Brutal and eye-opening – dominant Doncaster put Bradford City back in their place

Bradford City 1
Cook 83
Doncaster Rovers 2
Molyneux 57, Sharp 66

By Jason McKeown

The worst part is that now we can’t avoid having to downgrade our expectations. Bubbles were burst as reality took a great big bite here. Growing excitement over Bradford City promotion prospects has taken on significant damage. Just as we could begin to dream, we experienced the painful thud of crashing back down to earth.

It was a Doncaster Rovers mauling of the Bantams, even if the final 15 minutes and final score masked some of the starkness in the gulf between the two sides. The crazy aspect was City almost got away with it. Almost snatched the most unlikely of draws. They had a real go in the closing stages, and had Doncaster on the ropes. Some pride was resorted. But even if the players had succeeded in coming back from 2-0 down to earn a point, the cracks would have been difficult to paper over.

The simple truth is that City were no match for a terrific Doncaster Rovers, who for 75 minutes completely outplayed the home side and should have run up a commanding lead. It was the best visiting performance at Valley Parade since Mansfield’s emphatic 5-1 victory last March. But on that occasion, the Stags’ dominance owed as much to City’s awfulness as it did opposition brilliance. Here, there wasn’t that tiny crumb of comfort to take. City’s failings were not because they didn’t turn up. They just couldn’t live with their vibrant opponents.

The Bantams were not awful by any stretch. They had good spells in the game, especially early doors. But when Doncaster stepped it up, they played at a level the home side could not live with.

It was a clinical and brutal assassination of Bradford City’s character. If before the game you’d have been asked to write a list of the Bantams’ weaknesses this season, you probably wouldn’t have been able to come up with anything that Rovers manager Grant McCann evidently hadn’t thought of. The over-reliance of Andy Cook. The struggle to find him an effective strike partner. Getting the balance right in midfield with the choice of number 8s. The fact Richie Smallwood can be left too exposed. The struggles of Cheick Diabete on the ball. The defensive gaps Tyreik Wright leaves at left wing back.

In most games City have completed so far this season, they’ve coped with these weaknesses because their list of strengths have tipped the balance in their favour against limited opposition. But Doncaster Rovers were no run-of-the-mill League Two outfit. They knew how to exploit City’s shortcomings, and crucially had the capability to carry it out.

And so, lining up in a 3-4-2-1 formation, Doncaster seized control and ultimately made it count. The Nigerian defender Joseph Olowu had a terrific game against Cook, ably supported by Jay McGrath and Jack Senior. Just in front of them, Owen Bailey and George Broadbent sat deep and set traps that Bobby Pointon and Jamie Walker fell for. Linking up with Kyle Hurst and Luke Molyenux, Bailey and Broadbent swarmed over Richie Smallwood, who was hopelessly outgunned. Hurst and Molyenux were the best two players on the pitch, with intelligent movement dragging Diabete and Jack Shepherd out of position and causing carnage.

It really did feel like a back to the drawing board moment for Graham Alexander. After the injury crisis struggles of 4-4-2 saw him return to a 3-5-2 that – since March’s midfield pivot to a pair of number 8s in front of Smallwood – has been so successful, here the proven gameplan was badly blunted.

There is an argument – and a good one for me – that City were too gung ho. Everyone has been pleading for Alexander to play Walker and Pointon together with good reason, but the ill and absent Clarke Oduor – who is technically nowhere near as able, but who is more defensive-minded and disciplined – was missed. Smallwood needed help, and there was none coming from Walker and Pointon, who not unreasonably were prioritising popping up in the final third. Both were guilty of losing the ball in bad areas in the first half that led to threatening counter attacks. And though Pointon at least was behind City’s best attacking moments, the warning signs were there from very early on.

City had lots of the ball – 60% over the 90 minutes in fact – but struggled to offer much. Some nice passing, movement and commitment of bodies in the box waiting for crosses from outwide. But as soon as they lost possession, Doncaster countered with menace and purpose. The visitors created – and wasted – some fantastic opportunities when they overloaded City defensive players. It was no small achievement the Bantams made it to half time still level. But the fact they had failed to muster a single shot on target in the first 45 minutes said much about the direction of travel.

Alexander tried to change it at the break, swapping Pointon to the right and Walker to the left. His reasoning is it would make City more dynamic in switching the play, and so get wing backs Jay Benn and Tyreik Wright in better attacking positions. But it wasn’t radical enough to stem the tide. Ultimately it made no difference.

Because 12 minutes into the second half, Doncaster deservedly went ahead. Again it was a counter attack, and again they had created an overload. This time the final pass from Hurst was spot on, playing Molyneux into space. The 26-year-old struck a low shot past Sam Walker to send a lively Doncaster away following into raptures.

