Stirring second half fightback keeps the feelgood factor at Bradford City – but there’s a Jamie Walker hole still to fill

Bradford City 2
Oduor 59, Halliday 83
Morecambe 2
Connolly 3, McKiernan 18

By Tim Penfold

It was, in many ways, a classic League Two Boxing Day game. Bradford City and Morecambe put everything on the line for the points today, in a game that had more perspiration than inspiration, but was still good enough to send over 18,000 fans home entertained. Bradford City gave themselves a mountain to climb by conceding two early goals, but raised their game in the second half to force a point, and were the width of a crossbar away from taking all three.

Graham Alexander’s starting line-up has picked itself in recent weeks, fitness permitting. Unfortunately, fitness was what caused the change today, with both Jamie Walker and his obvious replacement Alex Pattison unavailable. It wasn’t a huge concern though, as the likes of Clarke Oduor, Harry Chapman and Bobby Pointon have all done well in the attacking midfield role in the Football League Trophy in recent weeks. It was a big surprise, therefore, to see Emmanuel Osadebe taking the role of Walker’s replacement, while both Pointon and Chapman didn’t even make the matchday squad.

Osadebe had an instant impact on the game, setting up an early chance – unfortunately, it was for Morecambe as a free kick was cleared into his heel and ricocheted straight into the path of James Connolly, who fired past Harry Lewis. No real blame could be attached to Osadebe – it was just a piece of bad luck, and City had to respond.

They nearly did, as Tyler Smith scampered through only for his shot to be saved, but otherwise they ended up launching the ball at a solid defence and seeing it come straight back at them. Andy Cook won some headers, but they didn’t drop to a City shirt, and there was a big Walker shaped hole in the middle of the pitch which Osadebe was completely failing to fill.

Morecambe didn’t really look like much of a threat, until they suddenly sprung a quick counter down City’s right. It was a simple move, a run to the byline and a cutback hammered high into the net by McKiernan, who had escaped the attentions of Matty Platt. Two shots, two goals and City were floundering.

Osadebe had one half chance immediately after the second goal, but otherwise City were toothless. Errors and sloppiness crept in, and attacks broke down too easily, particularly down the left. The Irish midfielder bore the brunt of the frustration from the crowd, too often slowing attacks down and giving the ball away. It was the visitors who carried the greater threat, such as it was, heading against the post from a corner and following up with a cross shot that deflected wide off Cook.

City looked to the bench for options, but in the positions where we needed improvements there were slim pickings. Oduor was the obvious sub for both Osadebe and Lewis Richards, who had been the poorest performers in the half, but he could only be used once. Graham Alexander’s decision was to introduce Oduor in place of Osadebe for the start of the second half, and the sub was greeted by cheers from part of the crowd.

The Bantams started the second half with a bit more tempo and a bit less hoof, linking quicker through the middle and stretching the defence. The pressing worked better as well, and created a good chance when Alex Gilliead won it high up the pitch, slipped in Brad Halliday who pulled it back for Oduor. It was a repeat of the goal against Gillingham – only for Oduor’s shot to cannon into Smith and loop over the bar.

The pressure was mounting though, and referee Darren Drysdale took centre stage, denying a shout from Andy Cook for a penalty. I wasn’t sure if it was one, but the one thing it was not was a dive from Cook, which was the referee’s bizarre decision.

The Bantams were not disheartened though, and got their goal shortly after. Halliday swung a cross in, which Cool nudged into the path of the onrushing Oduor. This time there was nobody in the way and it was 2-1.

This didn’t quite produce the siege that City fans might’ve been expecting, as Morecambe rallied without ever creating anything of note. The visitors were well organised and tough to break down, sitting deep and taking every opportunity to slow play down and frustrate us. There was one good chance that Platt headed over from close range, but a change in strategy was needed. Vadaine Oliver was summoned from the bench in place of Smith, and City went more and more direct.

Gilliead was everywhere, winning the ball back high up and starting attacks. Oduor found pockets of space but his final ball let him down at times. Richards charged forward down the left but too often made the wrong decision and had his crosses blocked. Morecambe put bodies on the line and cleared well.

Just as it looked like the visitors would hold on, the equaliser came. Ciaran Kelly swung a deep cross over from the left, and it was the unlikely figure of Brad Halliday who ghosted beyond his man at the far post and slammed the ball past the keeper. Halliday has been one of the stars of the recent good run, thriving in his role as wingback and adding an extra attacking dimension to his game. The goal was the least he deserved for another afternoon of constant running.

