Talk is cheap, action is priceless – part one

By Jake Verity

This has been a big fortnight for Bradford City. There have been open letters, owner statements, fan protests and in the middle for all that – some football has been played. Indeed, it feels like on the pitch fortunes have become a secondary consideration in the battle for Bradford City. The search for the club’s soul.

Following last weekend’s result at Harrogate – things felt about as bad as they could. And we had reason to be angry. I tried to capture the essence of our feelings last weekend; at least things have improved a little bit on the pitch. It is so, so good to see Bobby Pointon back in the side, let alone scoring a goal.

But onto the most important matter at hand. Stefan Rupp’s letter is his first public piece of communication to fans in some time, which should be welcomed, but, there is a long way to go in repairing this relationship. Talk is cheap. Action is priceless if done correctly.

And that’s what I want to talk about. Just what this football club needs to do both on and off the pitch. Many of my ideas about how to structure the squad, or who we should sign may start debates, but I want to show it can be done and there can be a reason for us to compete next season. We will do so, if we take ourselves seriously and do everything we can to get it right.

This is the first of two pieces, in which I will try to outline how the club could look to structure itself ahead of next season. This piece will focus on the pitch and what the club can do; the next will focus on all things off-the-pitch that might help our club to thrive, rather than simply survive.

League Two in 2024/25

I’ll start on what the division might look like next year. The big positive is that it looks like three of the wealthiest teams will be out of the division. Stockport, Mansfield and Wrexham continue to occupy the top three with MK Dons sitting just behind them. With three of those four going up automatically, League Two should be a bit more of a level playing field next season.

You’re probably thinking it and you’re right. There’s no excuse to be made here. That we’ve not competed this season because of the budgets of other clubs is a lazy way to blame how this season has gone. We should have kicked on after Carlisle and we haven’t. The club has got its recruitment and some other major decisions very wrong.

Remember also that both Stockport and Wrexham failed to beat us this season (the victory away at the Racecourse stands out as one of few highlights of this year for me) so they’ve hardly run away with it like Leyton Orient did. But, it certainly helps us to lose the clubs who are destined for League One and have squads boasting a dearth of talent and cash to pay for good players at this level.

We can see at present there isn’t much to separate the best of the rest. And again, that’s why it is so infuriating we’re likely to miss out on the play-offs. The nine points separating 7th and 17th show you that the rest of the league is very mediocre indeed. All of these clubs will be around next year and we simply have to be much better than them all. Our inconsistency has harmed us significantly. If we’d have turned just one of the three consecutive losses we recently had at Valley Parade into a win, we’d be going into Easter Monday four points off the play-offs with a game in hand.

That is why there can be no mistakes made in recruiting players this time around. There must be squad depth to account for injuries (imagine if we’d had proper cover when both Walker and Pattison were out). There needs to be a range of players for different scenarios. Most crucially, there has to be no mercy shown in retention. If we are a football club that is serious about its fortunes and future, there is no room for passengers, or below-par players at Bradford City. Everyone needs to make us better.

Retention, Recruitment and Roles

The club should offer new contracts to Jamie Walker, Brad Halliday and Bobby Pointon. I don’t think there’s a single fan that can doubt their commitment to the club, or their efforts on the pitch. They would improve any other side in the league and you would think if they aren’t to stay with us, they will go on to do better things. This is the easy part.

The harder part is being realistic about what needs to come this Summer. If the club is to be successful next season, I would suggest there needs to be a decision on the formations we want to employ, the types of players we want to bring in, and the style of play that we want to adopt. There’s no need to fix these rigidly too. We should be adaptive to suit a properly balanced squad of players. The work begins now and no later. Here is what I think we should do:

1. Commit to a style of play for the Club

This should be set by a Director of Football (if as it seems, one might be appointed) so that our football decisions extend beyond the manager, both structurally and in tenure. It is not unreasonable to assume that over the next five years we will change managers. And if we haven’t done so, it’s because Graham Alexander has done a very good job.

Making this decision now benefits us when we look to recruit both players and managers in the future as we won’t be doing so based on either our, or their short-term interests. No changing tactics at the drop of a hat. That is one of the main reasons this season has been so disjointed. We saw a real difference in Mark Hughes’ formations and squad more generally between last season’s play-off defeat at Carlisle and this season’s opener at Crawley. Graham Alexander’s arrival represented yet another significant change.

