Mark Hughes prepares to bow out as Bradford City manager after another demoralising defeat

Tranmere Rovers 2
Hendry 24, Morris 83
Bradford City 1
Cook 55

By Jason McKeown

As Mark Hughes headed over to Bradford City supporters at the final whistle to face a torrent of anger, Sam Stubbs walked just behind his beleaguered boss, pleading with the away end to stop their show of dissent. As gestures go, Stubbs’ actions proved as futile as the dismal midfield play that allowed Tranmere Rovers’ Kieran Morris to charge through and win this game. And as ineffectual as the weak goalkeeping from Harry Lewis that had enabled Tranmere to open the scoring. Stubbs’ appeals fell on deaf ears. The away end was not holding back in its verdict on the City boss.

Mark Hughes’ time at Bradford City is seemingly over. The noises before this crunch game strongly suggested that a Bantams defeat would see him sacked, and the woeful way in which the visitors lost at Prenton Park gave the travelling fans plenty of ammunition to make their feelings known. We’re now left sitting and waiting for someone at Valley Parade to take a picture of the corner flag, so it could head up the seemingly inescapable announcement of a parting of ways.

Stubbs clearly remains behind Hughes. And to be fair on this evidence, so did most of his team mates. Some had collapsed on the floor at full time, perhaps knowing the inevitability of what happens next. They didn’t stop trying all game – that much was obvious – but their lack of guile, quality and aptitude to come back for a point that might have saved Hughes proved well beyond them.

This was in many ways a re-run of the Walsall game on Saturday. You could go further, in fact, and say it was a re-run of so many of the 82 Bradford City games Hughes has overseen. A good start – this time with some decent chances created – before it stalled and ultimately fell apart. If football matches only lasted 25 minutes, Bradford City under Hughes would probably be top of League One right now, a few short years away from winning the Champions League. Games last much longer of course, and this one felt like an especially long night.

It all began to unravel when Tranmere’s Regan Hendry found a bit of space on the edge of the box, hit a pot shot, and somehow Harry Lewis made a complete mess of palming it away, the ball nestled into the back of the net. Lewis began as he left off on Saturday – confidence completely shot to pieces. His nerves were evident by several misplaced passes and shaky clearances early doors. Hendry’s shot lacked ferociousness, and probably could have been caught by Lewis if he’d just stood and got his body behind it. Another unfortunate howler.

At that point another hard luck story was forming. City were the better team in the first half for sure. Tranmere at times looked utterly woeful. But they grew into the game thereafter. For Hughes, the misfortune continued when the returning Alex Pattison went down injured and had to go off. Attempts to have both Jamie Walker and Pattison in the same starting XI – however dubious of a plan it looks – were over before it had really had a chance.

In the second half the fall away continued. Like on Saturday, you expected City to emerge from a half time team talk full of determination and urgency to come back. But like on Saturday, it didn’t happen. Eventually City did start to mount some attacks, but timidness was evident everywhere you looked. A collection of players passing the ball around too often and, with it, passing on responsibility too often to others. Who is going to be brave enough? As scorn began to pour down on young players Daniel Oyegoke and early sub Rayhaan Tulloch – who had replaced Pattison – you began to fear the team was folding.

To their credit they did find an equaliser. Adam Wilson played a short corner to Brad Halliday, who swung over a superb cross. The ball seemed to be slightly behind Andy Cook, but City’s number nine displayed remarkable aerial prowess to rise highest and send a powerful header crashing into the back of the net. That’s five goals in the last three league games for Cook, who is most certainly back. If only the team around him weren’t so feeble at creating him good chances.

You thought that would be the catalyst for a City win. That the team would seize the moment – seize on Tranmere fragility – to power on. But Tranmere were undoubtedly the better side in the second half. They pushed City back, and the visitors continued to look disjointed and slow paced when they did go forward.