Nine minutes later, Hurst picked up possession deep and went on a superb run. No one stopped him getting into the box and sending over a low cross, from which the wily 38-year-old Billy Sharp was free to tap home for his 278th career goal. Rovers could have made it much more. From the start of the second half to the 75th minute, Doncaster had nine shots on goal to City’s three, and racked up seven corners to the home side’s two. It was one-way traffic.

What rankles most about that period is how long it took Alexander to try and change it. He absolutely should have done something at half time to address the problems Smallwood was experiencing. Introducing Cory Evans, perhaps, and going 3-4-3. Going more defensive to curb Doncaster’s dominance. And yes, that sounds like a negative move that might not have aided the manager’s popularity stakes. But, at half time, what City fan wasn’t reflecting on Doncaster’s superiority and pondering if they’d settle for a point? Sometimes you have to be pragmatic.

Even if that was too soon to act, surely Doncaster’s opening goal should have been the cue to change things. 1-0 down, Alexander stood on impassively as his charges continued to struggle against the visitors’ excellence. A second goal was coming well before Sharp struck. Actions needed to have been taken to curb this. City had no plan to win back possession when they lost it, and that’s why they lost the game.

It’s times like this that make you realise that as fine of a job as Alexander is doing – and he really is – in crucial moments he still lacks that bravery and acumen to make tough, effective choices. Why did he continue to allow Wright to struggle so badly? Tolerate Tyler Smith’s ineffectiveness (City lacked their usual pressing game without Calum Kavanagh)? Recognise that Walker and Pointon were too immobile out of possession, leading to Doncaster attacks that outnumbered home players?

Eventually Alexander did act, making 5 (five!) changes in one go. Kavanagh for Smith, Brad Halliday for a struggling Diabete, Lewis Richards for Wright, Vadaine Oliver for Walker, and Evans for Benn (who found it tougher going on his return from illness). And it was a move 3-4-3, with Smallwood helped out by Evans. And it was more successful.

With seven minutes to go, Richards found space on the left wing and sent over a brilliant cross that Cook headed home to reduce the arrears. And suddenly we saw a completely different game. City pushed forward, roared on by a packed home crowd that stayed with the team all afternoon. Doncaster looked nervous and edgy. Crawling, rather than striding, their way to the finish line. Oliver and Neill Byrne had opportunities to equalise. Richards was great – he surely starts from now on. Deserved or otherwise, a City equaliser would have surely sparked scenes of bedlam.

But time ran out. The quintet of substitutions was ultimately too little too late. And really, there can be no complaints. The better team absolutely won.

And that’s why this defeat can’t be easily shrugged off as a bad day at the office. An under-performance in the manner of their three previous league defeats at Grimsby, Walsall and Harrogate. This was something bigger, something more significant. No one would claim City played well, but that was because they weren’t allowed to. Another League Two side has strode into our backyard and exposed our inadequacies.

No need to panic. Absolutely no need to panic. But work to do for sure. The positive run of late was no fluke, but did partly disguise the growing problem of a lack of partner for Cook. Stopped us thinking too much about suspicions we didn’t recruit well enough at left wing back over the summer. And quietened conversations that maybe converting a forward into such a specialist position is not the most robust of plans.

Every City fan loves Bobby – what a talent he is – but maybe, maybe, Alexander has been getting it right over the amount of minutes he’s had so far this season. Certainly the balance in midfield is an issue we can’t ignore. If you didn’t rate Oduor before, you might do a little more after that.

It’s fair to say that as a fanbase scarred by the let downs of the last few years, we haven’t been getting carried away with the P word. But up until today, there were many reasons to quietly believe this could be City’s year. Not least, a feeling that this division is much weaker than last year – and the year before for that matter – and that there is no one to fear. But Doncaster have rudely shown us there is, in fact, another level. High standards do indeed still exist in League Two. A standard that City have so far not come close to reaching.

And so the unavoidable downgrade. In no way should we be dismissing City’s promotion prospects. But today was the day that the automatic promotion places began to feel more of a pipedream (especially when you look at the table and realise Doncaster are still only fourth), albeit it with a long way to go. We turned up in good numbers – even Stefan Rupp was here – hoping for City to make a real statement of intent. But what we saw was something very different.

The evidence so far this season suggests City are play off contenders. But perhaps no more than that. Not the end of the world for sure. Offer us a trip to Wembley and play off success next May, and I’m sure most of us would gladly accept. It’s just that for a while there, City were hinting they could do something even bigger.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

50 replies

  1. A very passionate report Jason. I love your work I really do. iI’s pretty rare I get to see a game live as despite being a season ticket holder I live for from home and your reports and commentary are a massive part of helping me maintain my lonely passion! But… I was there today and despite losing I actually thought we performed pretty well. First 30 I thought we were by far the better team, yes we looked a bit shaky on the counter but overall we looked really good. I think it’s ok that another good team has a spell of pressure and scored a couple of goals, disappointing and frustrating but to be fair we responded and could easily of got out of jail with a draw. As a result of today I actually feel pretty upbeat about the situation, we clearly have character and ability and so many good players to come back to fitness….I can’t wait to get back up and see us play again!

