The January window closes with Bradford City adjusting to new realities

Written by Jason McKeown (images John Dewhirst)

And I guess that’s why they call it the (January) blues. After such a wonderful first half to Bradford City’s season, the opening month of 2026 was full of challenge, heartache and transfer disruption.

Multiple defeats, farewells to popular promotion heroes, and some apparent difficulties in upgrading the squad combined to cause some Bantam January Blues. It certainly hasn’t all been bad, but it was bumpy. And though we don’t know what it will ultimately mean for City’s 2025/26 destiny, January may well be looked back on as season-defining.

It’s worth reminding ourselves of the outlook for City as we rang in the New Year. The Bantams sat third in League One on 43 points, having lost only three times all season and having just chalked up five league wins in six matches. They were one point behind second-placed Lincoln with a game in hand, while leaders Cardiff were only four points ahead.

Now the complexion is very different. City’s points total has only marginally increased to 49, having won two and lost four of their January fixtures. They’ve slipped to fifth. The gap to Lincoln has stretched to nine points (still with a game in hand), while Cardiff are now 11 clear. Automatic promotion hopes are not dead, but expectations have undeniably shifted.

Meanwhile, eight players have departed and seven new faces have arrived. It’s been an exhausting month of rumours, and it seems clear that not everything went to plan recruitment-wise. So how do we make sense of such a tricky period, and what does it tell us about the rest of the season?

The floor was too low – so Alexander made tough choices

New Year’s Day brought the first of the January’s below-par performances. A chastening 3-0 defeat away at Mansfield. Beyond the scoreline, the deeper significance lay in what the match said about the strength – or lack of depth – in City’s squad.

At the turn of the year last season, Graham Alexander implemented a highly effective rotation policy that helped propel the Bantams up the table. For the most part of this season, however, he’s largely moved from rotation. But with the festive fixtures piling up, at Mansfield he brought in some of his squad players – and it didn’t go well.

That game proved to be the final appearance in City colours for Neill Byrne and Brad Halliday. It also felt like another nail in the coffin for Calum Kavanagh’s Bantams career. Meanwhile, Alex Pattison, Andy Cook, Lewis Richards and Tommy Leigh were not even considered for the bench – a recurring theme. As City licked their wounds, the Mansfield defeat perhaps provided the clearest illustration yet that the squad needed improving.

Rotation only works when the gap between your strongest players (the ceiling) and your weakest (the floor) is relatively small. Mansfield exposed a growing chasm. This was not really the fault of any individual squad player; rather, it reflected how City’s remarkable progress in the first half of the season had raised standards beyond many of them. This was no longer a side hoping to avoid the bottom half of League One, as many expected last summer. It was a team with credible Championship ambitions – and one that required greater depth to sustain them.

So exits that had already begun to feel inevitable were likely sealed. As fans, it hasn’t been easy to see Cook, Pattison and Halliday leave. They are loved for what they gave to the club, and they can hardly be accused of failing. They were simply overtaken by a rising bar.

Others have departed without the same affection but still deserve recognition for their contribution. This time last year, Lewis Richards was a leading contender for City’s player of the season. Injury – and then another setback on his comeback – curtailed his 2024/25 campaign. Although Richards was offered a new deal in the summer, something clearly wasn’t quite right between player and manager, and he has now moved to Crawley. If he can rediscover form and fitness, he could yet become one of the best wing backs in League Two.

Later this month, Richards may well line up against Kavanagh when Crawley visit Oldham. Kavanagh joins the Latics after two seasons that promised much at Valley Parade. His effort was never in doubt, even if he sometimes lacked technical sharpness.

After Cook’s ACL injury last year, Kavanagh stepped into the role of central forward and largely performed admirably. He was not always heavily involved in build-up play, but his off-the-ball running and relentless pressing brought real value. Injured at the start of this season, he has ultimately found himself behind Stephen Humphrys, Will Swan and now Paul Mullin in the pecking order. Oldham feels like a good move for him, and one in which he should thrive.

Tommy Leigh could make his Bristol Rovers debut on Tuesday alongside a former promotion-winning team-mate, Richie Smallwood, and against another Bantams midfielder who departed this January – Walsall’s Alex Pattison. Leigh has joined to the Gas on loan for the rest of the season. He remains contracted at Valley Parade until 2027 so we may not have seen the last of him in claret and amber.

