Something unexpected is going on as Bradford City endure another defeat that leaves them ruing their injury list

Bradford City 0
Tranmere Rovers 1
Hawkes 56 (pen)

By Jason McKeown

It could be a nosedive, it could be a slump, or it could be a mere blip – but it’s definitely something, and a something that wasn’t expected. Fair to say that the season’s first back-to-back League Two defeats was not on the agenda when Bradford City were setting new club records and earning themselves an eight-point cushion inside the automatic promotion places, just 11 days ago. But that’s exactly what has just happened.

The Bantams were looking so formidable, so well-drilled and so relentless, closing in on Walsall’s position at the top of the tree. But it’s now two defeats against two of the division’s most out-of-form sides. Zero points away to a team 19th in the table, and now zero points at home to a team languishing 22nd, who had not won on the road since the middle of October. It’s no goals, and only seven shots on target, over 180 minutes. It’s an erosion of their top three margin for error, which is now down to only three points. It’s missed opportunities to win winnable games that they may come to rue.

This is not a time to panic. Absolutely it isn’t. City are still in a really good position. A position that means they can afford to go through a few setbacks. But as Josh Hawkes fired home from the spot to give Tranmere Rovers a shock victory, nerves are jangling and bums are squeaking. Turns out if City are going to do it, they’re going to do it the hard way.

It’s certainly not a good time to follow up their worst performance in months with an even worse performance. Here, the qualities that have shot them up the table – the fast tempo in transforming defence to attack, the high press to pin opponents back, the clever link up play from front to back – was all below its usual standard. This performance was a throwback to earlier this season, where City look laboured and sluggish, and it’s no coincidence they’re regressing whilst once again missing the influential services of Antoni Sarcevic and Alex Pattison. They’re also struggling without the in-form Bobby Pointon.

Given Graham Alexander was able to go with the same front three who had played so wonderfully together in the last home game – the 3-0 win over Cheltenham – it was discouraging just how much they missed those who are injured on the sidelines. But as well as Jamie Walker, George Lapslie and Michael Mellon had worked that night against the Robins, they couldn’t function cohesively here.

Part of the problem was they were so isolated from each other. Lapslie had such a brilliant game against Cheltenham, but the last two performances appear to confirm the warnings from fans of his former clubs that he is a superb player one week, and anonymous the next. Mellon found space hard to find and was kicked repeatedly by Tranmere Rovers players who were clearly instructed to curb his off the ball running.

Walker was the most effective of the front three, and yet perhaps the biggest representation of the problem the whole team suffered. Lacking a regular supply of possession in areas he was tasked to operate, Walker roamed in search of the ball, in search of purpose. His work-rate and desire is admirable, but in coming back to try and get involved, he took up space where Brad Halliday and Brandon Khela were supposed to operate. And that left City having plenty of the ball in deeper areas, but struggling to stretch the play. As Walker came deep, collected possession and sent the ball forwards, you were longing for Walker to be up there to get on the end of his own work.

If we have the Cheltenham victory as a high water mark of what this front three can give this team, the contrast in possession is revealing when assessing why it didn’t work again. Against Cheltenham, the Bantams had 43% possession, produced 246 short passes, and had a 62% pass success rate. In other words, they weren’t especially dominant on the ball or tidy in keeping it. This ties in with their hugely successful quick transition, get it up the pitch approach.

Here against Tranmere, the Bantams had a considerably higher 67% possession, produced 392 short passes and had a 75% pass success rate. So a lot more of the ball, a lot more success passing it around, but a lot less purpose. Walker, Lapslie and Mellon collectively had 145 touches against Cheltenham, but only 118 here. So even though City had more of the ball, their forward line saw much less of it.

Those numbers confirm what we saw. City had plenty of possession but lacked their usual clear plan in how they were going to put the ball into the back of the net. And for that, you have to give Tranmere Rovers credit. Interim manager Andy Crosby had switched formation from 4-3-2-1 to matching the Bantams’ 3-4-3. Two of the three former Bantams in their line up took unfamiliar roles, with Connor Wood switching to wide centre half and Omari Patrick operating as a left wing back. Both acquitted themselves really well. But then, the whole Rovers team did.

Rovers have stank out League Two this season. Largely rubbish. Barely scoring. But since Nigel Adkins was sacked, they’ve improved and now have eight points from a possible 12. This wasn’t a great time to be facing Tranmere and they were stood up well to City’s press, backed by a small but brilliantly loud away following who put home fans to shame with their non-stop chanting.

