The Midweek Player Focus #32: Andy Gray

SAM_0239

By Ian Sheard

Prior to going to University, I was seeing a girl for about 18 months. However, once there it proved too difficult and we ended up splitting up. Having ‘flirted’ with a few other people at University, I returned to the once ex-girlfriend but unfortunately it didn’t feel the same. The same emotion wasn’t there and I regretted it for several reasons. If I’m honest though, I was probably with her because no one else would have me!

During pre-season I wrote a player profile for Andy Gray on reflection of his Player of the Year award in 2003, at a time when it appeared he might be re-joining the Bantams. As part of the piece I wrote, “Some City fans have recently ‘hit out’ at Gray lingering on the supposed contract offer from City, stating that he’s holding out for a better offer. Why not? Looking at it from Gray’s point of a view here was a player who gave his all for the club, as the player of the year award suggests, and scored goals.”

I could take a moment to win favour with users of certain message boards and a local newspaper site, by saying that Gray’s movement last summer and this January has served only to see him pick up a couple of pay cheques (a fairly larger one last summer in comparison to his current City deal, methinks). It would be easy to accuse him of only being at City for such motivations, and this article could serve the purpose of rallying up support for the ‘we hate Gray’ campaign. But it is important to consider a few factors before tying the flag to that post.

Gray was signed from the team down the road on a free and, apparently, at the beginning of the season, there were other clubs that were chasing his signature in addition to the Bantams. He obviously turned them down in order to try and prove his worth at a higher league team. I wonder if any of the other clubs in the running for Gray last summer staked an interest in him during the January transfer window too? Probably not many did, though I am sure there were rumours. In the end, he chose to come back to Bradford.

It may be that Gray felt as though he owed the club something, as he was forced to leave in 2004 due to the club being in administration and needing the money. Or perhaps simply observing a club on the up, in the league and cup, inspired him to want a piece of that action.

Another point to consider is that Gray is not the only footballer to return to Bradford City – and how many of those were ultimately successful on their return? Lee Duxbury, Nathan Doyle, Ian Ormondroyd, Dean Windass, Lee Sinnott, Bobby Campbell and, of course, Stuart McCall! Just to look at one example, Ian Ormondroyd. It is interesting to note that in his first season he made 87 appearances scoring 20 – one goal every four games – compared to his second spell where he made 38 appearances and scored six goals (a record of one goal in six). Stix still secured legendary status for his contribution to the promotion in 1996, and people may would argue that a one in six goal ratio is not bad. I would like to offer this example to the Gray haters.

Andy Gray’s first spell at the club saw him make 77 appearances and score 20 goals, which works out at better than one goal every four. So far this time around, he has made six starts (one sub) with no goals scored. Easy to suggest that I’m clutching at straws here in my case for Andy Gray, but if he scores two goals in his next two games then his ‘return average’ is better than Ormonroyd’s. A bit tenuous, I agree, but I do think the berating of him since his return is harsh considering this. And it’s also worth noting that James Hanson has scored seven goals in 36 appearances in the league so far, which is about one in five.

Yes, statistics are easy to use to help demonstrate a point. And some may argue that Gray’s overall effort has not been the same as that of Hanson’s. I would entirely agree, but Gray has not played football for a fair few months due to lack of opportunities at Leeds. This, coupled with his age, argues his case for rustiness further. It will be interesting to judge him on the back of completing a pre-season with us.

I do agree that Gray needs a goal and to contribute more when he is playing. But I do not think his recent form is as bad on paper as what people may suggest. It’s only food for thought, but I think that if Gray scores it could lead to a bucketful. And may just be what the club needs in that extra push for promotion.

Plus, on a personal note, I’m still on speaking terms with my ex!



Categories: Midweek Player Focus

Tags: , , , ,

14 replies

  1. It will be interesteing to see how Gray performs next year after a full pre-season and I would hope / expect for a vast improvement on what we have seen of him so far.

    My mine gripe with the Gray situation is that at the time of his signing we needed someone to help us over the line this year. I’m absolutely convinced that if we had faired better in the January window, we would still be well in the play-off mix rather than clinging on to a dying hope in desperation.

    With the addition of an attacking midfielder (who we hoped would be Kennedy) and a goal scorer (who we hoped would be Gray), I believe we’d still be there or thereabouts.

    • Interesting point about an attacking midfielder. Much of the debate on here has been about having someone play “in the hole” behind the front two. For me we have not replaced Syers, an energetic, box to box midfielder who can get beyond the front two and knows where the net is.

      The recent goal drought has clearly put our strikers in the spotlight but I think its goals from the midfield that’s been the problem.

      • Yeah, I thought we could have used Ritchie Jones in one of our recent matches. Still, Connell has the ability to fit in to a similar role when we’re going all out attack.

      • You obviously didn’t see Jones’ performance alongside Andy Gray @ Crewe in the JPT semi. His career was over with City after that performance. Hence his acceptance of a payout to leave. Connell is the enigma of the team, I like him, but whether he can go 90 mins is in doubt. Don’t forget Di Canio let him leave Swindon in the summer after being their top scorer with something like 18 goals (don’t quote me on that figure) and played alongside Paul Benson who Parky was desperate to sign earlier last season!

  2. Guys you’re dreaming or in fantasy football land, one or the other?

    I went to Crewe in the JPT S-F. He played from the start and in however long he was on the field , maybe the whole 90 mins(?) I can’t remember as his performance was so memorable (sic). He created himself just the one chance which he didn’t take. I suspect the Manager has finally seen sense and no longer even picks him on the bench with Wells available as the reserve main striker and Connell as the go to striker when the chips are really down.

    • I think it’s a bit strong to suggest it is “dreaming” or “fantasy land”. However slowly Gray’s second stint at City has proven so far, he has managed to play football for almost 15 years now. Clearly he is not a bad player, or he would not have played for clubs like Sunderland and Charlton. He has had a slow start for sure, but it’s not a question of ability (and yes I was at Crewe too). There is no reason to suggest he won’t come back.

  3. I think Gray has become a bit of a scapegoat among fans, someone who is easy to blame for us not scoring goals or whatever (a bit like Atkinson last year). I think he played well the last time I saw him at home to Dagenham (maybe Aldershot) and when we took him off we lost our momentum.

    He has a brain. A brain that Hanson and Wells definitely don’t have. I think that is clear for all to see. Unfortunately, we aren’t and never were in a position to give him a run of games and structured training throughout the week to get him fit.

    If we keep to the contract and don’t pay him up, I think he will come back a very strong and influential member of the team.

    • Your answer reads well Joe, although you couldn’t remember which match when you thought Gray made a difference when subbed. I just think to sign a 36 yr old in the last window, when someone the lives of Tom Eaves of Bolton W. would have been a good 4 month loan signing. I agree with you about Hanson/Wells presently however.
      Thanks for replying to my comment.

  4. I was always more of a Richard Keys man, myself…

  5. In my mind, to criticise Gray is to question Parkinson’s judgement in bringing him in. Have we learnt nothing from the improvement of Atkinson which we have witnessed this season? Give him a chance, we all know he’s a quality player.

    Still, given football fans’ need for a scapegoat, I doubt there’s many who will be less affected by it than Andy Gray.

    • Was a quality playe in my opinion and Atkinson isn’t 35 is he. I accept Atkinson improved significantly on last season as a loan player, he had to! However, I’ve noticed a lack of the early season drive/enthusiasm in his play presently. As for Parky’s judgement, who are we indeed to criticise. Perhaps the end of season stats for Andy Gray will bear me out(?)

%d bloggers like this: