
| Bradford City 1 |
| J. Wright 20 |
| Exeter City 0 |
Written by Jason McKeown (images by John Dewhirst)
Winning – when you’ve not won a league game in two months – should really be all that matters. And the headline here is that Bradford City have earned their first League One victory in seven. They’ve built on the resurgence of positive vibes from the trip to Bolton by carving out the tangible substance of three points.
Joe Wright scored – a nice goal it was too. A clean sheet was achieved. And when you pour over the League One table this weekend, it continues to make for compelling viewing.
So all’s well that ends well. Except, when you dig below the surface and assess the performance, all isn’t completely well, actually. After a month where doubts have crept in about City’s staying power, it turns out that winning is only part of the antidote. Because this was a display that emphasised the confidence and verve still isn’t at the levels of their carefree start to the season, and that opposition intellect over how to curb City’s 3-4-3 approach is spreading.
It’s hard to make a convincing case that the Bantams deserved this win. Exeter City produced a performance that belied their lowly league position of 20th. The 19 shots the visitors mustered was the joint-highest City have faced in the league all season.
Exeter had a goal disallowed for offside mid-way through the second half that replays suggest the officials may have judged wrongly. Sam Walker made a string of superb saves and rightly took the sponsor’s player of the match award. He was outstanding.
Led by the dangerous frontman of Jayden Wareham, and with the tricky Jack Aitchison and Akeel Higgins just behind, Exeter came with an ambition to win that was only undermined by wayward finishing and terrific home defending. They’ll spend the long, long journey back to Devon pondering how they didn’t earn at least a draw – but be heartened by the amount of anxiety they heaped upon their opponents. If Exeter can play like that every week, they won’t be troubling the relegation places that they’re tiptoeing precariously above.

And if we are to praise Exeter’s vigour – that means we must doubly praise Bradford City too. This became a major test of character, and they passed it. In unrelenting rain, plummeting temperatures and slithering darkness, City displayed courage and determination to get over the line. Certainly not pretty. Certainly hard-fought. But they showed resilience and strength to keep Exeter at bay. They did well to defeat opposition who played well.
It was definitely hard work. Exeter showed attacking intent right from kick off, but City initially gave as good as they got. Starting with the XI that played the majority of the second half at Bolton, the Bantams soon found some rhythm – and they were rewarded with a goal 20 minutes in. A corner wasn’t fully cleared and City’s pressing kept an attack alive, earning them a free kick. Tyreik Wright took it quickly and played the ball to Antoni Sarcevic, who directed it to Max Power. The City skipper sent over a cross to the unmarked Joe Wright that he flicked home. 1-0, and at that stage just about merited.
But maybe going ahead so early on invited a scarcity mindset of fearing too much what they might lose. City struggled for the rest of the half for sure, as Exeter dominated possession. Grecian wing backs Jack McMillan and Ilmari Niskanen got up and down fruitfully, pushing back their counterparts Josh Neufville and Tyreik Wright.
In what is becoming a wearisome trend for City, the opposition deployed an extra man in midfield – with Gary Caldwell’s 3-4-2-1 set up meaning that Power and Alex Pattison were outnumbered because of how Aitchison and Higgins dropped deep. The Bantams couldn’t execute the solution successfully used at Bolton – asking Neufville and Tyreik Wright to tuck in out of possession – because of Exeter’s rampaging wing backs. Large gaps emerged, hindering the Bantams’ ability to press.
And so, they spent much of the remainder of the first half hanging on. The front three of Sarcevic, Bobby Pointon, and Stephen Humphrys struggled to get on the ball. There must also be long-term doubts about whether Power and Pattison are complementing each other as a middle two, or whether each player’s desire to push forwards means they can’t play together.

Thank goodness for City’s defence though. Joe Wright scored at one end and made several crucial last-ditch blocks at the other – he truly is back on form after an Autumnal dip. Aden Baldwin’s return to fitness is huge for City’s ball distribution, and he played really well.
Ibou Touray was not quite at his usual high standards – just after half time he uncharacteristically played a weak backpass that Wareham latched onto and should really have scored from. But Touray’s unwavering commitment personifies this team and certainly this City performance. He stuck at the job. And that’s all you can ask.
By the time that dodgy backpass moment happened, Graham Alexander had tweaked the team – with some success. Half time saw the arrival of Will Swan for Pattison, and a switch to 3-5-2 that made City more effective.
The third quartile spell of the game – minute 46 to 67 – was by some distance City’s best, as they carved out several good chances. The bulk of them fell to Humphrys, who was guilty of missing passable opportunities. The City striker merited his start but once again flattered to deceive. So many wrong choices. It is tear-your-hair-out-maddening at times.
Nevertheless, the period of Humphrys and Swan leading the line – with Pointon and Sarcevic dropping back to midfield but encouraged to press – offered a lot of encouragement. It also helped the City wing backs win their individual battles and emerge as key attacking threats. Tyreik Wright had a tentative first half but returned to his Bolton levels after the break. It became Neufville’s best game in weeks.

