Some flashes of promise, but goals continue to be the hardest thing to come by

Mansfield Town 0
Bradford City 0

By Adam Raj

That was better than I expected. On paper, this afternoon’s fixture at Field Mill looked a tough ask. Free scoring Mansfield at home to a blunt Bradford City side who had only kept one clean sheet so far this season and were missing their talisman and top scorer. Mansfield weren’t without their own injury crisis however, with star striker Rhys Oates and influential midfielder Stephen Quinn the notable absentees, meaning striker Jordan Bowery lined up at right back with a handful of youngsters making up the numbers on the bench.

Two such unsettled sides probably best explain what was a fairly low key affair. There was very little goal mouth action at either end with both goalkeepers being spectators for the most part. City did play some good football through the thirds, but failed to produce a moment to really bring the 1,600 travelling faithful to life.

Tyler Smith, playing in his natural position in Andy Cook’s absence, had a good game with some neat touches and hold up play. But he really should’ve scored in the first half when his free header from Jamie Walker’s cross went wide. That was by far the most promising performance I’ve seen from Smith (disclaimer, I missed Wrexham) – he’s not a winger or wide forward, where he’s been playing and looked ineffective so far. Almost like players at this level need to be played in their natural positions, isn’t it?

Smith did benefit from a lot of support from Walker in particular, who at times was playing right up alongside him, with City in more of a 3-5-2 than the 5-4-1 that has been evident for the early part this season. Emmanuel Osadebe, who had a decent game, and the returning Clarke Oduor rotated to make it a three pronged attack when City pressed.

City’s wingbacks were noticeably more advanced than they have been and it was the first time that it looked like they were playing with wingbacks as opposed to fullbacks in a back five. Brad Halliday had an excellent game, until it came to making a decision in the final third in terms of whether to shoot or pass and the subsequent execution of that decision. Lewis Richards continues to impress and look a vast upgrade on Liam Ridehalgh at LWB. It is to be hoped that this tactical shift is here to stay, because having wingbacks who are ten yards deeper than they should be makes City unnecessarily defensive and only invites pressure.

Oduor had City’s only effort on target in the first half when he tested Christy Pym with a low effort from 20 yards which produced a routine stop from the Stags keeper and aside from Smith’s header, that was about as exciting as it got at either end.

The second half wasn’t anymore entertaining. Lots of nice football again from City but nothing of note created. A handful of poor crosses and poor decision making in the final third wasted some really promising positions.

Hughes’ decision to bring on Ridehalgh and Matt Derbyshire on 70 minutes killed any forward momentum City had, as both had extremely poor cameos. It is alarmingly obvious that both are far inferior to the players that they replaced in Smith and Richards.

That decision could have been costly as the hosts, who had aimed every set piece to the back post and the mountain that is Aiden Flint, caught City off guard with ten to play. Louis Reed cleverly dinked in a corner to the near post where Lukas Akins glanced a header wide of the far post. That was the closest either side came to snatching the three points that neither of them truly deserved.

In isolation, it’s hard to get too disappointed at this result or performance. The game was there to be won if we had more quality in certain situations. There were plenty of positives in the way we shaped up, moved the ball and defended as well as the individual performances of the majority of the 16 that played a part.

The negative is: we have to look at the bigger picture. And that picture doesn’t look great at the moment. City have been devoid of creativity in the opening month of the season and are unsurprisingly the joint lowest scorers in the division, albeit a record they share with four other sides.

They have blanked in three of their six league games and have only one goal on the road. There is heavy reliance on Cook regaining his form from last season and Pattison being the ‘other’ goal scorer in the team. City still don’t look remotely threatening from attacking set pieces and don’t create anywhere near enough for others to contribute in Cook and Pattison’s absence. As Gillingham have found out in the last fortnight, you can’t 1-0 your way to promotion every week, which is the only score line City look to be capable of producing.

