No reason to panic, but few reasons to be optimistic about Bradford City kicking off pre-season with defeat

Chorley 2
Carr 1+27
Bradford City 0

By Jason McKeown

Don’t panic. Of course don’t panic. Why would you panic? Chill. It’s pre-season. No points were lost. Nothing was at stake. Instead relax. Smile. Have a drink. And don’t think too much about this limp defeat.

Don’t panic about how easily Bradford City were beaten in their first pre-season run out. The big hole in the Bantams defence that allowed Chorley’s Tom Carr to open the scoring in under a minute. The horrendous goalkeeping that resulted in Carr making it 2-0 just before the half hour mark. The fact Chorley are a National League North outfit, made up of semi-pros, and Bradford City are supposed to be a club habouring realistic hopes of promotion to League One.

Don’t panic. But worry if you want to. In pre-season, nothing can be proven or disproven. Confirmation bias flourishes. If you’re feeling upbeat about Bradford City’s prospects for this season, you can shrug this off as a meaningless friendly and maintain your bubble of positivity. If you’re worried that Stefan Rupp pledges to invest more haven’t yet resulted in a tangibly better squad, this tepid performance represents a flashing red warning light on the dashboard.

Choose your own truth. I’m not judging. No one knows really how significant a result this is. And so no one is wrong or right to feel how they do right now.

What we can all agree on is that losing football matches is not a good habit to get into, and so this was not an afternoon to offer up great encouragement. City were hampered by the unavailability of Tyreik Wright, Brad Halliday, Calum Johnson, Calum Kavangh, Aden Baldwin, Colin Doyle and Kevin McDonald. With Graham Alexander wanting to restrict every player to 45 minutes action, City youngsters and a trialist goalkeeper were used to make up the numbers. Some caught the eye, others found it tough going. It’s harsh, but the old maxim that you’re only as strong as your weakest player rang true.

In the first half especially, City looked more like a group of thrown-together individuals than a cohesive football team. Mr A. Trialist – rumoured to be Spennymoor Town’s highly rated former Middlesbrough trainee Brad James, but who knows – struggled in the main. There was not much he could do about Chorley’s first goal, but some unconvincing attempts to catch crosses gave the home side reason to smell blood, and they quickly resorted to launching high balls into the box that caused more trialist keeper squirms and eventually a second Chorley goal.

Mr Trialist did make one very good save and was ultimately not helped by a shaky defence in front of him, with youngster Max Murray enduring a tough first half. At times it felt like City’s 3-5-2 line-up was operating as a 4-4-2. Wing backs Alex Gilliead and Adam Wilson were stationed too far up the pitch – basically operating as wingers with little interest tracking back. This resulted in wide centre halves Murray and Ciaran Kelly splitting out too far to cover the gaps. This left middle centre back Neill Byrne exposed, prompting Richie Smallwood to drop back to support on some occasions. Byrne equipped himself well, but the vast spaces left by City were regularly exploited by an enthusiastic Chorley side.

Where Chorley attacked with vigour, City laboured in the final third. Vadaine Oliver is still here, still trying to carve out a greater Bradford City role than man on the sidelines, but his struggles continued. Jake Young lined up alongside Oliver and was better yet was largely starved of the ball. Antoni Sarcevic showed some nice touches, but he and Bobby Pointon were forced to operate deeper than they would normally. It just wasn’t flowing from front to back.

All change at the break did lead to improvement. The second half Bradford City side largely took control of the game. Attacking with greater frequency, if lacking the sense of urgency and edge that would surely have come to the surface if there were genuine stakes in this game’s outcome.

For what it’s worth, Tyler Smith forced two good saves from Matt Urwin – the former Bantam number three, who was on the bench for that famous afternoon at Stamford Bridge. Jamie Walker seemed to be trying to replicate Cristiano Ronaldo vs Slovenia in how many free kick shots at goal he attempted. The Scot was just as unsuccessful as Ronaldo in finding the back of the net, but at least he didn’t cry.

Indeed, the only real emotions expressed by the players was a big beaming smile of a very lean-looking Andy Cook, when he blasted an effort well over the bar and over the tiny stand behind the goal. And there was some anger too from Alex Pattison, after he was fouled inside the box only for the referee to award City a free kick instead of a penalty. The players were trying, but gave off a body language of not being unduly concerned about their ongoing losing position. Fitness was what really mattered.

It was undoubtedly a more fluid Bradford City XI compared to the first half team. Gabe Wadsworth looked a revelation at right wing back. Fellow youth prospects George Goodman and Leon Brookes showed promise. Pattison glided past defenders with ease to remind us all what a big loss it was that he was injured for 90% of last season. There was some excellent link up play between Pattison and Jamie Walker that promises much for the season ahead. At the other end of the scale, Sam Stubbs was shaky at the back and Clarke Oduor struggled to affect the game. These imperfections ensured that – although Chorley were hanging on a bit – the hosts were good value for the win.