Setting a style and key formations allows us to recruit managers who can play the system(s) we want to employ. The club can and should actively keep a list of managers who fit our mold once this structure begins, so we know exactly who we want to appoint next time we see a change in the dugout. We should never have to go through the nonsense we endured last October/November again. Structure leads to stability which creates success. Remember that.

2. Recruit players based on that style

Having a style certainly helps us determine the types of players we want to bring in. Thinking about the Parkinson-era, we rarely changed what we were doing. In the early days we focused on a more defensively minded right-hand side (Darby, Thompson & Atkinson then Morais & McMahon) and expansive left-hand side (Meredith and Reid). A balanced midfield of the box-to-box Jones with the defensively minded Doyle then moved nicely into a box-to-box Cullen and more defensively minded Evans. It was solid.

I personally think we have looked most comfortable as a club when playing in a 4-2-3-1 formation. We had success using this system under Hughes in the 2022/23 season and it employs a level of attacking football that we enjoy as fans. 4-4-2 is outdated and doesn’t work in the modern game; and a 4-2-3-1 structure allows us to focus on creating a strong midfield that could run a 5-3-2, if and when necessary.

Having Scott Banks and Tyriek Wright either side of Andy Cook with Jamie Walker in behind was a joy to behold. Let’s get back there. Based on the players contracted to next season and who I expect would stay, I would advocate for us building a squad around the following:

Walker

Halliday; CB; Kelly; New LB

CDM; CDM

Pointon; Walker; Young

Cook

Subs: Richards, Gilliead, Oduor, Pattison, Kavanagh

This is a reasonable nucleus for the start for a good League Two squad, but it is clear where weakness would lie.

Firstly, we must prioritise bringing in a ball playing centre-half to the quality of Tomkinson or Crichlow. My suggestion would be that we commit to buying one. For the failures during Edin Rahic’s time at Bradford City, our investment in Charlie Wyke paid dividends and if Rupp is serious about investing in the club next season, we should look to bring in players who can grow with us, rather than losing them at the end of the campaign. Kavanagh feels like a return to this strategy – more of that!

Secondly, we must add real depth, leadership and quality in central midfield. Both Smallwood and McDonald have limitations, though both have proven useful at times. Keeping one of them for the bench would be fine, but it is time we brought in a very strong midfield – that is where games are truly won and lost. Having an expansive passer like Elliot Watt coupled with a tough-tackling midfielder who will protect the defence would make a huge difference.

If Smallwood is to stay, he must become the latter rather than trying to do both. Either a 4-2-3-1; or a 5-3-2 requires a solid midfield – which realistically has been propped up by three players this year – Smallwood, McDonald and Gilliead. Nowhere near enough strength in depth for such a critical part of the pitch. It must change.

I think it’s fair to say we need to add additional quality at left-back too. Richards is young and raw and will grow over time, but having real quality at LB makes a huge difference. Just look how pivotal Ibou Touray has been for Stockport.

I’d also like to see us bring in a striker who offers something different to, and plays well with Andy Cook. The big benefit of Young and Kavanagh is they can both play out wide, or up-front, but we must bring someone in who knows where the goal is and can be relied upon. It feels like the trio of Matt Derbyshire, Vadaine Oliver and Tyler Smith are unlikely to be this player next season, but you never know.

Finally, start trialing a new structure and system now, before the end of the season. Until it’s mathematically impossible to qualify for the play-offs, it’s not over and we should be focused on winning games. But, when it is (which will likely be soon barring a miracle and luck), we have a few games to start trialling our current squad in a new structure. Especially if a Director of Football is recruited soon.

3. The character of players, and fitting a squad together

Give Alex Gilliead the club captaincy – and have Brad Halliday as his back-up. With over 200 games in Claret and Amber, Gilliead’s drive, tenacity and commitment can never be questioned. He gets the club and has a connection with the fans. There is always a place for him in our team whether it’s in the middle, at the back, or out on the wing. Because of his utility-player nature, I have left him on the bench above, as he can fill in wherever necessary. If he isn’t starting, Halliday has proven to be a more than dependable deputy – embodying everything our club is about in his performances.

Looking at Chesterfield, who recently won the National League and will play us next season, their recruitment style should be our blueprint. They have some great young talent (Dobra, Berry); experience (Jacobs, Grigg, Naylor) and then solid players at their level (Mandeville, Grimes, Oldaker). Their current squad will easily finish top-seven next season and we should aspire to a similar structure.