The City ascendency didn’t last, however. And here we must talk about something that none of us really want to. Because midway through the second half Andy Cook came on for Humphrys, and City’s press…well, it stopped working again. Look, we all absolutely love Andy. Everyone wants him to reclaim his position as the King of Valley Parade. But it’s hard to avoid the worry that City’s high press approach just doesn’t suit the City legend. It’s not Cook’s fault, but his introduction to the pitch coincided with Exeter regaining control.
And it really was control. In the third quartile of the game (3-5-2 with Swan/Humphrys up front), City had six shots on goal to Exeter’s one, and 42% possession. In the fourth quartile (after Cook’s introduction), the shot count was one 9-1 in Exeter’s favour, as City’s possession dropped to 34%.
Again, we must stress – not Cook’s fault. And the final stages of any close game will typically see the team who is losing have more of the ball and harvest more shots on goal. But in that third quartile, we were treated to compelling evidence of how effective City can be when they’re front-fronted and high pressing. In the fourth quartile of the game, they couldn’t be either.
It led to a nervy ending that saw Alexander make moves to block Exeter from breaking through. Tom McIntyre came on and played in midfield. Neil Byrne replaced the tiring Baldwin. And then right at the end the sub was subbed, with Swan taken off for Jenson Metcalfe. There were some deeply uncomfortable moments for City that lingered on right to the final whistle. But though they faced sizeable pressure, the home side ultimately did not crack and saw it out.

This is not the sort of performance that gets you back-to-back promotions – something the Kop defiantly talked-up the prospect of, as it serenaded the team through the closing stages. But it is definitely the sort of game where, if you don’t earn victory, you’re not going to be in that conversation come Springtime.
So we headed home to warm chilly hands, safe in the contentment that the winless run is over. And that this is a game we’ll remember longer for the fact City won it, than we will that they were less-than-convincing in achieving it. It won’t make the season’s highlights reel, but it could be an important foundation in whatever City achieve.
There’s no such thing as a must-win game when you’re a newly promoted club that’s wildly overachieving expectations. But after a time when spirits have slightly sagged and even Alexander has publicly struggle to make sense of his emotions, City have got back to winning ways at the right moment.
And that really is all that should matter.