  2. Personally, I haven’t been getting carried away (just yet) about City making it up through the autos. I’m sure we’ll be fairly close and today maybe helped us supporters to regain an understanding that we’re certainly nowhere near being a team that is going to walk it up to League 1. I thought we played fairly well and had our chances even if we didn’t have as many as Donny. Looking at the next three fixtures, you’d like to think we should get a decent return of points in those games and we’re still in a playoff position as it stands so reasons to be optimistic!

  3. As ever a fair write up. And spot on with so many points. But I would genuinely ask, and I a truly not being contentious, what has really changed? We hounded out Mark Hughes who at this point in his play off season had 3 more points, We bemoaned his defensive style and lack of cutting edge. Yet, we are playing 5 at the back, with RS holding, and never ever look like scoring unless Cook can pull us out of trouble. But GA gets plaudits for this.

    For the record, I think GA is a nice man and has great values. I think CL, from meeting them both, is a great footballing mind. I wish them both nothing but success. And I am not so silly to not recognise that he had, up to today, the highest win % for many a year. But, I never feel entertained.

    I don’t even suggest this is a Bradford City problem. The game is determined by stats and copying the Man C model when clubs simply cannot do it. Many clubs are so possession based but with no output. We were so utterly neat and tidy today. We displayed some lovely one touch balls. But achieved the sum part of nothing.

    Doncaster on the other hand played gung ho counter attacking football that was frankly lovely. They could have been 3 up at half time and had 5 to their name at full time.

    The two playing 8 needs addressing. Walker reduced us to 10 men today. He’s a lovely guy, a credit to his profession and I don’t dislike him but is he really improving BCFC in his current role? I will not criticise a young man learning his profession in BP, but we need more. I hope it comes from BP who is an assured player.

    This is not an over reaction to a defeat. We were squarely beaten by a better side. `Buth both Harrogate and Morecambe that I attended in person still haunt me.

    There’s the beginnings of a side there. But, maybe we are too negative and don’t trust our players.

    I would love to know others thoughts on this.

  4. I agree with most of the points but just not the gulf in class.

    Yes Donny were the better team and deservedly won the game but for me they weren’t in a different stratosphere.
    They got their game plan right and played some really good counter attacking football which we struggled to cope with at times.

    Alexander should definitely have changed things earlier because doing it at 2-0 was too late but at 1-0 or with an extra ten minutes then we’d have maybe undeservedly taken something from the game.

    Bobby, Smallwood and JW is still our best midfield and our weaknesses are clear as day at LWB and next to Cook.

    I do agree that it proved that we’re a playoff team but not a top three team.

    We were five unbeaten before today and a lot of the good things about us are still true even though we’ve lost one.
    Old adage of try not to get too high with the wins or too low with the defeats etc.

    The atmosphere towards the end was fantastic and that along with the way that we were playing in those last ten minutes reminded me of the PP days.

    Shift Wright and Smith out in January and replace them with quality at LWB and next to Cook and we’d be ready to take that next step.

    • Wright’s got three assists and several other goal involvements.

      He also sent three superb crosses in during the first half and it’s not his fault attackers aren not knocking them in. He did another superb across the ground pass/cross against Tranmere, which you still marvel who it didn’t go in.

      Yes. He has flaws. But the main flaw is fans thinking he’s a LWB when he plays the left hand side of a midfield four.

      That’s the problem, as I wrote earlier we are too open at times when we play this system and that inevitably mans that all the left / right sided players are often made to look silly on the counter-attack.

      It doesn’t help that both the wide centre backs lack experience in playing that position.

      So I think there’s a collective fault in not getting Wright performing at his best at all times, but unfortunately the injuries to the defenders have meant we won’t see his best – until we have a dynamic street wise LCB, who know how to cover for him.

      So offloading him in January, is just knee-jerk. The type of thing poor managers do – as opposed to coaching them better.

  5. I have to say, even when I disagree with WOTP posts I can usually see a point but find this one way off the mark..

    usually spot on but in no way were we dominated today. Donny had opportunities and fluffed some good ones, but only as City did. And yes no shots on target but for example the ball played back from Wright that rolled all the way through the box without being hit in by anyone- far better chance than a shot on target but doesn’t register as a stat. I thought we went in evenly matched at half time.

    second half, their first goal was not a formation/starting line up issue… three players zoning on the ball and not watching the runner left him open to score. They capitalised on an error.

    Second goal is one Andy Cook would usually be on the end of. Striker making a run hoping the ball would be put in to him.

    Benn wasn’t 100% today and Halliday shouldn’t have been dropped after his recent performances. That position is strongly fought after and Brad is well up to the challenge. Wright has been poor but links up well with creative players Pointon and Walker- but Richards has his name on that spot for me.

