Self sabotage

AFC Wimbledon 3
Tilley 11, Browne 42, Stevens 67
Bradford City 1
Humphrys 77

By Adam Raj

This was a game that was lost before the first whistle. Collective disappointment and groans could be heard in both South London and West Yorkshire when the delayed team news got released. Five changes, none of which enforced and key men “rested” following two fantastic results and performances over the last week was certainly not what anyone would’ve wanted.

Optimism turned into pessimism. And they were right.

This was a dreadful City display, in which the first half recorded straight zeros across the board. Zero shots, zero shots on target, zero corners and zero touches in the opposition box. A performance that was worse than many of us anticipated.

Alexander’s five changes included bringing in Louie Sibley, Ciaran Kelly, Paul Mullin, Ibou Touray and Kayden Jackson.

Touray and Jackson’s return to the lineup were understandable given their influence and position in the squad. The others, less so.

Kelly and Sibley have been out in the cold for weeks, the latter not even making a squad since 24th January – six games ago.  Kelly seems to be wheeled out once in a blue moon to play against the ‘direct’ sides in the division – a move that worked well against Lincoln and Stevenage earlier in the season, but the Irishman’s last three starts have seen us concede three goals in each game. Not a good look, but how are players who feature once every six weeks meant to be match sharp and capable of performing to the levels required?

Arguably more concerning than the players who came in, were the players left out. Antoni Sarcevic, Aden Baldwin and Bobby Pointon benched, Tyreik Wright not even in the squad. No injuries, just ‘rotation’ according to Graham Alexander. Whilst I appreciate Sarcevic’s injury history, the statistics for when he starts/when he doesn’t are stark. If he’s available, he has to start.

City’s late arrival at the Cherry Red Records Stadium due to traffic meant kick off was delayed by half an hour. Whether that played any part in the performance is unknown although to Alexander’s credit, he dismissed the suggestion.

And whilst eleven men lined up in pink, City’s display looked like the Bantams were still very much on the bus. They found themselves behind after just eleven minutes as James Tilley’s cross from the right corner of the box went all the way in. Curtis Tilt seemed to pull his head away, leaving Sam Walker with no chance. What Tilt was thinking was anyone’s guess.

City could not deal with Wimbledon’s physicality. They lost too many duels. Midfield was too weak and they picked up very few second balls. Marcus Browne got the ball down and got the hosts playing, whilst Alistair Smith was the physically dominant midfielder who City could not compete with.

City had lined up initially in a 3-5-2 with Sibley in Central midfield. The on loan Oxford midfielder looked like a fish out of water, with no idea as to what was expected of him. Consistently out of position off the ball and contributing nothing on it. It was no surprise to see Alexander signal to Walker to go down for a tactical time-out. What followed was a return to a 3-4-3 but with no change of performance.

Wimbledon continued to dominate, and City were chasing shadows. When they did get the ball, it was a thoughtless lump forward to absolutely nobody, each met with a series of groans in the away end. There was no intention to get the ball down and play football.

A bad first half became even worse as the hosts doubled their lead just before half time. City had been caught up field from their own free kick when Myles Hippolyte took a quick throw to set Browne away and the midfielder made no mistake with the finish.

Lee Evans was covering for Tilt and Pennington who were still making their way back but had no idea where Browne was. Kelly was marking fresh air and failed to come across to cover and ultimately lacked the pace to keep up with the goalscorer. Bad all round.

Rather unsurprisingly a double change followed at half time. Pointon and Baldwin came on for Sibley and Tilt.

By that point, it was too late. The damage was done. Wimbledon, with only one home win since October were full of confidence and fully in control. There was not really any belief that City would work their way back into the game – they have failed to get any points from losing positions since October.

Just after the hour mark, Wimbledon made doubly sure of the three points. Tilley’s short corner was poorly cleared back into his path by Evans and Matt Stevens was on hand to cleverly flick in the hosts’ third of the afternoon.

Ethan Wheatley and Steven Humphrys were then introduced for Jackson and Mullin. Humphrys getting his first minutes as a City player on the left wing, probably going slightly under the radar given the circumstances. But Humphrys was City’s only bright spark on an otherwise miserable afternoon.

