A huge moment in Bradford City’s season as they display courage and character

Bradford City 3
J.Wright 32, Pointon 61, Swan 83
AFC Wimbledon 2
Browne 25, Stevens 53

Written by Jason McKeown (images by John Dewhirst)

That was a struggle. That was imperfect. That was slightly lucky too. And that’s why this should probably go down as Bradford City’s most impressive win of the season so far.

Because in AFC Wimbledon, the Bantams found stubborn, organised and well-drilled adversaries who weren’t prepared to fall into the traps that so many of their early season opponents have stumbled into. The Dons had a plan. A plan to stop Bradford City. To nullify the home side’s strengths. To try to turn the buoyant Bradford public against their own. And it came so, so close to working.

That’s what it made so encouraging that City still found a way to win. Behind twice. The defence shaky. The midfield confined. The attack disjointed. Their backs were against the wall. And in such circumstances, even claiming a point would have felt a reasonable achievement.

But this Bradford City team – well, they never stop.

So it was that with seven minutes left on the clock, Ryan Johnson attempted to shepherd a slow-moving ball through to his goalkeeper Nathan Bishop to clear. The Wimbledon defender should have just booted the ball into row Z, because Nick Powell was breathing down his neck, making himself a nuisance. Bishop’s panicked clearance hit Powell’s shin, and the ball ricocheted into the path of Will Swan, who calmly fired it into the unguarded net. It would win City a game that for significant spells they were second best in. And all the great work from Wimbledon – who played really well – was to be in vain.

It was one of the few times the Dons put a foot wrong. If there’s a manual out there on how to stop this Bradford City side, their manager Johnnie Jackson had evidently studied it intently. Wimbledon made it the type of game City are less comfortable playing. The ball quickly booted forwards from the back, so the Bantams could not press. A 5-4-1 formation, which routinely saw every visiting player lining up behind the ball whenever City had possession. Muscle all over the park, ensuring Wimbledon would not be bullied as others have.  

Josh Neufville and Ibou Touray were successfully quarantined. Especially as Max Power and Tommy Leigh were denied forward space to run into through the middle of the park, where they would usually try to link up with the wing backs. Ahead of them George Lapslie and to a lesser extent Bobby Pointon were crowded out, leaving Stephen Humphrys operating remotely and feeding off scraps.

It wasn’t all about Wimbledon parking the bus though. When they won turnovers, the visitors sprung into life and counter attacked with menace. No starting player had fewer touches than lone striker Matty Stevens – but my goodness, didn’t he give Curtis Tilt and the returning Joe Wright a tough afternoon. Especially as Myles Hippolyte and Marcus Browne prowled behind Stevens, ready to compete and win second balls.

All of this wasn’t a surprise. Wimbledon stand proudly alongside City within League One’s top five for lowest average possession. They were never going to play open, passing football like Wycombe and Luton in City’s previous two home games. They know how effective City’s high press approach is, because they are having success using it themselves. And they know how to stop us. If this match was a meme, it would be the one where two Spidermans are pointing at each other in realisation they are the same person.

So we got a game that very much felt like a League Two affair. And just like for a lot of City’s six-year exile in the bottom tier, for a long time it proved very challenging for them to handle. The pattern was set early. One team launching it long. The other standing tall and returning it back. City were direct but struggled to find their usual base camp up the pitch from which they can start to knock it around and cause damage. They couldn’t pin Wimbledon back, because the ball didn’t stick up the park long enough.

An early Bobby Pointon run and shot at goal – his effort was well saved by Bishop – showed it was possible to get through the dark blue lines. But it proved hard to sustain any pressure.

Wimbledon found the ball equally difficult to keep inside City’s half, but in Stevens they were causing problems. And so when they scored 25 minutes in, it was hardly a shock.

A long pass was sent towards Stevens, who shoulder-charged Joe Wright to the ground. There was no foul awarded, allowing Stevens to nod the ball into the path of Browne, who was afforded too much space by Tilt. Browne struck a low effort that arrowed past Sam Walker and into the bottom corner. And given the often-seen playbook of Valley Parade visitors deploying defensive tactics, scoring early and grimly hanging on, you already feared the worst.

