
Bradford City 1 |
Watt 83 |
Leyton Orient 1 |
Pratley 69 |
Written by Jason McKeown (images by John Dewhirst)
This is what the abyss looks like. For 14 long minutes, Bradford City were staring into a bottomless black hole. In grave danger of falling in, as they clung unconvincingly to the thinnest of ledges.
Elliot Watt’s late goal brought salvation but there is no doubt just how perilous the situation remains. The Bantams are still struggling just to keep their footing on that thin ledge. Their season in danger of collapsing. The club at risk of imploding.
When Darren Pratley pounced on a weak punch from Alex Bass to smash Leyton Orient into a second half lead at Valley Parade, the atmosphere grew very ugly. A home crowd that was already restless rang out the boos, loudly turned on manager Derek Adams and even chanted ‘sack the board’.
Moments later, Adams made the call to substitute Jamie Walker (who, unknown to the crowd, was injured), leading to even louder boos and a fierce rendition of ‘you don’t know what you’re doing’. And coming just days after a dismal home defeat to Crawley, 24 hours on from a disappointing end to the transfer window, and after a season of frustrating underachievement so far, Bradford City was in a very, very dark place.
Yet to the players credit, they dug in and rescued a point. A long punt into the box by Matty Foulds wasn’t dealt with, and Watt hit a half volley effort into the ground that bounced up and hit the back of the net with the aid of a deflection. It was no goal of the season contender. But its significance on Bradford City’s season may yet prove huge.
Maybe.
The goal came in the midst of a final 15 minutes of belated home pressure that left Leyton Orient clinging on for some reward. Adams’ subs might not have won him any prizes for popularity, but they did have a positive effect on changing the game.
With a switch to 4-4-2 over these closing stages, City went long and they went direct. Balls were pumped into the Orient box from deep, with City’s clear height and physical advantage allowing them to knock more loudly on the door. It wasn’t pretty, but at least some purpose and urgency was finally shown. In the end, time ran out too quickly for the Bantams, who during these closing moments actually looked like a credible attacking force.
What a shame that wasn’t the case for the 75 minutes that preceded it.

You can give Adams some credit for getting his players to retrieve something from a difficult situation. But he must take a huge portion of the blame for City falling into that grim position in the first place.
Leyton Orient were as average a side as you can get in League Two. Without a goal in over eight hours or a win since early December, they were workmanlike but dripping in ordinariness. The greyness of their away shirts a fitting representation of their style of play.
Yet for long periods, City failed to pose serious questions of their opponents’ fragile confidence. Some nice moments of build-up passing in the middle of the pitch, but no threat in the final third. Andy Cook, as ever, was deployed on his own up front – but seemed especially isolated. Left to feed off the measliest of scraps, it is to the top scorer’s credit that he sniffed out a couple of decent chances along the way.
City were desperately missing the injured Charles Vernam, and without him lacked a starting player with the ability or confidence to take on opponents, run between the lines and stretch the play.
Instead, behind Cook, Adams deployed central playmakers in the attacking three positions (Walker, Matty Daly and Callum Cooke), plus Watt alongside Levi Sutton. All four are capable of being very good players. However, their strengths are too similar to effectively work together. Each can pick a pass and set up others, but they need runners around them and clever movement to be effective. Too many cooks spoil the broth, as they say, and Cooke, Walker and Daly in particular were hampered by competing to do the same things.
Vernam would have offered something different. Sutton was the only starter with a record of taking opposition players on, but he was strangely subdued and currently looks well short of his best.
It all led to a static, predictable and – frankly – dull City performance. Orient rarely looked troubled. Their backline only breached sporadically, such as when Foulds broke through into the box in the first half. But even then, with only Cook as the focal point, there just aren’t the attacking options to create any kind of overload.
So stalemate ensued for 69 minutes, and the atmosphere remained low key with a hint it could all boil over into anger at any moment. At half time there were boos, which was a touch harsh, but they were nothing on the level of fury that followed Orient’s breakthrough.
Given City held the physical edge throughout, it is frustrating that Adams didn’t seek to spot the weaknesses in the opponents and take advantage sooner. That he seemed happy for his players to play at such a slow tempo, rather than raising the stakes. And his low risk approach was in danger of backfiring. At least until he was left with no choice but to roll the dice and take a bolder approach.
On a night where few City players hit the heights, it was fitting that Watt got the equaliser. The young midfielder – back here from injury – has had his critics this season but here he played with a bravery that was an example to others. He still gives the ball away too much and his decision making must improve, but unlike some of his team-mates he is not afraid to make mistakes. He is bold, and in such a tough spot that was what was needed. Credit should also go to Paudie O’Connor and Foulds, who like Watt stood up to be counted.

