Dismal home defeat underlines the limitations of Bradford City’s back to basics football

Bradford City 2
Ridehalgh 61, Addai (OG) 79
Crawley Town 4
Orsi 12, 90+7 (pen), Campbell 85, Lolos 90+10

By Jason McKeown

The problem with adopting a simplified approach is that you also make it easy for your opponents to thwart you. Graham Alexander had found commendable initial success from pressing the reset button on Bradford City. In taking them back to basics. But the competitive nature of football means opposition clubs will eventually work you out, and this chaotic defeat to Crawley was the clearest evidence yet that Alexander’s not-so-subtle plan has been rumbled.

From City’s best run of results in 29 years, the club has suddenly slumped to its joint longest winless run of the season. Promise has given way to frustration. The gap to the play off chasers had been clawed back of late, but now seems wider than ever. The club is back in the mud bath of mediocrity. The mid-table swamp it just cannot escape from.

They were objectively awful here. Humbled at home, after conceding three goals post the 84th minute. In a topsy-turvy game, victory had somewhat fortuitously fallen into their lap, and yet they managed to throw it away. The lowest point so far of the Alexander reign, at least since the last 4-2 Bantams’ defeat he oversaw.

City paid the price for starting awfully and ending shambolically. And what underpinned their failings was an opposition that was wise to City’s methods and primed to exploit their weaknesses. Five days short of his first anniversary in charge, Crawley head coach Scott Lindsey displayed a shrewd tactical approach and emphatically demonstrated he’d done his homework on his former team mate Alexander.

But City are not exactly hard to figure out these days. The 3-5-2 relies on direct punts forwards and overlapping full backs, with Richie Smallwood and Alex Gilliead providing cover for others to bomb forward in support of Andy Cook and Tyler Smith. Crawley identified and found gaps in-between Smallwood/Gilliead and the three centre backs who are not blessed with great pace to push out, with the impressive central midfield two of Adam Campbell and Liam Kelly able to initially dictate the game by operating inside this City chasm.

Lindsey’s 3-4-3 meant wide forwards Ronan Darcy and Jack Roles were able to push and stretch Brad Halliday and Liam Ridehalgh. And when the City wing backs went forward, Darcey and Roles were ready to run in behind, aided by linking up with their excellent wing backs – Nicholas Tsaroulla and Will Wright – who ably supported them. Crawley created effective overloads just inside the City half, often ending in effective through balls played for mint green shirts to run in behind the home side’s ponderous defence.

Crawley’s opening goal demonstrated all of this. Kelly had plenty of time with the ball as no City player engaged him, Tsaroulla ran behind Halliday and was picked out. He crossed for Danilo Orsi, who was somehow left unmarked in the centre of the goal to head Crawley in front.

A few stats for you before we continue. This was the 15th time in City’s 26 league matches, so far, that they have conceded the opening goal. And it’s the 10th time they have gone 1-0 down within the first 15 minutes. That particular trend has become worryingly more prevalent of late. Going back to the 4-1 MK Dons thumping in late October, in eight of City’s last 12 league games, they’ve gone a goal behind inside the opening quarter of an hour.

City are routinely starting matches badly, and this self-destructive habit is only getting worse.

Crawley were good value for their goal. They were well on top for 30 minutes, and if anything will be frustrated by their failure to make the most of several promising passing moves that saw them get into decent positions. A bit more quality and they could have extended their lead. When they didn’t have the ball, they sat back. They did as much as possible to slow the tempo, making sure that City struggled to mount any head of steam.

Towards half time it did get better and Smith and Clarke Oduor wasted presentable opportunities. It really wasn’t a good day for Smith, who aside from his one-on-one chance struggled to get into the game. In the first half he touched the ball just 13 times – by far the lowest out of all 22 players on the pitch. Service to the striker is important – and limited when City are so one-dimensional – but Smith also needs to do more to help his team by making better off the ball runs.

Smith was not the only player well below par. At times in the first half, it was difficult to understand what City’s plan actually was. The centre halves would boot the ball long down the pitch without seemingly giving any thought towards actually aiming for anyone. Oduor operated on the fringes and just couldn’t find space to make anything happen. And those Smallwood set pieces…grim. The half time whistle was not surprisingly met with Valley Parade boos.  

The green shoots of recovery seen just before the break did bloom in the second half. Aided no doubt by some strong half time words from Alexander, City re-emerged with much greater intensity and purpose. They played more on the front foot. Chasing, pressing and working much harder. The whole 10 outfield players seemed to be positioned a few more yards forward up the pitch. That did leave a big gap at the back that at one point Crawley threatened to take advantage of on the counter attack, but it was largely one way traffic. Cook, Oduor and Jon Tomkinson all came close.

No one exhibited the playing-higher-up-the-pitch more than Ridehalgh. The 32-year-old struggles to get up and down like Halliday, and so remained higher up the pitch to contribute more to City’s attacks. Remarkably, Ridehalgh got the equaliser – his first goal for the club, two-and-a-half years after joining – when his cross attempt looped over Corey Addai and dropped into the net. Ridehalgh’s embarrassed celebrations made it clear he hadn’t meant it, but no matter, City were level and in the ascendency.

