or so percentage possession 1 shot on target (COOK). It tells me how poor as a team we were. If Cook got injured we would be in serious trouble. GA is on borrowed time. Trying to hold on with just one goal is a dangerous strategy. City supporters deserve better. The squad is not good enough. We have signed older players. Vulnerable to injury and now Benn one of our inform players is likely to be out a good while. I listen to Alexander and I honestly believe he is watching a different match to the rest of us. Team selection and tactics against Fleetwood was a marker to me. Blaming the team not his tactics, selection and playing players out of position was down to the manager. To suggest otherwise shows how hopeless he is.
Its City allover.
Three seasons weve been crying out for someone..anyone to score goals and assit Cook…..NOWT.
Walker …..1 good game in four ( if we are lucky).
Vidane…Dont even bother.
Kava……trys too hard…like a teenager on his first date.
Bobby…..not sure what his best position is?
There MUST BE somebody out there…There must be!
It’s very simple, City do not score enough goals and we don’t keep enough clean sheets.
To give a breakdown, From the 16 league games this season we’ve only kept 3 clean sheets all season and we’ve only scored 2 or more goals 6x out of them 16 league games.
The ultimate question is how do you fix what appears to be a stuttering stop start season.
Personally i feel we need to ditch the 3 at the back. At the start of the season i was in favour of this but it’s clear from the stats it’s not working. I’d be in favour of returning to a 4-3-3 or a 4-2-3-1 system. This I would hope provides defensive support aswell as well needed support to the isolated Cook.
I very much believe the jury is out on Alexander, Lose the next couple of games and things might becoming increasingly tense, For me i struggle to see how he’s put any stamp on this team and made it his own. I appreciate there maybe an argument that he needs more than two transfer windows to build a promotion winning team but looking at the last two games against Doncaster and Fleetwood, Alexander has hugely got it wrong on both occasions with his team selection.
Performances from Halliday and J.Walker have dropped, He’s struggling to find settled positions for Pointon and Odour. Sanderson was mysteriously dropped from the team in September despite his bright spark, We’ve signed Huntington and paid him to sit on the bench, It’s hugely concerning considering the intention is to get promotion out of this league.
Alexander appears to be a man lacking any positive ideas, I wouldn’t go as far to say he’s lost the dressing room but as mentioned on multiple occasions previously this season body language from players is concerning.
Time will tell over the next few weeks where our season could go. No doubt this is the poorest league 2 since we got relegated back to this division and here’s hoping for a positive end to 2024
We certainly didn’t do enough to win today, it was solid but really unremarkable. We don’t have a player right now that scares the oppo, there’s no pace, no one on the ball that ball that causes any concern. we’re certainly hard to beat and we have Andy Cook but that feels like a recipe for mid table.
Maybe Sarc’s return helps us but after watching Tyson last night I’ve no faith in aging talent…
we don’t create enough. same story for almost a decade
margins far too tight.
one shot on goal. Come on. If we’re relying on 100pc conversion rate we’re going to be sorely disappointed come May
Andy Cook is keeping Alexander in his job.
GA has done pretty much nothing with his signings or tactics to show we could survive without him.
The rest of our forward line has contributed a whopping 2 goals in 16 league games. Smith, Oliver and Kavanagh haven’t got a single one.
We’re basically Morecambe / Carlisle with a goalscorer.
I feel a little hypocritical writing this as I would probably have been satisfied with a one-nil win, if not the performance overall. However, abjectly poor organisation at the final corner meant the result couldn’t obscure the appalling performance. Colchester we’re poor; at times they managed to embarrass us. Whenever their number7 attacked, the whole left side of our team looked as if they were wading through treacle. I disagree strongly with the statement in the article about Halliday. I think playing him as a makeshift central defender shows precisely why that should never happen! Time after time their attackers waltzed around him. Our midfield was non-existent, Cook a lone figure again. We hardly found an accurate pass all game. All this against a team that has been beaten time and again by lower teams( for the moment) than us. If this is all Alexander can offer then it’s time for him to move on.