There was still time for a winner, and Andy Cook came close, finding just enough space in the box to head a Richards cross against the crossbar with the goalkeeper beaten. There were, surprisingly, only three minutes of stoppage time added on by a referee who was alert enough to book a Morecambe player for timewasting but not alert enough to actually add the time that they’d wasted on to the end of the game. In the end both teams ran out of time and were forced to settle for a point.

The second half was a performance of great heart and enough skill to rescue a point, but we can’t fully ignore the issues of the first half. Walker and Pattison’s injuries left a vacancy in the team, but at no point in his time at the club has Osadebe ever shown himself as the answer there, and we are not short of alternative options. Oduor proved a much better option, and it is not difficult to make the argument that both Chapman and Pointon would too.

Pointon’s continued absence from the squad is bizarre. He was the best City player in that first half at Notts County before being subbed for tactical reasons – why is he not even on the bench now?

However, the second half showed the character that has been instilled in this team. There were some echoes of the Parkinson era, as a team not quite at its best forced a result through drive and desire as much as ability. It is this that gives us hope that the unbeaten run can continue, that performances like the first half remain an aberration and that this league campaign will not just peter out into mediocrity like so many others.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

42 replies

  1. 13 points out of 15 is good – as is coming back from two down. We must take the positives and steel ourselves for a titanic clash with Stockport.

  2. Fit players not in squad at this time usually equals transfer reasons (Pointon and chapman). Expect them both to go next week. Happy with a point especially at half time as it looked like only 1 winner.

  3. Whole heartedly agree with your point re Pointon and Chapman. Maybe Alexander does not see Pointon’s qualities. Great to come back from 2 – 0, to draw however. No escaping the fact that his substitutes were missing two key players. Love to have a statement from the manager re his bench choices.

  4. There is a difference between playing direct football and playing kick and rush. The latter is what we played in the first half albeit after a cruel bit of 2nd minute luck.

    I think Osadebe got a spot on the bench because he fills several roles. However, one of these isn’t in Walker’s position. Chapman, Pointon, Wilson, Tulloch could all do that role better.

    All in all it was a great effort to grab a point (and so nearly all 3) and keeps the momentum going. I have no doubt we win that game with Walker in – take the positives.

  5. In the grander scheme of things, I suspect that was a very useful result. A little wake call after 6 on the bounce.

    Clearly losing Walker is an issue, I didn’t hear what was wrong with Pattinson but if he isn’t good to go, I suspect that’s where our January business will be done, I get the clamour for Bobby or Harry over Mani but the reality is, as skillful as they are, they are both wingers and it is really difficult for wide players to operate centrally.

    • Osadebe was signed as a winger, Gilliead was a winger. Chapman filled in very well for Walker last year and, while I appreciate Walker has been tasked to play a bit deeper this year to accommodate 2 strikers, to say Chapman can’t play centrally or that role I can’t agree with.

      One thing Chapman is very good at is pressing and one thing Osadebe showed yesterday is that he isn’t. This seems an important role in the Alexander team which Gilliead and Walker perform very well. Yesterday in the first half Gilliead was doing it on his own.

      Thought Oduor did really well when he came on the shirt should now be his to lose but the next man up should be Chapman.

      All hopefully a bit of a moot point if Walker and Pattison are shorter term injuries.

      Ultimately I think yesterday signalled the end of Chapman’s time here as he’s at best 4th choice in the position he can play.

      Hopefully Pointon goes out on loan but signs a new deal.

  6. I have been impressed with GA since his arrival as manager. He has made some really good decisions in terms of team selection and tactics and also team spirit to never give up until the final whistle. However, one area has been a little surprising, his choice of subs. I can see Oliver for sure, Odour, yes. An extra defender be it Taylor or Stubb’s. Maybe even Osadebe. I don’t understand Derbyshire or McDonald. I would think younger legs like Chapman, Wilson and Pointon would be a better bet.
    I guess making these decisions are his perogitive and what he gets paid to do.
    It was a decent response in the second half after being down at half time. Hopefully Walker or Pattison will be back on Friday.

    • Chapman, Wilson & Pointon are wingers and we play a wingless formation?

      • I appreciate your point about Chapman, Wilson and Pointon being wingers, but at least one could be on the bench to bring a different challenge to the opposition late on.