Though the pressure was punctured by increasing time-wasting antics from a Crawley side who now seemed in full on retreat, the huffing and puffing paid off. Substitute Vadaine Oliver latched onto Dion Conroy taking a poor touch with the ball in his own box, and was tripped by the Crawley defender for a clear penalty.

Cook stepped up, saw his spot kick expertly saved by Addai, but as the loose ball rolled along the goal, and as City’s top scorer charged in to score the rebound, the panicked Crawley keeper inadvertently nudged the ball into his own net.

City inexplicably stopped playing from the moment they went in front. It was as though they thought the job was done. That they hadn’t looked at the Valley Parade clock that showed there was still plenty of time left. They sat back, defended deep, and invited Crawley to end the game as they had started it – on the front foot.

With five minutes to play, Campbell bundled home the equaliser after Wright got in behind Ridehalgh and sent in a low cross that Matty Platt could not clear. And worse was to come in the lengthy injury time that was largely the result of Crawley’s time-wasting. Another Crawley overload saw Tsaroulla get in and he was tripped by Halliday for a clear penalty. Orsi made no mistake for his second, and Valley Parade began to empty.

Those who stayed on were ‘rewarded’ with a Crawley fourth three minutes later, when on the counter attack the ball was worked by Liam Kelly to Klaidi Lolos, who fired home with the aid of a Ciaran Kelly deflection. From 2-1 up with five minutes of normal time to play, to an embarrassing 4-2 home defeat.

City remain stuck in the bottom half of the table. Some distance off the play off spots. Pretty much where they were when they sacked Mark Hughes almost exactly three months ago. Pretty much where they were when Alexander was first appointed. Whatever City have tried so far this season, the trajectory has remained the same.

But watching this muddled, messy and miserable defeat, it was evident that much has changed. Alexander’s long ball style is a world away from the idealism of Hughes. Despite the loud concerns that many of us raised about flip-flopping in style when changing managers, the club has fallen into that trap again. Hughes’ focus on playing attractive football might have ultimately failed, but this pragmatic style is difficult to watch. As Derek Adams, Gary Bowyer and Peter Taylor can attest, you can only be popular playing this way if you’re winning games.

And it’s more stark than just the style of football. Hughes downfall was ultimately his doomed attempts to get City to control games of football by dominating possession, when his players just didn’t know how to handle actually being in control. Alexander is the opposite – he doesn’t seem to want his players to control the game. The direct style means accepting possession will often be lost as quickly as it was won in the first place.

But the problem with never being in control is you don’t get to force your will enough on the outcomes of matches. When City got in front, they had no game management to see it out. When they were pegged back late on and eventually fell behind, they had limited means to wrestle back the game. Crawley took control of the tempo. They could find the gaps and they could park the bus and they could time waste and they could do everything legally possible to neuter City’s one-dimensional approach. I hate to use the cliché of No Plan B but there really isn’t one here, beyond going big man-big man and becoming even more direct.

The big question now is – what next? And here, the answers right now seem depressing.

Alexander has so far showed he only trusts in a small inner circle of players. Since the 1-0 victory over Accrington in November, eight of the starting XI have started the last 10 Bradford City games – Harry Lewis, Halliday, Platt, Kelly, Smallwood, Gilliead, Cook and Smith. The other three positions in the team have only seen change along the way because of injury (Lewis Richards and Jamie Walker) or suspension (Ash Taylor). That has seen Ridehalgh, Oduor and Tomkinson brought into the circle – making a total of 14 trusted players.

Everyone else is largely frozen out.

In the 90th minute here Matty Derbyshire was summoned from the bench and ended up playing just behind the front two of Cook and Oliver. He was almost operating as a number 10, when on the bench sat more obvious number 10s Harry Chapman and Bobby Pointon. This development does not say much about their prospects under Alexander. They’re in good company.

It’s well-known Alexander doesn’t like the size of the squad – one that, let’s not forget, was recruited for a completely different style of play. He wants to trim it. And the fact he only really trusts 14 players to start means a lot of overlooked players must be happy to head through the exit door. The question is – can Alexander move on enough of them, so he can bring in players that he does have confidence in, to bolster the 14?

And that leaves us onto Jake Young. Few people will have fallen off their chairs in shock when at 2pm it was announced Young was not in the City matchday squad. For all the bold talk that Young has been recalled from his successful loan at Swindon to play a part at City, the suggestion he is injured isn’t convincing anyone. Any minute of action in claret and amber for Young means he can’t be sold. And so not including him in the squad – with Alexander later claiming he got injured five minutes into training – seemingly makes City’s intentions clear.   

Credible sources have suggested to WOAP that there are no deals done. That Alexander does genuinely want to keep Young and play him. But it doesn’t look good does it? And the way the club and local media raised expectations earlier this week – only for ‘injury’ to flare up – is only serving to further alienate fans. A club that has an increasingly terrible record of communicating to its supporters is once again failing. Questions about ambition are returning and the answers don’t seem too encouraging.