Tranmere controversially won a penalty just after the hour when Kevin McDonald was ruled to have his foot too high in the air as he attempted to block a rebound attempt. He seemed to win the ball, but the referee Scott Oldham – who had an abysmal game – ruled against the veteran midfielder. Josh Hawkes took the spot kick. Lewis saved. A huge moment for the City keeper personally.

Again, you hoped it would be a turning point.

Again, it wasn’t.

The fact was that City could not change the direction of the tide. Richie Smallwood – not seen in action since he was jeered off when substituted against Harrogate a fortnight ago – surprisingly came on. Was this moment the City skipper began to prove his critics wrong? Where he went into bat for Hughes in a heroic way? Nope. Smallwood was dreadful, giving the ball away in the build up to Tranmere’s winner. It was a goal well taken by Morris, but the way in which Smallwood and Oyegoke lost runners in the build up was criminal.

There were still seven minutes of normal time, and a further seven minutes of stoppage time, for City to come back. They huffed. They puffed. But what was the game plan? At no stage did they create any meaningful pressure that hinted they could nick a point. They looked completely out of ideas.

Hughes copped for it big time at the end as he came over to thank the fans. He does deserve some credit for coming to face the inevitable backlash. I still remember two years when City lost here under Derek Adams, and the players got all the abuse while the Scot ran down the tunnel at full time to leave them to face it on their own. Feeble leadership.

As the axe prepares to fall, it’s hard to make any case for why Hughes deserves more time. If you are judging him purely on this season, there is just so little to be impressed by. The players are not set up effectively. They don’t seem to operate in a way that suits their strengths. Here – as on Saturday – the substitutions only made City weaker.

There’s a scattergun approach to team selection. Wilson was thrust into a full debut here, when on Saturday he wasn’t even brought on from the bench. He did okay and no arguing about the effort, but sadly there was absolutely no end product. The experiment of playing Oyegoke as a central midfielder shows flashes of promise, but is this really the right moment for Hughes to do this when his job is on the line? Dropping Alex Gilliead was really curious. City needed willing workers with bravery and, for all Gilliead’s faults, that is what he gives you.

You look at the signings made this summer, and it looks an absolute mess. Only Pattison can count as an early success. So many others do not look good enough to play week in week out. The drive to go 3-5-2 saw us place too many recruitment eggs in one basket, leaving us incredibly short in key areas. We’ve got players signed to play a certain way, which we’ve had to move away from, leaving many new faces already surplus to requirements. It reflects so badly on not just Hughes, but Stephen Gent.

It’s 40 years this very month since Mark Hughes made his professional debut, when he came on as a substitute for Manchester United in a Milk Cup win over Port Vale. It’s 24 years since Hughes began his managerial career, taking over the Wales national team.

An incredible career. Two spells at Manchester United, successful periods at Barcelona and Bayern Munich. He was popular when he turned out at Chelsea, Everton, Southampton and Blackburn. He’s managed some of the game’s biggest names, along the way of being in charge at Blackburn, Man City, Fulham, QPR, Stoke and Southampton. More than 600 club appearances as a player. More than 650 club games as a manager.

But it seems that an amazing 40-year career ends here. With boos and with fury. Hughes has offered scant evidence of late that he can turn this situation around. And as much as swapping managers has repeatedly failed at Bradford City, it now seems an unavoidable outcome.       



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

33 replies

  1. I for one want to give Hughes more time. I think the problems come from the top. How many managers do we need to go through before people realise that. We suffer from minimal investment and interest from Rupp

    • Agree with John’s comments above. Would give Mark Hughes more time. Stefan Rupp has proved his benevolence, but beyond that his lack of interest is problematic for the club.

    • While the minimal investment from Rupp, certainly since late 2020 according to Sparks, is true, Hughes has managed to bring in 35 new players in just 3 transfer windows.

      The has to be some accountability on the manager, recruitment and scouting in that regard. Even with players leaving it’s a huge number of incomings, almost scatter gun at time in it’s approach.