  7. I jokingly said I was going back to North Parade when I saw Drysdale was officiating…he didn’t disappoint!

  8. The new narrative seems to be that Pointon should play and if he’s not then it suggests he’s going. Could it not simply be that Alexander – like Parkinson – favours hardened senior players, preferably of some physical stature? Young Bobby, hugely promising though he is, does not have these qualities. He and Oduor to some extent duplicate each other as subs so it’s one or the other. That the latter came on and scored rather suggests Alexander was right to pick him. Furthermore Oduor professes himself to be a number 10, whereas Pointon is an outside forward. Currently, we don’t play wingers. Taking all these into consideration, I quite understand why Pointon is not making the bench. Speaking of big players and transfer dealings, I fully expect Alexander to sign a 6’ 4” keeper. I will be very surprised if Pointon leaves – and very disappointed. If as expected Young returns, Derbyshire must surely be encouraged to find himself a short-term deal elsewhere.

  9. A game full of action and entertainment, a fantastic advertisement for lower league football. For me GA strength has been playing players in positions that they understand and are comfortable with. We have been unlucky to lose both Walker and Pattison in the Doncaster game but unfortunately Osadebe looked like a fish out of water. I can’t think of anything he has done that would suggest he is going to be good in this role but Apparently he works hard in training. Pointon might not be huge but he is a terrier and would have fitted in miles better Osadebe, who’s confidence must be rock bottom. Stubbornness is not usually associated with success, so disappointing. And if McDonald and Derbyshires contracts were up tomorrow would we sign them again? Unlikely. what on earth was Platt doing for their second.
    Anyway, hopefully we can learn.

  10. I know it’s very early in his career, but Pointon has looked like a player way beyond the level of a league 2. And now It’s beginning to look more and more likely that the only reason for him to be left out of recent selection and, in particular, yesterday’s first-team squad -when both Walker and Pattison were unavailable- is if a deal has been agreed for him to move to another Club. If not a, “done and dusted” deal then then maybe an “auction” between competing interestrested parties. What other reason could there be?

    Having such a good player who can’t even get a seat on the bench, is both perplexing and frustrating for those supporters who were astonished at watching such previously rare
    but now consistant, high quality level performances from “one of our own” young and inexperienced Bradford City players. For someone with the abilities, the fitness and the footballing intelligence that Pointon has clearly shown he has got, surely there can be no case for any Coach/Manager to argue that he wouldn’t be able to fit into “our style of play”. Intelligent, gifted and hard working individuals can fit into any system.

    • I thought Pointon did really well in his few games and benefited from the system Macdonald played. To say he looked abive the standard would pergaps be a push!

      However until yesterday with Walker out and Pattison injured, who would you leave out for him? The side in this very direct style of play with 4 league wins in a row picked itself. I would have preferred Pointon or Chapman to Osadebe but GA quite openly explained the reasons why.

      I would prefer us not to play such constantly direct football and then Wilson, Chapman, Pointon, Oduor all come into contention from the start but the way things have gone so far we should let GA get on with it, is my personal opinion!

  11. You’ve got to give some credit to Morecambe, they did their homework, figured out our weak points and poked their fingers right into ’em… and it almost paid off.

    That was a certain defeat for the City of recent years.

    Only a few weeks ago, scoring 2 goals would have sounded less believable than a big fat dude squeezing down your chimney to reward your good behaviour with cheap Chinese products you don’t want (or need) … but probably more importantly, we’re finally witnessing the one thing we’ve craved above all else of anyone pulling on the C&A… DESIRE!

    Therefore, despite the disappointment of ‘dropping two points’ against a team out-of-form and a play-off rival at home… I’ve learned so much more about the team and the new gaffer after that performance than any of the wins we’ve had recently.

    The classic game of ‘two halves’.

    Despite GA publicly placing faith in his players about how they look after themselves over the holiday period, entrusting them to exhibit discipline when everyone around is celebrating and gorging on ‘performance-zapping’ festive feasts and their favourite topple…

    It was clear one or two of the boys didn’t share that philosophy and/or possibly didn’t think anyone would notice.

    I hate to conform to stereotypes, and this is only my opinion (not fact), but it looked like our ‘Irish Beckenbauer’ was seeing double yesterday.

    Don’t get me wrong, he’s played a vital role in our recent resurgence with a string of ‘last-ditch’ saving tackles and solid performances… and before the turnaround, I was calling out for him and Tompkinson to play either side of Taylor to make us more mobile and less susceptible to pace on the break… so, I’m a fan.

    However, virtually every pass he made was off or under-hit yesterday, which caused problems at times. There was one spell at the start of the second half, when defending near the corner, he passed it to one of their players, got it back, passed it to another, got it back and then skewed it out for a corner.