If Young is to leave, it’s better it happens sooner rather than later so Alexander can be given funds to strengthen. He clearly needs it. Because whether this bulky squad is truly good enough to do better than be languishing in 14th in League Two, the manager clearly doesn’t have faith in more than half of them to do so.

As results drift, the team cannot remain unchanged each week. Alexander cannot keep playing the same, increasingly predictable way. He did so well to press reset on City’s season, and build something positive from the mess he walked into, but now he needs to show he can take it further than this simple but ultimately limited approach.



Categories: Match Reviews, Uncategorized

Tags: , , ,

53 replies

  1. Sorry Jason you have completely lost me. Young pulled out of training after five minutes of a the first small sided game. GA made that absolutely clear post match. That would suggest to me that the player wants away irrespective of what the club wants. How much more information do we need from the Club FFS!
    As for the performance. Insipid in the first half but half decent in the second and deserving of the lead after a spirited comeback. All of course spoiled by shooting themselves in the foot in the last knockings. Not great but not “objectively” awful.

    • Not sure why you were getting downvoted for the Young comment – Wells and Wyke both went down injured in the first halves of their final games for us didn’t they?
      Seems to be a recurring theme with our forwards who know they’ve attracted attention from higher up.

      • Why do people say that Young doesn’t want to play for City how does anybody know that outside the club? It is more likely that Sparks is edging his bets and looking to sell him. This obviously upsets Young himself. This option can be verified when GA said in midweek that he was not looking to sell him but play him. As bringing Young back is like having a new player and he would not be looking to sell one of the top leagues scorers. Over the last couple of days the club have done a complete 360 degree turn on this. If the club do sell their only sellable asset what does this say for the ambition of the club? Personally I would keep Young for the rest of the season and hopefully he scores the goals for City to climb the table for a playoff push. Therefore increasing his value as we go. I fear that history will repeat itself and he will be sold for less than his value for an undisclosed fee and the money will just evaporate and not be used for team strengthening. If this is the case Sparks is playing a dangerous game as the season will mean we are mid table and the season ticket sales will fall next year. We shall wait for Sparks propaganda to start. Hope I’m wrong.

    • Players pulling out injured to facilitate a transfer is a ploy often orchestrated together by both player and club. What is does is alienate the player from the fan-base. So when he’s sold there’s no ill-feeling toward the club, and the player doesn’t really care as he’s got his move.

  2. This is all so typical of city.

    The predictable pant wetting over reaction because we beat a couple of under 21 teams and some of the poorest teams I’ve seen is comical.

    We’re awful. Genuinely awful.

    “Paddy” on here argued with me just 2 weeks ago that the biggest problem we have is fitting all the quality we have in the team!!! I laughed hard then. I laugh harder now. Paddy, have you woken up yet ?

    “Mega Ellis” , obviously as fan as long as my 40 seasons scorned my scepticism. Told me how the 20-1 for automatic promotion was good value. Jesus wept.

    When will people realise how deep rooted our problems are. Certainly not solved by a few wins.

    Today says so much about our club. Out witted by a club with a fraction of our resources or potential. Our first goals in 3 games were a miss hit cross and an own goal after a missed penalty. A player returning from a loan feigning injury to see if he can secure a move away. Abysmal tactics and borderline comical substitutions or bring Derbyshire on the not introduce Chapman or Pointon at all. Awful management.

    But do not worry everyone. Paddy and Mega Ellis think we’re Brazil because we beat a couple of under 21 teams.

    I hope a few on here cringe at the utter utter rubbish they type on here.

  3. Shambles on the pitch, shambles off the pitch. Players, management, board all seem to be operating with their heads firmly in the sand. Why address the problems when you can sidestep them or even better deny they exist at all. The problems are endemic. The lack of quality, bad decision making and weak leadership run the through the club like a stick of Blackpool rock. Enough said.

    • This article is spot on and so is mr Richard holden
      This team at the moment are not playing with any passion or footballing thoughts
      By selling young and pointon to fill the chairmans pockets will not only get the loyal fans up against the club
      But kill what chance we have left this year of getting into the play offs
      This is Docherty football all over again

  4. Seeing the unchanged lineup after the last match was a shocker. That we were so bad, was unfortunately not a shocker.

    Their first goal was so nice, a through ball, a cross, a goal. Why can’t we have nice things…

    • You’ve changed your tune. A week ago you were shouting me down and telling us all how we were cracking value for automatic promotion and how wonderful things were.

      I’ve been going 40 long seasons. I guess by your user name you have too. I genuinely don’t understand how or why people are still so gullible to wet their pants just because we beat a couple of poor teams and a couple of teams of kids. We are a mess. Top to bottom. A circus run by clowns.

      We’ve had 7 seasons of decline. We have clueless people in key positions.

      Today sums the club up. A complete joke.

      • It’s true I am not the real Mark Ellis and also true that I enjoyed watching him as a kid.

        I think you may have me confused with someone else, as much as it was nice to see us win some games on the bounce, I certainly wasn’t putting any of my hard earned on the autos…

        This message board would be pointless without different opinions, I welcome them all and enjoy reading them all, enjoy your evening Ricky lad.