There were late City chances and what might have beens. Substitute Tom Elliott won everything in the air when he came on and almost got Cook in for a winner. Another sub, Alex Gilliead, needed to run at people more but did at least produce one wicked cross begging to be tapped home. Theo Robinson also performed well. It was too little too late, but it was something. The smallest crumbs of comfort to take, after such a difficult few days trying to find reasons to be confident in the direction of the club.
Ultimately, nothing has changed. City are utterly unconvincing. They’re rubbish to watch. The manager’s post match comments continue to sound deluded to the point they’re insulting to listen to. The chances of promotion remain far from credible.
They’re still perched perilously on that ledge.
But they’re also still standing.
Adams was never going to lose his job in defeat here – but he was certainly at risk of losing a big portion of fans. In that regard, this late comeback is a stay of execution for the manager. The question is how he uses that limited extension of goodwill – and whether this night can be some sort of springboard to better times.
It’s painfully clear to every Bradford City supporter that his plan isn’t working. The 4-2-3-1 he favours just cannot succeed with the current personnel he has available. He is not even close to getting the best out of his players, many of whom are going backwards. It’s surely time now that he looks to implement a different approach. That he finds a better system for the strengths of the players at his disposal. And that he does something to give supporters more reason to believe in what he’s trying to do.
The three-year contract gives Adams plenty of protection. And, having made such an effort to secure his services, and allowed him to change so much at the club, it’s going to be difficult for CEO Ryan Sparks to sack him.
But this is turning into an unhappy manager-supporter relationship that we are starting to feel trapped in. And it’s time for Adams to prove that he deserves the backing of an increasingly disillusioned fanbase.
Categories: Match Reviews
Great written article Jason.
If Derek can somehow bypass his own thinking/tactics and just play to the players strengths, he may just save this ship from sinking.
Cook is far too isolated up top, the three behind are static with no forward progression. It’s not even safe football, there is no actual game plan or anything. Credit to Watt tonight for trying to do something different, the shackles need to come of the rest of the team. Let’s see a proper team performance for once which Derek tactically gets correct. He is inept at the moment.
I’m hoping the tide will turn but I just can’t see it with how stubborn Derek is.
I look forward to been proven wrong though! CTID.
Great summary Jason.
For things to change you need to change things. Derek. The system isn’t working we are bored s*****ss pal.
Predict no change in system as he is too stubborn to give in to our demands. and then a horrible defeat to Harrogate Saturday. It’s nailed on. Followed by the insulting interview afterwards! Eat sleep repeat.
These players are good enough and actually I believe they care enough but also it’s clear they have almost had enough of this underachieving tactic deployed. What’s the point in having 7/8 strikers in the squad and playing 1 each week?
Comments about getting Reece involved then no sight of him today? He’s mugging us off with drivel week in week out and this will only end one way from here.
Question is when?
We deserve better respect. As do the players to be fair.
Rich
Yawn Yawn Yawn.
I think you’ve said it all really. Noone played badly and at times you think they are about to click but the total lack of width kills them. He has to try a new system – it doesn’t work.
A great summation. It is almost like Adams is being annoying on purpose. Its ok been confident but his current attitude is combative and arrogant. The fans want to see something like in the last 10 minutes but tactically that was enforced. Prior to that that you had Cook against 2 bigger centre halfs with his back to goal and no one near him. Certainly never anyone running beyond him, This team is playing with ‘fear’. They are imo scared of making a misplaced pass (apart from Watt, and credit to him for that), but they are robotic like playing to instruction positional wise and it does not work. The centre halves for Orient must have loved facing the play all game until we finally actually played with positive intent. Orient had not scored for 8 hours yet Adams tactic of narrow condensed 4231 football at all costs played into their hands. Simplay playing a system imo i not good management. Its like relying on luck. we could all do that. Playing a system tjat plays to your individual/teams strengths is real management imo, and Adams shows none of this desire nor simple acumen. And ultimately as a fan it is as Gary Jones said tonight “boring to watch”.
You have to think that at some point he is planning to change tact sooner or later…
We have Cook, Robinson, Elliott, Delfuonso & Lavery seemingly for one position which seems likes overkill, especially as none of them lend themselves ro playing in the 3 behind as perhaps Angol does so you have to think he has to look at other options of formation if more than one plays
We seem to play differently to the way we tried to play at the beginning of the season which seems to suggest that he is not happy with something and is still tinkering and all the preseason work is being redone in terms of tactics.