The number eleven had a care-free attitude as always and wasn’t scared to try things, take a risk and have a shot at goal. His consolation goal was a fine individual move, skipping past three players and striking low in the bottom corner. But it was too little too late.

Alexander wasn’t really having it in his post match interview – emphasising the necessity to make changes with eleven games in 44 days and the impossibility to name the same side week to week.

But let’s look at the stats over the last eight League One games:

Cardiff City – 17 different players used in the starting XI with 14 changes across those eight games.

Lincoln City – 14 different players used in the starting XI with 6 changes across those eight games. As a bonus stat, Lincoln City named the same side six games on the bounce in this period, winning four and drawing two.

Bradford City – 23 different players used in the starting XI with 20 changes across those eight games.

City’s ‘rotation’ is disproportionately heavier than the two best sides in this division. Two sides with greater budgets and greater squads than Bradford City, but choosing continuity in their team selections.

Alexander’s trust in his squad players and judgement of their ability is misguided. He cannot afford to leave his best centre half and best two attackers on the bench, especially when his captain is also unavailable. The Bantams do not boast a squad talented enough to cope without those four players at once.

I would’ve thought Alexander would have learnt from a similarly silly team selection at Mansfield where City were on the end of another heavy defeat. But whilst his obsession with rotation has won on this occasion, he must learn from this.

Play your best team, appreciate some players are indispensable and appreciate some players just aren’t good enough.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

35 replies

  1. Poor transfer window . Team is clearly weaker . Shambles

    • Yep – Sibley won’t feature again after that (or shouldn’t and if he does then GA needs questions again)

      The 2 Newcastle loans are nowhere to be seen on our ‘better’ squad days.

      Mullin is poor to say it mildly!

      Safe to say Jan window did not take us forwards.

    • Some of the newcomers ensured that we looked stronger against both Peterborough. and Stockport. The former our most dominant performance most us can remember this century.

      You’d think we’d lost the equivalent of Sarc and Pointon – when in reality, in Cook, Pattinson and Halliday, we lost three players who brutally are not good enough for a top 10 L1 team playing a 3/4/3 system.

      Plus judging players on less than five starts and then assessing the effectiveness of the window, is way too early.

  2. Very good report and having also been at Lincoln away I feel I am a curse on the team.🥲 Good insight on the rotation of squad vs other teams; many of the starting guys just didn’t turn up, as it were / should have been delayed like the traffic and late start. What I also found frustrating was how many 50/50 balls in tackles we lost. Wimbledon looked v positive and hungry, whilst we seemed to evaporate from the energy we had in the last two home games.
    Though Wimbledon were clearly the better team all their three goals were really poor mistakes The second one from the quick throw in was especially shocking: a carbon copy of another goal we conceded a few weeks ago – can’t recall which team it was but maybe someone might remember. Alexander should be fuming.

  3. You’ll be glad you didn’t publish this article last night with all the anger around with that abysmal performance.

    The buck stops squarely with GA for yesterday’s result – which will probably be his downfall eventually – as he’s proved yet again not to have learned a thing from the past about mass changes!

    We are not Man City with a wealth of talent as back up!

    • He’s changed the team numerous times, during this brilliant nearly two year run or an average 82 points per 46 game season.

      It’s typical on social media, that when occasionally it doesn’t work out – then apparently it’s never worked!!

  4. sorry Graham, can’t support you on yesterday’s Wimbledon debacle. You cooked City’s goose before a ball was kicked, sacrificing the match on the altar of squad rotation. Earlier in the day I was confident of City getting something, maybe a win at Plough Lane. Those thoughts disappeared in the blink of an eye when I saw the starting eleven.

    during the match I received the following comment from another supporter, “Alexander thinks he’s Pep Guardiola. Thinks he’s got two full teams of top class players any of whom can come in with no drop off in team performance.”