Just like City’s other home defeat this season – Doncaster – the opposition had done their homework and executed a gameplan successfully, and that should trouble Alexander. It wasn’t pretty, it pushed the boundaries of decency, and a better referee than the woeful Thomas Parsons would not have allowed them such leniency, but Tranmere were good value for a win that goes some way to keeping them up whilst all but relegating Mark Hughes’ Carlisle United.

Even so, it could have been a different story. City started well enough, and in the first half had chances. Richie Smallwood produced a beautiful piece of skill that took out two defenders, before charging towards goal and unleashing a thunderous drive that flew just wide. Moments later, Lapslie headed just wide after an excellent Halliday cross. And then Khela had a chance and narrowly missed the target with a shot from distance.

Perhaps the best chance of the lot fell at Lapslie’s feet. Khela produced a lovely flick that sent Halliday rampaging through. He hit a cross shot that was begging to be tapped in, but the onrushing Lapslie fired it well over. Walker also embarked on a clever run into the box that left him with a shooting chance at Luke McGee. Walker’s effort was on target but lacked power, enabling the other of the three former Bantams to save.

Tranmere offered little attacking threat in the first half, but were successful in disrupting City’s momentum. They made sure the game was stop-start, and cut off the wide supply lines. Tayo Adramola’s one-on-one battle Cameron Norman was great to watch, but the on-loan Crystal Palace wing back ultimately struggled to find space to go on his characteristic rampages. And when City did angle crosses into the box, Mellon was swarmed on and so unable to get on the end of anything.

At half time Crosby took off Kristian Dennis, who had struggled to hold up the ball and give Tranmere much of an outlet. It made a difference. As the minutes ticked by Tranmere began to find some territorial advantage. Began to smell blood. Began to spot holes in City’s backline. And sure enough, some dozy defending in the box allowed Harvey Sanders to nip in. Jack Shepherd tried to put the ball out for a corner and as he did the Tranmere substitute went down in a heap. Penalty given. A debatable one? Most definitely.

Hawkins converted from the spot, and City had conceded at home for the first time since Grimsby netted in early January. They were behind at Valley Parade for the first time since Chesterfield took the lead in late December. It was all so unfamiliar. And City didn’t handle the unusual home challenge well at all.

They just never really got going. They couldn’t run up a head of steam. Shots on goal sporadic. A few corners won. A few dangerous free kick opportunities. But the game remained stop-start. No rhythm. It all suited Tranmere. It all hindered City.

Of course, midway through the second half everything was put into perspective. A supporter in the Kop needed medical assistance. The game was stopped for 12 minutes. We can only hope the fan is okay. Our thoughts with them, and also their friends and family who have suffered such unexpected and unwelcome anxiety. The limitations of City’s attacking efforts pale into insignificance compared to someone’s health. Hopefully, they will quickly recover.

When the game resumed, the same patterns continued. Tyreik Wright, Calum Kavanagh and Tommy Leigh came on in an attempt to change City’s destiny, and Kavanagh did come close with one chance. But even with 15 minutes of stoppage time added on, the Bantams just didn’t look like scoring. And though the home crowd largely stayed behind the players, frustration at the slowness in getting the ball up the pitch in the closing stages led to loud groans and some booing at full time.

So City’s home winning run is over. It’s been fun, it’s been transformative, and this wasn’t the fixture where you’d expect it to have ended. But there isn’t time to dwell and there is little to gain from talking ourselves into crisis. City are still second in the table, still in a position that a few weeks ago we’d have bitten hands off to have. Before Gillingham, it seemed City needed to win five of their last 11 games to just about seal automatic promotion. Now, it’s five wins from the last nine games. A tougher ask for sure. But prior to losing in Kent, the Bantams had won 12 out of 15 games. They’ve already proven they’re more than capable of doing what now needs to be done.

Still, there are reasons to feel less confident that before. The fixtures get tougher from here, starting with a flying Colchester United side who are unbeaten in 13 games, including winning five in a row, and who now sit inside the play off positions. And not long after that are promotion six-pointers against Port Vale, Crewe, Notts County and Doncaster. The tension has been racked up in the way we didn’t want it to. The countdown to kick off next week will be accompanied by a heighted sense of nervousness.