    We can be more forgiving of the occasional ‘off-day’ when we’re witnessing consistent performances with plenty of ‘heart’, so I’m quite happy to put it in the ‘bad day at the office’ category… but it would be a hell of a coincidence on Boxing Day if it had nothing to do with the previous day/night!

    Cooky too looked a little lethargic and slightly off pace, despite almost completing a spectacular turnaround our second half performance deserved with his header that hit the crossbar at the end.

    He’s not known for ‘energetic performances’ when he’s at his best, but one moment yesterday gave a clue that he was ‘feeling it’ a little… 10-15 minutes from the end, we were back in the game and sensing blood… they on the other hand were looking for any excuse to time-waste (obliged and enabled by our nemesis referee).

    Anyway, it was a GK and two balls were on the pitch. One five-yards away from our ‘Geordie Pele’ by the penalty spot, and the other out-wide by the edge of the area. It was obvious they’d use it as an opportunity to wind the clock down, and monsieur Cook knew it too as he hesitated and momentarily turned towards the ball nearest him… but I guess the thought of adding an extra 10-yards onto his journey back to the half-way line was enough to make him reconsider, so he left it and sauntered his way back while Morecambe took a breather.

    Again, I’m not criticising, or even upset with him… I think it’s pretty widely known that he enjoys a pint or two… and given what he’s done for our club already, who would begrudge him at Xmas… but for those who don’t believe it makes much difference, or does any harm, it was visibly evident that fuelling your body with the wrong foods and alcohol has a definite impact on performance… and even though they all gave 110% in the second half, it was enough to disrupt their rhythm in the first half and gave us a hill to climb just to snatch a draw, so ultimately it cost us.

    Morecambe also came fully prepared too and their game plan was spot on. They targeted two major weak spots in our team, and also came up with a solution to turn one of our threats/strengths into a vulnerability, and it worked a charm until GA sorted it out at the break.

    I know this will upset a good number of City supporters because football is a game of opinions and I tend to favour the overseas footballing philosophy, rather than the traditional English views… not that one is right and the other is wrong… and I certainly don’t want to head down that rabbit hole right now by opening a pointless debate about it…

    I just wanted to offer some sort of explanation why I oppose two players which many of our supporters adore – I’m not a lunatic or a whinger, I just look for different attributes in certain players.

    This will sound even crazier knowing he won the ‘man of the match’ award, at least by ‘the prawn sandwich eaters’ who only ever nominate goal-scorers anyway.

    I know he’s vastly improved this year, and he gives it everything, every game without fail… in terms of effort, he’s our best and most consistent performer. I’ll admit, I wanted him out last season (and early this), but now I think he’s an asset to our squad. No one is more amazed by his transformation than me.

    However, while his performances are energetic and driven, he lacks quality and pace.

    I want to point out that I’m not asking for him to be replaced, or blaming his performance yesterday… I’m merely highlighting what I believe the opposition were trying to do, because they were clearly targeting his weaknesses and focusing much of their play down that channel.

    One thing that hasn’t changed is his sloppy passing and constant loss of possession under-pressure. Morecambe have looked at that and closed him down at every opportunity which resulted in many unforced errors and turnovers. They also knew he lacks pace but is told to play high up the pitch, so they were waiting for his inevitable mistakes and overloaded down that side with quick counter-attacks – which is how they scored their second.

    He wasn’t the only culpable party in that goal mind as Smallwood lost his marker who nipped in to score, while ‘Our Kelly’ stood all by his lonesome, probably reflecting on the banging Xmas day he had.

    I’m not gonna fault BH for lack of pace or the fact he’s high up the pitch because this is also the reason why we’re finally scoring goals and winning more matches… even his sloppy play isn’t his fault either as those are his limitations – he’s a lower league footballer, so no point expecting him to be in the same league as Trent.

    I think he did three good things yesterday, one was the goal… another was how he chased back over a long distance and nicked the ball to prevent a dangerous attack… and the third was a decent attack down the wing, otherwise he was ‘Sterling-esque’, you knew he’d either pass the ball straight to the feet of a defender, or he’d make the wrong choice, which 9/10 he did… and for some reason that won him MotM.

    However, he did play better in the second half, and each of his three highlights came after the break, where GA made some tweaks which nulled the opposition tactics and lifted the team energy as a whole. So in fairness, he played his part in our recovery and obviously scored the equaliser.

    The other weakness they tried to exploit was our star flapper, Jerry Lewis. I know I’m gonna take some flak for this as well, since he’s made some world-class saves over the past two seasons that have saved/won a few points for us at times. Most recently at Gillingham where his cat-like reflexes prevented a certain goal at a vital point in the game – who knows how it would have finished had that gone in.