The most frustrating thing was that the game was there to be won and the last ten minutes proved it. There seemed very little justification in being so cautious based on what the opposition had to offer and even if they had have been caught out by playing more aggressively, coming back to equalise should not have been so daunting.
I’m not sure about the post game comments. As has been mentioned previously, he’s all about the stats and clearly thinks that they show we were better, however insipid it was.
Spot on Jason.
It’s so frustrating. Both watching our set up, tactics and performances.
But doubly so continually hearing the deluded comments of our manager which insult the intelligence of 99% of our fan base.
Unbelievably I actually preferred BowyerBall to AdamsAntics🤔
When you sign 3 non-goalscoring strikers, in Lavery, Robinson and Delfouneso, we shouldn’t be surprised when we don’t hit the back of the net anywhere near enough. I think Adams is out of his depth. I shudder to think what next season’s ST uptake will be. Sub 8000 at this rate, perhaps less. Adams isn’t going to work for us.
Which prolific strikers could you suggest we should have signed then Gav. The quality of the players in the lower divisions is abysmal. Every January and June onwards, its simply a case of shuffling the pack of mediocrity and the merry-go-round goes on and on. Young players coming through the system apart , virtually every other player is another teams castoff.
Boring Boring Bradford.
I think Adams has already lost the majority of the fan’s support, but what can we do?
The club won’t sack him as it would cost too much, not only in terms of money, but also reputation and judgement (on Sparks side).
Looks like we will just have to put up with it, or not. The fans will start voting with their feet, and just not bother turning up for the remainder of this season or next.
What I don’t understand about city is that managers like Adams and Bowyer have good records. They come to city and fail.
Players come to city then either get injured or deteriotate, or both.
The team don’t press their opponents. Other teams seem to try and work harder.
Why why why?
I simply cannot understand it.
DA’s interview after the game was unbelievable, (as are all his interviews). The man is delusional and has zero charisma. I don’t think I’d want to play for him either. Try and listen to it – he certainly didn’t watch the same game as the crowd did.
“There were two very famous football clubs – Leyton Orient and Bradford City” (or words similar), trying to win 3 points”
The blokes a Dinosaur.
It is easy to forget how free flowing the team played during the first month of the season. What went wrong? We lost Angol early in the season and that reduced our attacking threat and placed more reliance on an isolated Andy Cook. However I think the importance of Charles Vernam is under estimated by some who don’t seem to rate him that much. He has pace, provides width and is skilful. He also provides a crucial outlet for the defence and central midfield. (So did Crankshaw in his cameo appearances). The current team is unbalanced and crying out for a fresh approach. I hate to say it but the short term solution may be to go more direct with 2 forwards, as seen in the last 15 desperate minutes last night. It won’t be pretty but neither is the current brand of football and it might just prove more effective. One clear positive from last night was the performance of Matty Foulds who was excellent.
I can understand the comments, and certainly would not count myself as a fan of Adams, However a change in management at this stage would be wrong – he has only now (in the last couple of weeks) got a preferred squad together and his record indicates that his second season results exceed his first. I do not think he will turn out to be a good “long term” fit for us, but he may well prove to be the solution to getting us out of League 2. Instant solutions are rare and it took Parky some time to get us moving, whilst I don’t see Derek Adams having the same length of tenure as Parky I feel we should stick for now.
Real doom and gloom here I think I’ve finally had enough after last night.
The city is a small, run-down and outdated backwater. It’s all doom and gloom, deprivation, lack of education and ambition. It’s run by an amateur administration with decades of under-investment and acceptance of failure and mediocrity.
The Football Club is a reflection of the city (So is the Rugby Club).
High-achieving outsiders come to VP and get dragged down by it. We can all look for some positives in the city and the club (and they both have some) – we cling on to them for our lives but at the end of the day there are bigger things in play.
The only way I see out of this is to start again, a ground-up restoration of a professional football club in Bradford. A new smaller ground (15k with ability to extend and shared with the Bulls) – owned by the club and fans with new ambitions of how we can progress through the lower leagues to give the city a club it can be proud of again, not embarrassed about.
Good review of the match, Jason, summed it up perfectly.
I can’t remember who was quoted as saying that it is a sign of madness to keep doing the same thing over and over again and expect different results, and it probably wasn’t about League 2 football, but they were right. This has been going on too long now. We have some good players and some bang average ones. We need to start playing to the strengths of the good ones, and soon.
It was Albert Einstein.
It’s a shame we don’t have him in the dugout.
A fine summary here Jason.
Adams is hampering himself by not picking and choosing his battles. I don’t like always going back to the PP days but that’s the only recent example of a successful league 2 side.