Well, I’ll give you ten out of ten for your optimism and I’ll quote you here. “And though the improvements seen here offer up signs of better days ahead” Signs of improvement??? Where exactly. Bad management….Bad game time management….. Shocking defending / marking ( non existent)….Only one shot on target (Praise be for the Lord Cook)…and abysmal possession…
Why did we sign Huntington? He’s a right sided experienced Centre Back yet Alexander is playing Halliday there. I can’t believe Huntington is any slower than Brad. He was exposed several times yesterday due to his lack of pace.
As things stand Huntington will probably join our injury list soon with a bad attack of piles, caused by sitting on the bench for too long.
If we had held out for the 1-0 win then don’t get me wrong I would have happily have taken it, but It would have masked over an unimpressive performance, the one shot on target stat is good evidence of that.
The season is going pretty much how I expected, you look at Alexanders history as a manager and he’s always at good winning or unbeaten spells but then had long spells where his teams can’t get a win.
i think Rupp might regret not really going for the league this season because a little investment would give us the best chance in years of promotion.
Let’s up we can beat Morecambe in two weeks time and draw a big team in the third round and hopefully then in January they will be willing to add the missing bit of quality to the squad.
All about opinions – but I just saw more of what we’ve come to expect from this team and no sign of the better days ahead you suggest. Colchester were well worth the point and in reality should have had a pen first half. We created just one effort on goal against a team hovering around the relegation zone. For all their failings, at least Colchester had a style of play. I’m still struggling to understand how this team is trying to play. The only plan seems to be for Cook to grab us a goal from the very few opportunities we create for him.
Personally thought the defence struggled for much of the afternoon. Exposed against pace and persistently just hoofing the ball long and coughing up possession. Brad and Shepherd were the main culprits here and both in particular have struggled against pace in a number of other games.
I don’t see better times ahead as we’re still failing to address any of the underlying issues on the pitch. No-one in that forward line is gonna step up and give us 10-15 goals, and we’re left with Cook trying to fill that gap on his own. Smith should have been upgraded in the, and no one wanted Verdaine – which says a lot.
A lot of fans bemoan the lack of J Walker when he’s injured – at his best he’s a real asset, but on days like today (and there are lots of them) it’s plain to see why he’s stuck playing at this level. He had to produce more.
Rupp sold us a lie about him being more present and investing in the team. He just said whet the fans wanted to hear when he was under pressure and hoped the problem would disappear with better results.
I usually agree with most of WOP opinions but Smallwood effective? At What? I know people will say he does a lot of un-noticed work but un-noticed work means its not really of note. try telling your boss that the work you do is un-noticed!! If you do good work it is noticed. He has had a couple of good games but is he really so good that he has to start every game, is never subbed and has to take the majority of free kicks and set pieces. Would he play every game if he wasn’t captain? For me he slows the tempo down and when he tries to take free kicks quickly they don’t usually hit the mark. Let’s try a starting line-up without him – how much worst could it be?
One of my big problems with him is that I don’t see him as a good leader/captain. I saw a few comments on x yesterday saying what can Alexander do when the players just leave someone unmarked at the far post like that yesterday. But surely your captain is supposed to be a leader on the pitch and make sure things like that don’t happen
The game plan was not to concede early. We were deliberately slow with throws-in and goalkicks which for the first time all went long. It worked as far as it went. The trouble is having taken the lead – against a very poor side – we continued to slow the game down rather than kill off the opposition. The time wasting led to the 10 added minutes and we lost a goal in the dying seconds. I thought the subs didn’t help. Evans maybe touched the ball twice. Oduour did not show the same fight and aggression that Pointon always has. Oliver achieved nothing playing up top alone and is not as commanding in his own box as is Cook. We invited pressure onto us. We have some very difficult fixtures coming up – 4 in succession against teams above us.
Alexander is a dull, boring and uninspiring manager and if he has a plan no one else seems to be able to picture it.
Our recruitment continues to be mediocre at best and its staggering the same people are still responsible for it – adding Sharpe has certainly not improved a thing so far.
640 loyal fans at Colchester yesterday, they in particular and the rest of us deserve so much better than the rubbish served up by those running our club
Great article once again.
I was there at the Job Serve. It was the second game of the season for me – first being the same score at Cheltenham a few weeks ago. I live in London so tend to go to away game in the South.