    Some good second half chances wasted/saved (Pointon rushing his shot from edge of box, Kavanagh goal disallowed for some infringement in the build up, Byrne powerful shot straight at keeper, Cook header just wide of the post, Oliver free header he put back across goal) we were certainly competing with Donny everywhere.
    These are one of the better sides we will face this season and I think we matched them all over. We lack pace in any counter we offer and Kavanagh/smith have the pace without the precision to finalise things.
    Sorry but I found this post really negative and missing out on many good points of the game, mainly the fighting and effort levels which we have missed over recent seasons.
    great to see the fans singing through Donny goal celebrations and getting behind the team immediately. If we play like we have been doing recently we will be in the automatics by May. That performance today would have beaten 20 teams in this league.
    up the Chickens!

  6. After Doncaster scored their first goal, Benn chased a long ball and when it went out of play, he was clearly struggling. It took at least another 5 minutes before he was taken off, during which Doncaster scored their second goal.
    Many fans in the Kop saw Benn was struggling but either Benn should have sought treatment immediately and slowed things down or the bench realised what was happening and changed things earlier than they did.
    It would be nice to know if Alexander has acknowledged this in the after-match interviews.
    Overall, it was bad defending due to a lack of organization by the defence when sorting out who should follow/mark who that led to Molyneaux being free for the first goal and Benn not being able to get back, leaving Diabate exposed for Hurst to run at and passed him to cross for Sharp to score. Leaving Sharp on his own is unforgiveable, knowing his quality.
    Onwards and upwards to the next game, with minor changes needed to improve….

    • Benn pulled up immediately before they broke for their second goal. If he hadn’t they probably wouldn’t have scored it because he’d have been able to track back. Unfortunately the play moved too quick for him to go down.

      It was maybe naive of him not to go down for treatment after that, but ultimately that probably didn’t affect the result.

      • Maybe it’s just me but I said to my daughter before half time that Benn wasn’t right. After half time a blind man could spot that he was in serious trouble. I think he should have asked to be taken off but more worrying is that no one from the bench seemed to notice it, care or react to it.

  7. Totally agree with everything you said. I came down from Scotland with my City loving daughter to watch the match. I’m a fairly straight talking Yorkshire man who would have saved a few lines if I were writing your article by just saying that we were shite…..I hope Stephan Rupp understands the dismal rubbish we have to endure. What would we be like without Cooky ???? It doesn’t bear thinking about.

    • saying we were S****e today is complete garbage. Yes they got one over us tactically today and that can happen but we weren’t rubbish. The reason the atmosphere is better is because the vast majority of us can see we are no longer rubbish we are work in progress and 80% a decent team, well drilled and some excellent pros with some developing young lads involved more than we would probably like due to injuries. It’s a long season and expect a busy January to continue some reasonable recruitment so far.

      • pure citythink. A bloke has put a lot of time and money to come and watch the match (more than you), possibly more than me with the drive up from West Oxfordshire…..he’s entitled his opinion. To be “turned over” at home, in front of a returning, good sized crowd is so city. Donny are hardly running away with it at the top. So to see the pied piper excuses cone out…..we are not 80% there at all. We are clinging to an aging striker that the owners, the ex wigan grandaddys boy, and GA cannot find a solution to. Without his goals we are mod table at best.

        we were shite yesterday and underwhelming against an odds and sods team on Tuesday. The calibre of which they had a lad playing who was turning out for £150 a week the start of the season before. So keep the excuse monkeying.

    • I can understand the frustration Ian, but it’s a fine line between being straight talking and not thinking about what you’re saying.

      I enjoyed a good game of football which we came out on the wrong side of, it happens. You don’t get it all your own way against good sides, and there will be days this season when we go away and get a good result against a top side.

      • Thanks for the reply, just to clarify, I actually did think about what I wanted to say before I said it…..I just said what I was thinking. Doesn’t make me wrong. As someone who has been watching City home and occasionally away for over 55 years I can honestly say that I’ve seen good and bad matches, good and bad city teams, good and bad results and as a result I feel able to comment on what I’m seeing at the moment. I generally agree with most of what you say. Do I have the answers….of course not….do you have the answers…..of course not but it doesn’t make my criticism any less valid. This is definitely one of the most insipid teams I’ve seen for a while. Yes, slightly better than last season…so far but is that what we are settling for? Slightly better than last season?

      • Fair enough Ian. I see it a bit differently and I’m still quite positive that we’ll have a good season. Let’s hope for both our sakes that I turn out to be right!

      • Agreed 🤞

  8. Jason says we didn’t recruit well enough at left wing back in the summer but also says in this match Richards was ‘great’. I would suggest this is one of the least of the team’s problems. Richards is an excellent left wing back. The problem is Alexander doesn’t seem to realise this by selecting Wright instead when he is fit to play. The lad must be tearing his hair out thinking what more can he do to cement his place.

    • Wright sent over some superb balls at least three times yesterday – as he has done in virtually every game he’s played.

