Bradford City’s 1-1 draw with Port Vale on Saturday saw a much-improved defensive display – compared to recent home games – but a struggle to create opportunities going forwards. WOAP pundit team members Damien Wilkinson, Gareth Walker, Mahesh Johal and Nick Beanland share their verdict on the display.
What did you make of Christopher Routis’ home debut?
Damien: I was mostly impressed. Having seen him in the MK Dons league match, I thought he again gave a fairly accomplished performance and seems to work well with Rory McArdle. He is good on the ball and not afraid to bring it out/work up the pitch which adds a nice dimension in conjunction with Rory!
The pleasing part of his game against Port Vale was that he didn’t buckle under the pressure that Tom Pope tried to exert upon him. When Pope took full advantage of the referee and essentially led Routis into the first half booking I feared the worst, but he recovered well and there was a strong sense of poetic justice when Pope was on the receiving end of the same treatment in the second half (which he seemed to take great umbrage with!)
Overall, it leaves Phil Parkinson with a difficult decision to make next week with the imminent return to duty of Andrew Davies. Leaving Alan Sheehan out of the starting line up would suggest Routis has earned the right to keep the shirt so far, but you feel he may well give way to allow Davies back into the side.
Nick: Routis looks very promising – he reminded me a little of Marco Sas with his ability to bring the ball out of defence and pass the ball with great assurance. I thought by and large he handled Pope well though; with a poorer referee (hard to imagine, but not beyond the realms of possibility), he might not have made it to half time.
We now look well covered at centre half with McArdle, Davies, Routis and Sheehan.
Gareth: This was the first time I have seen Routis, other than in friendlies, and I was very impressed. I like the way that we used him to bring the ball out of defence rather than the big boot of McArdle. He stood up well to the physical challenge that Pope brings, and he did well to keep his head when Pope conned the referee into booking him; even going as far as to cleverly get his own back in the second half.
It’s a shame that he looks certain to be dropped from the side so as to accommodate Andrew Davies’ seemingly imminent return.
Mahesh: I saw Routis make his debut at Oldham and was impressed then. I was further buoyed by his performance against Port Vale and thought it was an accomplished home debut.
I echo both the views of Damien and Gareth regarding his handling of Pope. I loved his fire and how he wasn’t overawed playing an experienced and proven striker. It will intriguing to see how things pan out for our three centre backs because for the first time (in a while) in Parkinson’s reign there are multiple options who could all start. However, I agree that Routis will probably make way for Davies.
What do you think was missing from City’s play against Port Vale?
Gareth: I thought that City missed James Hanson and, had he been on the pitch, I feel that we would almost certainly have won the game. Other than that, the side clearly lacks pace and width. We have nobody who can “run in behind” and, as such, we spend a lot of time playing in front of teams.
I don’t think it was any coincidence that we had our best spell when James Meredith got forward at the start of the second half. Parkinson could be seen demonstratively encouraging Meredith to “bomb on”, and this tactic forced Port Vale to restructure their formation in order to cope.
Nick: City’s performance was much like every other home game barring Coventry. We dominated possession, but so much of it is in areas where the away team are perfectly happy for us to have the ball.
Billy Knott epitomised our problems – very capable of playing the ball backwards and square, but as soon as he tries something more adventurous it rarely worked. He was culpable twice in the goal we conceded, giving the ball away very cheaply inside his own half before doing the same again on the edge of the area. Both very poor decisions.
Our play looks so laboured and slow and as long as we try to play through teams it’ll be very easy for away teams to defend against – massed bodies in the middle of the park will generally do the trick. The only space was in front of Stephen Darby, and Port Vale were very happy for this to be the case as, for all his qualities, he’s never going to beat a man and whip crosses in.
Pace and width still needed…
Damien: Overall I felt that we just lacked that spark/bit of nous to complete the comeback completely.
Whilst I appreciate much of our attacking play is built on patience, it did expose our lack of pace and we frequently became a bit laboured in the build up. Furthermore, and perhaps with the lack of a James Hanson in the box, we often looked like we were trying to walk the ball into the net, particularly in the second half. That’s not to say we didn’t have chances, but we did seem to lack that focal point.
I thought Aaron Mclean had a good game and was a little surprised to see him taken off, as he seemed to provide an option in getting behind the Port Vale defence. It was perhaps harsh to then expect Oli McBurnie to provide some sort of Hanson/McLean hybrid!
I just fear we are hanging McBurnie out to dry at the moment and unless he can somehow conjure a goal from somewhere, you can’t help thinking a loan spell for a month would massively benefit both parties.
Mahesh: Sorry to sound like a broken record, but I again agree with the guys about missing Hanson and some pace.
I thought Port Vale’s defence was there for the taking; in particular full back Carl Dickinson. I would have loved to see a Kyle Reid-type player just run at them with some pace and vigour.
Upfront we toiled but lacked any conviction. Hanson has become more than a physical target man, he’s our only genuine goal threat!
Gareth: Spot on Mahesh! Port Vale were very panicky at the back, it was just frustrating that we didn’t have the attacking armoury to take advantage.
The squad lacks a couple of players in my opinion – attacking players at that. Someone with pace obviously, and someone who can offer us a genuine goal threat – because we are far too reliant on Hanson not just for our style of play anymore but as a goalscorer now too.
I doubt that the finances are there to bring these two players in and, on the whole, Parkinson’s recruitment in the forward areas has been poor during his tenure. It’s a real shame, really, because with those couple of additions I could see us being a real force in this league.
If you like what Width of a Post do, please vote for us in the Football Blogging Awards.
Categories: The Verdict