Written by Gareth Walker (all images: Mike Holdsworth)
It’s that time of year again where thoughts are turning to which names will be on the retained list and, conversely, which players Bradford City fans will be waving goodbye to during the summer. Whilst City aren’t yet mathematically safe in League One, Phil Parkinson will privately be considering the make up of his squad for next year, depending on which division we are in.
Here I get to play manager: discussing each current member of Parkinson’s squad and what decision I would make over their future if I was the in the hot seat.
The players who will be out of contract:
Jon McLaughlin: KEEP
He probably splits opinion more than any other player currently on City’s books. My own opinion is that he is a very good shot stopper, but the other areas of his game – in particular his distribution and the communication with his defence – are below average.
This means that on the occasions when the standard of his shot stopping drops, such as the games against Huddersfield (away), Wolves (home) and Walsall (home) this season, he looks to be a poor goalkeeper. Personally, I think he is a decent League Two keeper, but that if we have aspirations of getting promoted to the Championship then we need a better number one.
I’d offer him a contract as our back up. Whether he would accept that role is another question.
Stephen Darby: KEEP
He should comfortably win the player of the year award this season, and I doubt that any City fan would want him to leave the club. When considering all the players whose contracts are up, Darby is the only one who I would be really desperate to keep. Let’s hope that he feels the same way about staying at City.
James Meredith: KEEP
For the second year in a row, Meredith has been missing through injury for a large part of the season. Prior to this his form was average to say the least, when compared to his performances last season.
Personally I feel that he has suffered from not having any out and out competition for his place at left back. This has been highlighted by how much we’ve struggled to fill the role in his absence. When he is fit, he knows that he is a guaranteed starter and this cannot be good for any player. I think that it’s imperative that we sign some competition next season, to push him all the way.
Rory McArdle: KEEP
This is a really tough call for me. I think that last year’s ‘Marathon Man’ has struggled with the step up to League One. I’d keep him, but he would no longer be my first choice partner for Andrew Davies. I’d bring in a new right-sided centre back to succeed where Matt Taylor failed, and at the very least by competing with McArdle for a starting role. However, if the under-contract-Taylor can’t be moved on, the out-of-contract-McArdle might have to make way for an upgrade.
Carl McHugh: KEEP
‘Carlo’ is arguably my favourite player at City at the moment. Parkinson has gone on record as saying that the Donegal-born centre back would run through brick walls for the manager and the team. He is a vastly talented defender, who never lets us down.
He suffers because his main position is as a left hand sided centre back, and as such he is in direct competition with Davies for a place in the team. He is not a left back, although has often had to fill in there due to the lack of options to cover Meredith’s absence.
Considering Davies’ injury record and up and down form since returning to the side, I’d keep McHugh; possibly even fazing him into the side as Davies’ long-term replacement. The problem we may have is that if McHugh knows that he is only being kept as an understudy, he might think it better for his own career that he moves on.
Matthew Bates: RELEASE
Brought in as a utility player who can be used in a variety of positions, Bates has suffered by mainly being employed as the stand-in for Davies during the latter’s prolonged injury absence. As a former Middlesbrough captain and England U21 international, Bates certainly has the pedigree. Unfortunately, he hasn’t really impressed anyone.
Bates’ tendency to back off from attackers and bark orders at others, whilst seeming to do very little himself, has seen him targeted by supporters. I think it’d best for everyone if he moved on, and that his wages are freed up to use elsewhere.
Gary Jones: KEEP
‘Magic Man’ has bounced back from an indifferent start to the season – when many people were questioning his performances and writing him off – to re-establish himself as one of our most important players. Jason Kennedy’s failure to hit the ground running has meant Jones has played far more games than he or Parkinson would have expected. Being another year older, we really cannot afford to put off finding a suitable heir to his throne. However, he would still be a fantastic player to have in the squad and play half of the games, or to come off the bench to see matches out when needed.
Will the budget allow us to keep him in a diminished role? Maybe a player-coach type position would facilitate this move.