  5. Great report. I was at Lincoln away too and feel it went the same way with this abject display.
    I just felt a city had lost their appetite and energy. We seemed to lose most 50/50 balls, Wimbledon had the hunger and positivity.
    They clearly deserved their win, but ALL THREE of their goals were really poor mistakes. In particular the second goal from the quick throw in was really disappointing. I recall this was a carbon copy of a gosl we conceded from a quick throw in a few weeks back – can’t recall who but somebody may fill us in ? Alexander should be fuming

  6. I was fuming yesterday with that line up and stupid changes to a winning team (before a ball was kicked) but unlike most times I can calm down and be rational – this time the next day and I’m even more annoyed! You’d better own this GA and stop messing around with a winning team who should be going for promotion not dicking around!! I’m absolutely seething!! Self sabotage sums up yesterday perfectly!

    • I would like to put forward ideas which will not be all that popular in this forum.

      None of us knows the fitness of our players. I think Alexander worries about the continuing fitness of Sarcevic and Pointon. Tyreik was obviously unfit. Tilt had a terrible game.

      It seems that the players suffered a reaction from the flat out efforts of Tuesday.

      I don’t criticise Alexander because I don’t know the fitness of the players. And I suspect none of his critics do.

      Remember that we are 5th, 7 points clear of 7th with a game in hand.

      I personally don’t think we are good enough for promotion, but suspect only Cardiff and Lincoln are.

      There’s a long way to go, and whatever happens we shall have had 2 great seasons.

      • At last a voice or reason.

      • Surely, if Pointon and Sarc were in danger of injury (in otherwords not fit to start), why pick them? GA does this all the time and we lose. Once the team was anounced, I posted we would lose! GA post match comments were disgusting. He blasted the team in the way they performed. Never mentioned the fact that his team selection was the route cause. All I can suggest is stick to the team that are playing well and bl**dy stop tinkering.

      • He did admit he may have made a mistake in changes made so I think he has enough in the bank v the vitriol some of you lot are spouting or would you rather we lost more at home and won a few away or are you simply expecting complete perfection ? He’s dropped the ball, he will learn about his squad (as he has constantly) and use this learning to improve the teams circumstances. Anyone who doubts the above hasn’t been around for a few years!

      • Think about those who spend a fortune on travel and tickets and watch a performance like that!

  7. It has been suggested that Alexander is happy to sacrifice away games and concentrate on winning the home games which may well be enough to reach the play offs.

    If this is even remotely true it shows massive disrespect to travelling supporters.

    Yesterday’s team selection seems to bear this out.

  8. Left home at 6.45am and back just before midnight, to watch one of the worst 1st half performances I’ve seen. I was some what upbeat by the last 2 games and thought we could do something. How wrong could I be. Adam excellently summarize this rotation approach isn’t working. GA proves that he is human but he needs to start each game with our best 11, even if some only play 45 mins.

  9. Having watched the Stockport game I travelled to Wimbledon with optimism. Clearly the team didn’t. The players chosen were not up to the task and supporters are legitimately questioning the January recruitment. Re yesterday I heard a rumour that the wrong hotel was booked? Secondly, if we do not train on a Thursday it leaves little time on a Friday for training/preparation and travel when overnight stays are required. Just a thought.

  10. Was at the game. A bad start with the team’s late arrival, questions need to be asked about that. Graham Alexander has done a great job since he came to the club but seemed too wary of Wimbledon with team selection, too many changes. The two first-half goals were embarrassingly bad defensively. We missed Power (surely straight back into central midfield on Tuesday) and Sarcevic (can only assume he has a fitness issue). Only positives: Metcalfe in midfield and a classy goal from Humphrys. A loud minority of potty-mouthed City ‘fans’ gave absolute dog’s abuse throughout the game to Alexander and all the players (including second-half subs), elite-level knuckle-draggers who would be better off supporting Leeds. Awful performance yesterday but City still in with a huge chance of getting in the playoffs, which would be an amazing achievement for a newly promoted club.

  11. When offering my thoughts on a City performance, particularly a poor one, I do try to focus just on the 90mins, as to be sat on the cusp of March with a few points grace in the play-offs, we must be doing something right.

    However, yesterday felt like groundhog day, see Mansfield, Huddersfield, Lincoln and to a lesser extent Leyton Orient and Luton for a recent string of abject away displays.

    The visits to tough places like Bolton and Stevenage and getting a point seems light years away.

    Much had been said about the midfield been overrun in away games, and GA had intimated in recent interviews that he may look at trying something a little different. In the Stockport home game I noticed how Pointon had at times taken up positions more central, and yesterday Sibley was stationed more centrally throughout the first half. It clearly didn’t work, whether this was the personnel asked to take up this role is certainly questionable.

