Football club finally appoints football manager as Graham Alexander unveiled as new Bradford City boss

Image by Thomas Gadd (thomasgadd.co.uk) – copyright Bradford City

By Jason McKeown

33 days on from sacking Mark Hughes, today Bradford City have finally announced the Welshman’s successor – with Graham Alexander appointed the new Bantams manager. Chris Lucketti joins him as City’s new assistant manager.

The 52-year-old Alexander joins City on a two-and-a-half-year deal, having been sacked by MK Dons just 21 days ago himself. Alexander lasted only 16 games in the Dons’ dugout before being given the boot. On his Valley Parade unveiling Alexander said, “I am very excited about the role, the potential of the team and the club. Joining a club, you have to look at the short-term improvements you can make, but also look at the potential of what you can do. Here, for me, that scope is endless.”

City have turned to Alexander to be the next permanent manager after offering the position to Danny Cowley last week. Terms were said to have been agreed, before Cowley performed a U-turn and rejected the role. He is said to live in the Lincolnshire area. And with Grimsby and Lincoln City both in the hunt for a new manager, staying more local for family reasons probably holds greater appeal. Smart money would be on Cowley taking one of these two jobs, with Grimsby reportedly frontrunners.

The Grimsby and Lincoln positions only became available in the last three weeks, so if Cowley did initially apply for and want the Bradford City job, the slowness of the Bantams in making an appointment probably cost them their number one choice.

So instead Alexander takes the reins. It is not an appointment to set pulses racing, but he does have a track record that suggests he could prove successful. And given Alexander takes over from Mark Trueman, who took over from Kevin McDonald, who took over from Hughes, some greater stability in the dugout can only be a good thing.

Who is Graham Alexander?

As a player, Alexander was one of the great lower league stalwarts. He is only the second outfield player in English football history to have made 1,000 professional appearances. Only Peter Shilton and Tony Ford have played more English league matches.

Alexander emerged through the Scunthorpe ranks and made his debut in 1988. He stayed for seven years at Glanford Park, before a four-year spell at Luton. This was followed by eight years at Preston – the club he is best known for playing for – and four seasons at Burnley, which included helping the Clarets win promotion to the Premier League. Alexander finished his career at his beloved Preston. To North End fans, he holds a similar level of reverence as Gary Jones does to Bradford City supporters.

Alexander was originally a right back, but managed to successfully rejuvenate his career after then-Burnley manager Owen Coyle converted him to defensive midfielder. It is said by Burnley fans that this positional decision was the turning point that inspired their promotion that season, with a then-37-year-old Alexander going on to become the fourth oldest goalscorer in Premier League history the year after.

That was when he scored a penalty. And it’s something Alexander is especially famous for. He netted 78 penalties across his 17-year career in all competitions, with 65 of those coming in league competitions.

If we don’t include a short spell in caretaker charge of Preston, Alexander’s first managerial position was at Fleetwood Town. He was appointed at Highbury in December 2012 – just days before City defeated Arsenal in the League Cup – as the ambitious Seaside club sought to push on during their first year in the Football League.

In his first full season as manager, Alexander guided Fleetwood to promotion, via a Wembley play off final victory over Burton Albion. He later revealed, “We edged a tight final 1-0, and at the end of the game I recalled something David Moyes had said to me: ‘If you don’t win in your first job, you might not get a second.’ So my first thought at full-time was: ‘Now I might get another job at some point!'”

Alexander was sacked by Fleetwood in September 2015 after a poor start to the season (two wins from first 10 league games). The season before – Fleetwood’s first ever campaign at League One level – Alexander had guided the Cod Army to a respectable 10th-place finish, just six points shy of the play offs. He took the dismissal hard, reflecting after, “It was a really hard time, and I think I slept for a week. There was a bit of me moping, but I think I was also just knackered.

“I was an absolute slob for a week, but that didn’t sit right with me and by the end of that week I was ready to crack on. I had some really good phonecalls from people within the game, too. Sean Dyche rang me, because it had happened to him at Watford. He told me exactly what I needed to hear.”

