Practicality vs superficiality as Bradford City start carrying the Ming Vase

Bradford City 1
Pennington 11
Rotherham United 0

Written by Dom Calhowie (images by John Dewhirst)

Bradford City’s single goal win against Rotherham United at Valley Parade left you in no uncertainty that the Bantams have recognised the gravity of the task before them as they look to secure a play-off place. And that was in marked contrast to the frivolousness of the visitors who struggle at the foot of the table.

More so, perhaps, than any Bradford City manager before him, Graham Alexander has a clear target for his team to finish in the top six of League One, and the sine qua non of that target is to win the remaining seven games available at Valley Parade, starting here.

So the Bantams started the process of carrying seven Ming Vases over seven slippy floors with a mature and serious performance.

Bursting

Matthew Pennington scored the decisive goal in the game after ten minutes, pushing any number of visiting defenders out of the way to head a cross into the goal which came after quick thinking on the left-hand side by Bobby Pointon and Tyreik Wright following one of many small but significant fouls the visitors seemed happy to concede.

Bursting through the crowd of defenders, Pennington’s goal was reward for City’s strong start, which also saw Kayden Jackson enterprising before his withdrawal after being on the wrong end of a strong tackle. City mustered fourteen shots at goal, three on target, and drifted back into a game management, the Ming Vase held securely for eighty minutes.

Jenson Metcalfe, impressive again, tested the visiting goalkeeper and the post. Ethan Wheatley came on and went off and looked effective in doing what Alexander wants from him, from Jackson, and from later sub Stephen Humphrys, which is to work the ball in the final third, rather than to try to be in a position to score.

This is Alexander’s serious approach to game management, to winning football matches, and it is working.

Pressing

By contrast, Rotherham United seemed blissfully unaware of their position second bottom of the League One table, and treated the threat of relegation as something of a triviality. If Alexander has a clear view of what is important that City do, Matt Hamshaw in the Rotherham dug-out deals in irrelevances.

As synecdoche, watching the Rotherham keeper Ted Cann hover on the ball to try to tempt a City player into a press, which would, one imagines, trigger a series of passing moves through the Bantams midfield is watching an underestimation of how disciplined the home side’s forward line were, and how well drilled they are in only pressing when triggered.

Cann tried again and again, and perhaps in training it is a practical approach, but in the reality of Valley Parade at the end of Winter it showed a lack of seriousness. A kind of stunt rehearsed play against a team far too focused on not dropping the vase, to drop the vase.

Little

This was true throughout the visitors’ approach. They played two men against Josh Neufville, snuffing him out, but had no real solution to the dearth of attacking players that left them going forward, or the asymmetrical and easily managed attack. They passed the ball, but not into dangerous positions, and City turned them away when they did.

The visitors edged possession 52% to 48% but not only did it not resolve to a shot on target all night. It never looked like they would do if it meant having to best Pennington, Curtis Tilt and Aden Baldwin – all three of whom were excellent.

Rotherham played like a team that had not realised that the season is going to finish soon and they are not doing especially well in it despite the fact that it looks to be good fun to play for them. You get the ball, you pass the ball, you get told you had acquitted yourself well in a 0-1 defeat where the other team’s goalkeeper does so little.

They probably don’t even have a Ming Vase.

Edge

All of which leaves City looking at the need to get to 80 points (ish) with six more home games and seven away. Winning the six home games would give them 76 points. Adding points on the road is more difficult.

The trip to Reading at the weekend continues City’s issues with playing in a way which suits Valley Parade and the narrowness of the home pitch, and that suffers away from home in the wider spaces of a bigger pitch. As Rotherham’s penning in of Josh Neufville illustrates, there is no solution to this that does not come with weakening the team elsewhere.

Adding Lee Evans to Max Power and putting Jenson Metcalfe into the attacking three has merits, but so does the idea that resting the main eleven away from home makes the necessary home victories more likely. Changing the playing system away from home is giving the Ming Vases to Evri.

Those concerns, though, come from City getting into a position of strength because of these nights and afternoons at Valley Parade, where another win seems inevitable, and the regularity of that should not make it monotonous.

Step by step, slowly, we edge across the slippy floor.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

19 replies

  1. A brilliantly written article Dom – summing up well the calculated decisions needed to ensure that prized play off spot. Why results are the only thing that matters now

    Synechdoche is my new favourite word – I must try and shoe horn it into something soon

  2. A superb header to win the game. Great to see that desire to win the ball. All 3 centre halves were excellent as you point out, particularly Baldwin imo. And Metcalfe gets better and better, we were nearly treated to another one of his specials. Jackson looked up for it, hope he’s ok. Apart from that, I thought we continued to look dangerous and create good chances for good chances. Final ball and all that. Their debutant keeper had a great chance to equalise but messed his header up, he looked gutted.

  3. great defensive. Great midfield. The attack without Jackson?

    • Humphreys looks re-energised to me. Competition has meant he’s had to up his game, as it’s his consistency that let’s him down.

      Swan to come back as well – which let’s remember has one of the better shot conversion rates in L1.

      • I like Humphrey’s. Hard working team player. But I don’t think he has the control or brawn to be a lone forward. Maybe fair to start in his preferred position. Wheatley isn’t physically developed enough yet. Swan was effective when the team was playing more football (remember Power bollocking one of the defenders for hoofing it aimlessly up the pitch, compared to now). But hasn’t looked anything like dealing with the long ball. Mullins looks an obvious choice when Jackson isn’t available. Otherwise why did we sign him?

  4. Great article, very in-tune with the current team and fortunes. Interesting idea to save the players for home games, based on the line up at Wimbledon, that is exactly what I believed he must be doing! Great win, strong at the back again, 3 points and on we go. League 1 Play Off Final Wembley 30 years after Division 2 Play Off Final Wembley…. here’s hoping!

