A night of goals – and a workable-looking plan to take forwards – puts Bradford City in a better place

Bradford City 5
Platt 2, Cook 17, Smith 35, Richards 63, Oduor 66
Barnsley 1
Cotter 77

By Jason McKeown

Look away now if you’re Mark Hughes, but it seems Graham Alexander might have unlocked a way to get a tune out of these Bradford City players – and he’s succeeding through a return of a familiar idea.

3-5-2. Three. Five. Effing Two. That early season formation which caused so much anger, frustration and scorn. The tactical approach that Hughes was loudly ordered to move away from by an angry Valley Parade crowd. It’s back. It’s regenerated. And it’s….looking pretty good.

Here, in Bradford City’s final Football League Trophy group game, Alexander continued with Saturday’s Meadow Lane half time reshuffle formation, with further encouraging results. This was a scoreline and performance that requires plenty of asterisks – the visitors, Barnsley, were significantly under-strength, and neither team had a great deal to play for – but even allowing for the favourable circumstances, the Bantams greatly impressed.

Alexander has talked about giving every player he inherited a chance, and so logically you expected the new City boss to pick a more experimental line up here, with so little at stake. But instead, he went nearly full strength. This was a team that it doesn’t take a huge leap of imagination to picture starting against Accrington Stanley. More realistically, back up goalkeeper Colin Doyle will resume bench duties, Harry Chapman doesn’t look fully fit to start league games, Clarke Oduor has stiff competition and there are big question marks over Ash Taylor.

Still, the other seven starters here are likely to get the nod again on Saturday.

It meant that this was less of an evening trying out new things, more finessing and practicing an approach that is almost certain to be repeated on Saturday. That is 3-5-2, and a system that meets Alexander’s desires to play two up front – without leaving midfield exposed and too easily outgunned. RIP 4-4-2, and hello again 3-5-2.

Over the last one and a half games of playing this way, City have now scored seven goals and registered 30 attempts at goal. They began this night with the right intent, taking the lead after barely a minute when Chapman sent over a delightful cross from deep that Matty Platt headed home. This was Platt’s 66th appearance for the Bantams and – at last – he has a goal to his name.

It didn’t take long for the home side to double their lead with a goalscorer perhaps even more significant in the grand scheme of City’s prospects this season. Given Andy Cook’s fitness and form concerns, it seemed a strange decision to start him in this dead rubber. But it really did prove an inspired decision. Oduor found space and sent Cook away, and last season’s League Two golden boot winner finished well. This was Cook’s first goal from open play at Valley Parade all season. A big confidence boost for a player struggling mentally as much as physically.

Cook and fellow striker Tyler Smith showed more glimpses of forging an effective partnership, and the latter also got his name on the scoresheet before half time. Smith took advantage of a defensive slip and showed great skill to charge past his marker and finish emphatically from a tight angle.

This was by some distance the best performance I’ve seen so far from Smith. He showed a lot more energy and drive to run the channels. It was noticeable how often Alexander was yelling at Smith to “gamble” by making runs, as high balls were sent up to Cook to flick towards him. It seems the penny is starting to drop after a slow start to life at Valley Parade.

The goals continued to flow in the second half. First Cook was played through and saw his shot well saved, before Lewis Richards smashed home the rebound with a shot through a crowd of bodies. Perhaps the best goal of the night came after, when a lovely pass from Richie Smallwood found the rampaging Brad Halliday in space, and he crossed for Oduor to finish expertly.

City could have had more goals, but Barnsley did end the night’s scoring when Barry Cotter fired home a consolation after a mistake by Ciaran Kelly in the build-up. It was clearly a difficult night for the youthful Tykes, capped off by a red card for Jack Shepherd deep in injury time. The Barnsley manager Neill Collins cut a frustrated figure, and at half time he had a long conflab with his coaching staff in the dugout, before they eventually went to the dressing room to a speak to their players. Collins’ coaching team included former City hero Jon Stead.

As for City, there was much to like. The 3-5-2 suits their strengths, and though it does bare obvious similarities to Hughes’ original plan for this season, there are important differences too. Differences that suggest it could prove more effective.

The first is that City are a lot more forward-minded in their intent. There isn’t that same early season style of playing it around at the back – which drew so much ire under Hughes. When defenders receive the ball, their first thought is clearly to get it up the pitch as quickly as possible. That might mean a long ball to Cook, or a pass outwide to the wing backs.

