
| Bradford City 0 |
| Lincoln City 0 |
By Jason McKeown
This is one of those stalemates where we need to see what happens next before we can judge its true significance. It might be evidence of Bradford City’s character and inner steel that they can claim a battling point against a fellow top six side whilst injuries are mounting. Or perhaps, a fourth straight draw shows they are starting to find life in League One a little tougher. We’ll only really know how good a result this is when more of the pattern emerges.
For now we can say that City are looking solid if not as sizzling. Dogged if less dominant. Just like on Saturday at Stevenage, a point here is certainly no bad result in isolation. But maybe the tactical shrewdness of Michael Skubala is a sign of League One’s growing respect for the Bantams. And that opponents are figuring out ways to curb their pressing excellence.
It might be half term week, but Skubala had done his homework on City. With James Collins playing deeper, Lincoln had an extra player in midfield to crowd out Max Power and Jenson Metcalfe. The Imps’ physical backline routinely cleared its lines quickly and refused to invite any City press. Out of possession, Lincoln were outstanding – with wide forwards Rob Street and Ben House regularly tracking back to support their wing backs.
It all meant City didn’t have their usual space to operate. Power was initially swarmed on and really struggled. The so often-favoured diagonal passes to City’s wing backs were habitually intercepted. And on occasions when Josh Neufville and Ibou Touray did get the ball in wide positions, there was no space in front for them to cause their usual havoc.
This left City looking disjointed by their usual high standards. Lincoln were purposeful, front-footed and created several early chances. But they did not take undue risks, quickly retreating into a defensive shape that stopped City finding their usual rhythm. The front three of Will Swan, Antoni Sarcevic and Calum Kavanagh were initially barely involved.
I guess we’ve come a long way from those opening home games of the season, where much more fancied clubs than Lincoln would turn up with their play-out-from-the-back philosophies and get completely beaten up. City made hay against such breathtaking naivety, and we all had a lot of fun. Lincoln were not here to play the part of fall guy. And so here was a reminder that football seasons can often be a slog, and that this division is not going to be as easy as City have threatened to make it look.

And that’s why ultimately claiming a point is encouraging. In the first 25 minutes especially, City were awful – indeed, the first half overall was by some distance their worst at Valley Parade this season. They struggled to get to grips with Lincoln’s physicality, and when their usual tactics failed to make any impression, they were initially left scratching their heads.
In those opening 25 minutes Lincoln had five shots to City’s zero, and 63% possession. Graham Alexander responded decisively, moving Kavanagh up alongside Swan — who’d barely touched the ball — and dropping Sarcevic into a deeper role behind them. The press was abandoned as a tactic, with Power and Metcalfe instructed to drop back and shore up midfield with the extra help of Sarcevic.
The tweak to a 3-4-1-2 steadied City and helped them gain more control. In that second part of the first half, City had six shots to Lincoln’s two, going closest through a curling Metcalfe effort from distance.
The pattern of City’s gradual improvement continued after the break, where Andy Cook was brought on for Swan – the latter doesn’t quite look his previous sprightly self. The game improved as a spectacle, ebbing and flowing between spells of City and Lincoln pressure. And maybe if you’re a Lincoln fan, you’d have liked to have seen your team push on a bit more and take extra risk. Because with all of the home side’s injury problems, there was definitely an opportunity for the visitors to win it.

That largely went away during the final 20 minutes when Alexander made a triple sub and restored City to their usual 3-4-3. The mounting injury list might have left the City boss with a weaker-looking bench to usual, but once again Alexander played his hand well and the Bantams looked better for the introduction of subs.
As part of the revert to 3-4-3, Tyreik Wright came on to play as wide left forward and was superb. He produced the cross of the night that Joe Wright couldn’t quite get on the end of, and later was played in by Cook and fired an angled shot that George Wickens palmed away. The loose ball fell to the feet of fellow sub Tommy Leigh on the edge of the box, but he could only blast the ball into the Kop.
Not long after Ciaran Kelly sent over a looping cross that Cook met at the back post, but Wickens denied the City legend on his 200th appearance for the club. The Bantams tails were up, and had the game gone on 5-10 minutes longer they probably would have found a winner.
That would be harsh on the balance of overall play and Lincoln were good value for their draw. Alexander was proud of how well City stood up to the challenge and the performance of his back three, who were brilliant. Kelly deserves a special mention – with his manager declaring this the Irishman’s best game for the club. Metcalfe was also superb and seems to be really growing in stature over recent weeks.