So I would like to share a few impressions on the team based only those two games. I regularly watch a lot of football across all five national leagues, mainly the premiership so tend to make a few comparisons So while I know two game sis not a great sample I have a few points data points to draw on. I am keen to get feedback.
First impression: Behind Cook, City’s front 3 and any support received from the two WBs lack qualities to score goals. The goal against Cheltenham was a set piece, poorly defended; and the one against Colchester only came about through a ball lashed into the box that was very poorly defended from the start to the finish of the move. In the first game, Bobby P by far offered the most threat and really we should have won based on his efforts. In the Essex game, he clearly had an off day and their RFB did a good job of marking him. With him in that frame of mind, Bradford produced next to nothing. I had to remind myself that Sanderson on the pitch and apart from his involvement in the goal, I didn’t much see more in attack from Walker. Like most strikers Cook needs both service and scoring contribution. I doubt this team is capable of either.
Second Impression: we were playing weak opposition.
The Cheltenham fans I met explained to me that the whole team, except for 2 I think, had to be replaced after relegation on account of the club budget. At one stage while their replacement RFB got himself ready to launch a throw-in from near our penalty area all their “big men” lumbered into the box. Their manager Michael Flynn ran down the touch line screaming, reminding his players “What you fxxking doing? He can’t fxxking throw it, get fxxking back!”. Despite the lack of analytical skills in the opposition we failed to break them down.
Colchester are near the bottom every season, their best striker was on the bench and their central defence was sluggish (watch the goal again). And we were so nervous we started shxt-housing immediately after our goal in the first half. I always think this damages the confidence of the housers and sends signals both to team mates and the opposition of nerves and inability. Remember Southgate’s tactics against Italy?
And neither ground was a “fortress” with an intimidating atmosphere. Small genteel market towns are not dockyard clubs.
So all-in-all I was thinking to myself, how can we beat the bigger and better teams.
Third impression Colchester fully deserved their point, if not all three
The second half was all one way. It was attack vs defence. Our midfield three could not hold-on to the ball. We were lucky they did not score earlier, as we escaped nearly by managing to block several good shots.
I don’t blame the defence (even for the loose marking at the end) I as hold the attackers more to account. We simply couldn’t challenge them, give them anything to worry about. Was Varane going to outpace them on the break? Only if their CDs were dressed in It’s a Knockout outfits. So they simply attacked more and more, confident we would not score another goal.
Fourth impressions – the subs
For a “massive club” (to quote Danny PE teacher in his post match interview on local radio), we don’t half have a bad subs bench. Whereas Sampson Tovide (clearly no one had cut his hair) and Edwards made a big impression for them. Ok so our fans screamed at Tovide but he was a big player. So all-in-all the PE teacher could change the tactics, switch the position of a few players, and most important bring on attacking players with a different threat; and away they went. Our subs did not change the game.
Fifth impression – the manager
Should he go? I would say, no … not yet. I don’t agree with the guy screaming his views out as the players came to applaud the fans yesterday. Bad form that, I think, Not good for the players.
But he does to work on his attacking options (GA not the guy screaming yesterday). It is simply not clear how we score. Even with Bobby P playing well and Cookey scoring, it is not good. I can’t work out if the other players simply aren’t good enough for League 2 (any more) or the whole is less than the sum of the parts. Please let me know.
Btw at the pasting at MK Dons last season (remember that), a Don fan told me that he was relieved they’d parted with their manager and were now playing decent football. He was referring to GA and the new manager he welcome was Williamson who is now struggling at Carlisle. So it all comes around.
Thanks, all, and keep up the great work.
Some interesting insights and good sense here from Soulwise, obviously someone in a position to be reasonably objective.
Thank you, Mitchell, for your kinds words.
no idea how I got assigned the name “soulwise” btw! Xavi #6
G A do u think this is good enough turgid stuff from start to finish, go to the Acadamy and find a young lad who might surprise you and actually,ly score a goal Because at the moment Oliver sanderson smith Kav never look like scoring One shot on goal to team that as not won for eleven games l still want u to be manager but and its a big BUT find a good young lad partner him with cookie and we might Score if not the fans will turn against you,