Goals are a problem that have plagued City for years. Whether that is down to hiring defensive-minded managers or lacking the attacking quality in the playing squad, last season’s haul for Cook really was the anomaly in terms of a reliable stream of goals. And even then, collectively as a team, City didn’t do enough to back up Cook’s numbers.

Last season, Hughes was indebted to Cook winning games like this on his own with a moment of brilliance and getting everyone else out of jail. Through injury, lack of form and definitely a lack of service, City don’t have that so far this year. And it’s a problem that Hughes needs to quickly fix.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

32 replies

  1. 4-4-2, 4-4-2 – hear my chant. Make good use of the pace we have alledgedly acquired out wide and up front. And drop Smallwood.

    • Great idea Dave – let’s play 442, get beaten in the midfield battle every game and struggle to get out of our own half!

      • Steady Dave, you’ll upset the puritans that dont understand that four across midfield doesnt mean two of them have to stand on the touchline and can actually come infield to look for the ball

  2. It’s very quiet on here tonight,we are all waiting for season to take off but it’s looking like last season without Cooky goals and a negative approach which will not get you promoted .We have two home games to come we need 6 points and goals . Lets hope the loan players come good,or its mid table finish for me,not good .

  3. It’s far too early to make any assumptions and I often say anything can happen and usually does.
    I also say uou cannot determine what you have until 10 to 15 games snd that goes for every club, and players, not just City.
    Some signings will work out, some won’t.
    That’s the nature of the beast.
    Let’s see where we are in a month’s time.

    • You make a good point, until the transfer window closed we were unaware of what players Hughes was going to bring in.
      Let’s see how it works through September but with the injuries we have it may be October before we have a good idea of how this team will perform as a group.

  4. It’s far too early to make any assumptions and I often say anything can happen and usually does.
    I also say uou cannot determine what you have until 10 to 15 games snd that goes for every club, and players, not just City.
    Some signings will work out, some won’t.
    That’s the nature of the beast.
    Let’s see where we are in a month’s time.

  5. I’m firmly in the ‘lets wait & see’ camp too, & still think we haven’t recovered yet from last season’s Play Off disappointments enough to really shine at the moment. Resilient performance, a clean sheet, & a good work rate, would be my take away positives from this one. Four points in the bag from tough games against Crewe (H) & Mansfield (A) since the debacle at Morecambe, on top of knocking Wrexham our of the League Cup. Adding the new pace & talent in the Transfer Window will hopefully add fresh options, & a refreshed confidence too, but a bit of time needed to settle in & click as a team.
    Up the Bantams!

    • Maybe there is an hangover from the play offs.
      Who knows?
      But MH sets his team up to be hard to beat and the defence.is beginning to look OK, as it did last season.
      The new recruits may add goals and assists.
      We will be fine.

  6. It’s still early days. We were missing key players including our early leading scorer. Mansfield also had key players missing. If I was offered a 0 0 draw at the start of the game I would have taken it. The wing back style seems to be working better but I would hope we would start to see goals. Including cup matches we have had 6 away matches and only 2 home matches. There is little opportunity to build momentum with that balance of matches. The football season is a marathon not a race. Promotion involves winning, yes, but being hard to beat is key as well. I think the squad we have shows promise. Get our key players fit and playing, I believe we will start scoring goals. Well done Pointon. He has class for a player so young. Again, when he came on he showed great skill. His passing was very good.

  7. I’m always happy with a point away from home result wise as I’ve always thought win your home games and draw your aways and you’ll finish as champions. Mansfield are a decent side at this level so definitely a good point.

    As for the performance to me it was a typical Mark Hughes performance, i.e cautious with the ball often going sideways or backwards and not very entertaining to watch. It’s something that I’m getting used to now but I don’t find us an enjoyable team to watch, although would take it if it finally got us out of this division.

    • If Derbyshire is not capable of more than twenty minutes we should not have signed him. And, in any case, in such a short period he’s not likely to get himself match fit and in the striker’s groove. If we have to play without a target man for any length of time we can forget about promotion. Before the season started I asked on this forum what would happen if Cook were injured. I also posed the same question about Lewis. If you give a hostage to fortune you always suffer.

