The 2024/25 Bradford City season preview: Is there enough midfield thrust to boost Bantams’ goal record?

By Jason McKeown, Tim Penfold and Alex Scott

See the first, second and third parts of our Bradford City squad assessment.

Onto midfield then.

It was a small change but a significant one. Out of form in March, and as the protests played out at Valley Parade on Good Friday, City faced a crunch game with Tranmere, where Graham Alexander switched his midfield three from two holding and one number 10, to one holder and two attacking midfielders. He inverted the triangle. And succeeded in making City more effective.

Will Alexander continue that approach this season? The summer recruitment in this area hasn’t been considerable, and a clutch of familiar faces will be tasked with delivering in the middle of the park. But there is at least one significant arrival that could alter the dynamic.

Richie Smallwood

23/24 appsMins %GoalsAssists
39 (3)83%12

By Tim

Richie Smallwood has been, shall we say, a divisive player in his two seasons at Bradford City.

Signed by Mark Hughes to replace Elliot Watt at the base of the midfield, Smallwood has generally not hit the heights expected of him in his time at the club. He was woefully miscast as a deep playmaker when he’s spent much of his career as a ball-winner, and his partnership with Alex Gilliead was high on industry but low in quality, particularly when City dominated possession and had to break down teams that were sitting in. He was captain, but that seemed to give him the right to take every set piece, and while his corners often beat the first man, they also often beat every single other man and sailed out of play.

Yet under Graham Alexander he has shown some better form. Alexander’s teams don’t want the ball as much, and that plays into Smallwood’s strengths, although sometimes this has meant that he’s gone from endless sideways passes to endless hoofs into the corner.

At the end of the season though, the midfield really clicked. Smallwood’s role was simple – win the ball back and give it to either Pointon or Walker to progress it forward. With Halliday and Wright as attacking wing backs carrying the ball from back to front too, it was no longer all on him to get the ball up the pitch, and Smallwood’s performances improved no end as a result.

This is a key season now for the City skipper. He’s still the obvious choice for the deepest midfielder unless we play Sarcevic deeper, and he’s got one year left on his contract without an extension clause this time. If he can play like he finished last season, and is in a role that suits his strengths and weaknesses, then he may end up remembered quite fondly, but if the squad he leads continues to flounder then his City career will remain a disappointment.

What a good season looks like: Plays well and regularly in defensive midfield, breaking up play and generally being an asset to the team. Lee Bullock 2009/10.

What a great season looks like: His leadership and performances drive the team on to new heights and, hopefully, promotion. Stuart McCall 1998/99.

Alex Gilliead

23/24 appsMins %GoalsAssists
33 (5)70%31

By Jason

There were eyebrows raised by some when Alex Gilliead polled second in the WOAP writers’ player of the season award for 2023/24. A player who never lets anyone down, but who rarely seems to be the standout difference. Gilliead scored brownie points for playing reasonably well in a team that was not always playing coherently.

Gilliead was fine. Not the problem, if not exactly looking like the long-term solution for a team that stuttered for most of last season.  

The club’s longest serving player, Gilliead goes into a fourth straight season at Valley Parade with long-standing concerns about his end product still lingering, and an uncomfortable truth that the team ended last season in excellent form, with the North East native on the sidelines. Injury had struck in March, and in Gilliead’s absence Alexander unearthed a new formula of playing only one defensive midfielder – six wins from seven the impressive result.

And so Gilliead will find the competition for places tougher this time around. No longer Richie Smallwood’s midfield wingman, but a direct opponent for the only holding role. With Alexander going to great lengths to keep Smallwood over the summer, Gilliead’s prospects have diminished. Especially with suggestions close season arrival Antoni Sarcevic could end up playing deeper.

In some ways, Gilliead is now in a position where most of us would ideally like him to be. A squad player who can make an impact. Filling in different positions when needed. Fresh legs off the bench, when others are tiring. Gilliead could easily play 30 games this season without being first choice, making an important contribution that the team can’t do without. A much-needed Plan B.

It’s not necessarily great for Gilliead himself, but with City needing to raise the bar to raise the table, it might not be a bad thing if overall standards leave him more on the fringes.

Alternatively, Alexander might abandon last season’s late boldness of playing two attacking midfielders behind a front two and decide he needs another holder. Or Smallwood doesn’t hit the heights we need him to, and is dropped.

We’ve all seen enough of Gilliead to know what he is good at – and so what his ceiling probably is. You can’t not love the guy for the many great things he embodies. You wouldn’t want to lose his positive influence. But the harsh truth is that if Gilliead’s polling second in our player of the season poll come next May, it’s probably because something has gone wrong at the club again.

What a good season looks like: He produces another 12 months of whole-hearted, committed performances and scoops plenty of man of the match awards along the way. Alex Gilliead in 2023/24.  