That was a side which would see an opponent on a bad losing run, struggling to score and then go after them with a high collective press forcing players sorely lacking in confidence into mistakes in dangerous areas. We’d go man for man on their defenders and squeeze up the pitch.
Every fan in that stadium could see that Orient were there for the taking. He’s giving a side who seldom win on the road way too much respect.
The fact this side can still realistically get into the play offs with a decent run is staggering but it goes to show just what a terrible league this is. Forest Green and Tranmere even look nothing special when we’ve played them.
If you’re going to play that deep and look to counter then you need a) width and b) an outlet with pace, neither of which we had.
The small positives were Foulds and Watt with strong individual displays. Both punching passes through the lines but unfortunately Orient also packed the middle of the pitch meaning touches when it came into feet at pace had to be bang on. There were the odd moments where this happened but never getting into serious goalscoring positions.
Adams can’t pull the wool over our eyes anymore with “look at the stats, we were the better team”. Shots don’t necessarily equal good opportunities, our xG was around 0.5 which is shameful at home against such poor opposition.
He’s clearly banking on some run a la Mansfield in this second half of the campaign but it’s incredibly hard to see how that’s going to happen until we start frightening teams with overloads and more men in the box, playing higher up the pitch. Something we did well in the first month or two of the season.
Spot on again Jason. The way things are going you’ll be able to copy & paste your reports for the rest of the season.
Nothing changes on the field, because Mr Adams doesn’t appear to know anything else.
I think that the squad of players are good for league 2, in fact last night I thought that if Stuart had had a squad this good and playing his way we wouldn’t be watching boring, unattractive football.Not that I want Stuart back, that ship has sailed, but Adams must rethink his tactics and try to win matches instead of not lose them!
A fine summary here Jason.
Adams is hampering himself by not pick and choosing his battles. I don’t like always going back to the PP days but that’s the only recent example of a successful league 2 side.
That was a side which would see an opponent on a bad losing run, struggling to score and then go after them with a high collective press forcing players sorely lacking in confidence into mistakes in dangerous areas. We’d go man for man on their defenders and squeeze up the pitch.
Every fan in that stadium could see that Orient were there for the taking. He’s giving a side who seldom win on the road way too much respect.
The fact this side can still realistically get into the play offs with a decent run is staggering but it goes to show just what a terrible league this is. Forest Green and Tranmere even look nothing special when we’ve played them.
If you’re going to play that deep and look to counter then you need a) width and b) an outlet with pace, neither of which we had.
The small positives were Foulds and Watt with strong individual displays. Both punching passes through the lines but unfortunately Orient also packed the middle of the pitch meaning touches when it came into feet at pace had to be bang on. There were the odd moments where this happened but never getting into serious goalscoring positions.
Adams can’t pull the wool over our eyes anymore with “look at the stats, we were the better team”. Shots don’t necessarily equal good opportunities, our xG was around 0.5 which is shameful at home against such poor opposition.
He’s clearly banking on some run a la Mansfield in this second half of the campaign but it’s incredibly hard to see how that’s going to happen until we start frightening teams with overloads and more men in the box, playing higher up the pitch. Something we did well in the first month or two of the season.
With Adams style of football if you don’t get results, then I’m afraid you are always going to come under pressure from the fans.
If we are not careful then Sparks is going to face the same dilemma he had at the end of last season, where he has appointed a manager, but results and performances have largely been disappointing, and he has got season tickets to sell.
I think it’s telling that, for the managers that have been sacked since Jewell, I would say for the majority they have been sacked just as much for their style of football, as results.
As I alluded to the other day, I think we need to start appointing managers who have a reputation for trying to play good football. I accept some fans are never going to be happy unless we play well and win every week, but for the rational amongst us, if they were trying to play good football, but the results weren’t quite yet forthcoming, you feel it would bide them more time, as people could hopefully see what they were attempting to implement.
I agree completely with you on this. The best example is Pulis at Stoke where for a long time he kept them competitive but the dire football meant he had no credit in the bank when the losses started coming he was disposed of quicker than many managers (outside of Watford) would have been.
Whilst football is a results game it’s also an entertainment business. Do people want to pay money to wish they were somewhere else?
Neither side deserved to win last night because neither side did enough to show they wanted to score 2+ goals. At one point I wasn’t sure if the aim of both teams was to try and just keep the ball off the grass…
I did feel the booing was unnecessary at times as it was evident Walker was feeling an injury a few times before he was subbed, this situation also happened last game when Vernam was taken off. I think fans booing makes the situation worse for players on the pitch, particularly when they can see it’s justified. However if there was “credit in the bank” this may not have happened.