Nathan Doyle: KEEP (just)
I really can’t make my mind up about Doyle. He is still one of my favourite players. He should be our best player. He is arguably the most talented player at the club. So why doesn’t he show it on a consistent basis?
Doyle came back from the summer rest in great shape and put in some of his best performances since he rejoined the club. However, similar to last year, his form dipped considerably and his influence on games diminished. I don’t know whether this was down to fatigue or the injury that he was said to be carrying. Whatever the case, he needs to be more consistent.
We certainly miss Doyle when he isn’t in the side, but he splits opinion amongst fans, with some seeing him as a favourite and others thinking that he doesn’t contribute enough. Parkinson is known to like his versatility, but he is rumoured to be one of the highest paid players at the club and, as such, it will be interesting to see if he is considered a luxury that we can no longer afford.
Kyel Reid: KEEP
I like Reid. Although he infuriates supporters sometimes with his erratic-ness and sometimes poor decision making, it is undeniable that he is a major threat to opposing teams, who are often so fearful of him that they double or triple mark him.
I feel Reid is an upgrade on our previous enigmatic wingers. When he is out of the team injured – as he has been for a long time this season – we carry much less of an attacking threat. He is still our main outlet, and I would like to keep him in our squad; albeit with players brought into provide him with better competition for his place.
The problem we may have is that Reid has a young family down in the London area and he may decide to move on for personal reasons.
Garry Thompson: RELEASE
Thompson’s City career has seen more highs and lows than most. His form has varied vastly, but who could ever forget his goal against Arsenal? His commitment to the cause has been questioned in the past, but this season we have seen him show commendable fight when he has come on as a substitute – desire that has put newer signings and younger players to shame.
He is a favourite of Parkinson’s because he facilitates the high diagonal ball to his wing. It will be a shame to lose him and it is a big call, because we need characters such as him with experience if we were to avoid another season of struggle. However, I feel that if we want to move forwards and progress as a club, we just need slightly younger legs and that little bit of extra quality.
Thanks for the memories Thommo!
Rafa De Vita: RELEASE
Barring a brilliant assist for James Hanson’s finish against Preston in October, and a goal at home to Wolves a few days later, De Vita has been totally anonymous in the few games that he has played. He has spent large parts of the season on the treatment table, but his limited contributions when he has been in the side have meant that we haven’t missed him.
De Vita has been a disappointment, because I was impressed with him in pre-season and Swindon supporters speak relatively highly of him.
Andy Gray: RELEASE
It’s difficult to argue that Parkinson has made a successful signing in the last three transfer windows, but Gray really does take the biscuit as the worst of the lot. A high wage earner, who simply hasn’t provided the competition to Hanson that he was supposed to – and the veteran has spent most of his time injured.
Gray’s second coming at Valley Parade has been a major failure.
Louis Swain: RELEASE
Has anyone seen Swain since last summer, when he was given his one year contract? Being farmed out on loan to non-league wasn’t really a surprise, but the lack of updates on his progress makes it look like he is surplus to requirements.
The players who will still be under contract:
Andrew Davies: KEEP
Signed a two year deal last summer and, despite his injury problems and up and down form since his return, Davies is still our best centre back by some distance. If he wasn’t under contract there may be a discussion to be had as to whether we are getting value for money – and whether someone who is, say, 75% as good as Davies but always fit would be a better signing. For next season, we have to hope that Davies’ injury problems are behind him, so we can build a team with him in it.
Matt Taylor: MOVE ON
We know so little about this player, partly because he has been injured for such a long time. However, when Taylor has been fit, Parkinson clearly hasn’t liked what he has seen.
A fleeting appearance in one league game, along with starts in cup competitions at Huddersfield and Hartlepool, are his own appearances, which made the decision to recall him early from a loan spell at Colchester – where he was getting game time – a strange one.
His signing was initially well received, because of his reputation and promotion history when he was captain at Charlton; but these all now point to the fact that his wages are likely to be high and unaffordable for someone who rarely plays. With one year left on his contract, hopefully we can find a club willing to take him off our hands.