What a great season looks like: He becomes the driver of the team. Playing as a deep midfielder with a good eye for a pass and inspiring others, attracting adoration from fans who sing his name all season. Josh Cullen in 2016/17.

Kevin McDonald

23/24 appsMins %GoalsAssists
10 (9)25%00

By Alex

Ooft. What is there to say, really? Coming to join Mark Hughes’s ball playing squad, set on a promotion push in the summer of 2023, the move up north seemed a potentially great one for McDonald, coming off a serious illness and a kidney transplant. A former Premier League player, no longer capable of competing at the level, the Scot will have found kinship with Hughes at Valley Parade, and this will have seemed as safe a landing zone as any to get back into football. 

Fast forward three months, Hughes was out and McDonald was managing the team for an extended period, losing all the fitness he had previously built up. Then a new manager comes in, imposing a completely different style, decides he doesn’t fancy McDonald, and leaves him to atrophy on the bench from January with another 18 months to run on his contract.

At least he had a preseason to get back up to fitness this summer. Except he’s been banished again out of the first team squad, refused a place on the squad’s summer trip to Austria, with the club repeatedly leaking to the T&A how he doesn’t have a future with the squad. Antoni Sarcevic has seemingly taken his place in the squad and midfield rotation and that is probably all she wrote for Kev in a City shirt. 

Save for injury and illness, it’s hard to think how his year long spell at Valley Parade could have gone worse. He now has seemingly no market after now essentially four years without a decent run in a team. 

Especially given the service he gave the club late last year, stepping into the lurch after the leadership completely bungled the start of the season, at the cost of one of the final seasons of his career, the way he’s been treated by the club over the past six months has been really poor. The rawest of raw deals.

What a good season looks like: He finds somewhere where he can play somewhere he is valued.

What a great season looks like. We’ll settle for a good one, ta. 

Antoni Sarcevic

23/24 appsMins %GoalsAssists
28 (5)58%87

By Jason

It’s fair to say that Antoni Sarcevic is the most exciting capture of the summer so far. A distinctive name and a distinctive playing style, the Manchester Messi is a well-known lower league player, with a CV that features seven promotions (five from League Two). The Bantams are looking for serial winners. Looking for people like Sarcevic to spread his magic dust over a club weighed down by failure.

On paper it’s a great signing. Sarcevic has just helped Stockport win the league with 15 goal involvements along the way. He’s 32, so far from over the hill. Vice-captain at Edgeley Park, he brings leadership and knows this level incredibly well. His experience and know-how could be huge. He’s also worked with Alexander before at Fleetwood, so there seems to be little risk of a bad manager-player relationship.

All really good stuff. Genuinely, this could be a lot of fun. But there’s a but. This is a good signing…yet the more you think about it, the less sense it really makes. Especially after a close season where the club has told us they are restricted on signing players because of a need to move on others. Sarcevic is bolstering a part of the team that was arguably least in need of strengthening.

Where he will play is the big question. He is known as an attack-minded midfielder but has played deeper in recent years. Billed as a “deep-lying playmaker” he is arguably the player City spent 18 months wanting Richie Smallwood to be, before accepting defeat and letting the captain concentrate on being a holding midfielder who wins and gives the ball to more talented players.

On the surface, Sarcevic could be Smallwood’s replacement – but why retain the (supposedly) well-paid captain if you’re going to move him to the sidelines? There is every chance Sarcevic could end up in a more advanced role, playing with Jamie Walker, and ahead of Bobby Pointon and Alex Pattison. Again not the biggest priority you’d think. Sarcevic could be many things for City this season – including career staller of the club’s most exciting emerging talent in 20 years.

Ultimately, Sarcevic’s biggest problem might be fitting into a City midfield that ended last season looking hugely effective. If he claims a high-performing team-mate’s place and elevates the team, that’s got to be good of course. (We are Bradford City AFC, not Bobby Pointon AFC.) But the worry is that the resources spent bringing Sarcevic might – whisper it – have been better used elsewhere.

Put it this way, if Sarcevic doesn’t significantly shift the dial, and the current suspicions that City are defensively weaker prove to be the reality, the Manchester Messi might not prove to be the winner we thought we lacked after all.

What a good season looks like: He fits in effectively, producing a series of strong displays and memorable goals, but the team as a whole just falls short of promotion. Billy Knott in 2014/15.  

What a great season looks like: He proves to be the inspirational leader who transforms the culture of the dressing room, bringing a winning mentality to the club through a series of inspirational displays that invite hero-worshipping status from the Bradford public. Gary Jones in 2012/13.  

Tomorrow, we move onto the attacking part of the midfield.



Categories: Previews

Tags:

13 replies

  1. I think we are light in the defensive midfield areas currently

    although we ended the season with one defensive midfielder we may need to revert back to two defensive midfielders during the season at certain times

    I would like to see another centre back and defensive midfielder arrive before the end of August

  2. One of the reasons we failed last year was the inability to replace quality when injuries occurred. Keeping everyone happy will hopefully be a good problem to have.