Much respect to you , your fellow writers and the time and obvious effort you all take. But as is often the case WOAP match report is at odds with my interpretation of the game.
Credit to Tim Penfold for the best report in many for the Crawley game. That was spot on.
I am not one who wanted Adam’s appointment. Quite the reverse, based upon reputation. I do not like the way he treats players in interviews or his tactics or methods. I would prefer it if he were not City’s manager, but he is. He didn’t lie about his successes on his resume. As posted before dissenters at the time were light on the ground at the time of appointment. Adams won’t be endorsed by me and I am not here to defend him. What he must answer is why the more flowing football the team played in the early part of the season stops when we go ahead.
You say “It’s painfully clear to every Bradford City supporter that his plan isn’t working. The 4-2-3-1 he favours just cannot succeed with the current personnel he has available etc This is in total contradiction to what I saw and Tom Penfold reported on Saturday. “The first half was genuinely excellent. City set up in their usual 4-2-3-1 formation”, You cant have it both ways. When we play like that it does work and it can succeed. The issue is, there isn’t enough of it. City fail to press home their advantages.
The smallest crumbs of comfort to take? City had 12 chances, with only two shots on target. On Saturday that read 13 and 3. 20 shots against Salford. That has been a theme for Adams City teams. Far far too many missed opportunities. Lack of composure in front of goal or not taking responsibility by offloading again and again.
Another recurring theme – 1-0 up in fifteen games in all competitions, Adams City teams have conceded an equalising goal on twelve of those occasions and too often they have thrown points away doing this by generally trying to defend a lead. We stop attacking. It is in those cases that the 4-2-3-1 he favours doesn’t succeed. Someone said Adams is inept, well it worked at Plymouth and Morecambe but here how to play consistently motivate, inspire or engage his team is absent. Also his treatment of young men like Reece Staunton and Finn Cousins Dawson should not be tolerated by the club. I wonder what Trueman thinks of that and if Sparks has addressed it. I sincerely hope so.
A couple of other things of note – “Given City held the physical edge throughout?” Nonsense, Orient were bigger than us all over the pitch and from where I sit that showed. “Left to feed off the measliest of scraps, it is to the top scorer’s credit that he sniffed out a couple of decent chances along the way………City were no threat in the final third”.
I might argue there were at least three clear cut chances that without contradiction, should have been taken. All were created by Adams “negative team” playing 4-2-3-1 yet Cook was the one who missed sitters, as players have done all season, and had he not again squandered chances, as he did on Saturday and others as well then City would have won.
That leads me on to suggest the calls for Adams out would not arise had we taken six points. At least not so vehemently. If Cook scores his chances there would be a very different tone. Whatever we all make of the style of football those points would have continued to take us on the run needed to compensate for dropped points after being in winning positions. Whilst not enjoying what is happening, I have seen worse, much worse than Adams and very recently. We all have. Bowyer, Grayson, Taylor even Trueman and Sellers. Although if we fantasise about being champions with 100 points and Cook scoring 40 goals then we make a rod for our own backs with over expectations.
They are only my observations and many will disagree but it is not what made me post. Yes, those who pay to enter the ground can surely have opinions however that is not what makes fans.
That comes with standing by and supporting your team. Not fickleness, booing, cussing and changing loyalties and affections at every turn. There is absolutely no need to be so filled with bitter criticism and deep seated and hateful malice. What is to be gained for the Club and other supporters when those who took part were so intentionally and extremely caustic?
It’s as though they welcomed the opportunity to act that way. Does it make a player play better or try harder? Of course not. Do they think Stephen Darby, maybe Gary Jones, perhaps Bobby Campbell or even Ces Podd, those who played at Chelsea thought “Oh yeh that’s a good idea. That’s really helpful”?
God knows I’ve followed City, with so many others over so many years, through the odd thick but so many many more times “and thin” relegations Administrations, Hereford at home in 1981 in front of 1,249, Stockport away in the uncovered pouring rain in 92nd place in the football league on and on and on. Along with so many, I have no need to prove my pedigree. Of course I will be the first to criticise and offer a difference of opinion. Yet I have never booed a City player. Ever. The nasty, bitterly scathing reaction has no place whatsoever at Bradford City.
I have never been ashamed to be a City follower until the disgraceful behaviour of every one and all of those who reacted so appallingly when Leyton Orient scored. Did Adams want that to happen? Did he cause it? Was he jumping for joy that he might have been matched by the highly regarded Kenny Jacket? Did the players get out the party hats, jelly and ice cream? Or did they react and equalise? Yes, it is upsetting but that was it, it was a goal against our team at a football match.