    No one can fault his shot-stopping abilities. I’ve seen my share of City keepers since my first game in 1986, and few of them (if any) were as good at saving from close range as Lewis.

    Goalkeeping however has 4 key components: stopping shots is the obvious one, though without good handling… a commanding presence… and distribution, then you’re never gonna be a stellar keeper. His reflexes are probably as good as anyone in the business, and some of his saves deserve to be showcased to a wider audience… but not only does he lack in every other department (quite substantially), he’s error prone too!

    Just like he showed in our previous match at Doncaster from no apparent danger, he’s just as liable to cost us a goal from nothing as he is to save us one, and Morecambe definitely viewed him as a potential goal source.

    While I’m sure they were instructed to put him under pressure at every given opportunity as at the very least, it generally forces him into wayward clearances that concede possession, he was fortunate to avoid the ball at his feet (or perhaps that’s a new GA directive after the Donny debacle) …

    But they were also drilled to float crosses and corners into the six-yard box because when he’s not flapping like Alan Carr… he’s a complete lineophile who either daredn’t leave his goaline, or he loves it so much that he’s extremely reluctant to move off it. Sometimes, I swear it looks like the goalline is a track that he’s attached to and unable to get off, restricting his movement to side to side like a Subbuteo keeper..

    They didn’t actually score from that yesterday but nearly every cross and corner caused chaos, panic, and heart-in-mouth moments. If my nerves weren’t being severely tested (or I wasn’t a City fan), then I’d be in stitches every time I watched him in goal mouth action. At times it looks like he must be in high heels because he stumbles around an awful lot… then when he starts waving and flapping his arms around, it’s more like Jerry Lewis doing the Birdie Dance.

    One other blatant tactic Morecambe used to good effect in the first half was to anticipate our direct balls to Cook, which has been one of our strengths in recent weeks and led to many scoring opportunities and indeed goals. What they did was to drop a midfielder in there, 10 yards out so that every time the defender won the header, it went straight to him and that triggered a counter-attack where we found ourselves outnumbered at times, and had we conceded another goal during that spell, few of us could have complained, which would have put the game to bed.

    However, GA saw it all and made subtle tweaks at half-time to turn the game on its head, which gives me a lot of confidence in his abilities moving forward.

    I’ve noticed a lot of people comment that it’s early days and a few good results don’t make anyone a good manager (or team), which is absolutely correct and wise words.

    We saw with Trueman/Sellers how you can string a sequence of good (lucky) results together that defy statistics, logic, and the footballing gods, before the law of averages eventually bring you crashing back down to Earth with a bang.

    Which is why, I was definitely opposed to giving Kevin McDonald the hotseat after a couple of decent home performances and a few good results while many people were already convinced he was the next Alex Ferguson, before that went pear-shaped too.

    So, I definitely understand the common sense approach to judging GA’s managerial qualities over the long-term.

    However, for me there are plenty of tiny nuances which demonstrate how he focuses on the minor details that eventually add up to give you a significant advantage…

    There are blatantly obvious ones too, like his man-management skills… his demand for high fitness levels (look at how many late goals we’re scoring and have simultaneously stopped conceding) … plus his tactical intelligence and attacking philosophy which regardless of squad ability, he will find a system to compliment team strengths while maintaining the objective of creating as many chances as possible.

    Many believe he’s a direct manager, which I’m sure few City supporters care little about, myself included. But I’m not convinced he is, as he’s admitted himself the current tactic is only because it suits the squad best. He did that too at MK Dons topping the league and winning manager of the month for his blistering start – an effective tactic that suited his players, resulted in goals and victories before a meddling chairman demanded a change in style which led to defeats and the sack not long after… where’ve I heard that one before? Hmmm.

    I’m happy because it’s worked in our favour as we now have a tactically astute manager who demands 100% commitment from his players and sets his teams up to attack. In the past when we’ve had short term success and got carried away with it, the stats and performances told a different story… we just got lucky with the results.

    That’s why you can tell GA is different to all those because not only are we winning games, we’re dominating them and creating plenty of chances too, and while performances haven’t necessarily been silky or easy on the eye, they’ve been fully committed and now he’s got their fitness levels up, it’s generally evident from first to last minute.

    And yesterday at half time and playing straight into Morecambe’s hands, he changed things around slightly, made a decisive half-time substitution, and demanded more effort from his players, which could (and probably should) have resulted in victory. That’s ‘good management’.