Indeed, Walker had to make another smart save not long after to deny Hippolyte. And though Pointon remained lively, not much else was going right the other way. Several corners were won that came to nowt. Chances were limited to a Humphrys shot that was tame and straight at the keeper. If only they could find a way to press.

Just after the half hour mark they finally got a chance to do just that – and from it unexpectedly equalised. The ball was cleared but picked up by Touray, who laid it back to Leigh to launch an up and under. Bishop raced out of his goal to try and claim it but collided with Tilt, and the loose bouncing ball was headed in by Wright to atone for his earlier error. Was it a foul? Very possibly. Was it poor goalkeeping? Most definitely.

The goal led to City’s best spell of the first half. They were never exactly on top, but began to apply more regular pressure and Humphrys produced a superb long-range effort that rattled the crossbar. You didn’t really want the whistle for the interval to come.

Still, half time all square – which was to be expected. At the start of this week, Not The Top 20 reported that AFC Wimbledon are unbeaten in their last 19 first halves of league matches – and have only trailed at the break 19 times in their last 101 encounters. For their own part, City haven’t been losing at home at half time in a league game since March 2024 – the 3-0 Notts County loss, during that infamous 10-day implosion – some 29 matches ago. Both teams do not like to be trailing when they are supping their half time drinks, so again made sure they weren’t.

The second half saw a similar overall pattern. Sporadic moments of promise from City, but more often Wimbledon looking a nuisance on the counter. They went back in front through Stevens with a volley from a difficult angle. The goal had followed a period of play where Wimbledon pressed, and every time City cleared their lines the ball came straight back. So this is what it feels like to be pecked by the chickens.  

Again behind, but again not for long. Perhaps Wimbledon’s failing on the day was getting a bit too carried away with their counter attack overloads. Because when City got a chance to counter attack a Dons counter attack, Power was for once afforded space and played a brilliant ball to Humphrys. The City number 11 displayed excellent footwork to beat his man and shoot from a tight angle. Bishop could only palm the ball to Pointon, who finished brilliantly.

Three home games. Three home games where Bobby has scored. Don’t you just love him?

Although on this day, maybe Graham Alexander wasn’t feeling that Pointon affection quite so much. As the attack for the goal was taking shape, the City boss was preparing to make a triple sub. Even with City drawing level, Alexander went through with these changes. And that prompted the unexpected sight of Pointon going off just seconds after scoring. Humphrys was withdrawn too, which also felt less than ideally timed given how well he’d done to make the goal. Hmmm.

The other player taken off – Lapslie – was certainly justified after an underwhelming performance. And so onto the field came Powell, Swan and Antoni Sarcevic. It would be wrong to say the changes lost City some of the initiative – they never held it in the first place to give it up – but for the next 20 minutes, it did feel as though the triple substitution had only succeeded in weakening them. A tiny bit like the Banks off-Platt-on change during Carlisle play off game in 2023, a glimmer of momentum had been passed up.

Certainly Wimbledon will be ruing their failure to regain the upper hand during this period. From another successful counter attack, Browne was played in and just had Walker to beat. He screwed his shot badly wide. Moments later Wimbledon executed another press and the ball pinged around the box. It fell to Alistair Smith, who couldn’t really miss. He did.

Those let-offs allowed City to eventually regroup and assert themselves, which was cue for the late Wimbledon defensive mess up that allowed Swan to score the winner. It sparked scenes of joyous celebration on the pitch and in the stands. And as is largely the Bradford City way under Alexander, they saw out victory with relative comfort.

3-2 Bradford City. Not a scoreline that seemed likely given the recent goal-sporadic meetings between these two sides. Not a scoreline in keeping with the respective form of each team over the past 12 months either. It’s the first time City have conceded more than one goal at home since a 2-1 loss to Doncaster on 26 October 2024 – 20 Valley Parade games ago. The 26 October 2024 is also the last time, before this game, that Wimbledon have shipped in more than two goals in a game. Fair to say the goals conceded by both teams here were out of recent character.

But character is absolutely what City do possess. They have deep buckets full of the stuff. And they proved it emphatically here. Few of the players will look back on their individual performance with great pride (though credit to Leigh and Aden Baldwin, who made slow starts and improved as the game went on, plus Pointon who did well going forwards if not defensively). But no matter.