  5. Gritty yet assured. We looked well set up and our style only works when everyone is on it off the ball, which we were. Back three very good and Tyreik Wright continues to impress, he’s one of the first names on the team sheet for me.

    Thought Rotherham showed glimpses in getting between our midfield and defence but were ultimately poor in the final third and will probably go down.

    58 points with a 10 point gap to Reading and Stevenage in 7th and 8th now. 30 wins in the last 40 at VP. Incredible stuff.

  6. Great write up Dom

    Love the Ming Vase analogies scattered throughout and especially the ‘Evri’ one that made me laff out loud – the thought of them delivering the Ming ‘Jigsaw’ Vase . . . . . . . 🤦‍♂️

  7. I looked up the word Synecdoche in the dictionary and I’m still no wiser. 😊

    A victory built on grit and determination, one of the almost anonymous games that are played out twixt victories of the magnitude of Peterborough, that hopefully culminate in a successful end to the campaigne. Its common and all good teams have these bread and butter games throughout the season.

    Despite it been at times a bit of a turgid affair, Baldwin’s performance shone through.

    MOTM by a country mile and his best game for the club, if that display had been in a play-off final the eulogies would have gone on long after the final-whistle. He must be playing the best football of his career.

    A mention to Pennington for the deciding moment between the sides, a top quality goal executed with great precision and timing.

    Metcalfe continuing his increasing maturity and influence in the middle of the park.

    A shout out to T Wright, who’s benefit to the team has increased so much from earlier in the season, where his omission was met with indifference, to now we look for his inclusion as part of the first 11.

    And a special request to GA, please give us a victory on the road so we can really cement our place in that top 6.   

  8. A great article and an interesting perspective. Thanks, Dom.

    Quick question off the back of it: if our target is to assure a play-off spot, and with a Wembley final being the ultimate aim, why would we limit ourselves to being a threat on our narrow home pitch? Wembley has one of the largest playing surfaces in the country.

    I don’t understand the logic of being committed to only the one style when the Wembley pitch is perhaps the antithesis of that style…

    • Yes, it’s a priority to improve our away form (lost 6 out of last 7?)- I don’t think it’s credible to cement a play off slot without some points on the road.

      What is the issue- too hyped for the home crowd, that they struggle to stay as motivated away? Is it the variety of pitches, and too narrow a tactical shape for that? Or something in the travel logistics? Alexander said in pre-season they were looking at this, and it’s unfinished business.

  9. It’s simply amazing that we’ve been punching with Bolton and Stockport all season and yet show no signs of getting floored.

    • Yes it has surprised me.

      But then I look at McCall’s team that lost at Wembley rather unluckily to Millwall.

      Really, man for man, the bench, tactically, were they better than this team?

      I think not.

      If correct, we are good enough.

  10. i do think our match sponsors need to stop giving Bobby Pointon the m-o-m award just for stepping on the pitch. He’s a good player who did well last night but no-one round me thought he deserved m-o-m.

    Tyreik, Power, Metcalfe, Baldwin and Pennington for a lovely goal were our thoughts.

    A good win overall as we had to graft hard and I thought Rotherham were a good side apart from a toothless attack – or should we praising our defence more?

  11. If the plan is to write off away games then, perhaps, fans should save their money and stop travelling.

    Mullin, Humphrys, Jackson, Wheatley and Swan all seemingly vying for just one spot in the team, leaving some disenchanted squad members. No wonder Mullin looked fed up.

    Excellent goal but not much else to enthuse about, with the opposition showing little enterprise. Some solid performances with Baldwin, Metcalfe and Wright the best of the bunch.

    We did what we had to do on an energy sapping pitch and never looked in danger of conceding. Did my eyes deceive me? Who decided we needed to water the pitch at half time?!

    • I understand away performances have been frustrating but players like Sibley and Mullin have to take their chance. The performances of the players have been unacceptable, the resting of players has understandably increased that frustration. I personally am shocked a Baldwin doesn’t play every game given he’s a centre half and not covering as much ground but perhaps he wouldn’t have put in a performance of the season contender last night had he played Saturday?

      The manager is employed to make these tough decisions. I’m sure he’d love to roll Bobby and Sarce out every week but doesn’t think he can because he’s trying to give us the best chance of promotion

      In terms of points travelling away from home you are more likely to drop points than win them.

      We have / had have a tough Tuesday, Saturday period to get through which, if we come out of the other side without injuries, I imagine there would be a lot less ‘tinkering’.

      If the manger listened to fans Baldwin would never have played for the club after his red card, tyreik wright would never make a left wing back and Curtis tilt would never have been signed.

      Let’s stick with the team through the tough spell. I’ll be at Reading on Saturday in hope rather than expectation. A point would be a great result!

  12. “at Valley Parade, where another win seems inevitable, and the regularity of that should not make it monotonous” – it did feel a bit like that. We started well but seemed to get dragged down. For me there was a certain amount of apathy about the whole thing – we knew we were going to win, they knew they were going to lose, the supporters didn’t have much to sing about – it all felt flat. But as I pointed out at the end – poor game, but we’ll take the 3 points.

  13. I am not sure the Ming Vase strategy ever transfers well to sport. Had their keeper buried his header, it would – to mix metaphors – have been Humpty Dumpty time.  Sorry to differ in opinion from the writer, who is obviously trying very hard, but I didn’t see ‘frivolity’ from Rotherham, still less ‘triviality’. They looked ragged and desperate to me.  Our problem is lack of goals.  We play one and have three on the bench but create so little in concrete terms. 

    • Amazing how those ‘lack of goals’ and ‘little creativity’ have taken a promoted club into 3rd with a 10 point cushion on the playoffs at the end of Feb

Leave a reply to Rob W Cancel reply