    Overall, yesterday was a very significant and satisfying result. In recent years we’ve struggled to score more than one goal in a game, let alone pull back a 2-goal deficit, which is exactly the kind of character you need to be successful.

    Now we’re scoring goals a plenty, our defence looks solid (yesterday aside), and we’re looking a much fitter team than we’ve been for a long time, which as PP used to say “it buys and saves you goals at the end of games” (paraphrasing).

    Stockport Saturday, exodus Monday, and probable return of the league’s top scorer to come… ‘things’ (as Brian Cox and D:Ream will testify) … can (will) only get better!

    • What a ridiculous and slanderous post. So Kelly was p1ssed and Cook is fat and lazy. Cook won virtually every header in that match. Shame he didn’t go and get the ball and be out of position so the goalie could pass it into midfield! Smallwood, Halliday, Lewis – everyone gets stick in this monologue.

      • Thanks for sharing your views, though I think it’s a bit of a stretch to conclude I was calling Cook fat and lazy… when I saw him do that with the extra ball, I chuckled and thought back to the days when I used to drink and the next day I couldn’t really be all that bothered doing anything – which I put down to a few bevvies the night before. I’m certainly not slinging any dirt his way…

        Same with Kelly. Ironically, he put in a wicked delivery for the equaliser but literally everything else he did suggested his eyesight was a little worse for ware.

        I have no problems with either and I was only giving my opinion on why I thought both ‘looked’ off-the-pace.

        As for Smallwood, I actually thought he was MotM as he popped up everywhere and probably prevented us from going in at the break with a bigger deficit and second half he played his part in lifting the team. I only mentioned him as vindication for Halliday who despite my worry that he lacks pace and composure on the ball, gives everything, so I didn’t want to be overly critical.

        But Lewis, I’m not a fan at all, and I believe we need a commanding and pro-active keeper as he invites too much pressure on our goal by standing on his line and flapping at crosses… you always hear defenders talk about how there’s nothing better for them than a keeper who comes and relieves pressure by plucking crosses out of the air or clearing balls before the striker reaches it, well I bet our defenders aren’t saying that. We need to improve in that area if you ask me.

    • Always love reading your extended posts mate! A few chuckles to go along with too. Keep up the good work. I’m guessing a few thumbs down are for you having some of your own opinions – oh dear how dare you!! Ha ha ha!! At no point at 2.0 down did I feel like we were done for and that we wouldn’t get back into that game. Only a matter of weeks ago that would not have been the case, so that tells me that I firmly believe in this team and more importantly – in GA! Could turn out to be a season to remember! CTID

      • Yeah, thanks for that, it helps to know I’m not completely despised 🙂 I did expect it would ruffle a few feathers, though that wasn’t the intention – I was just releasing the valve that I’d bottled up after such a disappointing first half… however, I thought it would be more like 50/50 but apparently it’s upsetting 2 out of 3 people at the moment by the looks of it.

        I assumed it would be my Halliday assessment that would rile people up because he’s the new golden boy, and it doesn’t help that I watch the games on iFollow with Laurel & Hardy commentating because they seem to conveniently miss every error he makes then talk about him like he’s the ‘Ginger Cafu’, so that sometimes adds a chip to the shoulder that probably wouldn’t be there otherwise.

        However, it seems my suggestion that Cook & Kelly possibly celebrated Xmas that has tipped the scales.

        I mean no offence and I try to add a little humour to lighten it up when I can, so I’m really pleased to hear it goes down well at least with some people, so thanks for cheering me up.

        As for a season to remember… Bolton came from even further back than us 2-3 years ago when they shot up from something like 18th to automatic promotion and I definitely believe we have a good squad, so it’s definitely possible especially now GA is driving the promotion train. CTID!

    • If Andy C does enjoy a pint or two that is ok. After all one of his illustrious predecessors enjoyed a pint or four and he ended up City’s record goalscorer.

    • It’s unfair to suggest any of the team had over indulged over Xmas. City like any club have sports scientists and conditioners who would soon be aware if any player transgressed.
      Even ten years ago City had advanced to having named water bottles and amounts were logged by the staff.
      Things have moved on from the days of Bobby Campbell and his pre match sessions in the Old Crown.
      Players, even at L2 are athletes now and stick to diets prepared for them by the analysts.
      Cook does seem to suffer from sudden weight gain but to accuse him of liking a pint, or two, is unfair.
      Without knowing him I would suggest it’s very unfair.
      Like Campbell you could argue that as long as he scores goals then why worry, but we live in a different era and alcohol content would quickly apparent.
      Osadabe just had a bad game which happens.
      Other players were criticised,even Halliday who has been consistent this season snd scored the equaliser.