The hope has to be that when the City players walk out against Colchester, at least one, two if not all three of the sorely missed Sarcevic, Pattison and Pointon are amongst them. Or, if next Saturday comes too soon, the Saturday after that is a possibility. Because whatever the something is that’s hindering Bradford City right now, the return of their inspirational trio will go a long way to fixing it.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

12 replies

  1. We should have been ahead, possibly out of sight, by half time. Walker simply should have scored. Halliday/Lapslie too. But these things happen.

    We became increasingly disjointed in the second half, increasingly reliant on long raking balls and never really looked like levelling up.

    I’m not going to dwell on the penalty as I haven’t seen it again but it didn’t look like one at all. Soft? I’d say wrong. But then what would we expect?

    I wrote on here a few weeks ago (after Newport I think), that I thought the refs have been decent this year. Well this bloke does not fit into that category. He allowed blatant time wasting throughout and did not add a single second on top of the normal 3.

    The game was stopped for 14 minutes and he gave 15. So 1 minute added on! No play took place at all in the 91st minute and I assume that’s why he played a 16th extra minute.

    I agree with most of what you say Jason but good value for the win? They didn’t have a shot in the game. The stats said 3 (including the penalty) – I’m not sure what constitutes a shot. Maybe their performance was good enough for the draw they came for, but not a win.

    We have sneaked a lot of 1-0s lately and sadly we didn’t get it today, injuries are beginning to hurt us.

    I’m on holiday for the next 2 games. I hope we’re still in the automatics when I return!

  2. I personally think it’s a push to say Tranmere were good value for their win when they didn’t have a shot on goal in the entire match barring the penalty. But they did execute their game plan.

    That was the worst refereeing performance I’ve seen this season, trumping the displays at Newport and against MK Dons. Simply scandalous. To not book their players for the same offences that saw our lads booked is just outright disgraceful. If you don’t book players for continually fouling and time-wasting then you can expect more of the same, unless in the case of this ref you’re happy with that

    Unfortunately it’s a similar story for City when you take a moment to reflect. When teams sit everyone behind the ball and we need to truly enforce the play, we struggle. Hopefully, like when Walsall came to Valley Parade and we played them off the park, Colchester will look to attack, opening up the game for us. 

    The final thing I will say, and maybe the same can be said for the players over the last two games, is that I think we have got slightly ahead of ourselves. I’ve found myself watching other teams during the week, cheering on the oppo, and there’s still 20% of the season left. I’m not sure it’s good for my health! I think we all, fans and players, need to get back to concentrating on ourselves. Forget about what each goal does to the table and not get too worried or too over-excited per game. Our destiny is still in our hands. 

  3. For some reason I decided to remind myself of when we last imploded when so well placed, in 2009. With 11 games to go we were in 4th, 1 point off third. We picked up just 8 points from those last 11 and finished outside the top 7.

    The circumstances were different then. We weren’t injury hit, but the forward line desperately needed refreshing in January. We brought in an unfit Chris O’Grady for a month, then as the season was slipping away brought in Gillespie and Paul Mullin in a futile attempt to save the season. We went cheap and were punished.

    Are we in danger of imploding like 2009? Unlikely. I’m not saying we are.

    We’ve got pretty much a 10 point cushion from 8th, so it would take a freak set of results for us to drop out altogether. It would be massively disappointing to have to go through the play off though, and I don’t know if we would have the strength for it, going by the lack of goalscoring quality and resilience when we do go behind.

    What is similar to 2009 I think is some of us rightly questioned the lack of goalscoring threat brought in this January, in particular if we were ever chasing games like the last two. Also the risk we were taking with two fairly inexperienced 21 year olds, and Leigh – who looks totally lost the times he’s played up there. The quality does not look top 7 L2 standard, never mind L1.

    The key to our charge up the table was the best midfield we’ve have in 12 years, and any team would struggle with similar injuries. I do appreciate it’s L2 and you can’t afford to keep quality across the squad, but very quickly we’ve regressed to a typical, erratic L2 side.

    GA needs to find another system that works with whay he has, again – and quickly.