Alexander’s next managerial stint came at a club he was familiar with – Scunthorpe, where his playing career had started. He came in at the end of the 2015/16 season and started to build some momentum, which they took into the next year. In 2016/17 (the year Edin Rahic and Stefan Rupp first took charge at Valley Parade and Stuart McCall returned as City boss), Scunthorpe led the table for a large part of the season. They ultimately finished in the play offs, losing to a Millwall side in the semi finals who would of course go onto beat City in the final.

A year later, Scunthorpe were once again in play off contention. Standing fifth with seven games to go. That’s when Alexander was surprisingly sacked. Scunthorpe did finish in the play offs (losing again), but began to collapse. There are clear similarities between the controversial decision of City to sack McCall in 2017/18 and Scunthorpe giving Alexander the boot a few weeks later. Neither club would touch the heights of League One play off positions after. Indeed a year after Scunthorpe dismissed Alexander, they were relegated to League Two, along with the Bantams.

By this point, Alexander had another promotion on his CV. He took over Salford City, then in the National League, and guided them to promotion to the Football League, again through the play offs. With Salford’s high profile and heavy financial backing, it was the least that was expected. And when Salford finished 11th in their first season in the EFL (the 2019/20 season, which was curtailed early due to Covid) there was a feeling Alexander was underachieving with the resources he had.

Alexander was sacked five games into the following season, despite the fact Salford were unbeaten and fifth in the table. It was a decision Gary Neville has since admitted he got wrong, saying in 2022, “Graham Alexander should have never left this club last season. I should have never made that decision that I made.”

Next up for Alexander was claret and amber – but North of the border. He took charge at Scottish Premier League outfit Motherwell in January 2021, with the Steelmen in deep relegation trouble. Alexander kept them up, and in 2021/22 they had a very good first half to the season that saw them competing near the top. The second half of the season was less impressive, with Motherwell scraping Europa Conference League qualification. But when in July 2022 Alexander oversaw a qualifying round defeat to Sligo Rovers, he called a meeting with the board and an arrangement was made for him to leave.

Alexander later stated of where his time went wrong at Fir Park, “We got to January in fourth position in the table. It was a fantastic first year, just under a 50 per cent win ratio, but we lost Tony Watt to Dundee United, and Devante Cole in the previous summer. We had lost our two top strikers but made a decision, because part of the club philosophy is to bring players through, to not spend that money on readymade players to come in…There were things going on I’m not happy with, I’m sure the supporters weren’t happy with, and we came to the conclusion it was the best time for me to go.”

Alexander sat out the 2022/23 season, but this summer was appointed MK Dons boss. Having just been relegated from League One, the Dons were tipped for promotion and it began well enough with four wins from the first five games leading to Alexander picking up August’s manager of the month award. But it fell away from there, and they went eight games without a win before Alexander was sacked.

Part of the challenge Alexander faced was style of play, with MK Dons trying to build themselves as a club who play attractive passing football. When they started the season well, they were averaging just 44% possession. But Alexander was put under pressure to play a more expansive, attractive way.

Just five days before he was sacked, Alexander spoke about this conflict of substance vs style. “When I first started managing, there was no talk of ‘style of play’ or anything like that,” he stated. “When I went to Fleetwood, their aim was win promotion, that was it. There was never mention of a style. In fact, no-one has said that until I came to this club [MK Dons]. I was told we need to win, but we have a certain identity.”

On the drop off in form, Alexander continued, “Our possession stats, control of games, our ball retention, our pass accuracy has gone up, the number of shots and expected goals has gone up, expected goals against has dropped significantly. All those metrics have improved. The things that have gone down are shot accuracy and the results.

“Everyone wants a win, but at certain clubs, you have to win a certain way. And if you look at the stats from the last month, you’d think we were a certain type of team who plays a certain type of way.”

It seems that Alexander’s initial success and sudden demise at MK was partly due to being put under pressure to play a different way. But when results fell away, there was no patience for him in trying to play a more possession-based style demanded. The fact that MK Dons went straight out and hired Mike Williamson says much about their pursuit of footballing excellence.

The irony for Alexander is that – in Bradford City – he takes over from a manager in Hughes who stuck too closely to a principle of playing passing football, which supporters grew frustrated with. Alexander is more direct, more pragmatic. And he might just find that his new public are more willing to embrace it than the MK Dons audience was. You can see a good fit here.