      • Going into the match, I thought our extra day off compared to Morecambe who also played on Saturday would have given us an edge… so I was completely gobsmacked to see us looking that off-pace, especially since GA has dramatically increased their fitness levels in recent weeks.

        Then I noticed how pretty much every pass Kelly made was wayward, and how he seemed to be sluggish at times which put a wry smile on my face. It’s hard to tell with Cook as he’s got a laid-back demeanour, which I don’t care one bit about as long as he keeps banging them in, but when I saw how he ignored the ball when we needed a bit of urgency, another wry smile forced its way on to my chops.

        But like I mentioned, I don’t really blame them for it and now they’re playing well and giving it their all most weeks, even if it’s just an off-day, it’s easily forgiven.

        Bobby would have drunken them both under the table though I’m not sure how well he’d have fared in the modern day football that requires you to be at peak fitness levels and feed your body with the right food and drinks.

        I definitely wasn’t suggesting either were unprofessional or even that they’d actually done anything wrong… it was just the opinionated views of a faceless supporter whose words carry little weight or respect, and if I were either of them reading that then I’d hardly let it get to me. But I meant no offence by it and certainly didn’t claim they’d had a skinful… a couple of extra pigs in blankets could have been the culprit or noisy excitable kids playing with their new toys – it was more about celebrating Xmas than referring to alcohol, though you’d have a hard time convincing me that Kelly didn’t have at least one Guinness!

        Anyway, I appreciate your views and I’ll try to avoid giving opinions that suggest to some people that I’m questioning a players’ professionalism or integrity. I respect them all but sometimes I get carried away when I’m writing (as you can probably tell from the occasional verbose comments I make).

  12. Kelly now!
    Too much Guinness!
    He made the second goal!!
    How about some of the Morecambe players?
    Did their hangovers kick in for the second half?
    How about thus scenario.
    Morecambe had a slice of luck which resulted in the first goal.
    They then got a second.
    We hit back and could of even won it.
    You could see by the reaction of the Morecambe players at full time as they fell to their knees.
    Gutted.
    Or too much Brussels sprouts maybe!!!
    I had a wry smile.

    • Morecambe played on Saturday which is why I was so disappointed that they looked much sharper.

      Kelly did put in a peach of a delivery for equaliser, I think I mentioned that somewhere but it was literally the only time he got it right.

      One thing I want to clarify as I seem to have given the wrong impression about what I was saying… while I did imply alcohol could have had a hand in the sluggish start of a couple of players – I was in no way suggesting anyone got wasted or partied the night away. For all I know, Kelly might have 3 little kids who were too excited to sleep and kept him awake, or he might have had a family crisis… there’s a million genuine reasons that could have affected his performance that don’t include overindulgence.

      But as Kelly’s a jolly Irishman who are known (and loved) for big family get-togethers and celebrations, which is a special thing, I cheekily implied he might have had a beverage – which with hindsight judging by the reaction it’s caused, I probably shouldn’t have, though it definitely wasn’t a slur on his character or any offence towards the Irish (of which I have some blood myself).

      Although I also implied something similar about Cook, I was less convinced with him as it’s harder to tell because he’s quite laid back at the best of times, though it’s been documented through his career that he does (or did) enjoy a pint or two.

      Regardless, I wasn’t judging or berating either… I used to have a job that required me to work over Xmas and New Year, so I know how hard it is to balance work and celebration with friends/family… and I’m definitely not one to talk because I nearly always failed with it… at the very least I’d be going in to work tipsy.

      It was an observation I made which I openly shared as a potential reason (or at least one of them) for our slow start.

      Whether the disapproval is coming from the fact the thought entered my mind (HOW DARE I THINK!), or because I’ve said it out loud, I’m not sure… but it certainly wasn’t an intentional attack on their character/integrity. Some people have clearly taken it a different way than I intended (they are lousy, good for nothing, lilly-livered, alcoholic bums vs. they had a cheeky mince pie at Xmas), which is why I’m trying to clarify that now, but it was more of an oversight/misjudgment on my part rather than any malice.

      As for Morecambe in the second half, they have a problem holding on to leads and are known to buckle and capitulate, so we just needed to apply some pressure and raise the temperature to cause them to panic and defend deeper. It was a combination of an improved City performance and more intensity that contributed to saving a point, and almost rescuing all three. However Dwayne-Billy-Bob-Rufus, it’s ‘Redneck’ logic to compare ‘hangovers’, not least because I wasn’t suggesting anyone had one in the first place, but I don’t watch Morecambe players on a regular basis enough to spot a 5% drop-off in performance.