  5. It is awful to lose 3-0 in the last 15 mins, which included added on time. We sat bsck. Why ? Win 3-1 or at least 2-1. But to lose 4-2 ? Utterly ridiculous, shambolic and hopeless. To Crawley. Not Stockport. Not Mansfield. Not Wrexham.
    That was a terrible end. Just like Carlisle away in the play offs !
    Today was 6 years exactly since Yeovil away in the FAC 3rd round, the last time.we made it that far, when we were still 4th in League One with a League One Play off final 8 months beforehand.
    A massive month ahead. Both on and off the field

  6. I’m afraid that most teams who have come to Valley Parade look better than us; more pace, more creativity, better shape, better passing, better dead ball delivery. Having Cook up front cries out for the wing backs to able to play like wingers but until the second half they seem to play to a plan that doesn’t get them further than 2/3 up the pitch. This is a team that, without Walker and Pattison, has carried whoever plays in the positions currently occupied by Oduor and Smith. They simply don’t offer enough. We routinely get overrun by pace through our midfield; Smallwood and Gillead have been playing ok under Alexander until recently but, like you said in the article, teams know how to play us. Smallwood in particular doesn’t have the killer ball or the cute pass in him. Why isn’t the intensity of the second halves (when we’re behind) there from the start? Is that down to the manager’s “game plan” or the players? The defence is ok but the rest of it is sadly lacking. Why have both managers persisted with Smallwood on dead balls, awful. We did seem to have invented a new corner routine today but it takes two players to deliver it. Oh, and whilst I’m at it, Cook is unconvincing on penalties; he doesn’t strike the ball cleanly enough. A lot to sort.

  7. What a miserable afternoon at VP! The style of play is so so predictable; hoof and hope, slow boring throw-in’s, tippy-tappy passing around near the sideline rather than taking the chance to swing the ball into a loaded box. Corners are almost a pointless exercise and the set pieces are absolutely criminal…we’re talking about professional footballers here! Gilliad was excellent again, he works tirelessly and I think we’ll be in massive trouble without his pace and endeavour in the middle if he ever gets injured. Cook looks laboured and can’t seem to stay onside or on his feet half the time. We have to get Pointon in the team, he’s far too good to be wasted on the sidelines week in week out. How frustrating!

  8. The club is a joke showing no sign they know what they are doing,the manager,the jury is now out, some times managers do things like Hughes did at Carlise last season in the play offs, taking off Banks and putting on a center half ,for that i thought his days where numbered and today putting Derbyshire on again totally the wrong thing to do and now the transfer window the club better get it right this time or the fans will start to vote with there feet.

  9. Extremely frustrating result.

    Our next three games in the league are against Colchester (22nd); Doncaster (19th); and Salford (21st).

    For me, that’s the real test of how serious we are about making something of this season.

    This time next Saturday will probably give us a good idea what we can expect.

  10. The most depressing part of this is we have seen it all before. Change of manager, no difference. If you believe Jake Young is injured did you learn nothing when Nakhi Wells was before signing for Huddersfield? I dont blame the manager here, he is trying to rebuild his career and was that desperate he accepted the call from VP, the football managers graveyard.
    I don’t blame the players, the majority just can’t deal with the pressure of expectation that comes with playing at VP. They are League 2 players for a reason, but are earning a living best they can.
    I really don’t care if Young is sold, what I do care about is the lack of trust there is that the team will be improved with any of that money. What happened to the McBurnie windfall, sell on fees from Nahki Wells? Balancing the books and accepting mediocrity thats where. The club needs to change the record and prove that there remains even the smallest piece of ambition somewhere in the club.
    Sparks is AWOL, Rupp sits in Germany waiting on a cheque from whoever signs Jake Young & Bobby Pointon. Meanwhile, I’m increasing failing to justify why after over 40 years of supporting the club, as a fan & more, why I continue to care and waste an afternoon at VP again when those who can change the course of the club clearly can’t or don’t really care and the more worrying thing is I’m not the only one who feels like this.
    Personally the last few years have been hard & football was a release from that, something to look forward to, enjoy and spend a few hours away. Now it just feels part of the problem, a core I could do without.

    • Totaly agree. I dont even bother with watching Iplayer anymore either,feels like I am wasting my weekend.
      Still, the dogs loosing weight!
      Well done City,keep up the good work!

  11. Great write-up. ‘Objectively awful’ is stark but seems about right to me.

    Interesting to see the reactions generally. From singing the praises of Alexander’s direct football last week to now saying it’s diabolical. It’s a results business they say

    Does Big GA have some tricks up his sleeve? That’s what I’m wondering. He seems savvy, streetwise, that sort of thing. Let’s see

    ps here’s to Mark Ellis! He sure was mega

  12. A question; if Walker and Richards hadn’t got injured do we think we’d have taken 1 point from the last 3?

    We were onto something with a very raw but physically adept LWB carrying the ball forward and getting up the pitch quickly. Something Ridehalgh is not capable of.

    Between him, Halliday and a midfield 3 who work, and pressed together we had a recipe for success. Without those vital cogs it isn’t going to work.