That said, there’s no question Alexander’s managerial record is mixed. Promotions at Fleetwood and Salford, play off and European qualification at Scunthorpe and Motherwell, but a consistent pattern of a slump in results causing clubs to act.

Two wins in his last 10 at Fleetwood. One win in his final 13 at Scunthorpe. Four wins in 23 ended his tenure at Motherwell. Eight games without a win at MK Dons got him the sack. Even at Salford where he was treated harshly, Alexander’s first nine games of that season had yielded only three wins.

Alexander has an overall managerial win rate of 42.8%, but also has a losing record of one in three games. There’s reasons to believe he could be a decent appointment for City, but plenty of evidence to suggest he could fail.

What are the expectations for Alexander?

It has to be to push for promotion. This season.

After the recent loss at Sutton, City are slumped in 16th place but are still only six points off the play offs. There are still 30 games to play this season, and if Alexander can quickly get up and running City could quickly catch up the early pace-setters.

That said, recent League Two history is against Alexander and City in that regard. WOAP reader Jon Wolfe recently put forward a stat that – over the past 10 years – no club that has been promoted out of League Two sacked their manager mid-season. Jon followed this up with an illuminating piece two weeks ago which found that – since 2004 – only six clubs have been promoted from League Two after changing managers mid-season.

WOAP’s Alex Scott has built further on Jon’s work by analysing the impact of League Two clubs sacking managers mid-season when in the bottom half of the table (like City were where then sacked Hughes). Since 2013, there have been 100 sackings from clubs in these circumstances – and just one team (Tranmere Rovers in 2020/21) went on to even reach the play offs (Keith Hill took over a Rovers side 18th and weirdly was sacked just before Rovers’ play off semi final).

Whilst most bottom half League Two teams improved from the point of sacking their manager mid-season, less than 10% improved by five or more league positions. Just eight managed to finish in the top half.

Hopefully, Alexander can confound those dire statistics by pushing City on for promotion. But if the Bantams do succeed from here, they’re truly going to be making history. The data is against them.

Sacking Hughes so early in the season can only be done to give City a chance of getting promoted. Right now, that still has to be the target. There’s too much football to play to write this off and start planning already for next season.

What does all this mean for those at the top of Bradford City?

There’s little doubt this has been a tough period for Stefan Rupp and Ryan Sparks, with serious questions posed about their ability to successfully run this football club.

This is the 10th permanent managerial appointment of Rupp’s seven-year tenure, and the fifth time Sparks has agreed a contract with a manager. You would think that some pretty big lessons have been learned from such turnover. Lessons that would put the club in a strong position to have handled this change of manager much better. Lessons that would have helped the club put a strategy in place well before Hughes was handed his P45.

Looking from the outside, that doesn’t appear to have been the case at all. We’ve already talked about the recruitment and communication failings in depth here. The club dug themselves into a hole, and with it Rupp and Sparks have damaged their reputation amongst supporters.

In such a sticky situation, especially when Cowley turned the job down, the choice of next Bradford City manager was not an easy one. In a field of uninspiring potential appointments, opting for Alexander is probably the safest route to have taken. It’s not especially risky. And with such a patchy track record of picking managers, this doesn’t seem like the time for the club to plump for a leftfield, audacious appointment.

Bringing in Alexander won’t inspire a resurgence of confidence in Rupp and Sparks from supporters. Indeed, it is difficult to argue right now that sacking Hughes to bring in Alexander will improve the club. But it does at least allow a line to be drawn over such a dismal saga. A decision has been made, and only time will tell if it is the right one.

What Rupp and Sparks especially need to focus on right now is doing everything they can to help Alexander succeed. There have been whisperings from other recently sacked City managers that they just don’t get the support from within the club when it really matters. That when the chips are down, they are left hung out to dry. Derek Adams – who has been able to revive his reputation this season with more heroics at Morecambe – has just spoken publicly for the first time about his time managing City, which doesn’t reflect well on the club.

Adams was speaking on the Pilgrims Podcast and says of City:

“It has the biggest supporter base in the league, it’s one of the smallest clubs inside in the league. It’s got no structure. No idea on its way out. Doesn’t own its own stadium. Doesn’t own its training ground. And has no foundation to it. I like many managers think I can go there and change it. I thought I could, I probably could have. The problem is, you’ve got to keep the supporters onside for long enough. I didn’t win enough home games, at the time we drew too many home games. I still think I’d have got them in the play offs that season, probably got them out. That’s me saying that.