      There is a huge element of blowing what he has had on poor quality or unnecessary players. The strikers and forwards he has signed with the exception of Banks and Wright have been terrible, especially the permanent signings.

      Signing whole teams of players who can’t seem to play the way Hughes wants is entirely on Hughes and his recruitment team.

      • I would like to know if all of those signings are made by Hughes or by our transfer committee. Are we signing the only players we can afford or stuck with loanees paid for by the parent club? 

      • Excellent summary of the recruitment failures. What particularly worries me in this regard is the number of inept players inexplicably handed 3-year contracts.

    • The manager is to blame….Rupp is not. All these City fans saying Rupp Out is total nonsense, they all think some multimillionaire wants to come to Bradford to save us….which again is not going to happen…we get rid of players and the players we bring in are no better…in fact a lot of been worse than the ones who left…
      For a Division 2 Club we have a massive squad….but the likes of Stevenage, Burton etc who are tiny little clubs look to be holding themselves up there in Div 1.
      Which proves it’s nothing to do with money! It’s the manager.
       

  2. The season is probably over. We’re not good enough to go up. We shouldn’t (fingers crossed) be in a relegation battle. Sacking Hughes would incur a large expense so keep him on. If he surprises everyone a turns it round great. If we plod on into mid table mediocrity then it’s time to shake hands and move on to the next “saviour”. But I think we all know that Jewell, Evans or whoever won’t take this squad up so we’ll just have to grin and bear it yet again.

    • You can argue keeping hughes saves us some money 
      The problem is that I won’t go again now while he is in charge 
      And i suspect I’m not alone
      Empty valley parade for the rest of the season and finish 20th?
      No thanks 

  3. Sorry I disagree that funding is the issue, whilst we would love to have more money to splash, it’s noticeable that we have had better budgets than sides that have been promoted over us in recent years, ultimately by chopping and changing managers and not having a DoF type of figure to standardise the recruitment we haven’t utilised our playing budgets well.

    Clubs with far less wage budget than us have developed a strong identity in the pitch with what they what to do and bought accordingly and had flexible managers who could adapt to L2 football rather than play in an idealistic manner.

  4. 28 managers in 25 years, I read somewhere. If you’ve broken up with 28 girlfriends/boyfriends in 25 years, it’s not them, it’s you.

    The second half yesterday was really poor and thoroughly dispiriting. Is one half of decent football in a defeat against a team like Tranmere good enough? No, it’s not.

    As was mentioned in an earlier piece, if Hughes is sacked, pressure will mount on Sparks himself, for his managerial picks repeatedly failing. He’s in a tough position now.

    If we can’t give the most highly-qualified coach we’ve ever had time to get his project right, then we’ll never give time to anyone. We will have ended the career of Mark Hughes. It’s not something to be proud of, and not great for our reputation as a club, when trying to hire future managers.

    Anybody arguing that Derek Adams deserved more time would have got short shrift from me. The man was a disgrace. When things went wrong, he blamed injuries, the players, the fans, xG, and eventually the entire backroom setup.

    In contrast, I thought Mark Hughes’s post-match interview showed good grace in the circumstances. Under intense pressure–you could hear it in his voice–he didn’t go round blaming anybody connected with the club, he simply appealed for calm.

    Can he turn things round? Of course he can. 35 games left. He’s currently tinkering with the problem area, the centre midfield, with a kind of desperation, while under pressure for instant results. In many ways these are problems of his own making, but he’s fixed every other area of the pitch, so one would think he can fix that up too. But it sounds like he won’t be given time, by the fans, or the club. And we’ll be in even worse trouble than we are now.

  5. I don’t think it makes any difference whether he stays or goes – the problems at our club clearly run much deeper.

    As for the game last night – we started well and Cook should have buried that header from Walker’s brilliant cross – nothing wrong with the ball from him (or for the Walker chance) despite Jamie Raynor constantly telling us the final ball wasn’t good enough. Lewis had another shocker, he probably needs to be dropped now (for Doyle!?).