And that quickly brings us onto difference number two – the attacking intent of those wing backs. Halliday had another terrific game to build on his excellent second half showing at Notts County. He really does enjoy driving forwards and even popped up in the middle of the attack at one point. Richards – who had a torrid time in the first half on Saturday when asked to be a conventual left back – also looks good as an attack-minded wing back.

Halliday and Richards can get forward so well because of the structure of the three in the middle of midfield, with Smallwood instructed to stay back and protect the back three. The skipper’s role is to break up the play. Stop opposition attacks, and then play the ball quickly to someone else. This is so much more playing to his strengths. Ahead of him, Oduor and Chapman could get forward too knowing there is Smallwood the anchor looking after the space behind them.

In contrast, Hughes’ 3-5-2 was paralysed by hesitancy and fear. The wing backs did not bomb forward enough. The midfield was too reserved. The central defenders too focused on keeping the ball rather than getting it forward. All of which left the strikers too isolated. Here, Cook and Smith had so many runners around them offering support. And that all helped to create lots of good interlinking moments.

The risks Alexander wants City to take off the ball are similar to what we saw with the 4-4-2. Alexander favours a zonal marking approach. Not just for set pieces, but during regular play. In the Barrow and Notts County games we saw the players struggle with this shift in defensive approach, with opposition players ploughing past static defenders and taking advantage of City trying to mark space instead of individual opponents. Again, the 3-5-2 seems to help with this idea – if this is how Alexander ultimately wants City to play. There is suddenly less space for the opposition to run into.

It all looks promising, and we can expect a similar set-up on Saturday. The only questions are whether Alexander will bring the struggling Sam Stubbs back into defence, and who from Oduor, Chapman, Jamie Walker, Alex Gilliead and Bobby Pointon will play as attacking midfielders. I’ll whisper it quietly, but Doyle was excellent here. Is it worth looking at a change in regular keeper if Harry Lewis’ struggles continue?

All in all, this was a surprisingly really good night for City. I know the bar is low, but it was one of the best games I’ve seen at Valley Parade all season. The feelgood mood on the night boosted by the long overdue return of Vadaine Oliver from injury.

It goes without saying that a full-strength Accrington side are going to pose a much bigger test to City on Saturday. But at least there is now a clear plan that the players are getting used to. With this emphatic victory, there’s a much-needed hint of momentum. Something to build on.

Rightly or wrongly, City spent much of the close season recruiting players for a 3-5-2 approach. The move away from this formation mid-September – when results weren’t great – was understandable. But the other approaches tried have only highlighted a lack of depth and quality in key areas. Namely, trying to operate with wide players when you haven’t properly recruited any – and have largely relied on last minute loan deals. In the immediate term of needing results quickly, going to 3-5-2 represents a better fit with the resources that Alexander has available.

It’s not quite a return to Plan A, but it might just be the best way to get City’s stuttering season up and running at last.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

13 replies

  1. 3-5-2 always had the potential to work. It was Hughes that was holding it back, along with any other formation you care to mention.

    I’m confident Graham Alexander will get this right in time. I didn’t share the same negativity as some on Saturday (although you can never be happy about losing 4-2). That second half was hugely positive and had the feel of a bit of a lightbulb moment, when GA worked out what makes these players tick. Let’s hope so.

    • The problem with Hughes version of this formation was it was essentially 5-3-2, not 3-5-2. That and his overly conservative mindset meant it was never going to work. Formations are important but there’s more to making them work than just laying bibs out on the pitch.

      • I would argue it was more 5-4-1 or even 5-2-3, at no point did I see Hughes play a system with two central strikers. I personally believe that was the reason the three at the back failed. The wide forwards in Hughes’ system denied the wing backs the space to bomb forward and thus we ended up essentially playing a flat back five.

  2. I’ll reserve my judgement on 3-5-2 until we see what happens on Saturday.

    Seriously, I was not impressed with how the EFL Trophy competition is administered. In fact, the EFL have a history of not ensuring the integrity of competitions including league play are not protected. Tonight was a prime example where Barnsley were allowed to field a team that included 16 changes. A couple of years ago, Scunthorpe were allowed to field a team of academy players for the last game of the season and if my memory is correct the result was a 7-0 drubbing allowing Bristol Rovers to gain promotion on goal difference.