It’s a curious fall from grace. Reinvented as a defensive midfielder, Leigh began the season as a regular and started nine of City’s first 11 league games of the season. Then he lost his place, making the starting line up on just two other occasions – the defeats to Burton and Lincoln where both times he was hauled off. Ultimately, the rise and rise of Jenson Metcalfe has left Leigh languishing on the sidelines.

Just one week ago Leigh was starting for the Bantams as part of a League One promotion battle. He swaps that for a League Two relegation dogfight at Bristol Rovers. It will be very interesting to see how he gets on under Steve Evans – and if there is any way back for him at City next season.

Remaining in League One is Byrne, who has joined Doncaster on loan for the rest of the season. He is a good example of a player suitable for a bottom-half League One side but not beyond that – making him a victim of City’s rising standards. He may not go down as a Bantams great, but he rarely let the team down. Useful, until he wasn’t.

All of this leaves just seven members of the 2024/25 promotion-winning squad still at the club. The pace of change has been remarkable. Players who might reasonably have expected to feature prominently this season have instead been moved on. City’s high ceiling forced a reassessment of expectations, and tough decisions were made to keep pace with the rising tide.

Unfortunately, that tide has shown signs of receding.

January results suggest City were overachieving

If the Mansfield humbling can be partially explained by mitigating factors, the same is harder to argue of January’s other three defeats.

In the space of 10 days, City faced league leaders Cardiff, sixth-placed Huddersfield and second-placed Lincoln – and lost all three. Over 270 minutes they scored once, conceded six, and registered just four shots on target. In successive games, they set new records for lowest xGs.

It was without question a tough run of games – and the opponents lived up to their billings. Cardiff were superb in the first half and defended excellently in the second. Huddersfield, rejuvenated by a change of manager, delivered a season-best performance that befitted their considerable resources. Lincoln’s demolition of the Bantams was also their high watermark performance of the season so far.

While the manner of the defeats to Huddersfield and Lincoln was worrying, losing all three matches was not unreasonable in isolation. But collectively, they amounted to a stark reality check.

For how good City have been, here was another level – one which, for now, appears out of reach. With Bolton and Stockport also overtaking the Bantams, the credible top two hopes of the start of January now seem extremely optimistic.

The good news is that City still hold a seven-point cushion inside the play-offs, and many of their toughest fixtures are now behind them. It is still a fabulous position, just not as wonderful as the one they began January in.

Window offers some evidence of City’s place in food chain

After the Huddersfield defeat, an angry Alexander spoke sarcastically about “robbing a bank” to find the £5 million he felt might be needed to revamp the squad. He also asked rhetorically, “Have you seen how much League Two strikers are going for?”

We don’t know exactly who he had in mind, but credible reports suggested City were close to signing Fleetwood forward Ryan Graydon, only to be beaten by Salford’s higher wage offer. A host of other names were linked with the Bantams throughout the month – some fanciful, others more plausible. It’s reasonable to assume City entered the window with a clear list of targets but failed to secure all their first choices.

The transfer window always attracts fierce supporter debates over ambition. Last summer, Stefan Rupp told BBC Radio Leeds, “I definitely have the money to take the club to the Championship”. And in November Ryan Sparks said to the BBC that financial fair play rules would not restrict Rupp from spending whatever he’d like.

Have City lived up to those words? Possibly not. But perhaps, given the emerging evidence of the gap to the league’s elite, restraint was the wiser option. Spending heavily may signal ambition, but spending wisely is what sustains progress.

Let’s go back to Graydon. If Salford did indeed gazump City, it may be because the Bantams had set a ceiling on what they were prepared to pay for a forward with a limited scoring record at this level. Overpaying for players isn’t clever ambition – Sunderland’s ill-fated pursuit of Will Grigg remains a cautionary tale in knowing when to walk away [i].

After being linked with several strikers, and amid reports of rejected bids, it is probably fair to suggest that Lee Evans, Paul Mullin and Kayden Jackson were not first-choice targets (or at least with Jackson, he may not have been on the radar initially, given he was regularly in the Derby 18-man squad until the start of January).