To come through adversity like this would suggest this might prove to be a game that really sets them up for the battles ahead. Because the reality is that it’s only a matter of time before League One opponents stop turning up to Valley Parade with a set-up that leaves them vulnerable to City’s high press, physical, direct and low possession approach.

That Wimbledon – a team who were widely tipped for relegation – gave City a much tougher game than the highly fancied Wycombe and Luton says a lot. Like Jackson, opposition managers will increasingly get wise to the need to cut the supply to City’s wing backs, to flood the midfield, to not play it out from the back, and to not commit too many players forward.

Our start to League One demands respect from everyone else. And we’re going to start getting it.

With that in mind, City here proved to themselves that they can still prosper and win when opposition sides deploy spoiling tactics, a similar level of physicality, and target their weaknesses. This will be an important experience to fall back on the next time they’re in this type of situation – which as the season goes on is likely to prove more common.

That’s all for another day. For now, City can revel in standing third in the fledgling League One table. Still yet to be defeated. And one midweek EFL Trophy game away from setting a club record longest unbeaten start to the season.

It truly has been an Awesome August – and now we move into a Sizzling-looking September. Huge games coming thick and fast, from a first league derby with Huddersfield Town for 18 years to a trip to the mighty Newcastle United.

These truly are special times to be a Bradford City fan, and you just don’t want them to end. We came close to the music stopping here. The fact it didn’t leaves you feeling even more confident about this team’s resilience. And even more excited about their potential to make this a very special season.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

33 replies

  1. Thanks for (yet again) a very insightful write-up of an enjoyable afternoon.

    The only thing I see differently was our triple substitution. Far from making us look weaker for 20 minutes, I thought we immediately seemed sharper. Powell especially looked up for it in a way that Lapslie didn’t, and Sarcevic found passes that up to then we’d been lacking.

    On a different point, though he wasn’t in the game that much, Neufville’s gazelle-like acceleration is thrilling. Along with Pointon’s backheel that set up the chance where Humphreys hit the bar, it was a highlight that still leaves me with a smile on my face.

    We’ve come a long way over the past couple of years.

  2. They say teams that can still get a result when it isn’t going all their own way are usually the teams near the top come reckoning day. During that game, that’s what was going through my mind, especially when we went behind twice and still found a winner! Can’t honestly say I thought we deserved to get the winning goal today but at no point did I think we were going to lose – either at 1.0 or 2.1 down so that says a lot about where my expectations for this team now lie. We’ve lost or drawn so many games over the years that we didn’t deserve to, so I just enjoy the win more when I feel we sneaked it like today. That’s football!

    Sponsor’s MOM was Bobby but I also had Leigh & Baldwin as my main choices for that and I was also teasing with a shout for Power too as all three put in decent shifts in a very challenging game.

    All Yorkshire playoff group currently looks good but who will still be up and around there come next May is interesting to ponder.

    Our next three league fixtures are all top six teams that will give us another measure of City’s future expectations.

    Great season so far!!!

    • Leigh was easily the MOM and if sponsors can’t stop picking their favourites, then someone else should do the job.

      • They pays their money they get the choice. So many times we can’t bother to count we don’t agree with the choice but I expect that after shelling out I don’t know how much, they get to meet their player of choice.

        Best MOM choice I ever saw was 1996 at Lincoln City. They were managed at the time by John Beck a notorious route one man. During the game in the first 5mins the opposition punted a high ball up towards the Lincoln goal. The Lincoln central defender took it on his chest, controlled it & passed it out to the winger. John Beck immediatley substituted the player because he didn’t just lump it back. At the end of the game the sponsors made the defender their MOM for his 5 min contribution. Seems they hated John Beck & his style of football.

    • Leigh got it officially. Pissed up sponsorrs in hospitality go for the easy option. Tilt and Leigh were outstanding

  3. what a negative write up

    Wimbledon came full of dark arts and poor finishing and got what they deserved

    nothing

    • the only dark arts they had was the backing in on Joe Wright , other than that though Wimbledon were excellent, match reports are exactly that, reporting on the match. I think anyone in the ground recognised we got away with one down to their poor finishing but also our desire to never give in (which Jason acknowledged) . Teams are going to start setting on hard to break down and that’s when we will need a plan B to break down a mid or low block . Everytime we had the ball they just dropped into a back 5 and when they had it their front 3 were great playing little triangles.

      very accurate assessment imo

  4. Thanks for another well constructed & interesting piece on an enthralling game, but please don’t encourage the reference to ‘chickens’ which is becoming a tiresome & embarrassing term, we are Bantams. Who on earth wants to be associated with a chicken ??