    To play direct you also need players who will win it in the opposition half. We’ve lost that capability.

    I think Oduor has something and the making of a decent player but out of possession he just isn’t it in this setup.

    Peterborough Owner, Darragh MacAnthony always talks on his podcast about how he tells players if things aren’t happening then run your bollocks off. Chapman showed last year he’s willing to do this, Pointon does it. They simply have to be the replacement for Walker. I’d even argue Pointon at LWB and Chapman in CAM until Richards and Walker return.

    We do have capable players we aren’t using them. Although we could still do with finding a decent strike partner for Cook…

    • Great point, yeah Walker Richards and Halliday are key

      • Player’s get injured, lose form etc. That’s why clubs have squads; with fresh players ready to fit in to a formation to blend in to the system and identity of the club. Bfd City don’t have either alongside a plan B that adapts when problems arise.

        Can anyone help me out to explain why GA an experienced L2 manger put Derbyshire on? Ahead of Pointon or Chapman? His inept action in doing this has destroyed my hope that he is the man to resurrect our club.

      • Trevor I agree with your frustration in GA at the weekend but feel you have contradicted yourself slightly in saying we don’t have players to fit in and then gone to name 2 who weren’t picked – in addition to another replacement who picked up an injury.

        I feel while we are short of a backup at LWB we are pretty well covered across the squad, but I do agree that some of those players are overlooked currently.

        Also, When we resigned Gilli my thoughts were as a squad man who will play 30-40 games across multiple positions. His performances have earned him the central midfield role but if it wasn’t for injuries you could well have seen him at LWB and Pattison in his spot.

        Walker has become somewhat of a talisman for us 5 goals and 3 assists a good return for a CAM at the halfway point. He’s a high earner and we can’t expect to have player of his quality on the bench, in the squad both from budget point of view or general happiness of the squad. Ironically in his position we probably actually did have an equal quality replacement who also got injured.

        We then have players who are predominantly widemen but the versatility to play in the middle (Chapman / Pointon / Oduor). But with Pattison and Walker injured you have to expect some drop off in this position.

        My point is I do feel we have the players. I think we have been a little unfortunate with injuries but I’m also like you bewildered by some of the decisions made. They are currently GAs decisions to make though and he will live and die by them.

    • I would go so far as a replacement for Cook who’s gone back to his lazy, sulking ways again.

      • Just isn’t true. Our best chance of the game came from him winning a ball and Smith not putting in the back of the net. Later there was a brilliant piece of hold up and weighted pass into Oduor’s path. Yesterday despite Maguire and co trying to take his shirt he was still involved in most of our best stuff.

        He gets a very rough deal from referees who give him nothing.

        People always make this judgement if he goes a couple of games without scoring. Whether he’s scoring hat tricks or missing chances he’s still a moaning sod whether that’s at the ref or at his team mates when they don’t pick the right pass. That’s because of his hunger to score even more.

  13. Square peg in round hole would for me be the best way to describe the game.

    Liam Ridehalgh doesn’t have the endurance to be a LWB, Clark Odour is not an effective number 10 and it seems we have another stuborn manager who fails to see what the fans are crying out for.

    Credit to Crawley, Another team similar to Morecambe who have come to VP and taken the game to City and not sat back. They exploited the gaps on the wings behind Haliday and Ridehalgh and we simply didn’t have an answer.

    From an attacking perspective i feel we simply don’t have the athleticism to play in a 352 formation whilst Walker and Richards are unavailable. Comparing the front lines or both City and Crawley you saw the difference. Crawly were dynamic and had players who were prepared to get beyond the last man and run for the cause, I watch city and we seem very static and one dimensional and i feel it’s something teams have clicked onto.

    I do have sympathy with Alexander as he has inherited a heavly bloated squad however patience is running thin with the inability to switch it up and make adjustments. How Osadebe and Odour have started ahead of Pointon is baffling and today to throw Derbyshire on ahead of Chapman and Pointon further signals the lack of trust Alexander has in his squad.

    I would have very much loved to have seen Young and Pointon in for Smith and Odour with a fresh LWB but it looks like the end is near for both players in Claret and Amber.

    I feel the next few months are going to be painful before they get better but hopefully it can shape the squad going into next season. barring a miracle it looks like another season in league 2.

    All i want from the club moving forward is transparency. I listened to Alexanders interview on the radio and not impressed with the responses regarding Young and if he does leave i have nothing more than best wishes for him but i would be extremely dissapointed with how the club have treated supporters.

    Hopefully we can push on into the latter part of the season but something needs to change drastically if we are to end the season positively

  14. Whole heartedly agree with your assessment. Amongst the favoured players he uses week in and out one or two are simply not good enough. Smallwoods free kicks were abysmal. He must have in his contract that he must take the free kicks. To go in front near the end was deserved. The feeling I had was that City would concede again. Crawley got it right. Our manager had no real idea. Surely, City should have gone defensive. He brings on Derbyshire on took off a defender! It made things worse. Their late goals were exceptional when they broke and scored from deep without any attempt by City to contain them.
    Don’t talk to me about Young. His non appearance was not a surprise. To suggest he was injured is an insult to all fans. I would rather them say that, if he played it closes the door to potential offers. That to me tells me what this club is like. Full of talk but no substance. We are a big club and the supporters deserve better than what is being served up at the moment. We have good players that Alexander refuses to play. Pointon and Chapman to name just 2. If one or both goes this window then I will despair about this club. Finally, disappointed with the tactics and the substitutions of Alexander and he needs to man up and admit his shortcomings.