“But what did I do wrong? I probably was too honest. I didn’t do what Bradford City’s Twitter account says every time they get beat ‘sorry supporters’. I didn’t say that enough.

“To be fair to the club’s CEO, Ryan Sparks, he has spent the club’s money getting new seats for the stadium. They’re doing that. They have to spend £500k on rent each year, just to start the season. They then have to do maintenance on the stadium as well. Not easy. But the best advice I could give to a Bradford City supporter is ‘support your manager through thick and thin, and eventually you might get through that’.

“But it’s not just the manager. The CEO, the board of directors. If you’ve got 20 managers over 20 years, your recruitment process or the people at the top – there’s got to be something wrong somewhere.”

Ouch.

The Bradford City managerial position has been labelled “the impossible job” by the excellent Mark Douglas recently. There’s certainly more than a ring of truth in that statement, and those who are running the club have a duty to give their choice of manager the best possible chance of succeeding. Rupp and Sparks’ reputations are now entwinned to Alexander’s. This is an appointment that will be retrospectively criticised if it doesn’t work out. The pair’s judgement and ability to choose a manager will be questioned even more heavily. They are running out of chances.

The mood amongst supporters is as low as it has been in years. Possibly since relegation from League One, five seasons ago. It comes after a period where interest and support for the club had enjoyed a strong resurgence, and where a sense of togetherness had remerged. Hughes paid the price for his role in the sudden demise, but others are clearly culpable too and must also share in the responsibility. In appointing Alexander, Rupp and Sparks have the chance to demonstrate their worth as much as the new man in the dugout.

Tensions are running high, with social media talk of protest and boycotts against Rupp. I shared my views on the ownership situation last month and nothing has changed for me. The problems are not chiefly a lack of investment or because the owner lives abroad. Ultimately, Bradford City continues to underachieve with the resources it has. The club has to perform better on and off the pitch, and address every area where they’re falling short. If there really is no room for mediocrity at this football club, the standards and culture have to improve.

For now, it’s hard not to sit here – feeling weary, jaded and cynical – and believe that in choosing Alexander we’ve implemented anything more strategically-minded than rolling the dice once again, hoping our luck turns. And maybe this time it will. But until this football club starts genuinely displaying joined up, long-term thinking and fixes its structural issues, the odds are that it will be reaching for the dice once again in the near future.  

Alexander is a competent football manager. To succeed, he needs a competent football club. After a worrying period where Bradford City have looked anything but proficient, it’s time for every single person at the club to prove they’re up to the task.  



Categories: Opinion

Tags:

35 replies

  1. Interesting that Alexander goes for substance over style in his comments. I think City fans in general would accept results over fancy football, but the results have to come. If they don’t I feel that patience is low with the club at the moment. He has to hit the ground running.

  2. Two weeks ago Jason you were in raptures about atmosphere, togetherness and enthusiasm of fans after the Wrexham match. Now you think we fans are lower than we have been for five years. That doesn’t augur well for staying calm and giving the new manager a bit of latitude to sort us out.

    • I also thought this was a strange thing to say after the euphoria of Wrexham. We still have those same players who gave such joy on that day and we/they know that they are able to provide that level of performance and maybe Alexander can produce it on a consistent basis.

      • maybe it was a demonstration of how spirit and endeavour can succeed, after the discontent despite a play off promotion possibility under Hughes?

  3. Wow. You turned that article round fast, within an hour of the breaking story…some inside track on the likely appointment, methinks?

    It think you capture the mood right. Reflecting on the mood on all the recent League 2 managerial appointments- McCall for the third time (probably the most mixed), Trueman & Sellars after their improbable run, Adams the L2 promotion specialist, Hughes, the extraordinary Premier League rabbit out the hat…this is likely to leave us as the last inspiring.

    But lets hope he confounds the gloom and does what he clearly has before, and takes us up. Whatever the feeling now, I plan to get behind him, and will him to succeed.

    • No inside track, just an educated guess. It can be a risky approach to start writing before an announcement. I have a draft saved somewhere all about Paul Hurst’s managerial career I was expecting to publish in December 2020!