    A little Like Adam, I picked Lincoln to have a look if they use a rotational policy, and it appears they only really change the line-up when its required, due to injury ,suspension or a loss of form. Clearly this isn’t the only criteria for GA.

    For much of GA’s managerial career, and he’s said this himself that he never changed a winning team, and it seems that it was around when Cooky got his injured that GA adopted this rotational policy to protect players from injury.

    To a degree it worked, obviously we got promoted.

    I noted in GA’s post-match thoughts of the Wimbledon game, he did acknowledge he didn’t have like for like players to rotate. Which begs the question, was it really prudent to change over 50% of the starting line-up (Ok Power’s suspended). I sometimes feel listening to GA speak that he pays a lot of reverence to team spirit and keeping individuals motivated. And will select a player on how they’ve trained, sometimes perhaps it’s to the detriment of the team overall.

    I won’t dissect the players individually as everyone will have their own thoughts on the deficiencies of each performance. No matter whoever starts a game, they should be capable of a finding a teammate without aimless balls, or carrying out the basics. Taking a throwing to feet and the ball returned to the throwers feet, without it played straight back out of play, which was the case that gave Wimbledon the throw leading to their second goal. Pitiful stuff.

    I will however single out Jenson Metcalfe, he merited a 6 in my book.  Nevertheless put into context with the wretched performance of others he deserves some commendation.

    Is GA baffled by the away non-performances, we certainly are. He’s plenty of credit in the bank, we’re streets ahead of 18months ago, and still progressing. Hopefully we all stay on-board and work through this together.

    After Rotherham we travel to Reading, now on the back of recent away results I suspect none of us are holding our breaths for a positive return, However if we are to be defeated at least make Reading work for their win and know they’ve been in a hell of a battle.

  12. Another away match and another abysmal performance. In my opinion the squad is weaker after the transfer window than before. None of the new lads covered himself with any glory today. I think that is seven defeats in the last 8 away matches. Some of the team selection during that run has been baffling. Alexander is a likeable bloke and may be the victim of his own success raising expectations but lacklustre performances like this can’t carry on. We must start picking up points on the road again or inevitably in time it will have an impact on our excellent home form. And by the way, their second goal came from just about the slackest bit of defending you will ever see at a professional level.

  13. Obviously it was very disappointing to play as we did yesterday, & to lose a very important match, & yes it hurts.

    But I’m going to stick my head above the bunker, & try and put a bit of perspective on it, so here goes…

    IMHO, Bradford City have a truly excellent squad of players with very very few exceptions. It’s not just a bunch of half ‘decent’ players, but is a genuine Team in every sense of the word. As far as the Transfer window signings go, I honestly think GA CL & everyone involved did an absolutely fantastic job in putting a Bradford City shirt on Evans, Jackson, & yes Mullin too. The loanees add valuable options & depth, & as a long hard season goes into the final few months, we might we’ll be very glad to have them. Balancing the Club finances is just as important as getting results on the pitch. It’s a shame I know, but sadly that’s just the fact of it. I remember the 6 weeks of madness, going into administration, & having to go cap in hand to the Football League. Never again (I hope). The quality we’ve managed to bring in over the Transfer Window in that context is incredible. Our current 1st 11 must be absolutely knackered with the games coming thick & fast, & the shear 100% effort they all put into it. Minimizing injuries has to be a big consideration & sometimes this means resting players from time to time unfortunately, I can see that much.

    This game will very quickly be forgotten, especially if we beat Rotherham on Tuesday, as we hopefully will do. We’d all love to win every single game we play of course we would, & we’d all love it if we didn’t have to pay tax too, but that’s never going to happen either.

    Oh well, got that off my chest at least.

    Onwards & upwards, up the Bantams!

    • “Games thick and fast”!!! You must be joking. As a young man I can remember playing on a Saturday afternoon, out on a Saturday night and then playing Sunday League football at 11am the following morning. All that without the back up staff, modern training techniques and pampering available down at VP. if League One players can’t manage Tuesday/Saturday, they need to find another occupation.