    • What do you think a Bantam is?

      • Fully aware what a bantam is, but I don’t recall a chicken weight boxing division !!

      • Not all bantams are chickens. A chicken is a young hen. The bantam on our crest is an adult cock.

        Whilst I wouldn’t necessarily advocate shouting ‘up the cocks’ it would be more correct than ‘up the chickens’.

      • Andy,

        All Bantams are chickens, it’s just a reference to the smaller breeds

        there is no such thing as a young hen, a hen is a female adult chicken, a young female chicken is called a Pullet.

        A cockerel is a young male chicken, the adult male is a cock

    • I agree. We are the Bantams.

      This reminds me of the Harry Lewis thing. Ridiculous.

      The.Bantams came from a plucky bunch of Bradfordian males who were based at the barracks next to VP. The trained on the pitch hence Valley PARADE as in parade ground.

      They left Bradford for the trenches and most did not come back. In Serre we lost 1000s of Bradfordians as they died onna slope up towards the German lines.

      They fought above their weight.

      Hence the nickname Bantams became associated with our football club.

      Since then, in their memory we have become known as the Bantams.

      Please stop this chicken thing.

  5. I thought it was vastly superior to anything in L2 last season and was more akin to the Leyton Orient v Stockport L1 play-offs.

    I think both us and Wimbledon continue to be underrated.

  6. That was the best refereeing performance, I’ve seen in years.

    Without that, it would probably have been 0-0 with ten bookings, a thousand free kicks and ten minutes extra time.

    • Agreed, other whistle happy refs would have spoiled it, however, he missed their 14 nudging Wright and Tilt everytime they jumped to head the ball. Also them pinching 10/15 yards at every throw in was getting on my nerves!

  7. Humphreys is seriously skillful, I love to see him with the ball at his feet but I’d like to see what it looks like with him in one of the channels and Swanny in the middle

  8. The triple substitutions made us improve. That with the help from Wimbledon weaken their side by removing their forwards who had caused City’s defence so many problems.

  9. The ref was extremely lenient, and this did contribute to an exciting match, I also thought that he was fair to both sides. However his actions or indeed lack of actions hugely benefited Wimbledon. Stevens took his goal very well, but he made very few attempts at winning any of the balls that were aimed in his direction, instead choosing to nudge or push anyone who got in his way. The game would have been a much more stop and start affair had we had the referee from last week’s match at Peterborough, he let very little physical contact go unpunished, and I do think that most referees will not tolerate the physical nature of Wimbledons game. Whilst I acknowledge that it’s up to the players on both sides to work out what the referee will tolerate, and today he tolerated a lot, it remains to be seen whether Wimbledon rely a little too much on the physical side of the game.

  10. Great peice as always, Jason. On the referee, best referee we’ve seen at Valley Parade in a long time. He let the game flow, avoided the soft free kicks we endured every week in League Two, and as a result the match flowed brilliantly for both sets of fans. It’s been ages since we’ve said that. Thank goodness we’re out of League Two, where we spent more time debating referees than the football.
    We are looking good and its exciting to see what is to come from this team. 😀
    But while the football is finally flowing, Stephen Humphrys is dragging dark politics into the club. The England flags being waved don’t feel like genuine support, they are being used as a political symbol and are fostering a xenophobic atmosphere. That risks sending out the perception that the club stands for intolerance rather than unity, when in reality we have a proud, multi-ethnic supporter base. It is not just divisive, it risks making our fans feel as though we endorse the views of Humphrys and the far right.
    What is the club’s official stance on this? Does Bradford City have a policy or position on the sudden appearance of these flags and the political symbolism creeping into the stadium and also allowing a player to tweet this dangerous narritive? I have not seen them waved before now, so why are they suddenly in the ground at the same time as bridges and roundabouts across the country are being covered by people with a far right agenda, not one built on the simple love of England or Bradford City as our wonderful inclusive club?

    • I am not criticising or endorsing your views on the flags but can you explain why you blame Humphreys for it?

      Have I missed something?