    As pointed out if Gilliead is a huge part of the starting XI this season something has gone wrong, Clarke Oduor and Tyler Smith the same. He has let nobody down and has been a great servant. He will have a part to play this year from the bench, in the cup and potentially from wing back if required. This will probably be his final season as a Bantam though as he will want to play more of a role. However, as we have always experienced, a man of complete professionalism he will play his squad role and be a brilliant member of the dressing room.

    We previously had a squad that could cope with 1 big injury and be at the same level as we saw last season but as soon as Walker and Pattison missed time together we struggled creating. This year that isn’t the case and that’s why I think Sarcevic is a really important signing and alongside Pattison – who will be like a new signing himself – we are so much stronger than last season in these positions.

    Injuries will happen, suspensions will happen. For the first time in a long time we look well positioned to cope with them in midfield.

    • I agree. Far too much of last season (and the previous ones) we’ve lacked strength in depth that has had a major impact when key players were injured or their form dipped.

      Had we had adequate replacements for Cook and Lewis at the start of last season I suspect both would have been dropped. As Lewis (form) and Cook (fitness) weren’t hitting the same heights of 22/23.

      I still think we’re light on genuine quality in defence and we need a decent second choice keeper. It’s too much to expect Walker to maintain both fitness and form over the full season.

  3. this article is nonsense how can you compare both Smallwood and Gilliead to McCall and Cullen. You cannot mention both sets of players in the sentence. Players play in higher leagues in different eras at different times in their careers. McCall is the best ever Bradford City player. he was a better and a different type of player who was box to box in the promotion push in the late 1980s. Whilst Smallwood is one of the worst players who has come down from the Championship with a big reputation and has only delivered in the last two months of his contract. Which seemed to coincide with him wanting a new contract. Smallwood is more like a Mark Aizlewood who flattened to deceive in a City shirt.

    • I think this comment is unfair and can I ask for a bit more respect? 3 people have worked hard on this article and whether you agree or disagree it’s a bit rude to call it nonsense.

      I respectfully suggest you might have missed the point. At no point are we comparing current players to McCall and Cullen in terms of ability. Why on earth would we? We are simply looking at seasonal impact and what a current player could do this season that’s good/great, compared to what other City players have done in the past that’s considered good/great.

      Spoiler alert, we mention Nahki Wells on Friday but in no way are we comparing any City player to him. It’s more season impact good/great

      Hope this helps. Jason

      • Jason, you have my respect. Although, I would ask if you are comparing players against players from our history what are you comparing them against if it isn’t ability? Because if it is impact surely that is based upon ability and how they played in a City shirt?

        I think if people are comparing it should be against similar ability and players from the same division. Otherwise your article could be considered silly.

        Hope this helps.

      • As I say, we are not comparing ability. We are comparing the impact on the team and the season, comparing to players from the past and the impact they had on different seasons.

        Take Smallwood. No one for any second is comparing him to McCall for ability. That would make no sense. But as captain and central midfielder, we can say that a great season for Smallwood would be to prove to be an inspirational leading who drives higher standards in others and puts in a series of excellent displays. And a comparison to that would be the impact McCall had on City’s 1998/99 season.

        Again spoiler a lot but when considering for tomorrow’s piece what a great Jamie Walker season looks like, there isn’t really a good seasonal impact comparison. Because City have had very few number 10s deliver a great season worth of lots of goals and assists. So after a lot of debate we are benchmarking it as Beagrie 98/99. Obviously two very different players with very different attributes, but Beagrie scored 15 times that season and was very popular. That’s something Walker could emulate.

      • Man using the pseudonym ‘Jimmy Quinn was the best’ says ‘McCall is the best’

        Make your mind up son.

    • I thought Jimmy Quinn was the best. Come on, make your mind up! 😂

  4. In a word, we are strong in midfield attack and have little cover in the midfield sitter role.

  5. Unsure why there seems to be this view that McDonald is been treated poorly.

    Elite sport is brutal. GA didn’t sign him and so if he’s not part of the managers plans, why is that seemed as so terrible?

    A lot of people think he should be treated differently because he was our caretaker manager. Let’s remember that was a mixed bad. It started well, but then there was the luckiest win of the season at Wimbledon, then an admittedly great draw against Wrexham, followed by two of our worst performances of the season.

    We can’t afford to keep players, purely on sentiment.

    • What’s to be gained by “shunning” him? the price of a trip to Austria!

      What’s to be gained by treating him respectfully? who knows.

  6. We had too many players on the pitch who were happy just to make up the numbers, and wanted their team mates to take risks/ win games. Smallwood and Gilliead were amongst the worst offenders.

    I cant remember Smallwood ever turning a player or driving forward with the ball. And Gilliead seemed to be scared of shooting. wasn’t he a winger?