The fact City got some but not all of the targets they wanted may reflect a fiercer-than-expected market, and the reality that some of City’s rivals simply operate on a different financial scale. This weekend City face Luton and their new signing Devante Cole, amid suggestions of Bantams interest in a reunion. Yet despite Bradford sitting above Luton in the table, the Hatters remain leagues apart financially. Other side like Stockport, Huddersfield, Bolton and even Doncaster have made eye-catching signings.

Alternatively, City may simply be thinking longer-term. With automatic promotion probabilities falling, holding funds back for the summer – rather than gambling now and facing a potential financial hangover – may prove prudent.

There are reasons to stay optimistic

January certainly didn’t go completely wrong on the field. There was a very enjoyable victory over Blackpool, and the month ended with a hard-fought success over Doncaster.

Naturally, the jury is out on the new signings and whether they raise either the floor or the ceiling. But we’ve seen promising glimpses of what Harrison Ashby, Joe White, Louis Sibley, Jackson and Mullin can offer. Ethan Wheatley – finally in the building – clearly offers potential. Lee Evans was a much-loved loanee exactly 10 years ago and has gone onto have a very good career. It could prove a very clever signing.

Recruitment may not have been perfect, but the club avoided entering the dreaded Guthrie Zone.

The ground has undeniably shifted beneath City. January strongly suggests they are not, in fact, top-two material. But they remain firmly in the top-six conversation. With new faces bedding in and a kinder run of fixtures ahead, there is certainly no reason to write the season off.

The Bantams are just one point short of the 50-point mark that all but guarantees League One survival. While recent results have been uneven, their overall body of work remains deeply impressive. This season has already exceeded expectations, and whatever unfolds between now and May should be enjoyed.

In summary, City entered 2026 believing they could challenge for automatic promotion. Squad decisions were made to match that ambition. Subsequent results have suggested those sights may need lowering slightly – a reality perhaps reflected in the recruitment that was achieved. It may not scream top-two intent, but a fast-evolving City squad emerge from the window looking capable of sustaining a play-off push.

January delivered its share of reality checks. Yet the broader landscape remains one of genuine promise – especially now that the January blues can finally be shaken off.


[i] See Season 2 Episode 4 of Sunderland Til I Die – the foolhardy pursuit of Will Grigg and The smell of want.



Categories: Opinion

Tags:

13 replies

  1. I would say we’re stronger coming out of the window than we were going in and we’ve moved on some players that were not the future. That alone is a sign of progress, for years it’s felt like the only way a player goes is at contract expiry.

    I’m surprised GA let 2 CBs go without replacement, perhaps that means IB is now the left CB.

    ‘The Guthrie Zone’, very funny

  2. Alternatively, City may simply be thinking longer-term. With automatic promotion probabilities falling, holding funds back for the summer – rather than gambling now and facing a potential financial hangover – may prove prudent.

    This is it. The quality available over the summer isn’t there in January, which is known as a ‘repair window’. To start with ‘avoid relegation’ ambitions to revamping the squad to ‘chase automatic promotion’ isn’t really possible in January.

    The mgnmt simply did the best they could. Loans to chase promotion this season nonetheless, and hold off till the summer to really up the squad to fight for automatic promotion spots next summer.

    Meanwhile, if we have a good showing in the play-offs, it’ll convince the younger, better talent to come to us.

  3. Normally, I am a tad sceptical when a former favourite returns years later at the opposite end of his career but I am hopeful that Lee Evans will prove a good signing. He brings height to the midfield, a calm presence and good passing skills. I personally don’t think we were ever going to go up automatically, even without the January dip in form, but we remain a decent bet to make the playoffs if the new acquisitions can quickly settle in. I think Sibley might surprise a few people with his range of skills and versatility, based on what I’ve seen, read and been told. We now have no shortage of reliable penalty takers  in the squad, by the way, and three more serial promotion winners. If I have a worry it’s that we’ve let 2 centrebacks go.  It is a specialist position and we need four in any given squad based on the system we play. A couple of injuries or suspensions and we are struggling.

  4. as I said in November there were 7 players we needed to move on so good job done there

    sadly the incoming looks financially light weight and it’s play offs at best

    I still think we need Rupp gone if we are going to compete for the championship but at least we are back where we started and who knows, we may get lucky. We did last season!

  5. excellent point about spending heavily=ambition; spending wisely=progress

    I can understand the clamour for ambition but in truth it is gambling everything on red at roulette. Lincoln have made steady progress from the days of us feeling insulted that Paudie O’Connor chose them ahead of us and they reap the rewards of steady progress today.