The fact that Stockport, Wrexham and to an extent Notts County (before Luke Williams left for Swansea City) succeeded in League Two with a strong nucleus of their National League squad shows the league undoubtedly has quality.  The gap continues to close between the two divisions and we should recruit more often from there.

From looking through our transfer history, I believe we have not signed a single player from the National League in the last ten years. That’s a huge failure as there are so many talents we have missed out on. Think about Macualey Langstaff and how good he has been for Notts County this season, his first ever campaign in the football league. There’s many others just like him who are now far higher up the pyramid.

It’s time we started buying players on their way up, rather than those on their way down. The frustration for so many of us has been the players who have turned up at Valley Parade while tumbling down the divisions, far too happy to take a wage and produce little for it. There has been speculation that some of our players cannot handle the pressure of the big crowds, which is why we’ve looked at those more ‘experienced’ players on their way down the leagues.

Frankly if somebody has lost interest in their football – it doesn’t matter if they’re used to 20,000 seater stadiums – they will probably be a bad signing. I am sure that if you went to some of the top scorers, midfielders and defenders in the National League and asked if they wanted to join Bradford City, they would relish playing in front of our crowds.

It is so important we bring the right characters into our club. Real work-ethic and desire to be here coupled with pride and passion for the club. More Gilliead’s and Hallidays from League Two and above; more hungry players from the National League who want to prove a point. Add them into the squad I mentioned above – we’ll have a team worth watching.

So, what about the other things?

Whether it’s pre-season friendlies, matchday experience or communication with supporters – many of us have ideas about what we would like to see from the club. I will be following this piece with a second article outlining some suggestions on what could be done to improve fan experience and create excitement around Valley Parade.

For now though, I hope this provides some ideas about just what we could do. I know there will be opinions about the players I’ve said we could keep, the formations we should employ and the types of players we might want to sign. But, I hope the general points I’ve made here resonate.

Create a structure. Recruit to it. Think about the personnel we want. And let’s get working on it now before this season is done.



Categories: Opinion

Tags:

43 replies

  1. mostly very good

    I really want to see smith and Smallwood gone

    and of course Rupp gone

    then I will renew

    • I will renew when Sparks or Rupp have gone.

    • Agree but what no one is speaking of the players that are out of contract and who may want to leave.
      Halliday would be a fool to stay..the guy is a good L1 player all day long and they will want him
      Pointon…great young player and L1 teams will be lining up to sign him…
      What have we got to offer, a Chairman who seems to be not that bothered?..CEO out of his depth and that’s not even breaking the skin.

  2. Was Danny Rowe signed from the national league? Loved him in the short time he was here, embodied that point-to-prove attitude you mentioned.

    • He came from Oldham who were in League Two at the time, before leaving for Chesterfield in the National League.

      Agree on his entertainment factor. He would shoot from virtually anywhere!

    • Danny Rowe was hugely overrated. Ridiculous myth that he injured a goalkeeper’s arm with a shot. We got rid pretty quick and he didn’t do much elsewhere. Don’t forget he kept Cook out of the team and there were plenty who wrote off Cook.

  3. Richards, Kelly, Smallwood, McDonald, Oduor, Oliver, Derbyshire, Tompkinson, Smith , seen enough of all these guys to know they are not good enough

    • Richards has barely had a bad match.

      Kelly has had to cope, with his first ever full football league season with;-

      • Been thrust into a three at the back system that his manager didn’t know how to work
      • Been thrust into a three at the back system with a different manager wanting different things
      • Often had to work with different partnerships. I can’t think of one sequence of five in the row with the same back three – never mind ten / fifteen, like we had last season (albeit it with two CB’s)

      Both are young enough and certainly in Kelly look hungry enough to have good League careers.

      • Richards, terrible running style not even athletic. Foulds who we gifted to Harrogate is miles better.

        Kelly tries hard but sadly needs to go back to Irish leagues, he might look good there.

  4. Reference you closing comments on a previous page. It is incredibly disappointing to see you tolerate offence of those who bore the tide of 1985 which you yourself have no concept of and accept comments from idiots who cause further ignorance. I will never apologise for calling out anyone who belittles the event, make snide comments or is disrespectful of those who died. I didn’t cross a line and I don’t care for your rebuke. It was warranted. Shame on you because the comments were entirely justified in the circumstances. Reread the thread because you are out of order. You will be happy to learn that I will never visit this site again

    • I’m sorry to lose you as a reader but your behaviour was unacceptable. You swore, called people names and challenged people to physical fights inside the stadium on Saturday. I appreciate some people weren’t kind to you either and I will do my best to police things better in future.