I will always maintain true Bradfordians and City fans behave at all times with dignity, not least on 11th May.
To have been their that day, last night came as a shock, it was unjustifiable, indefensible. I prefer not to be at odds with others who go to Valley Parade or away games but last night was really out of order.
The players reaction to the outburst, the goal, the effort, their obvious desire to play, fighting for in support of and with a belief in their manager, the professionalism of many very young guys and yes Adam’s substitutions ensured the game ought not to be remembered for such an embarrassing and shameful over reaction.
Those idiots out with their flaming torches and lanterns. The pitchfork wielding mob baying for blood helped not one iota.
Were they demanding that Adams (or the players) be put in the stocks, be hurt with thumb screws or punished by public flogging, crucifixion? Will they not be stopped by anything as mundane as common sense or are they just dogs on the scent, out on a hunt for a fox?
One moron in the main stand, when leaving the ground, had such anger management issues and problems, spitefully screaming and spitting as if possessed by Beelzebub that the bloke needs help. He was acting like he needed demons excorcised. I hope he is reading this and goes to counselling because he is a danger and last night he was damaging his mental health. The actual facts are he disagreed with a manager of a football club in a game they drew in a home in which Adams team actually created enough opportunities for the star striker (and others) to miss enough chances to win two games.
A game in which promising young players like Bass, Foulds, O’Connor, Watt, Sutton, Daly, Cooke, Gillead played and are all 25 or younger It may not be as pretty as you want, Adams might not be your cup of tea, you might think Stuart was a genius, Kamara or Jewell legends or Parkinson was the special one but I fear that there is absolutely no place for what happened.
There is enough of the sickening mentality of gratuitous greed, selfishness and entitlement in football. Ask a Derby fan, a Bury fan, or so many other supporters of teams through no fault of their own. Such bile and vitriol is not welcome and is totally misplaced. Celebrate the fact about 100 Leyton Orient fans were prepared to come over 240 miles on a Tuesday night to see their team play, having gone through so much financial crap themselves and fears of non existence.
Maybe, just maybe, they are allowed a different reaction to the goal? “We’re winning away you must be……..” Should we all not be able to see that?
Perhaps a few involved will be embarrassed and go home to think again. As Half Man Half Biscuit say – Cease the trait. Please.
It is a frustrating time for all, our squad is seriously depleted and the in particular the wide players we hoped would feature have either been injured or not really delivered other than Vernam. Andy Cook will hopefully stay fit now but Angol sadly can’t overcome his injury issues for any sustained length of time. The other strikers have a great opportunity and with luck one of them will take that chance to make a difference.
The January Window – injuries mean we have had to get additional players in, they are players that often nobody else wants or don’t feature in their manager’s current plans, they will need a bit of time to settle and build confidence. All teams have this same challenge and it generally calls for compromise – everyone fails to pick up their targets – even the very biggest clubs in the world.
If our squad was all fit we arguably wouldn’t need them, they know we didn’t plan to have them in our team it’s only by chance/bad luck that we now need them. If our players get back to fitness then they may not feature but for now we just have too many players sidelined or carrying injuries so they will be professional, put on our shirt and we need to back them like any other player rather than rubbish them before they even play.
I’ve never been a fan of booing but understand why some people do it to feel make themselves heard, to me it makes players even more frightened of messing up and less confident. It’s a distraction and waste of time in my opinion. If it’s going wrong try encourage change, be the 12th man
Our manager is focused and disciplined, he will anger some and please others because he isn’t trying to be popular rather he is determined to be successful. At times that means taking a tough line and yes his interviews are bizarre but have no doubt he has staked his reputation on getting our club out of this division and he will be ruthless, that’s what we brought him in for. We have had too many recent managers that sulk, let players drift until their contract ends and not be accountable but it’s very clear he isn’t going to do that or go to the pub with them either.
We are now beginning to see those players who are prepared to give all for our club and that is a growing list, I believe we will succeed and it is clear that determination exists in the wider management of the club who from the top down are also trying to be more assertive, that makes them an easy target for personal abuse because they are public in their views but anyone who stoops that low has no place at our club.
I believe it’s time to decide – back a single minded ruthless determination to get our club out of the bottom division and accept that inevitably some people will be upset along the way or revert back to the safe middle line and trying to keep everyone happy and hoping that if everyone tries to get on it might work out.
Good post Mike.
If you could guarantee that next season Adams would get us promoted, but the football would be pretty dour then I would take it in a heartbeat. I just want us to get back into League 1 and start to put behind us the mess that Rahic created.