    After we equalized we inexplicably lost all shape and composure and that is where you would hope that Hughes’ experience, knowledge and authority would kick-in. Unfortunately he (and Hodges) just seem intent on getting wound up by the ref and/or crowd, as they often do. He should be able to lift himself above all that nonsense instead of getting dragged down by it.

  6. Loved Hughes as a player but he’s failed time and time again as a manager. And he’s failing again with us. As spectators, we don’t get his tactics or selection. He seems to make schoolboy errors. It’s incredibly frustrating watching a City side look so disorganised. I travelled 180 miles to watch us yesterday against Tranmere. It took Time, effort, passion, hope, anticipation. What I saw yesterday, last Saturday, last Tuesday and probably will see this Saturday is a group of unorganised men running around a football pitch like headless chickens. Can Hughes turn it around? Can we give him more time? Can he restore the faith? I dunno.

  7. Mark Hughes has been unable to adapt to the requirements of League 2. The only argument in persisting with him is to sort the mess of his own making.

    His lack of tactical onus is staggering and he seems incapable of motivating his bloated, unbalanced, average ability squad.

    I wrote on here last season that he was “underwhelming”. I can’t find a word strong enough to describe what I’ve witnessed this season.

    After Adams, and now Hughes, my interest in all things Bradford City is rapidly waning. I shan’t be booing him on Saturday (if he’s still around) because, after last Saturday’s capitulation, I shan’t be there.

  8. The recruitment is a major issue to me. Pattinson apart, others are uninspiring. It appears to to be bums on seats rather than specialist players in certain areas where there is weaknesses. That is down to Mark Hughes and Gent. If he is still here on Saturday his team selection would need to play in a position that suits rather than playing a wide player in a midfield position etc. It’s got to be a team strong in defence and exciting in midfield driving the forward players. Probably Hughes as a get out of jail key on Saturday. Win he stays anything else, he’s on his way.

  9. The past informs the present. There is absolute no evidence that Hughes can turn the ship around. Sadly the tactics, signings, formations, substitutions, his  reading of the games are weighing just too heavy on the scales  of failure. Add the negative football that’s on offer where can he go from here? 

    The current set up from Rupp, Sparks, Gent and Hughes is failing hand over fist. The statement from  Rupp on Insta the other week just confirms  how out of touch he is with the mood at club. 

    Hughes has lost the fans and the players. His position is untenable as is Rupps, Sparks and Gent. 

    The club has to be sold  or Rupp has to change thie current football regime as it’s failing.

    Big decisions needed but given the past informs the present I have no faith in the current regime that things will improve. As a club we stuck in negative cycle of failure and I for one can’t see this changing anytime soon.

  10. I think the entire situation is really S**t tbh! I don’t for a second think anybody linked to the club is desperate for us to fail or even saw this start to the season coming, but something needs to change and fast!
    I agree with absolutely everything in the write up except the Smallwood comments. It’s beginning to turn into a bit of a witch hunt. If you go back and review the passage of play, Smallwood clears the ball (no different to clearances made by McDonald, Walker or Ridehalgh), he’s then was the only one who went to press the ball…from 20 yards away. The gent who assisted the goal came from Tulloch/Walkers space. He didn’t just stop as is becoming the narrative based on one situation earlier in the season.

  11. To be fair there wasn’t much difference between the first 20odd minutes at Tranmere to the same period at Newport. Had we been 2 up you couldn’t have argued. We were totally dominant, had hit the post and missed gilt edged chances. But we didn’t score and Lewis then threw one in. That changed the game completely.

    Lewis played well after that but it was an absolute howler, a game changer. As the bloke behind me said who never stopped swearing all game, you can’t blame Hughes for that.

    But like you say Jason, what happened second half? We got worse, we stopped playing in the way that had been effective. Instead of giving the ball to Macdonald to play make, we give it to Platt whose pass always puts Halliday or any other for that matter under pressure.

    I am at a loss. Tranmere were terrible and beat us.