      Jason

      • Police what you like but I note interestingly you don’t condemn the comments about 1985. Pardon my intolerance but some things are unforgiveable and I suppose you will “claim it” again on your site come May.

        Sticks and stones – Sorry, but If anyone cusses my father in law, who counted the bodies, then anybody will always be invited to pay the price. I bear the scars too as a helpless young man.

        I am sure you will get that this would challenge the most saintly individual but oh dear my behaviour was unacceptable?

        You need to try to actually understand how sore things remain for some of us and how we might be intolerant of idiots who pour fuel on the fire.

        I wish you well and regret absolutely nothing

      • Hi again.

        I’m really sorry but I have not seen anyone make any comments about 1985 or mention your father in law. I’ve just re-read all 80 comments and I can’t find any evidence of this. If I have missed it I’m sorry – please let me know the comment and I will deal with it.

        Thanks
        Jason

    • no one has made any comment or reference to the tragedy apart from you.

      and no one would. Your just making things up and then arguing with yourself. This site has done no wrong. Your words have.

      • I was about to unsubscribe and saw this garbage. This will me my last post. I promise.

        Danny, you have not a clue who I am or what I went through. I carry both the burns and the burden of 1985. Do you? Sympathies to you or yours if that is a yes, but if not then you simply will never ever understand.

        Are you so unbelievably ridiculous to think I would make up my father in laws role in the tragedy? Or if I was there?

        If anyone thumbs down me for reporting that, as some idiot did, hence my anger, then they are ignorant, pathetic and shameful and your comment sits alongside that.

        Do not trouble yourself to respond. You’re not worth it. I am making nothing up and totally resent what you say. Jason was sufficiently magnanimous to say he would pursue this. I don’t care to, but thank him.

        What you have done is both sad and frankly pathetic. I hope you can deal with that on 11th May.

        End

      • That is not what Danny said. He never claimed you had made up what your dad did. No one would dispute that for a second. It sounds like your dad did amazing, heroic things and he should be applauded.

        Danny was suggesting you were making up that City fans on WOAP were mocking the fire disaster. As per my earlier comment I can find no evidence that anyone has made such comments. I don’t think any City fan would ever do such a thing and it wouldn’t be tolerated if they did.

        The thumbs down (you said it was a comment before so im afraid you seem to be changing your story) was for your general comment, not specifically for the fire disaster. Again, no City fan would do a thumbs down for that.

        Jason

      • Please allow me to once again disagree. He knew what he was suggesting.

        You should recognise that too, otherwise his post is irrelevant.

        That’s it. I’m gone.

        I thank you for your scribes, comments and good faith in a club which I first witnessed in a 1 v 7 defeat at VP V Stockport. Keep the faith and best wishes but I’ve had my filll of wannabes who know more about football than one of the longest serving players and managers. It’s a City supporters thing to not support and abuse, even boo their own players.

        Goodbye

      • cespodd i echo Jasons response.
        I genuinely hope you can heal from what was a truly terrible experience. But repeat no one on here or indeed any city fan forum would ever be disrespectful of that day.
        Thanks for the support Jason.

  5. I enjoyed this, Jake. A really good article and some really thoughtful points. I don’t necessarily agree with all of it but it’s all good food for thought. I definitely agree about the centre mid positions.

    For me, Smallwood has been disappointing in all the games I’ve seen him in. He is clearly a good player but he consistently fails to do anything more than the simplest pass. I had no faith in him to score the penalty on Monday, but he did so well done in that regard. I think my view of a great midfielder is moulded by the McCalls and Joneses of my City lifetime.

    If we build the squad around Cook then 4-2-3-1 looks like the formation. But I’m wary to put it all on him, even though he is a great goalscorer. I think Jake Young may have his own views on the formation that gets the best from him. That should also be considered as he doesn’t look a lone frontman and probably doesn’t function as well in an attacking midfield position. Happy to be corrected but if we want the best from Young, we need to review how Swindon deployed him and how he linked up with team-mates to score a hatful.

    I know people are angry with the last 6-7 years but we need to look forwards now. The past cannot be changed. Without hope we have nothing and sometimes having a bit of positive mental attitude can help get a better perspective. Let’s be kind to each other even if we disagree, eh? We are all Bantams.