    Another example where the EFL rules are loosely managed was when Bolton Wanderers were coming out of administration and allowed to start the season with a squad made up of primarily academy players. A blatant example, where the integrity of the competition (league play) was undermined.

    I love watching English Football and I appreciate that there is a world of difference between the Premier League and the EFL but I can’t help thinking some of the decision making is based on flying by the the seat of their pants. Ironically, just like City is administered.

    • We win 5-1 but you are ‘seriously unimpressed’ with the administering of the Bristol Street Motor’s cup clash between two teams already qualified for the next round.

      I’m sure if Jake Young was the EFL trophy administrator, all would be good.

      • Interesting you mention my long standing admiration for Jake Young. However, how it relates to my concerns regarding the EFL is a bit puzzling.

        I’m assuming you’re not an admirer of Jake Young. Just think of the money City are going to get when the cash inadvertently falls into Sparks inept lap.

  3. Hughes did have some success with 3 at the back early in the season. Including a good performance against Colchester, and a point away at the best side in the league Stockport. Jason raved following some of the pre season encounters that this was the way forward.

    So we shouldn’t get overly positive about 1 game but the biggest thing is no matter the opposition a side struggling with confidence got an emphatic win.

    After being on the front foot against Colchester early in the season we seemed to regress back to a low energy, defend first approach. Confidence after not getting over the line in a few games or tactics it didn’t work.

    We also started the season without Halliday at RWB – a lack of confidence in his offensive abilities have clearly been dispelled – and Lewis Richards so we didn’t have the wing backs to make it offensive. To the point above with Ridehalgh it could feel like a flat 5 at the back.

    There’s still definitely questions over the 3 centre halves to make it work (will we see an opportunity for Jon Tomkinson) and strength in depth at wing back (Gilliead appears our next best option). But with Big Vadaine Oliver back to compete up front, Young (and East?) to return in a month and Pattison/Chapman soon to return there should be a competent squad to work with – confidence is key and confidence is lacking.

  4. Slightly worried that we seem to be the only team focused on doing well in the Bristol Street Motors trophy but to see ‘Bradford City’ next to the number ‘5’, i’ll take it.

    I hope GA has had to time to come to the same conclusions about his new team as many of us have.

    1. Jamie Walker is the best footballer at the club – the team should be built around him.
    2. Andy Cook is slow and immobile – he can be a threat but needs to play alongside a fitter, quicker more mobile forward who can score goals.
    3. None of Wilson, Smith, Tulloch, Afoka fit that description – bad signings, all of them
    Jake Young might be and we should recall him but no guarantees (Eoin Doyle..) – the club may be the problem, not the player
    4. Ash Taylor is not good enough for this level. We should avoid playing him at all costs.
    5. Platt/Stubbs are good enough but alongside a quicker, more intelligent centre half (a Crichlow/Burke type) – not together – loan market in Jan?
    6. Pointon should play irrespective of formation – he’s too intelligent, too young and too lively to leave out
    7. Pattison/Smallwood/Gillead/Chapman all decent players at this level
    8. Full Backs/Wing Backs – personally have never had a problem with Halliday or Ridehalgh
    9. Lewis needs resting/dropping – we know there’s a v. good keeper there – we need to help him

    • I think you make a lot of very good points here, Ed

    • Plenty of optimsm which all sounds good after beating a team of kids. The truth is Hughes left us with a dire squad lacking pace, strength and guile.
      I think Alexander is a good coach but he will sure need to be to generate anything positive out of this season. Hopefully in January he is able to tweak the squad but i still believe he will need much more time than this season to get the squad in better shape.

  5. How about a ‘shout out’ for the precise, long-range pass from the much-maligned Taylor that put Smith in for his goal!

  6. ‘3-5-2. Three. Five. Effing Two. That early season formation which caused so much anger, frustration and scorn. The tactical approach that Hughes was loudly ordered to move away from by an angry Valley Parade crowd. It’s back. It’s regenerated. And it’s….looking pretty good.’

    Just wanted to echo this! Can you believe it. I don’t know whether to laugh or cry. What a club. Really hope it works this time.

  7. Wow we beat Barnsley’s reserves. Let’s see what Saturday brings?