Jason Kennedy: MOVE ON
A dazzling performance at Valley Parade whilst playing against for Rochdale last season convinced Parkinson that Kennedy was the long-term successor to Gary Jones. Unfortunately, it simply hasn’t worked out and Kennedy finds himself warming the bench back on loan at his old club.
This is one disappointing signing where the blame cannot be solely laid at Parkinson’s door. Some fans at Spotland regarded Kennedy to be a better player than Jones, and most of the Valley Parade faithful were delighted when he decided to finally make the journey down the M62 to West Yorkshire.
However, in claret and amber, Kennedy looks half the player that he did in black and blue. Hesitant on the ball and avoiding responsibility are just two of the criticisms levelled at him. Again, with one year left on his contract, I hope that we can find someone who wants to take him.
Mark Yeates: MOVE ON
The biggest disappointment of all of last summer’s signings. 12 months ago, Yeates was a regular player for Watford as they marched towards the Championship play off final. He started this season well, scoring a great goal at home to Carlisle, but that was as good as it got. Yeates soon lost his place to Reid, and found himself reduced to being a bit-part player.
Along with Doyle, he should be our best player. However, many supporters have questioned his attitude and commitment – and as one of our highest earners, with another season to run on his deal, I expect him to be moved on. That is unless he can show us some real form over the last few weeks of the season.
James Hanson: KEEP
The fulcrum of our side, and arguably our most important player due to Parkinson’s Plan A. Hanson is getting better and better, and I am delighted that he has committed his long term future to the club. We do, however, need to find a way or a style of playing without Hanson, for the times when he is injured or ineffective.
Oli McBurnie: KEEP
The cream of the crop of our talented youth team, McBurnie is being handled with care and I expect to see him being continually drip fed into senior action next year. He has shown enough potential so far for me to think that he should have a bright future, and I’d like to see him as our fourth striking option next year.
Lewis Clarkson: KEEP
Another player who has suffered with injury since signing, we have so far seen very little of Clarkson. Brought in as one for the future by the current coaching staff, I see him as striker number five next year; possibly being loaned out for experience if the right opportunity arrives.
Aaron Mclean: KEEP
Having arrived to much fanfare as Nahki Wells’ replacement, Mclean has so far failed to live up to expectations. However, with another two years to run on his contract I refuse to write him off after just six months. The effort is clearly there in his play, I just feel that he looks a poor signing because he doesn’t fit in with Parkinson’s tactics. Mclean is the player who I feel would benefit the most if we manage to develop a Plan B.
The players who are on loan
Arron Jameson: SEND BACK
A token signing if ever there was one. With hardly any senior games to his name, Jameson was not the player that supporters wanted to see brought in to challenge Jon McLaughlin for the number one jersey. We might as well have put the youth team goalkeeper on the bench, and that is in fact what Parkinson has done when faced with the task of balancing the allocated number of loanees in his match day squads.
Adam Drury: SEND BACK
We were crying out for a proper left back after James Meredith’s injury, and it was puzzling that it took so long to bring one in. Drury has been steady if not spectacular in the role, and there is a chance he could be offered a deal for next year. Personally, however, I would question whether he has done enough to earn it.
Adam Reach: SEND BACK
When Reach signed for us in January, I spoke to a Shrewsbury-supporting friend of mine who revealed that Reach had been brilliant for his first month on loan at New Meadow, earlier this season, but that his form then dropped off spectacularly.
Unfortunately that seems to have been the case during his stay in Yorkshire, too. Reach was so good at the start that we were worried about Middlesbrough recalling him. However, his inconsistency probably explains why they haven’t done. Another player who clearly has talent, but doesn’t show it enough and recently has appeared to be playing for himself rather than the team. I don’t think that we can afford another squad member of that ilk.
Kyle Bennett: KEEP
In contrast Reach, Bennett’s City career started slowly but has improved considerably. He had a poor performance against Oldham recently, but I think that was more to do with the bizarre tactical shifts from Parkinson during the game. Bennett put a good performance in at Rotherham on Friday.