      • That is just plain wrong. Of course you played a lot, but you can have no conception of the physical and mental demands the modern game puts on players. Recovery time is essential.

      • I remember playing for 2 different teams, Sunday morning and Sunday afternoon. I cycled from one to the other.

  14. Another dismal away from home display, against a poor side. Can’t understand the team selection again?! Five players not match fit. Think the board is having a say to the team selection. Understandable that they don’t want to sign players to only to sit on the bench or just train. But surely these players should only be slotted in eventually over a period of time from a winning side. Winning two games and not conceding a goal, surely GA should keep a winning side for consistency? The next four games are against relegation teams. Not a dead cert but we need to capitalise on these games and keep in the promotion pack.

  15. The defensive performance was the worst of the season. Arguably, the worst of the last two seasons.

    But the reaction is depressingly negative. As is often the case when emotion rules the head.

    GA’s points tally of 152 from his last 85 matches, means he deserves better than this. Not last because he’s rotated numerous times and it has largely worked out. We can all be Nobby Negative and point out matches when it didn’t work. How about a bit of balance and pointing out the matches where it did work?

    And comparing us to Cardiff and Lincoln, is just silly. We’re literally years behind these two who are experienced L1 operators or higher. They simply have far better squads.

    The only way we’ve been able to remotely compete with them is to have high intensity pressing identity. That’s very energy sapping, meaning that some players cannot play twice per week or rather risk injury.

    Hence we get changes that none of us like. But we’d like Sarcevic and Baldwin been out for weeks, even less.

  16. Once again there is mention of this mythical animal.

    The Bradford City ‘Board’.

    We dont have one. We are a single owner football club operated by a CEO.

    Anothee fan says we are skint. Another says ‘we have not got a pot to piss in’.

    We have as much money as the owner is prepared to release from his personal fortune.

    Thats over and beyond any funds generated by club income which is largely Season ticket sales.

    Unless we are prepared to go into serious debt then thats where we are in the grand scheme of things.

  17. once again I feel for George Lapslie. Sibley comes in and starts after being nowhere for 6 weeks – does very little – yet Lapslie ( who is our player and has another year on his contract after this season) is not even included in the squad after looking decent in two recent cameos. Baffling

    • I’ve advocated on other websites how much I rate Lapslie, yet he hardly gets a sniff. Good engine and always likely to score. To my mind he’s never let us down, yet he can’t hardly even make the bench, let alone, given a starting position. Surely he was a better option yesterday than Sibley?

      • Absolutely agree Gerry. There is a player there – skilful, intelligent, energetic – he scored decent goals last season arriving late into the box and was even league 2 player of the month – and ever since, has been starved of proper opportunity. At least he scored the goal that sent us up ( not Sarc).

  18. I wonder how GA will react to this result! Whether he reviews post match reactions from a supports perspective or from punters from wop. He must feel the frustration of supporters reaction to his constant rotation of his squad. He must see how bad his changes have performed. Yet he continues with squad rotation. If the likes of Pointon, Baldwin, Wright, and Sarc are rested to the bench or dropped, must affect those players. Especially when the replacements have failed to perform. They must wonder WHY they sat on the bench twiddlng their thumbs. Had we played the same squad against Stockport, yesterday, I am certain we would have won. This defeat is squarely down to GA.

  19. Add me to the list of Lapslie fans. Surely, if Sarcevic isn’t fit/able to play, Lapslie is the natural replacement? I don’t recall him ever letting us down. He really appears to have had a raw deal from the manager.

    It really is difficult to comprehend Tinkerman’s thinking at times, reflected again in yesterday’s lineup and, not for the first time, we paid the price for his inexplicable selections. Five changes from a winning side absolutely beggars belief and the vast majority of fans will have predicted the shambles that followed. Certainly, those on social media did.

  20. Turning up late with half the first team missing, wearing a kit that looked like someone had put it on the wrong wash cycle, trying a new formation for 20 minutes then abandoning it, looking half asleep, being second best to every challenge, and conceding from a throw-in. That was Sunday league level stuff lads. 

  21. If GA finally learns and he and the chosen players turn this around and win away at Reading, Port Vale and Wigan (completely possible) then all is completely forgiven !

Leave a reply to Steven J Cancel reply