Obviously, there is no guarantee of that, and the issue I’ve got is that pragmatic managers normally struggle to be successful here, because I believe the club has always had a reputation of trying to play good football.
I always go back to the example of Peter Taylor, who had an even better track record than Adams, but was never accepted by the fans due to his style of football, and it created a negative atmosphere around the place, making it very difficult to create a successful environment.
Hi Rob. Thanks And Jason’s article today makes sense. It’s time to back them and try make a difference.
Hi Mike,
The problem with Adams is that he is not allowing us to be the 12th Man
One of the few pleasures this season has been from listening to Gary Jones and Fillipe Morais providing insight on the performances.
Fillipe’s comment after Crawley was particularly telling. He explained that often City would come out in the second half and do stuff simply because they knew how the crowd would react.
I’m not sure Derek understands how powerful the city support can be and does nothing to try and harness it. It’s not about being single minded. I don’t expect him to pick the team and formation just to please the supporters but I do expect simple stuff like honest post match interviews, respect for his players and him to applaud the supporters especially at away games.
As a contributor point out it would put credit in the bank and cost him absolutely nothing.
It’s blinking infuriating!
Thanks Andy. I think we all want to see things change for the better and the current puzzle is how to make it happen with this manager and group of players. As a group they are well capable of doing it and Jason’s item today says it all.
Yesterday, in these pages, I remarked on the distinct possibility of Adams persisting with the same formation and same tactics and getting the same result. He seems to think the only win worth having is if you grind it out. He lacks flair, imagination, instinct and I now regrettably conclude he will not succeed at this club. Having formed that conclusion, it behoves me to retire from all forums whilst Adams is manager. – rather than spread disaffection. Farewell.
Your comment, about ‘City’s clear height and physical advantage’, seems well out. Mitchell 1.9m, Beckles 1.91m Happe 1.98m for Orient V Robinson 1.75m Cook1.85m and Elliott the tallest at 1.9m.
I was struck by how very tall most of the Orient side was!
That aside, your summary of the game and the state of the club, in particular your final paragraph, is spot on.
At this level, players cant always adapt to the ways the manager wants to play. We should be adopting the style to best suite the players we have. He just seems to be determined to impose the one up front style, when clearly it doesnt suite the players we have. If we had championship players then they should have the ability to adapt to the style the manager wants. But not at this level. You have to forget get your principles sometimes
Much respect to you , your fellow writers and the time and obvious effort you all take. But as is often the case WOAP match report is at odds with my interpretation of the game.
Credit to Tim Penfold for the best report in many for the Crawley game. That was spot on.
I am not one who wanted Adam’s appointment. Quite the reverse, based upon reputation. I do not like the way he treats players in interviews or his tactics or methods.
I would prefer it if he were not City’s manager, but he is. He didn’t lie about his successes on his resume. As posted before dissenters at the time were light on the ground at the time of appointment.
Adams won’t be endorsed by me and I am not here to defend him. What he must answer is why the more flowing football the team played in the early part of the season stops when we go ahead.
You say “It’s painfully clear to every Bradford City supporter that his plan isn’t working. The 4-2-3-1 he favours just cannot succeed with the current personnel he has available etc
This is in total contradiction to what I saw and Tom Penfold reported on Saturday. “The first half was genuinely excellent. City set up in their usual 4-2-3-1 formation”,
You cant have it both ways. When we play like that it does work and it can succeed. The issue is, there isn’t enough of it. City fail to press home their advantages.
The smallest crumbs of comfort to take? City had 12 chances, with only two shots on target. On Saturday that read 13 and 3. 20 shots against Salford.
That has been a theme for Adams City teams. Far far too many missed opportunities.
Lack of composure in front of goal or not taking responsibility by offloading again and again.
Another recurring theme – 1-0 up in fifteen games in all competitions, Adams City teams have conceded an equalising goal on twelve of those occasions and too often they have thrown points away doing this by generally trying to defend a lead. We stop attacking. It is in those cases that the 4-2-3-1 he favours doesn’t succeed. Someone said Adams is inept, well it worked at Plymouth and Morecambe but here how to play consistently motivate, inspire or engage his team is absent. Also his treatment of young men like Reece Staunton and Finn Cousins Dawson should not be tolerated by the club. I wonder what Trueman thinks of that and if Sparks has addressed it. I sincerely hope so.
A couple of other things of note – “Given City held the physical edge throughout?” Nonsense, Orient were bigger than us all over the pitch and from where I sit that showed.
“Left to feed off the measliest of scraps, it is to the top scorer’s credit that he sniffed out a couple of decent chances along the way………City were no threat in the final third”.
