Bradford City falter on the road again

Burton Albion 2
Hartridge 41, Shade 58
Bradford City 1
T. Wright 90+2

By Adam Raj

City’s poor run of form away from home doesn’t look like ending anytime soon. Another miserable afternoon on the road makes it nine defeats out of the last 11 trips away from BD8.

I feel somewhat conflicted about my analysis of this game and the wider away form issue. Objectively, City are fourth and in with a chance of promotion in their first season back at League One level, which in itself presents as a very positive season. However, as someone who travels away week in week out, nine defeats from 11 is difficult to accept.

This game in itself wasn’t awfully dissimilar to the ones that have preceeded it. City started well, should’ve gone ahead, conceded from an individual error and then never looked like getting back into it.

There was a resounding acceptance amongst the travelling Bantams that the game was done as soon as Alex Hartridge’s header was palmed in by Sam Walker in the 41st minute. Such is City’s record when they fall behind, there wasn’t any real belief that they could muster enough to even retrieve a point.

City haven’t won a point from a losing position on the road since the trip to Rotherham in October. 18 away games in all competitions – 12 times they have been behind and not a single point has been retrieved. In fact, the midweek draw with Mansfield was the first time, home or away, that City had won a point from a losing position since the Rotherham game.

City are a side who need to score the first goal. Without that advantage, they struggle significantly. Going behind throws their game plan in the bin, the opposition sit back, take few risks in possession and maximise set piece opportunities. It negates everything that City are good at – the press becomes redundant, they’re not the biggest or most physical and they don’t possess players of sufficient technical quality to break down a low block.

It means City get forced into a game they don’t want to play and ultimately can’t play. First half, their reaction was to pump the ball long, second half it was a patient possession game. Neither worked and both made for pretty painful viewing.

Aside from the Aden Baldwin diagonal, City don’t seem to have a plan on how to progress the ball forwards. At this stage of the season, there isn’t a side in the division who don’t know how we play and who don’t try to stop our width.

Tyreik Wright had the freedom of the Pirelli in the opening stages of the game but as soon as the hosts fixed that issue, City’s attacking influence became nil.

Wright was denied an early opener by the feet of Brad Collins before Bobby Pointon shot wide from another good chance. They were chances that City had to score but ultimately didn’t.

And as sure as night follows day, City were made to pay. Baldwin conceded a petulant foul which allowed George Evans to deliver for Hartridge’s opener. It is a goal Walker should’ve saved – a header into the ground in the middle third of the goal but City’s keeper seemed slow to react, eventually pushing the ball into the roof of the net.

The hosts had got themselves ahead against the run of play in a first half where City were the better side, if not spectacular.

Second half however, was not good. Graham Alexander made a double change – Ethan Wheatley and Lee Evans coming on for Will Swan and Josh Neufville with Jensen Metcalfe being moved out to wing back. This was all after Antoni Sarcevic had been replaced late in the first half (gulp).

It’s fair to say the changes didn’t work. City were ponderous in possession and became error ridden in defence. 58 minutes on the clock and Tyreese Shade spun Baldwin before firing in low across Walker to double the hosts’ lead.

City managed very little in response. Stephen Humphrys’ free kick forced a good save from Collins in the 87th minute but it wasn’t until stoppage time that they created a big chance. Evans played a good chipped ball over the Burton back line which found Wright’s clever inverted run and he managed to poke home past Collins. It was probably the only time City attempted to create a chance through the middle of the pitch in the whole game. Still, it was too little too late.

City’s away form creates an over-reliance on games at home. It’s a sizeable ask to keep winning with Plymouth, Bolton and Stevenage still to visit Valley Parade who all still have plenty to play for in the play-off race. But it’s a situation they have created for themselves.

But we can’t just sweep the away form under the carpet. Let’s not forget, if City are to finish in the play-offs, they will face an away leg with obviously much more at stake than the regular league fixtures. Performances and results on the road since January suggest they would wilt under such pressure. However, early season results at Stockport, Blackburn, Stoke and Cardiff would suggest they can thrive.

It’s up to Alexander to find that Bradford City again.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

21 replies

  1. Nine defeats from 11 on the road is difficult to accept indeed, Adam.

    Responsibility to fix it rests with the manager, and to be fair, GA would probably admit the same.

    But knowing he hasn’t done a good job on the road and finding a solution are two different things.

    We don’t fix it, in L1 we shall remain. Maybe not a bad thing? A competitive division with affordable tickets. Let’s win the league next season then go up!

  2. A very fair reflection of that game Adam and you faithfully going to all City away games must feel like a punish, especially this calendar year! A tough gig watching City on the road that’s for sure!