    • it was been openly discussed elsewhere from about 9pm last night

      • yesterday afternoon it was abundantly clear and Sunday fairly settled too.

        I mean, can you imagine the likes of John Terry donning the City track suit and how that could have unfolded?

        Loads of wild speculation but probably 3 or 4 actual candidates.

        Cowley

        Alexander

        Plus a couple of others like David Artell or Wild?

        Gary Rowett could possibly get a tune out of the City squad but how many are willing to ply their trade 84 clubs down the pyramid?

        Not many.

        30 hours of interviews and 8 with GA.

        good luck to all concerned.

  4. I too feel jaded. I cannot get enthusiastic about this appointment despite wishing him the very best of luck. Instead, my overwhelming sentiment is to ask “is this the best we can do? Is this where we’ve come to as a club in terms of the quality of applicant?” I fear that, within a year or maybe even before this season’s end, we may be yet again hunting for a new manager. Oh, how desperate I am to be proved wrong.

    • my sentiments exactly!
      plus I think it’s time somehow we bought back the ground , I’m fed up of the situation being a serious constraint on progress, someone should start a go fund me page surely with all the businesses linked to the club and fans chipping in £50 x10000 = 500,000 could bring us somewhere near to buying back the ground

      • l think you are well off the mark if you think half a million pounds would be enough to buy the ground back! Firstly is it for sale? The rent package for the Flamingo Land Pension Fund, is a good source of income for the owners. Apparently they get around that figure each season. I anticipate they have minimal overheads in the arrangement. I guess others will have a far more accurate figure as to the market value of Valley Parade, but l would anticipate at least £5,000,000 would be needed, which if invested could provide the pension fund with a comparable income.

      • I did mean the fans contribution plus businesses, if we had ownership of the ground surely this would release funds for players etc

  5. The last three paragraphs really sum up my view on the appointment of Alexander and the current state of the club.

    I really hope GA is successful at BCFC but at the same time I think the club is ignoring the elephant in the room; namely the lack of structure and a clear, long-term plan.

    Until that’s addressed we’re doomed to make the same mistakes.

  6. I think it’s important to point out that Graham Alexander was in a job when the first applications/interviews potentially took place.

    I don’t think any of Sparks’ appointments have been bad ones. We can criticise the 5 week delay but we are all hypothesising about what we think has gone on. It seems we took too long but the end result is good – Alexander is a good fit, with a decent record, a better fit than Cowley I’d argue. None of the appointments have achieved their aim but that doesn’t make them bad initial appointments.

    We need to back him and we need the club to provide the support to him.

    I for one am feeling positive. Come on City!

  7. Yesterday, the Swindon Town owner, Clem Morfuni published a long reply to toxic speculation and remarks on social media following the Clubs 7-3 drubbing by non-league Aldershot. Unserstandably their fans were upset and a section of them took to social media to voice their concerns; some positibve, but the majority highly toxic and abusive. Morfuni refuted the accusations and rumour as nonsense and then re-iterated the clubs long term plan and gave a great update as to how the club were performing against that plan and putting the defeat into its proper perspective. It was clear, consistent with everything he had said before and very candid.

    Oh that City had such a plan (and dare I say it, such an Owner and CEO). Instead, we get virtual silence and then the ususal PR claptrap announcing the new manager (and for the record, I think this is an underwhelming appointment). I deduce that Sparkes and Rupp cannot quote a long term plan because one does not exist and until it does, we continue to play the management roulette wheel and hope the latest selection does the trick.

    A key part of a CEOs role is to lead and to do that , a CEO needs to set direction and publish a plan that all stakeholders can get behind and support (Fans, Players, Management , Sponsors etc.). Regular communication of how the plan is proceeding , good and bad,gets everybody bought in, even in the tough times. In the absence of a clear plan, we get what we have always got under Sparkes particularly (but Rupp must take his share of the blame); confusion, toxic speculation and impatience for a decent way forward.

    Good luck to Alexander and welcome, but lets not kid ourselves that this addresses the real issues facing this club.