    • Re. Young, nobody on this forum actually knows the true situation. All the speculation seems to be that the club is looking to sell. My first thought when hearing the explanation about him “walking off the training ground after five minutes” on Friday was that the player himself is trying to ensure he doesn’t compromise a move for himself.

  15. Just a word on Jake Young.

    It’s frustrating that we have to go through this ‘injury’ charade but I think we have to accept that there are times when for commercial reasons the club can’t be as open and transparent as we’d like them to be.

    Who knows, the club may be edging their bets, trying to balance contract extension negotiations with offers from elsewhere. As with any employer you wouldn’t expect them to give a blow by blow account of that process.

    Let’s face it. The mismanagement of Jake happened at the beginning of the season not now. We should be asking questions of why he was allowed to go out on loan in the first place, not complaining about lack of communication on his return.

  16. 6 years to the day from seeing the wheels come off at Yeovil
    Nothing has changed
    In 5 years we will play on 6 January again
    And if Rupp hasn’t gone it will be in non league

  17. New year yet same old City! I wasn’t optimistic going into this game! On North Parade before the game, someone asked the question. “Will City make the top 7” amongst our group the answers were “yes” and 50% and obviously “No” the other 50%. I was in the No camp as soon as the team news came in. “No Young? Pointon?” Pointon on the bench. Watching the game I was baffled by our free kicks corner routines, these are like gold dust for league two teams who take full advantage of them as a means to scoring. Not City. What do we do on the training ground all week? When we managed to find ourselves 2-1 in front that should have been the cue to play Crawley at their own game. Oh for a Tony Mcmahon. Alas no panic stations. Back on the sanctuary of North Parade and reflecting on the afternoons events, no real surprise after all this was our twelfth attempt of winning a home game, we’ve managed it on four occasions this season all by the magnificent margin of one clear goal. When will we ever improve? Here’s hoping after all hope is all we have.

  18. Just considering that we have conceded 4 on three occasions since GA arrived.
    At Notts C, at MK Don’s and yesterday.
    Food for thought.

  19. So MH quickly discovered this squad isn’t good enough to play 3 at the back yet GA doesn’t appear to believe we can play any other way. Long and direct or short possession based? I don’t suppose it really matters because neither approach has had any lasting effect. It all comes back to that same old issue, recruitment. Yes this isn’t GAs squad but that doesn’t mean he’s free from criticism. With no Walker we lack that cutting edge and yet both Pointon and Chapman can’t get a game. I can only assume GA doesn’t feel either of them can play in a more central role. Are we really that bad that we can’t revert to a 442 or 433 to utilise them both? That would subsequently solve the current LB/LWB dilemma. We need some quality from somewhere. If only we had the leagues top scorer! Oh wait a minute…… Young would be the first name on the team sheet for me, it would give everyone a lift. Is his heart in it? Has his head been turned? Maybe, but he publicly said he was happy at Swindon and would probably still be there had we not cut his loan spell short. Surely this is an opportunity for GA to use his man management skills and get him up for it, make him feel wanted and ready to lead the charge up the table. Are we really that desperate to cash in? We don’t have many prize assets but in Pointon, Young and Cook we have something to build on.I still think Stubbs is worth a punt and Platt, Richards and Kelly have shown promise. That’s not to mention Walker, Pattison, Halliday and Gillead. Surely we can do better!

  20. Crawley played good football whilst GA’s tactics whilst not great you cannot blame him until he has chance to get rid of all of the players Steven Gent brought to the club as Head of Recruitment. Is it any coincidence that the two managers who turned down the City job Robinson and Cowley have gone to two teams in lower positions? I wonder whether Both Colchester and Salford will end up higher than City come the end of the season? What does that say about the Bradford City project and the way the club is run? Lots to ponder.

  21. I rarely leave a comment nowadays but feel I must ask woap readers a few questions.
    Why is every manager of City a failure?
    Every manager comes with a good record…then fails.
    Why does nearly every player City sign deteriorate?
    Generally speaking, the failure of an organisation is due to the people at the top.
    So maybe the fault lies with Rupp and Sparks.
    I would welcome ideas.