At times he frustrates by playing very narrow, but I feel that is partly on the manager’s instruction. If he can continue to improve, I would like to see Bennett as one of four wide players in next season’s squad.
Matty Dolan: KEEP
One week, Dolan looks like the best player on the pitch. The next he has an absolute stinker. Contrast his performances against Gillingham (home) and Leyton Orient (away) with those against Shrewsbury (away) and Oldham (home). However, even in the Oldham game, Dolan managed to produce the only bit of quality in a Bradford shirt, when he set up Adam Reach’s goal.
As a relatively young player I think that Dolan will continue to improve and become more consistent. I believe it’s pretty much agreed that he will join us permanently in the summer, and I am quite comfortable with that.
Chris Atkinson: KEEP
This is one where Parkinson and I would no doubt disagree. Along with Jameson, Atkinson has been one of the unlucky ones who have missed out when we have been limited to just five loanees in a match day squad. It’s a shame because I feel that he could provide the attacking impetus that we sometimes lack from central midfield.
Atkinson did well in brief cameo appearances against Wolves (away) and MK Dons (home), and would likely be a relatively cheap signing as a fourth central midfield option. I hope that Parkinson leaving him out doesn’t indicate that he isn’t intending on keeping him.
Jon Stead: SEND BACK.
I was impressed with Stead at Leyton Orient (away) and even more so at Rotherham (away); but he definitely isn’t the man to be Hanson’s understudy, because he doesn’t win enough in the air. I’d rather see Parkinson sign a different type of striker, especially considering the wages that Stead is likely to be earning at Huddersfield.
However, much will depend on whether Parkinson intends to try new tactics next year. Stead is ideally suited to playing the lone striker role, as he proved at Rotherham, because he has experience of doing this in the Premier League with Sunderland and Blackburn. I wouldn’t totally rule out him signing permanently.
The players in the youth team
I’d expect youth team captain and dynamic midfielder Jack Stockdill to be offered a contract. Deals may also be awarded to central defender Niall Heaton, wide forward Nathan Curtis and winger Callum Chippendale.
If the above decisions were to come to fruition, there would be spaces in the squad to fill and a need for several new signings. As a priority, I’d be looking to sign a first choice goalkeeper, some competition for Meredith at left back, a right-sided centre back to replace Bates and Taylor, and a third senior striker to compete with Hanson and Mclean
There would also be a need to sign a couple of wingers or wide midfielders, to compete with Reid and Bennett.
Very interesting Gaz, heres mine
Agree with all except let Jones go, no room for sentiment, his legs have gone. Offer Drury 1 year deal, get rid of rest except for Dolan & Atkinson. Bennett too lightweight.
Ever thought the reason McArdle has struggled is due to the amount of games played last year? Pushing 60! A good sumer break might refresh him.
Didn’t poor old Simon Parker get a huge dose of criticism from this website (including follow-up comments) when he speculated that Kyel Reid was unlikely to be kept on for next season? We’re still not safe and here is an article telling a whole host of players we rely on to drag us over the line that they are not wanted. As for Kyel Reid, this article repeats what Parker said – he lives in London and is unlikely to want to stay so he has probably played his last game for the club
Ian, the article in the T&A you refer to was criticised for its use of language in basically calling Kyel Reid ‘bad money’. Seen as Gareth is arguing we should be keeping Reid, it hardly contradicts the previous piece. As for ‘a whole host of players we rely on to drag us over the line that they are not wanted’, Gareth has argued that eight of the XI who started on Friday should stay, and the three he doesn’t think we should keep are on loan to the club and may not even see their futures at City.
We are effectively eight points (including the superior goal difference) clear of relegation with four to play and there are nine clubs in-between ourselves and the bottom four. The players and management should not be taking anything for granted of course, but as mere fans I think we are entitled to start considering next season.
From what I recall, people took issue with Simons article because they thought that he was insinuating that Reid should be realeased because of his injury!