      Yes absolutely, their first goal had more than a ‘slice of luck’ to it, in fact maybe that’s what caused the dip in Kelly’s performance (the Morecambe boy is a mile off-side, with their cleared set-piece about to launch a dangerous counter-attack for us, hits the back of Osadebe’s heel instead of into his path, and ricochet’s perfectly to give him the perfect goal-scoring opportunity) … perhaps he half-inched his 4-leaf clover or lucky charm, so he was missing the ‘luck of the Irish’ while they got the flukiest of goals…

      I feel compelled to explain I used a little sarcasm there before I start another stampede back to the ‘noose box’… but this only added to my frustration anyway, because had we started the game as they’d done the previous six, then that was a victory 9/10. While the comeback was pleasing for many reason, my underlying feeling is that we’ve thrown two points away… which is a big shame.

      They did get a second one, well done, your powers of observation deserve my upmost respect… kudos!

      And well, everybody knows that sprouts are the food of the devil… eat them at your peril, definitely a potential culprit.

      Keep on wry-smiling!

      • Kay of Cookie it’s a joke to even label anything on him, he played the first 2 months half fit carrying injury (told me himself) as we stupidly had no back up, then gets a boat load of grief for it after all he’s done for us he’s the best striker to get a team out of this league 100%. Kelly so he’s 2 sliding tackles were easily forgotten then? The lad is getting better every week and learning his craft keeping Stubbs out is no mean feat I might add. Plus his delivery for goal and a good delivery in 2st half that should have needed in a goal. Your posts are far too long to enjoy and full of digs. Have a word and know that this is read by some players and their families. Get behind the lads like the fans have the last few times we’ve been behind and then see what happens.

      • Lay off Cookie I meant!

  13. I think we can all agree that Johnathan Tomkinson was excellent throughout. A really good addition to the team.

  14. I think many of the posts tell us more about the writer than anything else.

    • Well this post is vague, thinly-veiled, pointless, boring, cautious, scant, and lazy… but i can’t imagine what that tells us about you… care to teach us what we should look for and how we should judge people when reading their comments?

  15. Nevertheless, it’s got under your skin!

    • Not really because it’s more of a compliment, to me anyway, so thanks. Happy holidays, and go easy on the drinking!

  16. Have you got a thing about drinking? I mean you have already gratuitously accused two of our players of doing that on the eve of a match. Shame on you. Life’s too short to bandy words with you. That is my last.

    • Andrew is entitled to his opinion. If you have a problem with what he says challenge and give an alternative. Otherwise what is the point in this message board.

    • I was making fun of myself and this unexpected furor with a little light-hearted irony but it takes the shine off when you have to explain your own jokes, so I guess that’s another egg on my face. I hope one day you find it within your heart to forgive my abhorrent behaviour and sinful thoughts that are corrupting such beautiful and pure minds. Bandy no more good sir.

  17. I’m a big fan of this board. The posts are usually excellent and very well written, and the comments are generally thoughtful and interesting to read. So, I’m disappointed my comment has provoked so many people and is somewhat overshadowing what is a very good article by Tom.

    I’ve got no right to tell people what to do, so I won’t, but I wish the attention could go back to where it’s deserved… the above content and second half performance.

    Apologies if I offended anyone but I think we should draw a line under it now.

    • Just because your losing!!!

      • Outclassed and outwitted, I never stood a chance really…

        “you sed he’s an alcolik wife battera who shoots cocane at arf time…”

        “erm…. no I didn’t, I just suggested they looked off-pace the day after Xmas and cheekily suggested a couple might have had a single beer or festive treats…”

        “how dare ya, are you telling me they got wasted til 5 int mornin before a game… you shud be angd!”

        “erm…. no I didn’t, I just suggested they looked off-pace the day after Xmas and cheekily suggested a couple might have had a single beer or festive treats…”

        “yor scum you are sayin they went fru 5 kegs a beer an 10 bottles of wisky on xmas… you shud get ya facts rite before spoutin yer rubish…”

        “hmmm… do you know what…”

        However, I should point out in my defence, I’ve over done it gorging on festive treats, so it’s affected my performance. I’ll guess I’ll just have to try and make a second half comeback.

        Truly humbled.

  18. What ? Where have you dreamt this nonsense up? Outrageous leave it out