  6. Note contractual situation of squad, according to WOAP information:

    8 under contract to summer 2025 – S. Walker, Taylor, Gilliead, Kelly, Oliver, Odusina, Young (with possible option of further year), Richards

    6 under contract to summer 2026 – Kavanagh, Cook, Pattison, Oduor, Smith, Wilson

    3 with possible option of further year – Smallwood, J. Walker, Hendrie

    13 out of contract – Halliday, Ridehalgh, Platt, Stubbs, Chapman, Pointon, Youmbi, Rowe, McDonald, Derbyshire, Richardson, Doyle, Jeffreys

    3 returning to loaning clubs – Oyegoke, Tomkinson, Wright

    • Also: Hadi (contract not known), Cousin-Dawson (out of contract from summer 2024), Wadsworth (contract not known)

    • thank you for clarifying the contract situation although McDonald has another year. Unfortunately City have to free up as many spaces in their squad for new recruits. They will be unable to get rid of the substandard players who are still under contract. Therefore although I would offer Halliday, Platt and Pointon terms I would release everyone else. It’s a shame we cannot get rid of Taylor, Oliver, Oduor and Smith also.

  7. Great article, and I agree with point 3 about recruiting from NL. Conn-Clarke at Altrincham would be a great example of this and a signal of intent. The only issue I forsee, is that if the top NL players look to move up from the NL, they could bypass L2, just because of the lack of FFP/Salary Cap in the NL, and the higher wages available in L1. Same with Ireland-based players. Georgie Kelly moved to Rotherham in L1 over us, likely due to wages. Jesse Debrah, who was only down the road at Halifax, went to Port Vale.

    I guess this is where we will find if Rupp’s comments about having a much more competitive budget rings true; and with the introduction of the DoF, this could be a big focal point for him?

  8. Excellent article, Jake.

    I’d also be offering Stubbs a contract as I think we miss his organisational skills and when he’s on form he’s arguably the best defender in this division.

    It’s good to see someone not writing off players for next season, based on this. History shows, in L2, that a lot of clubs that have had a mediocre season often follow it up with promotion or a significantly better one – provided they’ve kept faith with the same manager.

  9. Great article Jake. Whilst I agree with most of the sentiments expressed I fear that it won’t happen.

    In the close season of 2023 (post-Carlisle) Ryan Sparks publicly announced that we would play a more aggressive style of football this season. This was to be backed up by a smaller squad albeit made up of players able to play a variety of different roles. This would allow us to flex our formations to suit the opposition.

    All very laudable, but we ended up with a bloated squad, which we need to cull in January and players playing out of position which they couldn’t adapt to.

    So, it seems whilst the club identified a similar approach to what your suggesting nearly 12 months ago, it failed miserably to implement it’s own plan.

    Hence my scepticism when it comes to what RS et al say and what actually happens.

  10. ”Setting a style and key formations allows us to recruit managers who can play the system(s) we want to employ.”

    Is this how Directors of Football work at other clubs? Genuine question.

    I’m not sure how many managers would want to be told what formations to play, sounds to me like it could cause problems.

    Another problem is if we hire a DoF now, then we have to match our permanent house style to Alexander’s brand of football, or hire a new manager.

    (I’m always on the side of giving a manager more time, but I think this would be the exception! Don’t think I could take Alexander’s hoofball for eternity)

  11. Many of the issues this year transpired from no DoF with Hughes going directly into Sparks who doesn’t have any footballing expertise resulting in the last minute panic and bloated squad. There needs to be clear hierarchy who has the final say Manager or new Head of Football Operations. The concern without that would be disagreements ultimately ending up with RS making decisions he isn’t qualified for.

    That said we’ve a missed opportunity for a play-off finish this year not because we are good but because we are good but because you have to be so bad to not finish 7th. We haven’t scored enough goals (only 2 teams have scored fewer). Until the recent injury crisis in defence we had one of the best defensive records and still have a competitive one yet all season we have continued to select 8 defensive minded players while attacking, creative outlets continued to be overlooked.

    Interestingly, despite this the XI you have proposed hasn’t changed any of the forward players. Two things here, there is a level of truth to Rupp’s suggestion we have been unlucky with injuries but also it’s mismanagement of the playing squad. It suggests we have the talent in the building to rectify our downfall; scoring goals.