  4. Was anybody really surprised at the outcome of today’s game? It had all the ingredients of a banana skin ie. A team who haven’t won away for months but who have had a recent ‘New manager bounce’ plus a sense of anxiety amongst City fans about the continued absence of our first choice midfield.
    We probably should have edged a game of fine margins, particularly as we had 16 shots to Tranmere’s 3.
    However we cannot escape the fact that some players went missing in action. I won’t name them but I think there would be broad agreement on who they were. I was also surprised at the choice of our 3 Central defenders, particularly the choice to play Baldwin in the Centre and Byrne on the right. This made our distribution from the back lopsided and unbalanced.
    Finally it must be acknowledged that the performance of the referee did influence the outcome of the game to our detriment. Forget the laughable decision to award a penalty! His overall performance was atrocious and to describe him as being incompetent is being generous.
    The last 2 games have left a feeling of deflation. 2 very winnable games but zero points. Alexander has been here before and managed to turn things around. There is little room for error now.

  5. I agree with all the sentiments above.

    We didn’t take our chances in the first half. Had we scored one of them I think we’d have won the game at a canter. Never mind Ewing theory we badly missed Cook yesterday. We win that game with him in the team.

    Tranmere were awful, they weren’t good value for anything apart going to ground and grappling. They were aided in this tactic by the referee. He was atrocious. They had zero threat going forward and were only ever going to score through a dubious penalty or a lucky goal. Having said that we had zero threat ourselves in the second half, it was like the dross served up earlier in the season. It’s worrying how inept we were.

    The injuries in midfield have pulled the rug from under the team and stopped the momentum. With Sarc, Pattison and Pointon fit I believe we’d go up as champions. Without them we’re an average league two side. We’re also badly missing Richards and Cook. I don’t know where we go from here or what G.A can do other than pray the injured players recover as soon as possible.

    • Watched the highlights back and it’s never a penalty. Their lad trips himself up over Shepherds foot, the balls behind him. It’s farcical.

  6. We can blame the ref, time wasting etc but we have to find a way to break teams down. So many times when the ball is not in play the game is at walking pace.
    How about the 8 second rule being implemented for free kicks and throw ins?

  7. Alexander thought that Tranmere wouldn’t score and we would. And who can blame him. The problem was we didn’t have anywhere near enough energy from midfield going forward and we fell into the possession trap of thinking if you have the ball at the back it’s playing well. It was very Hughesy and unfortunately we became bogged down trying to get the ball through a packed midfield, played too deep and Mellon was isolated. Kavanagh should have been brought on by halftime latest to join Mellon, and we could have had at least a chance with the long ball. Maybe GA thinks this is beneath us.

  8. Thought we did enough in the first half to merit a goal – wayward finishing being the problem. A goal then would have changed the game. I agree with most of the previous posters re the ref, he was abysmal, inconsistent in his decisions of virtually identical situations. But we were also culpable particularly with the awful penalty decision, because the situation arose from our own lax defending.

  9. Well I have to say that was the most disappointing performance in quite some time, yes the ref was awful, yes they time wasted and cheated, but we showed very little, Alexander’s game plan after a reasonable first half left me bemused just what did he say to them at halftime? when he made substitutions he basically took all the width out of the game and resorted to hoof ball which suited them perfectly, I accept that the main three injuries have affected us but they are all basically attacking midfielders, our forwards need to step up and quickly otherwise we can forget top 3 , with some tough away games on the run in and our away record not great yesterday was a ridiculous result had we scored and gained a point I could have taken that given the ref etc but to fold away so tame leaves me gutted…. Loose Saturday and forget top 3 that’s for sure!

  10. Funny how we can all see the same game slightly differently – i thought City were really good, especially first half. Smallwood was superb and showed another side of his game that we dont normally see, aswell as doing all the ugly stuff brilliantly as usual. A couple of flicks and turns, lovely. Khela looks like a real prospect. On another day, with a different ref we win that game, and maybe with Sarc/Patto/Bobby options we would have done. The chances that fell to Mellon, Kav and Tayo second half, you feel one of them would have been put away. Nice to see Patto and Sarc taking photos with the fans behind the Kop before the game – if the club arranged that then good on them.

  11. Just want to give a shoutout to Brad Halliday’s amazing sprinting-off-the-pitch-when-being-substituted technique. He’s truly an inspiration to us all. 

    More generally… I thought City looked a little over confident in the first exchanges, like a team that’s won 10 in a row and thought they could just rock up and nab the win. A bit swagger without substance. Where was that intense high pressing to make Tranmere uncomfortable on their big day at Valley Parade? That’s what got us where we are. 

    Tranmere looked really poor to me, they barely posed any threat at all. No use blaming the ref, City had themselves to blame, for me. 

    Luckily we’re still sitting pretty in second, with all to play for… Did anyone think City would make this easy for us?