Football is all about results – no, it’s all about opinions!
Interesting assessment but I wonder if it’s a little premature. If we win all our remaining games or lose them all, then depending on who plays I suspect you’d be re-writing the piece!
I am a firm believer in retaining a good mix of youth and experience. I like the idea of the older pros staying on, being good squad members, working on coaching badges and supporting young players. For that reason I would keep Jones and Thompson – but only if they want to stay.
Defensively I would keep the preferred back four and McHugh and JMac. JMac is learning his trade all the time as he comes up the leagues and i like him as no.1 but agree that a proper challenger would be a positive step. I’m also a McArdle fan and think an early season finish and longer rest will do him good. He can also play right back if cover needed for Darby so I hope PP keeps him.
I agree with the rest of your list of releases except for De Vita and Stead. I’d like to see a bit more of them – De Vita may be given a few games now he’s fit again so PP can assess him. Clarkson has suffered with injury but sounds an exciting prospect.
There are some good squad members on that list and PP likes the ‘playing for each other’ strong team ethic. I think Darby, Davies, Johnny Mac, McArdle, Doyle, Meredith, Jones and Hanson are key to this and would be pleased to watch them play for us again next season.
Before we consider each player individually, a lot depends on the club’s objectives for next season. I see two options. The first is that we keep the squad largely together, move on a couple of unproductive high earners and sign a few good players to make the difference and make it to the play-offs. The second is that we rebuild heavily and treat the season as a chance to get together the core of our next promotion-winning squad. The first feels more likely.
I would agree with most of what Gareth has said – as usual I would guess there might be a released or retained player that causes a raised eyebrow or two but on the whole I don’t think these assessments will be too far out.
The only area I am not totally comfortable with is the decision to sign Dolan and Atkinson – I don’t think Dolan has done quite enough yet to warrant this and to keep Atkinson based on a couple of ‘cameo’ performances as a back up midfielder for next season does not sound like positive dealing to me. Many match reports and comments this season have surrounded our lack of pace, creative influence and goals from midfield – we should be looking to improve on what we get from magic man Jones (who cannot keep doing what he did at Rotherham week in week out) and Doyle rather than looking to supplement them and I for one hope the summer will provide sufficient options for Parky to help achieve this.
Whatever happens it will be a big summer for BCFC and for Parky and my main hope is the new influx of players have a little more positive impact than the players signed/loaned over the past 12 months.
Opinions, don’t you just love them!
How can anyone suggest that Gary Jones should not be offered another contract? If it wasn’t for Stephen Darby, Jones would be my player of the season. His age is just a smokescreen for suggesting he shouldn’t be offered another contract. His desire, commitment and passion are there for all supporters to see and if I was our manager, I’d be offering him a two year contract. Who can forget his performance against Crewe Alexandra at home this season?!?
With regards to the majority of last summer’s signings not performing as well as we’d hoped, has it got anything to do with the superb team spirit created last season and the majority of that nucleus of players still at our club?
Agreed. I find the widely-used remark that Jones’s “legs have gone” both lazy and disrespectful. He has played more games than anyone expected, but he continues to cover an awful lot of ground during 90mins. Moreover, the phrase is a horrible reminder of Jim Jeffries’ painfully inaccurate assessment of McCall.
Both men are legends at our club for similar reasons, not least their committment, passion and a refusal to accept anything less from their team-mates. In embodying those qualities that best represent us as fans out there on the pitch, we sacrifice these type of players at a far greater cost than arbitrarily having someone younger on the pitch.
Exactly – McCall’s “legs had gone” and we replaced him with Gary Locke. Those trying to user Jones out of the door should be careful what they wish for…
Right on the money Gareth with your assessment of the squad on who should stay or go, haven’t understood the stick McArdle has taken this season, I couldn’t give a toss about the long ball pass, he’s an excellent defender. Reid has been a massive miss, if he get’s back to full fitness he’s a great player to have in the team, still remember looking on in amazement when he is double teamed and on occasions he’s had three opposition players in attendance, an excellent player at this level.