      If you and other fans cannot see this or the facts of his three assists so far and lots of other goal involvements, than I suggest that he’s the latest player the fans love to hate.

      Positionally, he’s poor at time – but as he’s played that position less than 20 times and with at least two different LCB’s then we simply need to be a bit more understanding.

      Thank goodness GA will be.

      • Where do I (or anyone else on here for that matter) say we hate Wright? The overwhelming response has been that Richards is the better wing back and should be picked from the start. If anyone thinks Halliday should start rather than Benn does that (in your eyes) automatically mean they hate Benn? Of course it doesn’t.

        Just to contradict yourself you have even commented elsewhere that Richards should have started!

      • ha ha. Contradicting yourself again brobantam. Make your mind up. Should Richards have started or Wright cos you’ve now said both.

  9. Jason says we didn’t recruit well enough at left wing back in the summer but also says in this match Richards was ‘great’. I would suggest this is one of the least of the team’s problems. Richards is an excellent left wing back. The problem is Alexander doesn’t seem to realise this by selecting Wright instead when he is fit to play. The lad must be tearing his hair out thinking what more can he do to cement his place.

  10. First 30 mins we were by far the better team with Pointon and Wright tearing them apart. After that they changed the system to match ours and we struggled to match them in midfield, with the wing backs not doing their bit to cover. Benn and Diabete was a disaster. Pointon and Walker were swapped around for some reason which ended the Pointon-Wright partnership that had been working so far. The subs made a difference in changing the flow of the game, but they came too late.

  11. Doncaster were beaten at home and came to VP determined to win today. Made 4 changes. City made changes as well. City had a majority of possession but ineffective. Lucky to go in at half time – level! City did nothing until we were 2 down. Things changed. We were all over Doncaster. It was too late. Following the City changes, we were competitive and the better team. Had that happened as soon Doncaster scored their first goal, the result would have been different. GA was too late. I agree, we need a foil for Cook. Also, a player to take the pressure off Smallwood. I believe it’s not the end of the world. This is as long as GA sees this and acts. DONT LEAVE IT UNTIL IT’S TOO LATE!!!

  12. Let’s not beat about the bush. Doncaster were much better than us today. They were very quick and incisive, moving the ball through the thirds whilst we looked to work the ball wide and hope Cook could get on the end of a cross. All well and good if good crosses come in but Wright in particular makes one good cross in 10 and Richards put him to shame with his fantastic contribution in the last 20 minutes. Why the hell didn’t he start!

    The recent Width of the Post article pointed out the issue of needing a second striker who can score 10 goals plus, which has always proved to be a recipe for success. We had Jake Young. Gone. We have Ollie Sanderson. 2 goals and really looking the part. What’s happened? Not running around enough in training? Might as well go back to Fulham if he can’t even make the bench.

    We are half decent but Donnie showed us where we need to be. There is still a long way to go and the play offs are a realistic target. Top 3? Norfolk and chance until we address our shortcomings..

  13. As much as I continually agree with much of WOAP’s assessments of games, there is one thing recently I disagree with. You have recently repeated in post match reports that we have a “good squad”. Yet I disagree. Apart from Cook there are no goals in the other strikers. We finished approximately 30 goals behind last seasons promoted teams. Now whilst they are proving even this season in an higher league how much better they were, and that the goals will probably be a lot less, we simply do not have this “good squad” in this department.

    We apparently recruited for wing backs. Yet continually have resorted to players not really suited to this role or have even done it before. E.g Wright, Halliday, even Richards.

    Then there is the defence. Which was indeed a pre season concern for many and was exposed against a decent team today

    That’s areas of this squad of “depth”, 2 keepers on the bench recently for example thats concerning and arguably inflicted by signing some players with recent injury record’s and of certain ages towards the end of their careers. Imo recruitment has yet again failed for any team wanting to truly challenge for automatic promotion. Even Sharpe was very non committal nor showed positive conviction in our chances of promotion anytime. Perhaps 3 years?

    Doncaster was our actual first real test of our credentials and we failed badly imo. Looking at December’s fixtures the reality of our “good squad” will be seen by the end of it. I’m seriously hoping I’m wrong but I’m readily expecting the annual optimism of fans citing “spending” in the January window which in reality with this ownership/leadership is a post Christmas ‘crackers’ story.

    Thank goodness for Andy Cook. But sorry he alone doesn’t make a “good squad”.

    IMO.