      It’s a genuine request for more information about a player you say is “dragging dark politics” into the club.

      • Stephen Humphrys posted on Instagram photos of himself climbing a lampost to put up a St George’s flag. There is no suggestion he has done this for political reasons and he has claimed he is simply being patriotic. However his actions have stirred up quite the social media debate. Jason

      • Thank you for the reply.

        I don’t bother with Instagram and the like.

    • I was dismayed at the flags too, they make me feel deeply uneasy and I agree it risks alienating people. I’ve never really liked the Ulster flag that’s sometimes displayed too, I dunno what the motivation behind it is, but I do know sectarianism has blighted loads of lives in other places.

      I don’t mind national flags and jingoism when there’s a football tournament or the Olympics to celebrate etc. This is something different however anyone tries to dress it up.

      I’m old enough to remember the last time things really kicked off in Bradford areas, it was grim and I was relieved when we didn’t have any trouble last summer.

      It’s a proper shame to be commenting on this when the football is entertaining and matchdays are enjoyable – but I agree with Thomas it worth voicing concern about.

    • nothing wrong with the flags or fan base was a great atmosphere

  11. Thanks once again for another great article Jason, & I agree, such a huge win for many reasons. This was a full blooded battle between two teams who we’re determined to win at all costs, & credit to Jake Reeves & his Wimbledon warriors for making this game such a great competitive match. Teams will really struggle against us if they try & pass from the back, & we’re proving that teams will also struggle to out battle us in a physical battle, that’s going to be so worrying for opposing managers, & I reckon that’s one of the reasons this win was so important. Fully deserved as well, yes Wimbledon did have chances to win it with Brown missing a golden chance especially, but we could have scored more as well, with Humphreys hitting the crossbar etc. Our players once again gave it their all, & just kept going & going. A massive team effort, & I thought Tommy Leigh was brilliant.

    We go into September completely unbeaten in league & cup, I can’t remember that ever happening before. It’s great to be a part of it all, & long may it last!

  12. If we are suggesting yesterday was a poor performance it shows how far we’ve come.

    it was a great game with the momentum swinging throughout. I don’t think we got away with one – while a draw was fair – both teams had chances to win it.

    Humphrys crashed one against the bar, Joe Wright chose to head straight at the keeper when players were lining up to tap in are just two opportunities that stand out.

    Defensively it was the shakiest we’ve looked and Wimbledon has their chances too. Over the last few years we’ve watched game after game where we never threatened. Right now it feels like we can score at any point even when we’re not playing at our best.

  13. Thanks as ever fir this. Food for though. I agree with lost of it, especially what a fantastic August, a mood of optimism, great character.

    Was this the most crucial match so far? I agree we will see a lot more teams following the Wombles tactics, so we need to find a way to win those games. I wrestle with how far we were lucky yesterday, that the Wombles didn’t take their chances, and defensive bungles leading to 2 goals. Of course most goals are as much about an attacking team besting a defence. I do think Alexander needs to flex his approach for these situations. And whilst i know we are at our most effective with less than 50% possession, they do need tomarkedly improve passing accuracy, which feels wasteful.

    However, the table doesn’t lie, our current 3rd is well deserved. And Tommy Leigh MoM for my son and I.

  14. They tried to do to us what we tried to do to them but we were better.

  15. I havent been able to see the games as I live far away and have been in France but I would like to raise our defence which I dont see much about… while I am thrilled with where we are and our general attitude and results – I am concerned that I now expect – along with a win- that we will ship at least one goal – there seems little discussion about this here and I for one would be interested in what people here would do if you were coaching our defence – I dont want to go down the route of ‘inevitable’ but why?

  16. Another great article about the boys Jason. This squad is still going through the gelling transition. What will they be like once they’re firing on all cylinders?! I’ve never known a squad to be so resilient and tenacious. They never know when they’re beaten i.e. Stockport and Wimbledon. It shows lots of character. Winning momentum goes a long way in this game. GA is having the luxury to rotate his squad to keep them fresh and fit…it’s a long season. This squad can write themselves in to the City’s history books. I’ve been watching City since the 70’s and it’s a long time since I’ve been walking down to the Valley with such excitement to watch the boys perform, since that promotional side in 1999. All credit to GA , his management team and the executives for putting such a great squad together. Bring on the derbies!