    Yes we need to be run far better off the pitch but there have been definite failures on the pitch and that has to be levelled at Alexander for his part that he hasn’t taken more drastic action to try and get a more offensive threat, with more attack minded players on match day.

    • I think you’re saying the problem was that Sparks’ lack of football experience meant we needed a Director of Football.

      Maybe it’s simpler to hire a ceo with previous experience running a football club, rather than create an elaborate structure to the club to cover for Sparks?

      Honestly I think this DoF business could be a really bad move, it could just lead to even more chaos. Let’s not forget Sparks has no experience hiring Directors of Football! He might get that wrong.

      I’ve nothing against Sparks but radically and permanently changing the club structure so he can keep his job seems a bit much.

      • I’d advocate for a structure that most upwardly mobile clubs seem to have. Stockport’s DoF openly talking about 7 year plans is interesting.

        I think the hierarchy is important but more important to get the right people into those roles. MacAnthony at Peterborough talks a lot about getting the best available in the roles off the pitch.

    • Really fair comment. My general feeling is we do have some good attacking players – as I say the core squad left above isn’t bad at all.

      Cook needs no introduction; Young showed his ability at Swindon; Walker is a very good player at this level; Pattison has been unfortunate; Kavanagh is young but looks like a good investment; and we all rate Pointon.

      I think the key focus for us in the window should be:

      1. A winger of real quality (e.g. Scott Banks is one of the best wingers I’ve seen in a City shirt at L2 level; a huge miss for us this year).
      2. A striker who can flourish in a more fluid-style of football & still score goals. Think about it that cup game against Wycombe – Cook would have scored almost all of Smith’s chances, but wouldn’t have created the space or movement. We need someone who can do both to a decent level.

      I certainly think Alexander deserves some criticism for recent decisions. He’s been pragmatic to the extreme with the wrong personnel when it’s not been needed (Grimsby a great example with no target man to benefit), and sometimes when he felt he had space to be unnecessarily expansive it’s cost us (Notts County & Mansfield).

      I do however think the main place we’ve lost games is midfield. We are so weak & lacking depth there it’s outrageous.

      Look at any successful side in the League and they have strong performers there. As I say above we’ve relied on three players in two key positions. That’s why we’ve ended up seeing random players there (Oyegoke; Stubbs) during injury and have struggled in those matches.

      Midfield screens the defence but is also the bridge to attack. For what it’s worth, I think it’s no surprise we were at our best with a fit Smallwood & Clayton together – both proper fits for that role last season!

  12. I have never seen Alex G taking the team by the scruff of their necks and driving them towards victory – so why on earth make him captain? He’s a bang average league two player who, based on my viewings of him at home games, has 1 good game in 5, and drifts in and out of the other 4 as badly as the rest of the inconsistent underperforming squad!

    Midfield needs completely ripping up and staring again with players who put in steely displays, who don’t tin out of 50/50’s, who pass and MOVE into space, and above all pass the ball with an intent to get past the opposition.

  13. In an ideal world the start of 24/25 would look like this

    new manager

    GK – walker / new keeper

    RB – Halliday / new back up RB

    LB – new left back / Richards

    CB – 2 new CB’s / Stubbs / Platt

    CDM – 2 new CDM

    CM – 1 new centre mid (box to box) Pattison(fit) / Gilly

    Wingers – 2 new wingers / Chapman / Odur

    attacking mid – Walker / Pointon

    Strikers – Cook / Kavanagh / new striker

    Squad of 24

  14. Great article. I do have a soft spot for Stubbs. I think he is a great leader and last year he seemed less error prone, so I wonder if it’s just a confidence things. I would be OK seeing him in a back 4.

    I had a question in the other article that may have got lost with all of the “excitement”, that may impact the summer – takeover rumours? I have heard nothing on it? Am I living under a rock or is there someone who can shed some light on it?

    Last thought to the set of asks to Mr Sharpe :). I would love to see this long term identify also run through a coaching structure too. Bring in ex players in at different junior levels, every 2-3 years keep moving them to more senior teams and then potentially into first team coaches in the future. It’s the European common approach but I like it, and I think it’s super motivating for kids to also be coached by known ex players. 

  15. Brad Halliday is not a good footballer. Brad Halliday runs, runs and then, after getting himself hideously out of position/misplacing a pass and in the process getting someone else out of position, runs some more. Brad Halliday plays the the law of averages so every now and then a cross/meaningful pass will reach it’s intended target…but not often. If we can sell him, we should. Brad Halliday points a lot.