    As much as I love Sam Walker in a City shirt, I’m watching his every move more closely now than ever before. That first goal yesterday was poor from him and he should’ve saved it without that much effort. We need him back to his best right now for the run in – not the time to gift goals to the opposition.

    We had those early good opportunities to score but somehow managed to miss what looked like nailed on goals. We should’ve put some daylight between us and Burton.

    A lot of would’ve, could’ve and should’ve there but that’s how it looked to me!

    Also is Gary Bowyer more of a right Tool these days or did I miss that side of him when he was in charge of us? Not sure GA thought that much of him by the end of game handshake either! Hope he gets that excited and annoying beating other teams and not just City!

    • I agree that Gary Bowyer acted like a complete tool on the touchline! I was surprised because I don’t remember him carrying on like that when in charge of city.

  3. We have a great first 11 players but a lot of smaller players. I think that physically smaller players, unless they are of an exceptional quality use more energy and tire more than the bigger players. Combined with lack of r&r leads to them missing chances they might otherwise have taken and picking up injuries that they otherwise might have avoided. We also see the team getting good opportunities to put the ball in the box from the wings (the bloke who sits behind me endlessly repeats the mantra “just put it in the box “), but there’s no one in the box with a goal threat! Why go on endlessly about “the squad “ and then ignore a lot of them? In a way even if GA doesn’t think they are good enough, he has to use them to protect his preferred first 11 from burning out. Regarding tactics, occasionally I would like to see a central midfielder carry the ball directly up the middle instead of passing out wide.

  4. City’s away performance and results would suggest a non league side level.

    city’s performance at home would suggest a championship side!

    That said, our expectations was primarily survival and competing at this level. The early season performances increased our expectations to possible automatic promotion. We would happily have accepted this position at the beginning of the season. Whether we get promotion or not, this seasons experience will stand us in good stead for next season #CTID

  5. The transfer window was supposed to make City stronger ? It clearly hasn’t . A tired starting 11 who obviously can’t play week in week out . With nobody as good to come in and bolster the team . I fear the season will slip between our fingers and we finish 8/9 then what ? What a waisted opportunity . Shambles .

  6. Why not try something different?  I wouldn’t be averse to us setting up for a draw in an away fixture just to try to break the losing habit. That way we might just nick a goal on the break.  Personally I’d try a back four and have the extra man in midfield rather than at the back.  Just doing the same thing and hoping for the best is tactically naive. 4-2-3-1 when defending; 4-4-2 when breaking.

    • I completely agree. We have two weeks now to let platers rest, regroup and go again, but GA saying that “we’ve come this far”, “you don’t get to be fourth best in the league” etc etc doesn’t change the fact that we have been found out tactically.

      It’s time to rest, regroup and change the tactic. 4231 or 433 would be my preferred formations, as long as we keep getting ball on the deck and play.

      We need to take teams by surprise, which is exactly what happened at the start of the season

  7. For the opening part of the game I felt we were watching Jekyll FC, alas it soon proved to be more Hyde FC that again turned up. Early on, Tyriek got plenty of space to play and create problems, he did go on throughout the rest of the game being our most effective player.

    Bobby gave his worst showing in a City shirt, his game visibly fell apart after screwing his shot wide of the post, perhaps his close relationship with the fans and a sense of letting them down at the crucial moment had some bearing on this.

    Matty Pennington struggled particularly with his distribution, his contribution recently with his two well taken goals make it difficult to be too critical of him, however he will feel he didn’t do himself or the team justice today.

    Tyriek aside none of the players came away with much credit.

    Sam Walker is starting to receive a bit of criticism on social media regarding some displays. Of course particularly on media sites  fans vent frustration, need scapegoats and not to read too much into it. I would describe Sam last season as outstanding, with the exception of a very impressive early part of this season he’s been adequate. He doesn’t make howlers, however on a couple of occasions he must feel he could have done better, and feel a little disappointed his percentage of shots stopped hasn’t been a bit higher.

    The reliance on Baldwin’s 60yard drives got little reward, Burton had clearly got the measure of this. Leaving us without any plan B. Times like this patience and adopting the shorter pass to find space needs to be deployed. We did it with aplomb against Peterborough and Port Vale, it’s not beyond our remit.

    As the season now goes into the home straight, it’s looking more and more as we’re going to have to reply on home form to seal our spot. We’re now looking nervously over our shoulders, we only need to falter at VP and a good season overall would be marred by the dismay of dropping out of a top six, that we’ve looked comfortable in since early stages of the season.

    The Rotherham postponement I felt came at a unfortunate time for us, we really could have done with those points under our belt before hitting the tough run that immediately proceeded it. I’m hoping the postponement of the Plymouth game is one that works in our favour, I’m trusting that GA uses the break well.