Don’t panic. Of course don’t panic. Why would we panic? And yet this was no marker of intent. No great demonstration of City’s quality and credentials. There was a chill in the air that was more than the Lancashire wind. And for Graham Alexander, it means the journey home would have felt less comfortable than the journey there. Restful sleep a little harder to achieve over the coming days.

Just as a convincing City thumping of Chorley would have been no guarantee they would romp to promotion this season, losing like this does not mean they are doomed to fail. Yet this performance shows there is work to do. Gaps to fill. Improvements to make. Ultimately, they have some way to go if they’re going to be ready for when it gets truly serious.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: ,

12 replies

  1. It’s good to have something well written to read about City after so long a break. I can’t believe the result of this match has a bearing on anything very much. But I am slightly surprised with all that firepower at out disposal we didn’t manage to score against a team from the sixth tier fielding several trialists. Can someone tell me where McDonald is? I did not see him on any of the training videos? Is he injured or training elsewhere? I may have missed a reference to him perhaps. Thanks once more to the esteemed writer for his services.

    • Why didn’t McDonald take the managers job before Christmas how stupid that was. He may never get the chance again?

  2. People will say it’s only a friendly, the team gelling, getting fitness levels, results don’t matter etc etc.

    But no matter who you are playing or at what level, winning becomes a very good habit and I’m sure the players will feel just a little bit hurt at getting beat by a part-time National League North side.

    I just hope that come the start of the season we don’t hear that well used phrase from some fans that we need to give the team 10 – 12 games to ‘gel’
    The seadon starts on August 10th and all good teams start on the front foot, not playing catch up in October/November.

    Let’s go!!!!!

  3. A good article.Id just make 2 points . Chorley played a friendly last Tuesday, which I feel makes a huge difference in terms of match fitness. I’ve seen many seasons where City have had a good pre-season, which wasn’t followed up by a good season and visa versa

  4. Yes it’s good to seeing WOAP back again and we are talking City and football once again.

    Firstly I don’t believe this result means anything. I sincerely believe this.

    Pre-season results over the years have proved that.

    But in reality nothing has changed.

    Rupp has not ‘invested’ as many thought he had promised although at the time many were not optimistic that this would manifest itself in ‘marquee’ signings.

    The fans forum (45 mins).proved to be another ‘tick box’ exercise fulfilling the obligation of the clubs charter and that of the EFL.

    There is debate as whether the new signings have improved the quality of the squad.

    I waa amazed at the take up.of season tickets and once again the Bantams faithful have given their usual superb backing to the club.

    As I say nothing has changed.

    • can’t believe this has prompted ‘dislikes’.

      There is nothing to disagree with.

      • Agree. Other than Sarcevic, the signings look bang average to me. No evidence whatsoever of increased investment in the playing budget. Rupp duped us again, but some of us never believed him in the first place.

    • “Firstly I don’t believe this result means anything. I sincerely believe this. Pre-season results over the years have proved that.”

      I read a post on the Cow’s Arse forum earlier, which I do happen to agree with (the horror!).

      A point was made referring to the terrible 2018/19 season, in that we lost every friendly bar one (a last minute win at BPA), including losses to several non-league sides and the awful 7-2 at Harrogate.

      It was a terrible pre-season, no doubt impacted by the various off-field issues at the club. 5 games into the season we sacked the new manager and the season overall couldn’t have gone any worse.

      While I do agree friendly results don’t matter individually, in the context of an overall preseason programme a complete set of poor results and performances is something not to be ignored.

      Besides, it’s not the 1990s anymore – I’ve seen comments saying ‘we beat this team or lost to that and it didn’t matter’ – true, but the game has moved on, including preparations, build up and general training activity.

  5. One match does not make a season. This was a friendly and preparation leading up to it was minimal. As pre-season progresses we will see a picture of what the season will look like. Early days not worried ATM.

  6. welcome back Jason and woap team. Looks like another long season ahead of ups and downs. Mr trialist may not have passed his trial, so that’s something learnt at least.

  7. For one of the sides it was a case of 45mins in an unfamiliar team after a week of very hard physical graft and 3 months without a game. For the other it was their cup final, all looking to impress the league scouts.

    no one got injured, most of the squad got some minutes and one of the juniors impressed so all in all a good day

  8. I remember the Derek Adams’ pre season where we won all but one of our games and myself and my dad remarked how good we looked when we beat Blackburn (I think) at home 2-0 with both Cook and Cooke scoring. That pre season and the good start, after 4 games, made me think we were onto something, how wrong that turned out to be… Of course your preparations and training are important in pre-season but results wise I don’t know if there is a connection between results in pre season and where you finish. Be an interesting analysis looking at teams that got promotion and relegation and see where they finished, one that I won’t be doing myself.