  14. Richards had done more than enough to retain his place. (Could Alexander have dropped him if the penalty at Cheltenham had been awarded and we’d scored from it?) Likewise Halliday. Taking both out looked like a mistake as soon as the team sheet was out and so it proved. Currently Richards is a better and more confident wingback than Wright who offers little going forward and is a defensive liability. In a word Wright is a winger not a wingback.  A couple of our central defenders have gone back to looking  vulnerable when run at. I also thought our management team were particularly dopey this afternoon. We were under the cosh and lucky to go in level at half-time.  Changes were needed but were not forthcoming until the sloppy goals went in. Benn lacked his usual fitness and, when struggling from injury, needed to come off before the grand and futile gesture of 5 on and 5 off. How is changing half the team so late in match supposed to help? Well it did to the extent that Richards showed his worth by crossing perfectly for Cook to score. It is so annoying to lose a six-pointer in a derby match, against one of the fewer higher placed teams we’ve faced this season. Much has been said recently about the paramount need to find a partner for Cook. On today’s evidence Smith is clearly  not the answer. Given the importance of this match and the strength of the counter-attacking opposition,  I thought Alexander might be a bit savvy and stiffen the midfield with the addition of Evans and possibly push Walker up higher.  It was a tactic he might have adopted in the second half to stem the the second half to stem the flow of Doncaster’s attacks. Instead we just mucked about switching Pointon and Walker and then back again. A tactical masterclass this was not

  15. interesting to read both your match report Jason, and the comments. I’ve rarely seen such a different spread of views on the same match. I think I lean to the view that the score line was a fair reflection of the balance of play. They were ruthless in counter attack and yes they could have had more. But they sidn’t manage to score more- just as we were ineffective in the final third.

    I wonder if a few ayers- Jay Benn in particular- just weren’t,fully match fit with recent illness maybe that still lurking.

    I agree that it would have been food to see changes quicker. Five subs in a single change is a big call but I watched the managerial chat, sitting near the dug outs. It took almost 10 minutes to work it out and get them on the pitch.

    The debate on Lewis Ritchards is interesting. My son has been scathing about his form this season. Today he thought he’d been replaced by a different person. To me this emphasises the L2 reality that what defines most players ar this level is very variable form. But a brilliant 20 minute cameo from him today.

    • Great post.

      Wise observation from your son. I’ve always liked Richards and if he plays like that all match then he replaces Wright – who I think gets a lot of unfair flack.

      Problem, is a you say imply these players are in L2 for a reason. Grant McCann was slating his Doncaster team for wrong attacking decisions in the last few matches, warning that the January transfer window is fast approaching.

      I just goes to see that success in L2 is more to do with how good you are at grinding results out as opposed to scintillating play.

  16. Great article, sums everything up very succinctly.

    I was getting excited after last weeks victory against the Gills but now I’m not so sure! Cerrainly not an automatic promotion team if that’s the standard we’re up against, however, I doubt whether Doncaster will play that well every week, possibly a case of them raising their standards for a visit to valley parade, they got beat at home by lowly Bromley on Tuesday so who knows. McCann certainly had them fired up with talk of needing ‘killers’ in the team pre match!

    With regards to City I found it curious Halliday was dropped he looked back to his best last week and I thought we missed Odours energy. Wright was badly exposed again at left back, I prefer the solidarity we get from Lewis Richards.

    The substitutions were far too late in coming, it was obvious at 1 down something had to change as we were getting blown away, I agree with the article that a more pragmatic approach may have been the best way to set up for this game.

    Credit to City though for pulling a goal back and settling up a grandstand finish, City teams in the past would have capitulated.

    Also very pleasing to see the vast majority of fans stick with the team.

  17. They exposed our weak points. Their defence had Cook in their pocket. Wright is not good enough, and Smallwood needs Odour not ‘our Bobby’ to help him out.

    Just be thankful that we don’t play that quality every week.

    We’re still good enough for promotion.

    Keep the faith.

  18. Keep calm and carry on.

    Beaten by a good side, beaten by a good manager who got it right.

    Our manager got it wrong. That’s fine he’s allowed too. He’s currently doing a good not great job and that’s fine too there’s scope for improvement and we are top 7 despite the team disruption and should get better not worse.

    Today never felt like the day to deploy all our attacking talents. I’m the biggest advocate of the JW/BP partnership but alongside both attacking 2 wing backs we gave the opportunity to be exploited on the counter attack and a good side did. If you can’t win against your rivals don’t get beat!

    Yes we need Walker/Kavanagh/Oduor to start contributing goals or find an alternative. Sharpe will see this and if it can’t be resolved with what we have he will put it right. But also we need to start keeping more clean sheets. Room for improvement and doing well is not a bad place to be.

    • Couldn’t have written this set of comments better if I tried.

      I praise GA for still having a go in this match. But I’m convinced started with BH/LR would have yielded a different, more postive, result.

  19. I thought Doncaster deserved to win but it wasn’t as stark as has been made out. We just were slightly off it, persistent mistakes giving them the chance to break.

    Up until the first goal there wasn’t much in it but once Diabate failed to deal with the punt forward the wheels fell off for a while and they took control. What should be worrying for them is that they lost control and we very nearly snatched a point.