    • Pointon’s biggest weakness is that he suffers most when playing twice a week and still at times gets bullied too much by ‘kick em first and ask questions next’ teams, especially away from home.

      That aspect of his game has improved drastically and I’m sure it will continue to do so.

  8. Lee Evans’ pass for our late goal showed up something we’ve been missing all season – a midfielder who can create scoring chances without us having to spray the ball wide.

    I’d like to see us set up away from home with Power, Metcalfe and Evans in central midfield and be harder to break down. With the bonus that Evans can provide quality passes through channels or over the top centrally for Wright, Neufville and Swan/Wheatley to run onto. As Adam’s report points out, we’ve become too easy to defend against because everything goes out wide and other teams know this. We need someone in midfield who can utilise Swan, Wheatley or Jackson’s ability to run behind off the shoulder of the last defender, to give opposition defences more to worry about.

  9. First, Adam, you are to be congratulated for writing such a fair and intelligent report. I was so dejected yesterday evening that I couldn’t have done it.

    Secondly, every City supporter would have been delighted in early August last year if they had known we would be 4th with 7 matches to go.

    That’s the positive. The negative is what we saw yesterday. A bright start, bad misses, goalkeeping error, then dismal play against a poor team. Let’s be fair, Burton do well to survive in league 1. They use all they have and grind out results .

    What’s wrong with City? I never claim to be an expert, but I think Walker is a bit error-prone just now, but more importantly I think Sarcevic is hanging onto fitness, Metcalfe, Pointon, Neufville are simply tired. Sibley should have been a good signing but was never fit, Jackson is a huge loss, Wheatley and Mullin very disappointing. I thought we signed well in January, but appear to have been wrong.

    They are young men, and have had a very tough season. Maybe the break until Good Friday will help.

    Whether Alexander could change formation and tactics I leave to others to discuss.

    Finally, failure to make the play-offs will hurt, but I still think it has been a very good season, and the future looks good.

  10. Oh dear another horrible display away from home. We are void of any idea’s and can’t defend. Hoofball all the way never works. Diagonal passing not good. How can our lone striker get in behind. Pass the ball play it through the channels. The midfield is poor as well, always outnumbered and the opposition find it so easy to pass it through us. We still don’t have a striker as good as Cook. The squad depth is not good. Loanees nowhere near good enough. Who brings these players in?

    • “Who brings these players in?”

      The management team that have been in place for 2 to 3 years and have taken us from 15th in L2 to 4th in L1 in the space of just over two years.

      Bad performances will occur in a new league. And yes, it is very frustrating!!

  11. If we wanted to keep the option of long ball play we clearly should have kept Cook!

    • Occurs more often when the team are basically knackered, as our style of play doesn’t fit well with playing twice a week for a spell.

      It’s tired players with tired ideas.

  12. Since GA went to 3/4/3, at Crewe in November 2024, we’ve had such a great run of success that we’ve forgotten about the big downside of that system – we cannot play well when there is a consistent run of two games per week.

    I suppose this isn’t dissimilar to Premiership teams who are in Europe, but even last season and during our 10 match home winning run, we were often not that great – but playing lesser sides and so getting away with it.

    It’s remarkable we are where we are, but because we are not vastly superior to any side in this division (or inferior) unless we have those energy levels high – we often look poor.

    Hopefully a nearly two rest will help.

  13. I agree a more defensive outlook would make sense away from home. Playing with five forwards just seems overambitious to me, we’re rarely going to dominate teams and pin them back in their own half for a whole game. 

    At Newcastle, Alexander played Halliday and Touré in the wingback spots (I think) which was disappointing to many of us at the time, even if it made sense against champions league opposition! 

    I guess we need to give League One teams that same respect, away from home, by playing a more defensive-minded 3-4-3. 

    The two remaining wide forward positions can be filled by whoever isn’t knackered that week. And we wouldn’t have to learn a completely new shape with only a few games left in the season. 

    All we need is a player like Brad Halliday to make it work… 

  14. Some very good and interesting comments all round. Think the best advice is to change the formation maybe as suggested a 4-3-3. You would have a multiple choice in midfield and a pressing forward line…Humphries on the left Swan in the middle and Wheatley on the right? Wing backs to boot. With again a multiple choice with two central defenders? This would be an attacking formation and nothing to lose with only seven games to play. This two week rest will give GA and his team a good refreshing rest before the Northampton game with the Easter schedule which usually sorts out who’s going to finish where? This team is more than capable of finishing in the playoffs and what a season this has been….unexpected considering our first season in this division! Home wins and hopefully a couple of points on the road and we’ll be booking our tickets for the playoffs hopefully finishing at Wembley! What a season….go on the boys one last push on that last bend we can do it! Up the Bantams!!

Leave a reply to Chris S Cancel reply