    For what it’s worth unless we have a top L2 name lined up I wouldn’t change it. I don’t agree the signings have been poor, they are just not working- yet!. The ‘yet’ is the key – will it ever happen.

    • Finally Rob, someone else who sees Platt as a problem.
      He can’t pass accurately, carry the ball with any purpose and has no pace at all.
      Opponents let him have the ball as they know he will either give it back with a poor pass or he’ll put a team-mate in trouble so they will mess it up. He causes nervousness in team-mates and midfield need to take it off him even if it means they have to play deeper.
      Also, only Cook needs to be playing with his back to goal, everyone else should be looking to go forward. It will mean they don’t go backwards with passes but will actually play forward, which will get the supporters onboard.
      A few tweaks are all that is needed.
      Most of all, the team need to be more confident in their own ability and show it. Then the fans will support the players even more.
      As others have said, will another manager get anything more out of the players?
      We have to bide our time and pray it will improve but the longer it goes in the same vein, the worse the reaction from the fans.

  12. Wasn’t at the game but it’s all so dispiriting at the moment as it has been over many years on and off. Maybe a change of manager would help , then maybe not. I’m of an opinion that Mark Hughes appointment turned the club around and i would give him more time , whilst the fare we’re been offered is poor we are only 6pts off 6th placed Swindon !
    I don’t agree with the boos etc but understand it. The team and manager need our support in difficult times .

  13. Not advocating for Hughes to leave, but, if he does, who does anyone fancy to take over ?

  14. You sack someone if you have someone you better lined up. Does Sparks have someone better lined up, highly unlikely.

    The correct play here, is for Sparks to come out and state Hughes aint going anywhere, relieving the pressure. His contract is up at the end of the season so it really doesn’t matter.

    Relieve the pressure, see if he can do it, if not he announces his intention to retire at the end of the season and we have 6 months to properly prepare for what comes next.

  15. I personally take no pleasure from Mark Hughes departure, even if now unavoidable. I just feel worried, disappointed, & very sad.

  16. It’s very easy in the heat of the moment to demand change, but are the calls for hughes out and Rupp out going to change anything in the short term.

    I’m not a hughes fan and believe he is very much on borrowed time, I do believe however if we are to make a change in management we have to act differently than we have done in the past. I would very much prefer to follow the Huddersfield route which is line someone up to replace the manager, rather than sacking and allowing your inbox to be flooded with job applications.

    The club needs direction and to do that City have to identify who they want in charge and the approach they want to take. Rewinding time when Mark Hughes showed an interest in taking over after Derek Adams i don’t think any CEO or chairman of a league 2 club at the time would have rejected him. At the time it sounded too good to be true and credit to Hughes i thought he would have left a long time ago and maybe that’s where loyalty needs to be repaid. I don’t think Ryan Sparks or Rupp should be blamed for things not working out, however very much feel whoever is in charge of recruitment and finalising signings needs to have a long think.

    I do feel Hughes will be in the dug out on Saturday and despite my feelings i will support him. What i would like to see between now and then is a statement from the board acknowledging the poor start to the season. I don’t want Hughes to be backed as we saw before with McCall, But rather for the board to come out and be honest, admit recruitment has been poor, address the concerns and try move forward and go out on Saturday and play like a team and not a bunch of individuals.

  17. It’s time Bradford city fans backed marked Hughes and stopped dissing him. The players should start playing the same sort of football they play in training instead of relaxing on match day. Enthusiasm for beer swigging fans on match day ,zilch.

    • I stopped going to Apperley Bridge because the training was a replication of match days. That’s the problem!

  18. Some of you say keep Hughes till the end of the season
    Well we at the moment are just above the trap door many more performances like the ones against grimsby, Harrogate,Walsall &Tranmere &we will be in serious trouble of falling out of this league
    I am not a Hughes fan his choice of playing style does not suit 4th division football neither does it suit the players he has Recruited
    Sparkes has to find a person who can make these players into a team & quickly
    I hope its not Trueman or Hodges he turns to as a stop gap
    Who is out there & available &wants the job ?