Categories: Match Reviews
Bradford City bounce back from New Year’s hangover
A reality check for Bradford City, but not a reality shift
Salute your indefatigability – Bradford City end a fine year in familiar winning style
That’s character, that’s Bradford City 2025
Exeter have conceded fewer goals than all but 4 teams, they’re a pretty good side that’s struggling to score. That’s exactly what we saw, it was hard to create chances against them and they were always a threat but through a combination of poor finishing, an offside flag, Big Sam and a phenomenal goal line clearance by Wright they couldn’t score and we did.
i think it shows again that perhaps aside from the bottom 4, every team is closely matched and every point is hard to come by. To a man today, they kept their heads up and kept going, GA got the halftime calls correct and we took the 3 points.
Wareham was afforded far too much space today and the number 9 linked the play well with Exeters midfield and wing backs. Poor finishing and 2 outstanding Walker saves won the day. 19 shots on goal is far too many opportunities for any home team to concede with promotion aspirations. Exeter deserved at least a point from the game. I thought we were out gunned in midfield and the change was badly needed in the second half as Pattison had no impact on the game what so ever. Tyriek Wright was superb in the second half although struggled defensively in the first half and the change in formation with the introduction of Swan and the dropping back from Pointon and Sarcevic made us more competitive in the middle of the Park.
Cook had no impact on his introduction and he appears to be struggling for fitness and form which is understandable but you raise a valid point about how cook fits into this city team.
The only consistency is the officials that baffle me week in and week out with wrong calls, inconsistencies and incorrect decisions. Lots of shirt pulling from Exeter players going unpunished and slowing the game down only 15 minutes into the game that they had control of and were playing well!
The club is well placed and there is much to be happy about. Third in league and Plymouth next up who are struggling at the foot of the table. Expectation levels have been raised however, this is a very good city squad that are struggling to reach the heights of a blistering start in August and September.
We are physically small. They were big and worked hard and we couldn’t live with it. So a terrific result. It’s something we need to address I should think.
As you said Jason, “ back to winning ways”. But this was far from a convincing display and the substitutions confused us? Swan behind Humphries ( who frustrates us!) and bringing on McIntyre in midfield and he’s got Lapslie and Metcalfe on the bench? But it paid off (just!) Exeter were a good ball team who found a man but no end product. Another day some of their shots would have rolled in. If they continue playing like this they won’t need to worry about relegation. We stood off them and let them play. We need to work harder, especially in midfield. There was times I saw players walking, this is not good enough. Walker was outstanding. But a wins a win and the position in the league looks good. Six more games and we’re half way through the season. Hopefully we can continue with this winning momentum against teams in the bottom half of the division. Keep in the top six for January and we’ve achieved what we wanted to achieve ….staying in this division.
Winning – when you’ve not won a league game in two months – should really be all that matters
It IS the only thing that matters
City away is when every team love to punch way above their weight. One of their fixtures of the year for sure. Marked and highlighted on the training room wall.
Psychologically we need to match the attitude they are bringing to VP.
how do we get the atmosphere back?
maybe a £5 game?
The EFL rules prevent too many discounted games per season. Ie £5 entry.
Get back to top of the table for Boxing Day. A full house and a belting atmosphere guaranteed. Completely possible with the run of fixtures before then.
No trains. So I can’t be there for one. Will be many more in same boat.
Good summary Jason. I struggle with the negativity towards Humphrys. I get his end product is frustrating but he is head and shoulders above Cook, Swan and Kavanagh imho
He’s exciting, you want to see him on the ball as there’s always a chance he can make something happen.
I agree about Humphrys. He has pace and skill and physicality. He has the confidence to take on defenders and create his own goal chances. Since arriving he has produced some excellent efforts on goal and often been unlucky not to score a tremendous goal. Central frontman is not his best position, he needs to play wide, dip the shoulder, swerve and blast for goal – to score or create havoc in the defence. He is not a natural goal poacher. He and the team need one too play alongside. I fear Cook is at the end of his career. Still worth his place in the squad this season to be used as Alexander is currently using him. Ditto Swan, who had a great early season. Without the missing piece – an accomplished finisher – City may still graft and struggle into, or just outside, the play-offs. With an established finisher, or one capable of developing into one, the squad has the potential to have a serious chance at a double promotion.
If Humphrys doesn’t play centre forward he doesn’t currently get into our best team.
Pointon has one of the best goal / min ratios in the league and only has 2 less than the division’s top scorer. He’s become excellent at arriving in the box at the right time.
However, in the last couple of games you can see he’s got quite angry with Humphrys for not feeding him at the right time.
I felt Humphrys played at excellent centre forward role on Saturday outside of the box. He didn’t overplay but held the ball up well, he ran the channels and he pressed. Inside the box he made the wrong decision or lacked the clinicalness in the right moments. Can he develop this is the question and can we wait for him to develop that. If he can’t then he is backup to Pointon in my opinion.
Spot on Jason , my take on the game exactly. Disjointed 1st half with so much space in midfield where again we lost the battle ,this has to be addressed. Formations are ok but change it to suit the game .
2nd half after the changes we were much better and suddenly it looked as if we would win comfortably ,pressing them back ,chasing every ball and should have got another goal to settle it. Also the crowd got up for it at this point .
One criticism is our game management late on , we’re still trying to push on when we should be protecting the ball with possession and seeing the game out . Having said that the win is all that matters and we’re still up there .
3 points, clean sheet and a win at home, that’s all most of us can ask for in a new league. A good finish from the centre half. I still think promotion talk is a little premature, survival is the first priority and then re-asses where we are to push onwards.
A slight worry for me is the lack of goals from the forwards recently, they need a goal to get their confidence back. When did Swan last score? Is there a lack of service and clear cut opportunities for them all? I agree that the press doesn’t work with Cook but that’s never been his game. Do we need to adapt more as a side when he is introduced? Play 442 instead and get the ball whipped in from the wings or should we be looking at giving him a fond farewell in January and bring someone else in that fits the style better?
Who can we offload in January? Who or what do we need to bring in? A lot to ponder but we as fans im sure would rather be discussing this rather than the doom and gloom of relegation.
I really didn’t understand the lack of atmosphere in the stadium yesterday. Yes I get that they played better than us for the most part but it was silent from the start.
To the game, and winning when you don’t play well is a great trait to have.
The one thing I will say is that had we not been 1-0 up, the pattern may well have been different. Goals change games, goals dictate the rest of the game.
To be 3rd is amazing. Let’s keep the positivity.
A wins a win but the performance overall was very poor. Midfield was lacking. Metcalfe would have been a good option. He would be playing in his best position midfield. Pattison was not at his best and the midfield was non existent. We need to play in way that we did early part of the season. Or a way where we can boss midfield. City are nor getting a lot of shots on goal. That needs to change. More that happy for getting the win but dissapointed with the performance.
Definitely a very had fought win and we are still not firing on all four cylinfers currently.
Humphrys continues to be his frustratingly greedy self – he needs to work on his vision a bit more to look for passes and not keep his head down running into cul-de-sac’s all the time.
The next 2 league games are massivie if we are to harbour ambitions of promotion so was good to get back to winning ways despite the performance, as had we drawn again or lost then confidence really would have taken a dive.
But with 10 points seperating 1st down to 19th – this league is so tight – the 2 next games against the bottom 2 teams are must win games – 4 pts from the 2 games min, 6 pts should be the aim.