    And if we did go up this May, would we have the money to compete and avoid doing a Burnley – a season of misery?

    I feel that we are stronger than we were and are building nicely. I thought Mullin was great on Saturday, a bit of nastiness and very pacey so I m much happier we got him rather than an experiment with a Fleetwood player who may be a star of future or a one season wonder (Vadaine Oliver?)

  6. Excellent and considered post. It may be against most supporters thoughts, but investing wisely for the future rather than blowing lots of cash on gambles in an inflated market in January despite our League position, seems prudent to me.

  7. I’d say overall we look better on paper now than we did going into January, we are certainly healthier up front in terms of numbers and options. I’m not saying Mullin is definitely better than Cook but we don’t know how Cook would’ve fared with regular games for us, whereas Mullin has scored 5 times this season in limited games at Wigan. Jackson should be an improvement on Kav, although that bar is quite low. Wheatley brings pace, height, energy and strength, you could see him being horrible for defenders to play against with 20-25 minutes left. We’ve got a mobile forward line, who are mostly versatile enough to play across all 3 positions and interchange with each other; aside from Mullin.

    With midfield, I think we will see Sibley play centrally if and when required, he’s played in several positions across his career and even as a CDM. So with Power, Metcalfe, Evans and Sibley, we’ve got a good 4 central midfielders.

    In defence, I think with the fact Touray can play at LCB, and arguably, we’ve looked better with him there and Wright at LWB, we should have enough at CB (you could argue we’ve got 2 for every CB spot (CK & IT = LCB, CT & JW = CB and MP & AB = RCB (although Baldwin does look better in the centre at times, I don’t think Wright can play on the right of the back 3). We will need some fortune with injuries, as all teams do, I think we struggle to get the ball from defence to attack when we don’t have Baldwin or Pennington in defence.

    If we could get McIntyre back on a free I’d certainly take him but given he barely played, I think he’d rather get a move to a club where he can play week in week out.

  8. Thanks for this- as ever in agreement with the analysis.

    I was struck by the scale in of change- think we were at the top of end of ins/outs in the window?

    I have also liked what I’ve seen of all the pre final day new recruits at various points, albeit apprehensive when looking at their records. As is the nature of these things, a few punts on fit in team, coaching, stepping up. A case of trusting a proven management team’s judgement for me, right now.

  9. Not a bad January window. I think Mullin, Jackson and Evans are experienced and should do well going forward. They certainly have the experience. Missing Sarc throughout this January has impacted us. We certainly have more variation up front and midfield. We have to consider the new incoming players haven’t had a lot of game time. They will hopefully contribute long term. Certainly, we have a great chance to fix our place in the playoffs. I feel some of the current top 4 have to experience tough times and there are lower teams that are stringing a lot wins and likely to chanlenge for a top 6 place. Everything is still open. Last season Walsall were streets ahead at the top of league 2, until they lost consequtive matches and finished outside the playoffs. There is still hope for the Bantams.

  10. A poor window where City showed a complete lack of ambition in not signing a player for a transfer fee. Whilst selling a number of squad players for nominal fees. I’m sorry to say that City have one of the top three crowds in the division and a matchday turnovers which other teams will in envious of. The league next season will be harder again and I hope everyone involved with City do not rue the day that they did not go the extra mile to guarantee a playoff place.

    • Who did you think they needed to get that was available and how much do you think the investment needed was?

    • Absolutely ridiculous comment. We can’t compete financially with a lot of teams. Our business has to be more shrewd than that.

      Just zoom out a little and take in the context. We are 7 points safe inside the play offs with a real chance of a play off push. We had a fantastic start to the season and have rode the wave of positive momentum. We were going to hit bumps which we have and we have had to regroup and stregnthen which we have done.

      So calm ya boots, get behind the team and lets see what the rest of the season brings.

    • in life you have to take advantage of any opportunity that comes your way whilst it is offered and compete with your competitors. If you are old enough to remember other City teams where we had the chance to go to Division 1 with Dolan you would understand my concerns. If not understand that if we cannot compete with teams like Lincoln who get smaller crowds and incomes why can’t we…..the only solution then is to put season tickets up next year then because we will need better players next year in Division 1 when Sheffield Weds come down.