I might argue there were at least three clear cut chances that without contradiction, should have been taken. All were created by Adams “negative team” playing 4-2-3-1 yet Cook was the one who missed sitters, as players have done all season, and had he not again squandered chances, as he did on Saturday and others as well then City would have won.
That leads me on to suggest the calls for Adams out would not arise had we taken six points. At least not so vehemently. If Cook scores his chances there would be a very different tone.
Whatever we all make of the style of football those points would have continued to take us on the run needed to compensate for dropped points after being in winning positions.
Whilst not enjoying what is happening, I have seen worse, much worse than Adams and very recently. We all have. Bowyer, Grayson, Taylor even Trueman and Sellers. Although if we fantasise about being champions with 100 points and Cook scoring 40 goals then we make a rod for our own backs with over expectations.
They are only my observations and many will disagree but it is not what made me post.
Yes, those who pay to enter the ground can surely have opinions however that is not what makes fans.
That comes with standing by and supporting your team. Not fickleness, booing, cussing and changing loyalties and affections at every turn.
There is absolutely no need to be so filled with bitter criticism and deep seated and hateful malice.
What is to be gained for the Club and other supporters when those who took part were so intentionally and extremely caustic?
It’s as though they welcomed the opportunity to be that way.
Does it make a player play better or try harder? Of course not.
Do they think Stephen Darby, maybe Gary Jones, perhaps Bobby Campbell or even Ces Podd, those who played at Chelsea thought “Oh yeh that’s a good idea. That’s really helpful”?
God knows I’ve followed City, with so many others over so many years, through the odd thick but so many many more times “and thin” relegations Administrations, Hereford at home in 1981 in front of 1,249, Stockport away in the uncovered pouring rain in 92nd place in the football league on and on and on. Along with so many, I have no need to prove my pedigree.
Of course I will be the first to criticise and offer a difference of opinion. Yet I have never booed a City player. Ever. The nasty, bitterly scathing reaction has no place whatsoever at Bradford City.
I have never been ashamed to be a City follower until the disgraceful behaviour of every one and all of those who reacted so appallingly when Leyton Orient scored.
Did Adams want that to happen? Did he cause it? Was he jumping for joy that he might have been matched by the highly regarded Kenny Jacket?
Did the players get out the party hats, jelly and ice cream? Or did they react and equalise?
Yes, it is upsetting but that was it, it was a goal against our team at a football match.
I will always maintain true Bradfordians and City fans behave at all times with dignity, not least on 11th May.
To have been their that day, last night came as a shock, it was unjustifiable, indefensible.
I prefer not to be at odds with others who go to Valley Parade or away games but last night was really out of order.
The players reaction to the outburst, the goal, the effort, their obvious desire to play, fighting for in support of and with a belief in their manager, the professionalism of many very young guys and yes Adam’s substitutions ensured the game ought not to be remembered for such an embarrassing and shameful over reaction.
Those idiots out with their flaming torches and lanterns. The pitchfork wielding mob baying for blood helped not one iota.
Were they demanding that Adams (or the players) be put in the stocks, be hurt with thumb screws or punished by public flogging, crucifixion?
Will they not be stopped by anything as mundane as common sense or are they just dogs on the scent, out on a hunt for a fox?
One moron in the main stand, when leaving the ground, had such anger management issues and problems, spitefully screaming and spitting as if possessed by Beelzebub that the bloke needs help.
He was acting like he needed demons excorcised. I hope he is reading this and goes to counselling because he is a danger and last night he was damaging his mental health.
The actual facts are he disagreed with a manager of a football club in a game they drew in a home in which Adams team actually created enough opportunities for the star striker (and others) to miss enough chances to win two games.
A game in which promising young players like Bass, Foulds, O’Connor, Watt, Sutton, Daly, Cooke, Gillead played and are all 25 or younger
It may not be as pretty as you want, Adams might not be your cup of tea, you might think Stuart was a genius, Kamara or Jewell legends or Parkinson was the special one but I fear that there is absolutely no place for what happened.
There is enough of the sickening mentality of gratuitous greed, selfishness and entitlement in football.
Ask a Derby fan, a Bury fan, or so many other supporters of teams through no fault of their own.
Such bile and vitriol is not welcome and is totally misplaced.
Celebrate the fact about 100 Leyton Orient fans were prepared to come over 240 miles on a Tuesday night to see their team play, having gone through so much financial crap themselves and fears of non existence.
Maybe, just maybe, they are allowed a different reaction to the goal? “We’re winning away you must be……..” Should we all not be able to see that?
Fantastic and spot on.