Outside of those four players, it was patchy. Credit to Power for the way he kept going and the bravery he showed in always calling for the ball. But that was a long way off what he can deliver. Touray and especially Neufville look like they need to rest up rather than play in this weekend’s FA Cup tie with Cheltenham. Sarcevic battled gamely but looked like he might have been rushed back from injury a little too quickly. Kavanagh couldn’t repeat his recent strong form and Swan/Cook were left too isolated.

The point lifts City back up to second, and that remains a beautiful, unexpected sight that no one should be downplaying. But that said, City’s league record has gone from W7 D2 L1 a month ago to W7 D6 L1. Still really impressive. Still well above expectations. But no longer quite as remarkable.
It’s fair to say they’re missing injured players, not quite hitting September’s heights, and encountering opponents who have learned how to nullify them. But whilst it’s four league games without a win it’s also seven league games unbeaten. And five of their next six league matches are against sides currently in the bottom seven. So whilst this might be a slight dip by recent high standards, there’s nothing to seriously suggest it will be more than that.
We shall see how it plays out. And that’s why – even though this game won’t live long in the memory – we may look back on this draw in a few weeks’ time and apply a better understanding of what it showed about City’s trajectory.
Categories: Match Reviews
Another brilliant Bradford City home win gives more licence to dream the unmentionable
Bradford City make it back to back wins as they avoid a banana skin in Devon
A night to forget, a January of change: Bradford City’s squad reckoning
A return to winning ways, though Bradford City are still labouring to rediscover the higher gears
Four draws on the spin might seem slightly disappointing (due to our combined higher expectations now) but we could’ve easily come away with three wins (or four if you’re really going for it) out of those games. In other words, we weren’t overpowered by any of those four teams fearing defeat so maybe we should consider that being the marker of our current success. Not to mention the fact we’re second even with that recent points collection. I’m expecting we’ll kick on again after the FA Cup weekend and start to turn draws back into wins! Hopefully a few more injured players back by then too.
Thanks for the write up. Helped me process a rather strange game.
I actually felt that for all Lincoln’s huff and puff and moments of neat passing, they never really looked like scoring. Perhaps that was because their finishing was pretty awful and defensively we were pretty strong; but they never created a clean-cut chance, and most of their chances and shots on goal came from our mistakes and sloppiness.
I thought that first half we were just really lacking quality all over the pitch. It seemed that ever key pass was poor, or every opportunity to break or create something resulted in the wrong decision being made. This improved second half, and Cook gave us more of a focus and sticking point higher up the pitch. We created a lot more chances, and really should have scored if it wasn’t for some rushed shooting, or a failure to gamble a bit.
As you say, was it a good point, or have the past 4 games signaled the start of a “poor run” – the next 2 or 3 games will tell us. But still really impressed with the team and Alexander overall, what a joy to be a City fan at the moment.
Great write-up, as ever. It was an honest game. Lincoln impressed physically, and came to play and try to get a result, and there was hardly any time-wasting or feigning injury (kudos to the Lincoln players for this, including those who quickly got up after crunching tackles and taking a ball to the face). I don’t think there was even a single offside call all game either.
A few scattered observations:
Jason, you sum it up perfectly.
I am very happy with the league table and our prospects but do worry about the injury prone nature of our squad, and wonder if there is a reason for this.
But, after seeing match after match last season of teams wasting time and playing for a draw isn’t it good to watch good teams coming to VP and entertaining us.
I think this is a good league.
Nothing of great concern yesterday. An effect of the injuries and impact on the squad. Balance has been knocked a little bit and while you are right to point out the back 3 defended superbly they also limit us in terms of the tempo we play at.
Kavanagh is a completely different type of player to Pointon. He can’t do the things Pointon can do in tight spaces. Not a criticism of Kavanagh at all but the team need to adapt to the injuries.
And they did in the second half. Wright was brilliant and Cook while not having an amazing game gave us a focal point that gave Lincoln something else to think about. Credit to Alexander I think his changes probably meant we edged the game overall but let’s hope some of the wounded are back soon.
A very fair summation, Jason, of the state of current play. Personally, I would start Cook and try to get 60 minutes out of him. That’s the time to bring on a runner, like Swan, when the opposing defenders are tiring. 4 points from 12 is disappointing after the good start to the season, but there is consolation in that we fought back well against Rotherham and with a bit of luck – and better refereeing – might have won the other 3.