      • I asked the same question plenty of times last season regarding Cook and Lewis myself. Overall I thought that we were a poor team last season with a great keeper and striker. With out them two last season I thought that we would be nearer the bottom of the table than the top.I

        Letting young go out on loan and keeping Derbyshire was strange in my opinion.

  8. We have to assume that in Hughes’s estimation Wilson, Afoka and Tulloch are more likely to bring us success – goals and assists – than Young. Time will
    tell.

  9. At league 2 level who wouldn’t miss Cook and Patterson in the team?
    That said, our Golden Wonders were replaced with Smiths and Walkers talents up front, and they combined pretty well and caused problems. Sadly when they came off we looked very plain.
    Don’t worry I’m not going to mention crisp passing or crunch tackles, but at least it was a solid point in the bag.
    Sorry I’ll packet in now.
    Up the chickens 🐔

  10. Yes I saw and spoke to Don there. After leaving the Avenue, he had a short spell with Barrow and then for a short time was chief fryer at Seabrook’s. A hard man but never dirty. Times change. I’ve just watched the Glasgow Derby and no booking until the 72nd minute. Don’t know what McCalman and Scoular would make of the modern tippy tapping, pressing but not tackling. No idea what Don did after Seabrook’s. I’d be interested to know.

    • I used to see Don regularly on my daily walk. He always thought I was an avid Avenue fan. Little did he know the abuse I used to give him during those great City v Avenue derbies!

      He was as hard as nails on the pitch but a lovely man off it. We used to spend hours talking about the players of his era and the demise of his beloved Avenue. He used to look forward to the monthly get together of former City and Avenue players, which were held at the Greyhound in Tong.

      He grew very disillusioned with the modern game.

      • Sorry, Mitchell., I missed the bit after Seabrooks.

        He told me he was in partnerhip, for a while with John Hardie,the Avenue goalkeeper as a joiner, and I think he continued in that trade.

      • Thanks, Stephen, much appreciated. John Hardie was a great keeper, so good it allowed Avenue to let us have Pat Liney. I too have known a number of Avenue players who possibly thought I supported their team because I knew all about them. Football was much cheaper and I always watched Avenue when City’s away match was too far to travel. We took some good players from them, not least Rodney Green and, indirectly, Bobby Ham. Also Charlie Atkinson and Gerry Lightowler. The great Mitch Downie also played for both teams as did a few others, particularly after Avenue went out of the league.

      • Apologies Steven for later spelling your name the other way.

  11. I liked the certain substitution we all keep talking about, the only player who decided to spin the ball and head in the direction of goal, well after all he is one of our own and why wouldn’t you want play positive football for your Club, well done Bobby Pointon 👏👏👏👏

    It’s only a matter of time until the penny drops that we look a different team when the talented youngster is on the pitch, give him his home debut and sub him before the end for a standing ovation.

    Come on City…..

    • He’s got to start! Pointon has not let the team down when he’s come on. He shows flair and has an eye for a pass. Definitely needs to start. We have a star that will go far (hopefully for us).

  12. Mitchell, my last word on the subject! Don told me that after one away game, the Avenue players were making their way to the train station in a fleet of taxis. An away supporter, the worse for drink, spied Jimmy Scoular and shouted “Scoular, you bald headed bastard!”. Jimmy told the taxi driver to stop, grinned and beckoned the guy over. With false courage, the guy wandered over, Jimmy wound the window down and, as the fan popped his head in, Jimmy laid him out with one punch!

  13. Frank Large once patted Scoular on the head after scoring (from memory) his third for Northampton. The great man chased him and threw him over the wall on the top side. The referee looked the other way!

  14. The problem is Mark Hughes, he brings in players willy nilly with some not even given a real chance. If they aren’t better than what we’ve got why bring them in??? He plays people out of position, and thinks he can get promoted by trying to win matches 1-0.
    The guy hasn’t got a clue, and if was a good manager he wouldn’t be at Bradford!!!