  19. What even was the rationale for changing to 3 at the back? Last year wasn’t without it’s problems but I don’t recall a flat back 4 being one of them? Changing the system was always going to be a gamble and it’s clearly backfired. Persevering with it has contributed to the poor start and it seems we’re back to square one……..yet again. Tinkering, changing shape and personnel at a time when we should have a settled side and system. That failure has to fall at the feet of MH. In his defence he has appeared to recognise his mistakes but at what cost? How long will it take to find a new system that suits the players available? January is a long way off and the size of the squad doesn’t suggest too much room for manoeuvre. I don’t necessarily doubt his belief he can turn it around but how long do you give him? He said there’s too much noise, everyone needs to calm down. He accepts boos when we lose but can’t accept too much noise when we’re sat in 18th!!! Again, maybe an explanation as to why the poor start, why the need to change shape, why the insistence on playing out from the back despite unsuccessful attempts to do the same last year! I’m all for playing attractive football but for 45 minutes last night Stubbs looked like Pirlo! Why wouldn’t you utilise that and mix it up a bit? I have no problem giving him more time but we need some big performances and soon.

    • I think, in fairness, had Hughes been sacked after the Walsall defeat, people would have said we were better last night and a bit unlucky not to come away with a point.  It’s hard to blame the manager for the first goal which is entirely Lewis’s fault. Sacking Hughes   and some of his staff is going to cost a fortune. I can quite see why Sparks will be reluctant to sack the fourth manager of his time in charge. Yet even if we win against Swindon and results pick up we pretty much know, don’t we, that this is not the manager to take us up. Do we let him see out his contract and save face (his and Sparks’s) or do we act decisively and try to save, instead, the season! There are lots of financial and other issues that fans are not privy to.  Who knows what will happen but what is certain is that it’s a proper mess at the moment. I’d love to know btw if there is a common theme to all the duff signings and which agents we favour. 

  20. Maybe Hughes is right, do we need to all just take a breather, calm down and be honest with ourselves and realise that it’s a long way until the end of the season?
    Are we too demanding as a fan? Are our expectations too high just because we have a big stadium and a great fan base? Are too many thinking that we should steamroll everyone in our way?

    The results and performances don’t lie either. There is a serious lack of confidence running through the squad. If they cannot believe that they will turn it round and do not believe in how Hughes is wanting them to play then there lies an even bigger problem. The car will not go anywhere with the wheels facing opposite directions to each other.

    Expectations of every fan regardless of what level of football is that the players give 100% every game, do thier level best to win and show some passion. Are we getting that from each player at the minute? Me thinks not. Is that down to the manager ? Is it the individual themselves? Or is it a culmination of a number of factors?

    I doubt the club can afford to swing the axe but cannot afford relegation either, so an improvement has to arrive soon otherwise VP will be even more of a ghost town and toxic melting pot. Time will tell if Hughes lasts, I’m hoping that he can turn things around however on present form it’s hard to see that being possible.

    If he does go, the question is who next? Who would want to come to us? Would anyone be able to get anything different out of the players we currently have?

    More questions than answers at the moment I think.

    • I am inclined to agree that there needs to be a bit less panic and a bit more calm. Frankly social media doesn’t help and almost provokes emotive reactions. However the best person to give people assurance to stop an outbreak of panic is the manager himself and for whatever reason he is failing.

      MH has obviously been under pressure but i have had the distinct impression that he is passing it on to his players. In the second half last week for example the team lost its composure and it felt like they were panicking with pressure on them from the bench as well as the stands.

      Frankly it’s not much different to previous occasions and Parkinson aside I can’t think of a manager at VP in the modern era that has weathered a prolonged storm and restored calm once confidence deteriorates. I’m not convinced that MH is helping himself but i agree with CS there is a culmination of a few factors in all of this and it’s not necessary the recipe for success with the next manager or the one after that.