I am quite optimistic this is a decent point in the scheme of things. After last night we’ve now played nine of the other eleven teams in the top half, and only lost once. For the first half an hour Lincoln were much the better team and, to your point, had worked on a gameplan. Teams are allowed to do that and to push at the top end of the table we’ve got to find a way of overcoming it. We haven’t quite managed it in terms of a result but the longer the game went on the more we dominated.
Like you I think Neufville is probably due a bit of a rest, that was as quiet as he’s been but Lincoln had clearly worked out a plan to nullify him and it worked, the long diagonal ball over the top was seldom successful. Someone else made the point that it is also time to start Cook and I’d agree with that as well, even if you get an hour out of him. He occupies the two central defenders to an extent where it leaves wide open spaces for others. When both Wright & Cook linked up last night in the last twenty minutes, City were at their most threatening.
Final point on the back three, Lincoln carried a threat, certainly in the first half. Byrne & Kelly aren’t everyone’s cups of tea, and I get it, but no reason to grumble last night.
Sad to see Power laying into Halliday at the end. Not a good look for a Captain.
In a game of few incidents, I’m amazed that only David Murray has picked up on the poor behaviour of Power in berating Halliday at the end. He’d already had a go at a couple of other players during the game but he seened to go on at Halliday for ages and, at one point, I thought the pair were going to come to blows.
I wonder how he’d have reacted to a team mate criticising his many misplaced passes and wayward shooting?
As David said above, not a good look and such scenes should be reserved for the dressing room.
We can’t love it when he cajoles and encourages the players and then moan when he, admittedly, goes over the top for once.
He’s old school in a world where such behaviour does look poor – but we didn’t bat an eyelid when Jones was doing it 11 seasons ago.
Halliday’s a big boy and I’m sure they’ve kissed and made up.
As we are all saying, key injuries seems to be the biggest factor. For last night, I see the current absences of Pointon and Patterson as a drag, they are useful playmakers.
The table doesn’t lie, and notwithstanding the games in hand of Stevenage and Cardiff, shows our quality. No team is storming ahead.
Stockport have hardly turned up this season. They’re like us last season – lots more to give than the first quarter / third has shown.
Humphrys, Pattison and Pennington reportedly in contention for the FA Cup game on Saturday. Baldwin, Pointon and Tilt reportedly back in training. 8 out of City’s 9 league games before the New Year are against teams currently in the lower half of L1 – an important couple of months coming up in the promotion race.
Unconvinced that Leyton Orient or Wigan are an easier bunch to play against than what we’ve had in the last four matches.
However, you’re correct to allude to the fact we’ll be better when the likes of Baldwin will be back.
It’s noticeable how poor the distribution is at the back, when we are playing with two players, in Byrne and Kelly not known for their passing skills.
However, I am delighted that both have had excellent recent matches – as they were getting far too much hassle. But that seems now to be directed at poor Kav!!
We’re fine. Two draws against the two physically toughest teams in the division
However, the way we play, it’s ridiculous expecting our wing backs to play twice in a week. It happened earlier in the season when Neufville, looked short of energy after playing Sat/Tue (or vice versa).
Both must be rested for Saturday.
Uncertain, as I’ve mentioned before that 3/4/3 can survive the season. Swann surely deserves to have Cook alongside him – he’s had a thankless task for the last couple of matches.
And if Pointon is injured and Wright off form – why on earth would we manufacture a left side attacker when Pattinson certainly and Sarcevic are better with a midfield three.
But let’s be honest Stockport and Bolton have more to give than us – which is why I think Top 2 won’t happen (amazing that we’re even thinking about it!!)
Top 6 is possible, but we may discover that we’re not quite good enough up front as the season goes on.
Top 9 would still be a fantastic season. Hoping for better.
Even though the bantams are a depleted side at the moment with injuries it just shows how resilient and adaptable they are in this division. The main objective this team is doing is not to lose when they’re on that pitch. Seven games unbeaten. Some of the players that are coming in are growing in stature i.e. Ciaren Kelly. What a game he had on Tuesday! Don’t forget this is mostly a new team in a new higher division and from what the fans are seeing is the togetherness that GA and his team are installing in to them. Hopefully he can rest some players on Sat at Cheltenham and hopefully by the next game against Burton he has the full squad back and we can continue to be successful again with three points at the Valley fortress.