How should we remember the unimaginable? 40 years on from the Valley Parade fire disaster

By John Dewhirst

With each passing year the number of surviving supporters who attended that fateful game at Valley Parade inevitably declines. Those intimately familiar with the old ground having been regular supporters are likely to be well into their late fifties by now and I suspect the number still attending games is unlikely to be more than a thousand, and certainly less than five percent of those at the Fleetwood game.

As with wars, the memory of historic events is inherited by younger generations who get the prerogative to choose how the disaster should be remembered. Older generations have to accept change although they may be uncomfortable to do so. However, it doesn’t mean the oldies shouldn’t speak out about it.

A fundamental question is how will be disaster be remembered in future? As the late Paul Firth used to ask – how can people remember something of which they had no direct exposure and which happened before they were born?

On previous occasions I have written about the focus on the 56 fatalities to the exclusion of recognising that countless others were impacted by the disaster. Back in 1985 – and certainly for the twenty odd years following – equal consideration was given to the plight of the survivors in the collective memory of the disaster. Having seen first-hand forty years ago many of the burns injuries as well as experienced the fear, this is a big part of what I remember about the disaster. It was not just about the 56 victims but the wider community that was impacted.

You can understand the difficulty for younger fans to comprehend exactly what happened at Valley Parade in 1985. Wooden grandstands for example have long since disappeared from English stadia and Valley Parade is completely unrecognisable to what they could see in surviving photographs from pre-1985. The old world is as alien and antiquated to them just as 1945 was to myself forty years ago and is now. So what can the younger generations remember other than the annual tradition of a minute’s silence before the last home game of the season?

I’d like to think that the relevance of the disaster for succeeding generations will be more than as a source of identity or a branding for hoodies. I take pride in the rebuilding of the club through the efforts of supporters after 1985, the collective support given to survivors of the Valley Parade fire and the inspiring example of our emergency services – themes that we can’t allow to be forgotten.

There were so many positives that came out of the disaster, not least the University Burns Unit. Surely the most fitting way of commemorating the disaster is to recognise the inspiration that can be derived from the post-1985 recovery in Bradford.

Yet how do kids know what it is that they should remember if there is little or no mention of the disaster in local schools and no celebration anywhere of the post-1985 positives? Frankly it should be commemorated and headlined within the Bradford 2025 programme of cultural events being one of the best testaments of Bradford culture and community in the modern era.

The vast majority of us were equally upset by the sight of people letting off flares on Saturday. Whether we like it or not the pyrotechnic culture is already well-established in Bradford and there was no shortage of fans queuing to buy fireworks at a certain shop on Darley Street. The City Park event on Tuesday confirmed that flares and fireworks are going to be with us for the foreseeable future and are becoming de rigueur.

There will always be a handful who want to let off flares at a match although it should be remembered that it was not unknown – even if uncommon – for bangers to heard at matches in the run-up to 5th November each year prior to 1985. Even in 1960 it was considered a big problem at Valley Parade that merited debates about supporter behaviour. And in 1985 there were newspaper claims – later dismissed – that a flare had been the cause of the fire.

I don’t know what can be done about the issue now unless we get intrusive airport style security searches at the turnstiles, and it can’t solely be the responsibility of the BCAFC stewards to solve the problem. As evidenced on Saturday with the pitch invasions, stewards are not the police and do not have the powers of the police. Many are agency workers so their effectiveness for serious and dangerous issues is limited.

Unfortunately, it seems that there is more chance of the problem escalating than disappearing – whilst there has been temporary respite from flares at Valley Parade, we still get them at away grounds. Sadly if our fans can’t refrain from lighting flares at games it serves only to encourage visiting supporters when they come to Bradford and, for what it’s worth, we lose the moral high ground. Just when we are celebrating bumper crowds the phenomenon of flares is the kind of development that could deter families with young children from attending matches in the future.

My fear is that before too long there will be a serious accident arising from a flare being thrown into a football crowd – you don’t need much imagination to work out what would happen if a flare landed in your lap at a game. Sadly, the phenomenon may only recede when a headline injury eventually happens.

The irony of course is the relevance of the Valley Parade disaster and maybe this calls for some fresh thinking about how to commemorate the disaster so that younger generations can find it relevant and inspiring as well as the basis to understand the risks and the concerns about burns. The more people who understand, the less likely it will be that the flares become widespread or considered acceptable behaviour.

The only suggestion I can offer is that those identified with the flares – and it shouldn’t be difficult given the photo / video footage of the crowd and the CCTV on Saturday – should be required to watch a film or hear from firefighters about injuries from fire. Maybe peer pressure is the best way to deal with the problem, so that it is no longer considered cool to bring flares to matches. Either way, the whole issue of pyrotechnics is the complete antithesis of what I remember about 11 May, 1985 having actually been at Valley Parade on that day.

The disaster also taught us to appreciate the positive aspects of football – the camaraderie and unity of purpose as well as about enjoying the good times. This last weekend has brought a return of the feelgood factor to Bradford and joyous celebrations. Let’s have more fun although preferably ‘No pyro, still party’.