  8. I am a little bit happy about GA, his record is far better than Bartons, Holdens and a few others who were mentioned. He doesn’t appear to have baggage like some of the others. I really wish him well and hope he is successful. I tend to agree with csmith, we need a plan for now and the future. What do we want and how to achieve it. It needs GA and RS and SR getting together and thrashing out a plan. Also we need to get away from this “big club” mentality. We are a 4th division club and that is that. I certainly didn’t walk into VP for the 1st time and think this club is a big club or a sleeping giant. We are what we are and we need to change it by rethinking the whole structure and philosophy of the club. Just need GA to be the man.

  9. I think Adams is spot on (except the bit about him probably getting us in the playoffs). The ground rent and the shitty training facilities are real problems, they are problems that predate Rupp and they are problems that will hold us back until something can be done about them.

    Alexander seems exactly like McCall, good when things are going well, zero plan B when things turn. It could be worse, could be better…

    • I think he’s better than McCall, as he has had some bad spells and turned them around. Interestingly, Stuart’s had just the one – at Scunthorpe and that fell away and he got sacked.

      I’m OK with Alexander. Let’s remember he’s still a youngish manager and every one of them gets sacked as some time, even Klopp.

      I much prefer him to the Cowley’s who I think are a bit of a busted flush.

    • What do you mean by shitty training facilities? We know that the club doesn’t own them and they are within the estate of a school but are led to believe they are very good for a 4th division club. Or do you know differently?

      • There is a lot of rubbish posted about the ‘shitty training facilities’ and the fact that we don’t own the ground. I would suggest that ten minutes spent on the internet.will reveal that lots of clubs including several.in the Premier League do.not own their stadiums. In addition the training facilities are the equal of many clubs maybe superior to some. Again the fact that we don’t own them.is irrelevant.

        in fact there are some advantages to not owning the ground or training facilities

      • Fair shout Mick, I don’t know how they compare with other Div 4 training facilities, perhaps they are up there but I doubt the players love sharing with school kids.

    • I would not be swallowing Adams comments so credulously. This is the man who thinks it’s a good idea to alienate an entire fan base (both us and Argyle) and whose media comments were so ridiculously one eyed to be laughable. We already know what financial constraints the club runs with but the back room staff is comparable with the rest of League Two and the commercial department bigger and better than most I would wager. The training facilities are much improved.
      Getting out of L2 does not require a bloated infrastructure or an over complex vision or strategy. Much less “fashionable” clubs achieve it season after season at our expense!

      • …and I am afraid much less”fashionable” clubs never go any further because they have no long term vision and plan. Brentford and Brighton are great examples of basement clubs who achieved their current status as a result of successfully developing and implementing a long term, sustainable plan.\\otherwise its all just “lets see what happens this week/month/year”

      • Brighton and Brentford would not have succeeded without significant investment from Bloom and Benson respectively. Both have exchanged debt for equity. Spending does not guarantee success but Brentford in particular would not have reached the heady heights without very significant deficit spending. That is not to say that they are not otherwise well run and we can see many clubs who have spent big and failed miserably. That investment did not just commence once they had reached the Championship if you look back
        I would be absolutely amazed in todays business world if City did not have short ,medium and long term objectives. It is a bit insulting to suggest that the club does not have those sort of fundamentals in place. That is not to say that the strategy is water tight or that it is being implemented effectively! Current results suggest that improvement is needed and I am sure Ryan is aware of this

      • Sorry postscript! If you are looking for a blueprint for success without the dosh Luton are the outliers. As far as i can see they have got to the promised land without any significant monetary investment in the team or infrastructure. So perhaps we should be looking at them for inspiration👍

      • Paul, we have no idea if the club has or hasn’t short, medium or long term objectives because they don’t communicate those objectives.

        RS publicly stated, before this season, that the dull possession football of last season wouldn’t rear it’s head this season, but within a few short weeks we were back to the frustrating approach play that ultimately contributed to MH getting the sack. So much for that objective!

        I suspect there is no long term plan because that would need Herr Rupp to be at the helm long-term. Why spend time on long term planning to achieve success when you don’t intend to be around to see it come to fruition.

        Yes, Brighton and Brentford have had significant investment but it was having a clear plan and a robust structure that has helped them achieve success and it has also meant they aren’t just one-season wonders in the PL.