  22. I have to say your report sounds like you are as demoralised as the rest of us , my take on the situation is simply over the last few years only Mark Hughes tried to play the brand of football most fans enjoyed, I remember after Adams it was like a breath of fresh air to see the team passing and Cooke scoring plenty of goals , however the loss of T Wright and S banks left a huge hole in the team never to be replaced and the signings in the close season were second rate at best so probably rightly so Hughes got the chop , it’s early days for Alexander but his method of hoof ball does not sit well with the fans and his persistent refusal to go with the more attack minded players and persist with Derbyshire to name just one does beggar belief
    For what it’s worth our midfield has and will not contribute enough goals to get us out of this division love them or hate them Gillead and Smallwood and Odour have not got 7/8 goals a season in them and running your socks off with no end product just doesn’t cut it for me these guys have had lots of chances to make a difference and need changing like yesterday
    We need pace and fitness in the transfer window and a little more faith in the younger more dynamic midfield we do have available at the moment

    • “Hoof ball” is exactly what we had yesterday as distinct from ‘Route one’ football which is a time honoured tactic whereby the trajectory of the ball is aimed along a pre-defined path, usually up-field towards a tall target man, à la Parkinson’s ‘McArdle Ball’ to Big Jim. What we got yesterday was the non-tactic of just lumping it anywhere up the pitch in the hope the thing might land somewhere in the vicinity of a City player. Then, when fresh legs were needed, the situation was made worse by bringing on not the 26 year old Chapman or 20 year old Pointon but the 37 year old Matt Derbyshire! Imagine what Pointon must have thought seeing someone old enough to be his dad getting on the pitch ahead of him.

      • Mr Dunn you are spot on as i have said earlier in rhe 1980s we had a manager called jhon Docherty
        He played a goalkeeper 4 defenders 1 midfielder who never saw ball because mr dochertys hoof ball”” meant that as soon as ball was got by goalie or our defenders , it was booted hard and high to our 5 attackers to chase after like greyhounds after the hare.
        The football was ##ite week in and out and we never got many happy days watching BCFC as fans
        The younger newer fans wont remember the 2.2 draw at peterborough United where eventually civil war broke out on the standing terrace behind the goal between city fans
        Keep Docherty and sack Docherty sides fans were thrown out the game ended 2.2 and on the Monday Mr Docherty got the boot. This i never want to see again but it could unless we play propper football not hoof or Mark hughes tippy tappy nonsense either.
        I wish we could play as a team like paul Jewell had it beford the megalomaniac big geffory Richmond sacked him

    • Jones and Doyle didn’t get close to 7/8 goals combined in 2013, McCall and Whalley didn’t get 7/8 combined in 98/99. Josh Cullen only scored 1 league goal for us.

      Yes Oduor doesn’t look good enough to replace Walker’s goals but we have been unlucky to also lose Pattison there.

      • To be fair to the 2012/13 squad players like Thomson Connell and Andrew Davies chipped in with around 16 between them , so where are those 15/16 going to come from with this group? That’s my point

  23. I’m surprised we haven’t tried mixing it up and going with a 3-4-3 ourselves, especially with Walker/Pattison out, and Pointon & Chapman on the bench. Smith isn’t exactly in good form at the minute.

  24. Young has not been filmed by the club saying he is buzzing to come back for unfinished business with his best mates and looking to score the goals to take us to promotion. Smallwood when asked about Young in the press conference said something about not yet having seen him train on Thursday. It was hardly a ringing endorsement. He was neither presented to the crowd nor named in the squad against Crawley. Everything suggests Young will be leaving if any team comes in for him. Today we could obviously have done with him. The salient question is: is Young pressing to leave or is the club hoping to cash in on him – or perhaps the decision is mutual. Alexander, post-match, left me in no doubt that the player was the one trying to force the issue. To almost immediately pull out of training for a niggle seems pretty blatant to me and it will leave a bad impression if Young subsequently has to stay in the absence of takers. I personally have not forgotten Waddle’s bout of diarrhoea or Wells’s knee. Both left a bad smell! We have enough problems on the field at the moment without this diversion. I feel enormous sympathy for the current manager saddled with the sins of his predecessor. He’s inherited a squad of players drawn from a lucky dip bag. If I were Alexander, I would send back all the loanees, including Tomkinson, who has not greatly impressed me. That would free up some places and I’d try proactively to shift three or four others with financial inducements of one kind or another. I’d then ignore Gents’ input and look to bring in a handful of players I knew and trusted, who suited the kind of style I want to play. What else can he do? There’s not enough quality in the squad at the moment to aspire to anything above the proverbial mediocrity.

  25. Notts county lost their manager to Swansea city last week. That’s the second manager they’ve had poached and received compensation for in a row!! On social media their fans are gutted but they also have faith that the club will replace him with someone decent and they will continue to keep improving. And I wouldn’t be surprised if they are right and will have another great season next season.

    Stockport county are another club who missed out in the play offs last season like ourselves, but again on the eve of this season the overall feeling you got from their club that the club is on the up and they were expecting to have another good season again.

    Why bring this up on a Bradford city match report?? Because I think Bradford city could learn a lot from clubs like these. They just seems to be no strategy from the top down at Bradford city. They just doesn’t seem to be any strategy or long term thinking in both the recruitment of both players and managers. We get a new manager with a completely different way of thinking and playing to the previous one, then he needs time to rebuild the team and squad to play that way 18 months later we sack him, go the opposite way again and do another rebuild.