*I have assisted ITV with a multi-part documentary about the fire disaster, principally providing background historic detail about the club and Valley Parade. John Helm / YTV were present on the day of the disaster and the company has been responsible about control of the original film footage during the last 40 years, so I endorse the production wholeheartedly. ‘Never Forget: The Bradford City Stadium Fire’ is being broadcast in five episodes starting Monday 12 May on ITVX.



Categories: Opinion

Tags:

18 replies

  1. Flares. Loved them last Sat around North Parade, Manningham Lane, at the Parade on Tuesday and admittedly at VP, for me it added to the experience and memories of the day. However, I appreciate this is a delicate topic and as a compromise would advise against the use of flares at VP. Yes I know it’s illegal, but not everyone has common sense (people shouldnt steal but it doesn’t stop some, just spend a day in our justice system).

    Saying that I sense we might see flares used more commonly, seems to be part of new the football culture/vibe.

    • In 1985, not surprisingly a lot of people were impacted by the mental trauma of the experience and the sight of flares in the ground nowadays is not the best thing for their state of mind which we all have to respect. However, whilst we no longer have wooden grandstands, flares at the rebuilt Valley Parade is also about the risk that they represent. On North Parade or in City Park, if I felt uncomfortable about the sight and smell (or indeed the likely carciogenic fumes) I could walk away. In a packed, all-seater stand the risk of injury from a flare is far greater simply because it is harder to take evasive action.

      This is more than flares being a delicate topic, it is about the risk of injury that they pose at a football match. Forty years ago we were all blasé about the possibility of a disaster at Valley Parade to the extent that none of us – myself included – had the leap of imagination to envisage the possibility of mass injury and fatality. With the benefit of hindsight we were proved to have been foolish. In terms of risk assessment nowadays it’s much more difficult the discount the possibility of an accident occurring as a result of a flare. The wooden stand at VP has been replaced by a concrete structure but human bodies are no less vulnerable to burns.

      • I too take a great deal of pride in the rebuilding of the club through the efforts of supporters in and after 1985, the collective support given to survivors of the Valley Parade fire and the inspiring example of our emergency services – themes that we can’t ever allow to be forgotten. I have said it before, that my future father in law became my hero that day and why. And yes, there were so many positives that came out of the disaster.

        Like yourself John, we were similar ages at the time to the likes of Peter Jackson, Stuart McCall and all those very very young men who coped with the aftermath and the funerals so well and with great dignity.

        I saw first hand the saving of the club through Peter Flescher and the Claughton liquidation. You’re totally correct about the support in 1885 and onwards. Then supporters came again to the rescue under the Moore/ Brackenbury (RIP) Administrators. Again, I was a witness and working to assist. Meanwhile can I just say that I recognise what you have done for the club and how eloquently and knowledgably you write seemingly containing your emotion which I struggle with.

        What ultimately my take is, that we will never let this club die as we diminish in numbers year on year.

        I spoke with someone who lost his father today. A victim of the fire. The flares are insensitive he said. Yes, human bodies are no less vulnerable to burns. Young people, you might think it’s exciting. You might think it’s clever. But can I ask you to cease the trait. Please? And stop it with the hoodies. Those of us who were witnesses do not need to wear then and neither do you. They are not badges of honour, even if you were there “that day”

  2. It is not easy to understand the trend to memorialise the 56 with hoodies, caps etc. Again as someone who was at the game it sits more than a little uncomfortably for people to be making a profit from the immense suffering of that day, and indeed suffering that still is borne by members of the community to the present day.

    The emergence of flares over recent seasons has been so disappointing, and for some very triggering. I too worry a serious injury will be the inevitable result of this trend. In this day and age surely culprits can be identified by CCTV and arrested as they leave the stadium, banned and re-educated as you suggest.

  3. I thought the flares were a great part of the atmosphere outside the ground but I don’t think they belong inside the ground ~ especially our ground

    I would be happy for zero tolerance inside just announce it’s going to be a ban and then use cctv and catch the few who do it

  4. Very well written article. I’ve been supporting City for well over 60 years, and flares were never, or very rarely used in any celebrations that happened in the distant past at Valley Parade that I can remember. Really no need for them now. They don’t belong in the hands of people who are clueless as to their use or the dangers they pose to other people or property!

  5. what happened 40 years will not be forgotten by those there even if they want to erase the images in their head from that day. I’ve only just began to ask for help in helping me get over it. Thought about it every day since. Something as innocuous as a may 11th use by date on food sets me off.

    But it cannot stop people having fun,enjoying the occasion like last Saturday.

    We have to carry on. I’ve not seen us use pyros at V.P. other than the Fleetwood game.The 56 branding is more of a cringe for me than coloured smoke.

    • You note you’ve recently managed to ask for some help, so just a quick reply to wish you all the very best with it. Hope the process brings you some resolution. 👍🏻

  6. I wasn’t sure what time the 40th commemoration service began in Bradford so I went onto the BCFC web site.Not a mention.

  7. I was not a stadium going city fan in 1985

    teenagers and older kids from my estate were there though. All did get home.