        Whilst we may not have that kind of investment we can still study what they have done right and implement that to scale

  10. probably the best appointment we could make from the manager pool available right now.
    I liked Alexander as a player, a lot. Anyone who is so dedicated, so disciplined to get so much out of their aging body demonstrates a strength of mind that is extremely admirable.
    his managerial record is pretty good. Yes it fails off at all clubs but doesn’t everybody’s? Hence why they’re sacked. He was sacked with his clubs in fairly high positions almost every time.
    it’s a bit of a dice roll as is said but hopefully he can stamp his plan on the team very quickly. Given his experience at these levels you’d hope his blueprint is understandable and implementable to these players.

    any word on any fitness / sports science joining or just Graham and Chris?

  11. Graham Alexander has more than 1,500 games as player or manager behind him. This is a huge experience for a man who has only just turned fifty. He clearly knows his way around the game and must have good contacts. As far as I can see he has never taken a team down. He comes across as intelligent, articulate and determined. I can see how he would have appealed to an interview panel and it appears he actually delivered a presentation – Allardyce-style – rather than just answered questions. All in all, he has created a favourable impression.  Let’s hope he gets off to a good start and that the team’s efforts are not undermined by basic goalkeeping errors. 

  12. Lots of criticism about Rupp and Sparks and lots of speculation. Isn’t it about time that WOAP picked up the phone to get the club’s perspective and hear the other side of things – find out the facts maybe – from those in charge at VP. The lack of communication works both ways. Not surprisingly there is a siege mentality at Valley Parade. It’s not to condone the lack of comms from the club but it’s understandable how it has got to this state. With the appointment of GA the club needs a fresh start and WOAP can play its part by encouraging the dialogue instead of taking the potshots.

    • The same goes for the City Gent!

    • Hi John. not trying to get into tit for tat but the burden of responsibility for communications related to the club’s plan surely lies with the club doesn’t it? No disrespect to Jason and team but I don’t think that responsibility lies with a “hobby” online media outlet. The guys have “day jobs” and so this is done for the love of it. I don’t think the recent comments and challenges over ownership plans and track record can be accurately described as “pot shots” but rather objective statements bringing the topic into the discussion, based upon 7 years of decline / failure.
      I like the suggestion that perhaps the woap team could try to contact the club for another interview like the one done not that many years ago with sparks.
      perhaps Jason and team might reply and surprise us that they have made attempts to contact the club. I don’t know….

      finally I think most would agree that balance is key. We don’t all need to be wading in on the owners. But rupp and sparks record isn’t great when it’s boiled down. Hopefully all that is about to be turned around for the better

      • I completely agree with you that the club should manage its communications. By the same token no credible journalist will publish something without checking the facts and providing balance.

        I go back to my own time editing The City Gent in the late eighties and interviewing Stafford Heginbotham who was then chairman. I didn’t like the guy and I didn’t like the experience of interviewing him. However it felt the right thing to do before I sat at a typewriter and wrote words of criticism. Besides I invariably learned stuff and it made me realise that things are not always so black and white and that other perspectives exist. Words carry influence but they also come with responsibility whether it’s a hobby or an occupation.

        The comms are clearly broken and it needs a fresh approach for the good of BCAFC which is in all our interests. We all need the CEO of the club to succeed whether it is Ryan or anyone else. At the moment I don’t think Ryan is being given a fair trial and it can hardly be motivational for him to read a lot of the comments on social media. The fact that he recently received an email with an implied death threat would alter anyone’s outlook. On his part Julian Rhodes withdrew from a public front after similarly receiving threats and if that is a coping mechanism then so be it. What I am saying is that there is a need for a reset of communications and posturing over who is going to do it likely means it won’t happen.

        There is a desperate need for challenging journalism but where is it going to come from? I’d argue WOAP is actually best placed to provide the scrutiny but ultimately you won’t get it without picking up the phone or doing interviews to establish the other side of the story. Until you make contact you don’t get to know what you don’t know.

  13. Cowley has stated he never accepted the job and well said John Dewhirst

  14. I hope one of his first jobs is to negotiate a new contract for Bobby Pointon. Wonder if he knows that as well as the huge squad that shows up for training there is also 5 or 6 players out on loan.

  15. I know it’s an age thing, but what I’d give for a Roy McFarland, Trevor Cherry, or a Terry Dolan.

    Good luck to Graham Alexander, & the old Halifax Town centre back, Chris Lucketti nevertheless. They’ll certainly get my support.

    Up the Bantams!