    We’ve got a CEO who just hides away at the minute, when a ships in trouble that’s when you need your captain outs seems to only show when the seas are calm and the sailings plain. I bet if we ever did manage to get promoted sparks would be quickly all over the media claiming the plaudits.

    I’ve said for a long time the problems at Bradford city run much deeper than the manager (even though at times I’ve agreed the manager is part of the problem)

    It’s not Alexander’s squad so he’s got a free hit for the rest of this season from me, but I’ve heard nothing from the club that gives me any confidence that they’ve learned from past mistakes and the recruitment will be better or atleast more consistent in the future.

    • Excellent post.

      • Thank you!! I want to be positive and excited about the clubs future but just think there’s a lot wrong behind the scenes at the minute. Unless we get extremely lucky then until them problems are fixed thing we will struggle to progress as a club.

  26. The whole club from top to bottom is a mess, SPARKS IS AT FAULT FOR MOST OF THE MESS.

  27. Do we have to accept that we don’t have a chairman prepared to lose pots of cash, stop moaning at him and his chief executive and accept that we are basically getting what we pay for?

    • I’m just hoping Rupp decides to sell the club for a fair price in the near future (taking into account our lack of assets) and we get lucky and get an interested ambitious owner in his place and we then get lucky getting a David Baldwin/Shaun Harvey type character as our CEO.

      At the right price I honestly think we are probably the best club to buy in our division and better than the majority in the division above too.

      I think if Rupp was interested he could take us far and had a lot of value to his investment but unfortunately he isn’t so instead we just tick over, he isn’t the worst owner in the football league by a long shot, but we also could do much better.

      • Fair comment and I agree that Rupp bought the club for business reasons. Unfortunately City are not going to be a likely draw for a multi millionaire who is happy to throw money at the club. In fact if we had loads of assets I would be worried about a Bury situation.
        Personally I feel (and I don’t know this for certain) that if Rupp is leaving us neutral, as in nothing in or out, that’s more than fair.
        If we are neutral then simply putting prices up will increase our playing budget.

  28. We have as many assets as most clubs. If you the research even up to PL very few clubs own their stadiumd or training facilities.

  29. I’ll say it quietly, but I don’t think we were that bad on Saturday. If that team had Walker in then I think we win (and we’d have probably beaten Morecambe too). But then I was resigned to us finishing midtable months ago so perhaps my expectations are lower. We’re short of three or four starting players (LWB, central midfielder, No 10 and a second striker). Ridehalgh, Oduor and Smith are not good enough, and Gilliead/Smallwood together are too limited/too similar in what they bring. Tomkinson looks good, but it’s a big weakness that he’s a left footed defender who finds himself on the attacking inside right position all the time.

    The lack of strategy at the club – swinging between appointments of managers with fundamentally different styles – is an inexcusable today as it was when we first appointed Alexander. Nothing he has done here is out of character or unexpected, so the blame for that is on Sparks.

    Where Alexander can be criticised – and this a trait shared with us by MK Dons fans before his appointment – is how he has his favourite players and won’t change his mind on who they are. We’ve had quite a few fixtures in December/January and not made use of the big squad to keep energy levels up. Sam Stubbs was clearly our best defender until Alexander arrived, and deserves to be ahead of Taylor in the pecking order. As well as Pointon and Chapman, there’s Kevin McDonald who was a big hope for us back in Aug/Sep. I can only assume there are things going on behind closed doors because if GA thinks that Oduor is a better No 10 than Pointon in this formation then next season will be a long one too.

  30. This repeats a lot of the stuff already posted but I’m gonna have my say anyway. Something is not right in the structure of the club itself – too many managers with decent records fail at our place for it to be coincidence. But there’s not enough hours for all of that so I’m gonna stick to the playing side…..

    A more direct style is fine, we won plenty of games under Parky playing like that but we have to play it properly. Pointless chucking it up to Cook for nobody to ever win a second ball, even if Cook doesn’t win a clean header there’s a ball to fight for.

    3-5-2 doesn’t work without really fit, athletic wing backs. Halliday does a job but Ridehalgh can’t do it. I’m not having a go, if we wanted a solid, defensive full back he’s fine but he’s no bombing wing back. Two goals came from balls inside him cos he wasn’t in position after going forward. Oyegoke and Richards are suited to these wide positions but if they aren’t fit we need to change it up.

    I think we have enough quality and the right players to play 3 centre halves as long as we still have Tomkinson. What has Stubbs done wrong?

    We can’t underestimate how much we miss Jamie Walker. He is by far the cleverest footballer we have, if the team is struggling he will invariably get on the ball and do something. Plus without the ball he works really hard which Oduour, skilled player that he is, doesn’t seem to. If you’re best player is out it’s silly to think you won’t see an impact.

    Tyler Smith IMO is not the player we need next to Cook, he doesn’t do enough and misses chances. If Young is leaving it needs to happen quick and we get someone to play up there.

    Subs on Saturday, he was never gonna bring Pointon on when we went 2-1 up but Derbyshire did seem a waste of time.

    Osadebe, Derbyshire, Oliver and Chapman could leave for me. I like Chappy but he’s clearly not part of GA’s plans.