    I remember seeing the skyline from my estate in Allerton. And the news and the T&A newspaper. I remember it vividly. It ran a like frame by frame picture story of the development from tiny orange speck visible underseat to what we all know it became.

    I started going to VP in 1990 and though neither me nor any of my family were there in 1985 I have a similar view on flares and pyros. We’re not Roma or Milan. And we have our history. One that must always be remembered and marked with respect. I personally find that does not sit properly alongside a fan base who let off flares. It’s a massive contradiction.

    I don’t have a plea to fans. I just wanted to write a few of my thoughts. I do also agree with the point that inevitably times change. Generations change and we have to accept it to some extent.

    something I really wasn’t sure whether to write or not is this. I was absolutely stunned and horrified to hear a song being played on north parade on Saturday after the game. The lyrics couldn’t be more inappropriate to be played at or around a city game. Does anyone else agree? Or am I being over sensitive. The song was by Billy Joel by the way

  8. There’s certainly an element of social boasting/like farming when you see social media posts along the lines of –

    ‘why does this not get as much attention as (insert other major loss of life)?

    Then proceeds to post visuals of the standard ablaze and fans running for their lives.

    That’s exactly why we didn’t want more ‘attention’. It becomes an online edge circus.

    One person today posted ‘everyone should see the unedited video to see how fast it spend’ (not verbatim). I mean, just why?

  9. Quite simply , we should remember as we have always done, with quiet dignity and respect.

    One thing that doesn’t sit too comfortably with me is the usage of “The 56”. Those 56 people were men, women, children, parents, grandparents, uncles, aunties and whatever else to someone. Using “The 56” makes them sound like a commodity rather than departed family members and friends. Even today at the memorial service I found myself inwardly cringing every time one of the dignitaries used the term.

  10. You asked how we should ‘remember the unimaginable’? I was one of three generations who were there from our family – and I am the only one now left – so this is always a difficult day for me as it will be for many, but we should continue to mark the day and those who died by behaving as Popplewell himself said we behaved in his report – ‘With quiet dignity and great courage’.

  11. Thank you for this very thoughtful article John. I think it’s fair to say, that those of us who we’re fortunate enough to return to our homes that day, left something of ourselves behind at Valley Parade. Looking back now, I can honestly say, the young man I was on that morning of the 11th of May was not quite the same young man who went to bed that night. Even 40 years on, I cannot go to a match at Valley Parade without thinking about what happened. There are quite a few fellow Bradford supporters who could never face going back again, & I can quite understand why. The flares are of course in bad taste, but not I’m certain meant as a deliberate painful reminder, just more out of (happy) ignorance if anything. The money making hoodies & t-shirts are again not meant to cause destress, but is more a reflection of the times in which we live, where the chance to make money will always trump any moral considerations. I’m not sure what really can be done in either case if I’m honest. But if anyone reads this, who maybe wasn’t around in 1985, & would like to show they care about what happened that day I’d just say, please think of others & leave your flares at home if you can, & instead of buying that hoodie or t-shirt, why not donate the money you’d spend on it to help the burns unit? I do think it’s wonderful & so important that what happened that day is still recognised by young & old to this day & it must always be recognised. We don’t need the flares though lads, we’re much better than that.

    Thank you.

  12. John.

    I agree with you 100% about flares.

    I also agree with you about 56 `Hoodies` etc.

    As someone who was there on that fateful day I think the whole thing is bigger than simply `The 56` as there were so many fans injured and affected by the fire disaster.

    I dont need to have to clap on the 56th minute.

    But I also realise that those of us who were there are a diminishing number and therefore have to pass on the task of remembering to younger people.

    I have realised in recent years that younger people, and those who were not present did nit witness the sights, sounds, and even smells that we did will, hopefully, take the remembrance forward long after we are gone.

    My biggest frustration surrounds the `flares`.

    I really do not think they have any part in Bradford City celebrations and the use of them shows total disrespect by, generally, younger fans toward fellow fans who remember the day.

    I include the use of flares on North Parade, Centenary Square, and certainly within Valley Parade.

    It simply should NEVER HAPPEN.

    But again when you see the things being sold on the streets to fans, and you even see the players using them, then I think its nigh on impossible to stop it happening.

    Tonight I watched the BBC2 Documentary `Unforgotten` and in fact I played a small part in the loan of some material used in the production.

    My motive in providing some of the images which have never before seen the light of day from 1985, was the hope that it might educate some of these morons who use the flares.

    A naive viewpoint perhaps, but one can only hope.

    Having seen the finished programme tonight maybe it should be shown annually in every Bradford school to educate the new generations of Bradfordians.

  13. I really don’t like the flares. I think they’re totally unnecessary. It’s still possible to go wild in celebration without them and the ecstatic release of emotion at the Fleetwood game wouldn’t have been diminished by a lack of claret and amber smoke.

    It feels to me like if the club want to stop their regular use in the ground becoming an inevitability, they probably need to take some kind of public stance on it. That’s going to be totally undercut by all the shared images of players holding flares aloft themselves though. Not a good look at all.