    I agree with the points on Richards. He’s a better option than Wright if we insist on playing 5 defenders. Wright is a good attacking option but he’s not a defender and I get the impression he doesn’t want to defend. I disagree on Benn. He’s a better option than Halliday who slows every attack down. It’s not a negative on Halliday and I’m not worried if he plays, it’s just Benn for me is one of the finds of the season. However he should have been replaced earlier here as was done fitness wise.

    Diabete worries me but he’s doing OK. Shepherd and Byrne look good.

    I thought Smith played well first half but faded badly. Cook was just manhandled all game but refs don’t bother. I like Kavanagh but he’s just offside all the time.

    Oduor was a miss today but Pointon played well over the 90. Maybe one of those guilty of giving the ball away too much.

    I think we shouldn’t go too overboard. I felt last week we overly enthused, this week overly worried. We need to keep ourselves in it and strengthen our overall play and we’ll be close.

    If I can make a couple more points. Decisions wise I thought the ref was fine but his eagerness to flash the yellow card was baffling. I thought there was one poor challenge in the game, no real dissent, no time wasting and yet loads of yellows. I do think this affected the play.

    Secondly I would like to see 2 law changes in football. 1. A reversion to the law that goalkicks must be passed out of the box. Then we might see an end to this nonsense of the goalie and two centre backs stood with nothing happening. It always seemed the most bizarre law but you can see why it was there now. 2. Subs – why do they have to happen 1 at a time, why an electric board that the 4th official faffs around with. Our 5 and their 3 subs must have taken 3 or 4 mins. It’s a nonsense.

    Still optimistic about the season. Up the bantams.

  20. good morning all.

    I have been a Rovers fan for over 50 years . . . Pretty much seen it all.

    Thank you for your honest and in the main constructive insights.

    Bradford will certainly feature in the promotion battle and I genuinely hope that Both Doncaster and Bradford get their just rewards.

    We are Yorkshire and our resolve will win through . . . Keep believing.

    Donny Dave

  21. Following from afar and only having bbc sports stats WhatsApp group and WOAP report, it sounds like we went too gung ho Tyler Smith Bobby Pointon Jamie Walker Tyriek Wright Jay Benn and got done on the counter personally I think we’d have a better balance with Richards LWB and Halliday RWB more solid defensively. The image that springs to mind is England v Greece

  22. Thank you Jason. Some fair points across the messages. I’ve learnt to appreciate with City that it’s the winter period that are major challenges come. Wondering if there is a stat available for how much we struggle between the clocks going back and subsequently forwards again over the years? I’m not just blaming the pitch here I think it’s just one of those things possible a combination of training ground, pitch and anything else! Of course 2013 broke the mould cup wise but even then we struggled in the league massively in the winter months! Just something to consider. This aside I like the way GA is the type of manager that learns on the job is always open to new improvements and it as bloody minded as our previous 2 managers. This alone gives us all hope. Keep the faith winters coming!!

  23. From a Doncaster fan at the game yesterday I’d just like to congratulate the author of the article. It is a really well written piece and I think accurately describes the game. Rovers played well yesterday. Indeed it was perhaps our best performance of the season (I haven’t missed many games) so I wouldn’t get too downhearted as a city fan. For what it’s worth I certainly expect to see you up there at the end of the season. One thing though – you definitely played into our hands tactically. We are much better when we get the chance to counter-attack teams. In the vast majority of our wins this season we have been the team with the least possession. Difficult though because you were the home team, with a big backing and therefore expected to go for it from the off. Which you did effectively for the first part of the match. If you had scored when on top early I suspect we’d have seen a very different game. Good luck for the season

  24. Excellent match review. Unfortunately Tyler Smith put in exactly the sort of performance we have come to expect. If he could just be more of a nuisance to defenders that would improve his input no end.

    We were so lucky not to be at least two goals down by the break after gifting them possession on the halfway line and allowing them free runs at goal on 3-4 occasions.

    We were completely under the cosh after the first goal and it seemed extraordinary the mass substitution only occurred after the second as by then Doncaster were strutting around the pitch as though we were barely there.

    To me the goal we got back illustrated the huge difference between carefully passing the ball around compared to the complete commitment shown as Richards raced onto the ball to deliver the perfect cross for Cook to dispatch. We need more of that intent and pressure.

    The mystery to me is why Sanderson isn’t starting every match if he is fit, he looked excellent earlier in the season and is the only striker apart from Cook who actually looks like scoring and has.

  25. but the ill and absent Clarke Oduor – who is technically nowhere near as able, but who is more defensive-minded and disciplined –

    Agree with the second bit regarding Oduor but not the first. Technically I think he’s at least as good as any other player technically. When he has the ball at his feet and dribbling he keeps possession as well as any other player.

  26. I’ve had 20 hours and a delicious meal (washed down with some delicious alcohol) at my best friends (Halifax Town fan!!) last night to digest the match. Whilst at the end, I thought we looked vastly inferior to Doncaster, I’ve changed my mind for the following reasons;

    1 – Inevitably the fitness issues due to the bug lots of the players have had, plus injury situation (remember, we’ve still got two our of three missing from the back line who started the season plus Odour, Sarcevic and Pattinson) meant that that nightmare 20 minutes in the second half was somewhat inevitable against a very good team.

    2 – With the wonderful benefit of hindsight we were too gung-ho. I like the way GA is arguably the only manager we’ve had, down here, who believes that you have to create chances more than prevent (he’s not had much competition given the negative mindset of some of the past ones!!). However, this was a match where Halliday and Richards start and we go 3-5-2 or even 5-3-2 – that Doncaster are very good on the counter-attack, so cover for that, given the state of the squad (note, I’m a bit fan of Wright and if we’d got on the end of some of his superb crosses he put into the box, in the first half things could be different). Ironically, the attacking wing backs – would have been ideal for the Cheltenham match. GA now has a good problem as he has two sets of these who have different strengths and weaknesses, but all have shown they are good at this level. He now needs to utilise them correctly (fitness permitting)

    Last season, we’d have lost this in the same manner as we did the Mansfield match. So I’m not going to have a go at Byrne and Benn, who particularly looked off it. Just a 1% reduction in energy levels against this Doncaster team, means you’re having a hard game.

    When I first heard about the sickness bug, given the injuries we still had – I’ve have bitten your hand off, if you said we’d be 7th just before the FA Cup break.

    We’ll know more of where we are in this next run of matches up to the start of the Notts County one. If we’ve automatic promotion aspirations we need to the gap to at least stay the same. Then, Notts County, Port Vale and Chesterfield – will serve notice as to where we really are.

    I’ve also always thought we’ll spend in January, if needed. So this is a solid start, which under the circumstances GA and the lads have done a decent job. But nothing more.

  27. Excellent write-up again , Jason and I pretty much agree with your analysis. We do, indeed, lack at least one more proper striker with 15 or 20 goals in him. The 3 on view yesterday, Smith, Oliver and Kavanagh haven’t got a goal between them so far. Also one of our big failings this season as in previous is our lack of players capable of running with the ball at pace then either delivering an assist or having a crack themselves. Donny had 2 such players . Our defenders struggled against them but no defender, even at higher levels, relishes quick, nimble players running at them. For me, this is an area that has needed addressing for a number of seasons. I dare say such players are hard to find at league2 level but Donny had them and I rather think that the teams who finish top 3 will probably also have such players. Personally, I think we look like a 7th to 10th place team again atm.

  28. Great article Jason but “Clarke Oduor – who is technically nowhere near as able” in comparison to Walker & Pointon is a load of nonsense. Clarke Oduor is the most technically gifted player at the football club, the players have said as much. The reason we play better with Oduor in the team as he is better at keeping possession. Walker & Pointon got caught in the possession too many times and were obviously a trigger for donny’s press.

    • I tend to agree with this. However, the other two have a better end product.

      I think Evans looks a good signing and his calmness on the ball, could be crucial as the season goes on (assuming he stays)

  29. Great article Jason as usual-About a month ago Doncaster were at Harrogate. Harrogate pressed Molyneux and there midfield and left Jordon Gibson who started well running at Harrogate back 4. But Harrogate got a foot hold and went at them down the flanks and kept getting behind them eventually winning 2-0. We started exactly the same, first 20minutes we were on top but as people have said they always looked as if they’d get something on the counter attack. I’ve always said when Jamie Walker plays well City do but Donny had done there home work and nullified his receiving the ball and got at Pointon also. I couldn’t understand why Richards was dropped after how well he played at Cheltenham, steady in defence but goes at full backs and can put a good cross in. Where missing players and could have sneaked a draw but overall Doncaster were the better team. Hopefully get to January, get some players back and get some out on loan or sell and stay in and around top 7, let’s see.

  30. Outplayed us for 75mins ??? Ha ha.

  31. Wow ! What a response to Saturday’s defeat by a strong Doncaster team ! As usual Jason’s report was a fair and balanced summary of the game and City’s current state of affairs. Also as usual, defeat against one of the better League Two sides generated a lot of negativity from too many responders to WOTP. I’ ve waded through most of the reaction and congratulate Cyprus Bantam on a succinct and balanced summary. In my opinion, he’s spot on with every point made. One thing I’d like to add. I’ve been an admirer of Jamie Walker since he came to the club. Where was he on Saturday ? I hardly noticed him in the first half and overall his contribution was poor by his standards. Not fully fit ?

  32. I hope you will allow me to comment as a Donny fan from far away – Bogota to be precise.

    I cannot recall ever reading such a thoughtful, intelligent, insightful and intellectually honest report in lall my 50 odd years of supporting DRFC. Even more astonishing is the widely shown intelligence displayed in this thread.

    I suspect you guys are the most observant, honest and articulate group of supporters in this country. I am as impressed by all of you as I was with the staggering display put on by the Rovers

    So a big thank you from Bogota

    good luck!

    Bob Gilbert