Credible draw with leaders Stockport County underlines Bradford City’s recent progress – but also shows there is work to do

Bradford City 0
Stockport County 0

By Jason McKeown

There were moments during this stodgy, rain-drenched, war of attrition where a game of football almost broke out. But ultimately, the stench of stalemate wafted over Valley Parade long before the final whistle confirmed a 0-0 outcome where the only winner was pragmatism.

Bradford City and Stockport County both clearly habour high seasonal ambitions, but here they put idealism to one-side for the night to instead trade low-risk blows and ultimately cancel each other out. You suspect neither side minded settling for maintaining their bubbles of positivity. Leaders Stockport are still recovering from a mini dip and will be thrilled to remain five points clear, on an evening where their three closest challengers all slipped up. The Bantams get to stretch their unbeaten run to eight games, and end 2023 still reasonably in touch with the play off pack.

For each side, take the point on offer. Shake hands. Smile. Move on. It was a slightly underwhelming outcome for a packed out Valley Parade that included a healthy Stockport away following. But no one is going to spend the New Years Eve weekend feeling too unhappy.

After a day of dismal weather that placed the game in doubt – a late pitch inspection was needed, as the Bradford district took another battering from Storm Gerrit’s latest flourish – the mud-soaked pitch and swirling rain were never going to be conducive to free-flowing action. It was a grim night to play football, and the game matched it. Mistakes were plentiful as the ball held up when it should have rolled smoothly, or breezed out of play after getting caught in the wind. The Valley Parade pitch began to cut up, and the damage to the turf could remain visible and problematic during the rest of City’s season.

Both halves of this game followed a similar pattern. Stockport started each 45-minute period very strongly, pushing City back and threatening to live up to their lofty league position. Then City came back, enjoying spells of pressure and creating the better chances. Ultimately, it became increasingly scrappy. Each half slowly drifting into nothingness, as both sides prioritised not getting beaten over pushing for greater rewards.

In holding something back, Graham Alexander arguably disclosed his personal feelings on the limitations of the squad he has inherited. Other than introducing Vadaine Oliver midway through the second half, Alexander neglected to trust in his bench to try and give City an attacking initiative and turn one point into three. Since finding success with the 3-5-2 at the start of this unbeaten run, Alexander has made minimal starting XI changes. The underlying message in recent weeks has been the manager’s dislike in having such a large squad. In theory he has a strong hand of options to choose from, but evidently doesn’t like enough of what he has. The writing is on the wall for a lot of members of this squad.

There were two changes here, with Lewis Richards presumably injured and Emmanuel Osadebe demoted to the bench after blowing his Boxing Day chance to deputise for the crocked Jamie Walker. That meant a return for a fit-again Liam Ridehalgh and a starting berth reward for Clarke Oduor, following his strong impact from the bench against Morecambe. But the other nine starters – Harry Lewis, Brad Halliday, Matty Platt, Ciaran Kelly, Jon Tomkinson, Richie Smallwood, Alex Gilliead, Andy Cook and Tyler Smith – have earned the status of trusted Alexander lieutenants. In the second half the likes of Bobby Pointon, Matty Derbyshire, Kevin McDonald and Osadebe gamely warmed up, but Alexander saw greater merit in the tiring legs of his starters than giving any of the back-ups the chance to prove the match winner.

Given the don’t-get-beat priority, that’s fair enough. His dependables largely delivered a solid display. All three centre backs made mistakes in the tough conditions, but showed strong character to maintain their composure and remain strong. Smallwood excelled in the middle of the park and Gilliead characteristically ran himself into the ground chasing and harassing everything.

The issues lied in the lack of balance with the wing backs. While Richards is a player with limitations, his athleticism in getting up and down the pitch with the ball is something that Ridehalgh just cannot match. Get the ball to Ridehalgh out wide in the final third and his great crossing ability – compared to Richards – makes him a useful supply line. But working the ball around in a way that allows him to get into these positions is a lot harder.

Stockport would have quickly realised that the typically brilliant Halliday was the only City wing back who would run with the ball, and so worked hard to close down his space. They often succeeding in forcing the right back to play it into a congested middle of the park. And with it, the danger was usually snuffed out.

The targeting of Halliday ultimately led to City becoming exceptionally direct, which didn’t suit Smith or Oduor. The latter was involved in almost of all of City’s best attacking moments in both halves, and he has quality when the ball is at his feet. But Oduor’s influence was too sporadic. A player of promise, but who doesn’t quite suit this system. The jury is out on whether he can be entrusted with Walker’s role. And with the Scot set to be out for a few weeks, the hope has to be that Alex Pattison is fit enough to return soon.

Smith had a good chance just after the break, but it wasn’t a night where he was able to have enough influence. City were better for bringing on Oliver for Smith, and going big man-big man to spearhead the aerial approach. Oliver certainly made an impact and flicked one long ball into the path of Cook, who had the night’s best chance with a half volley effort brilliantly saved by Ben Hinchliffe.

That was one of only two shots on target all night. The other – for Stockport – had come very early doors during a goal mouth scramble. It was a curious display from County, with manager Dave Challinor making two changes at the break that also involved bringing on a big forward – Kyle Wootton – to play to the conditions. Where this seemed strange was Challinor withdrew their top scorer Isaac Olaofe to make room for Wootton. In the first half, Olaofe looked their biggest threat and showed some great intelligence sitting on Kelly when he worked out he wasn’t going to get any change out of Tomkinson. Perhaps Olaofe was injured, but his exit from the battle was certainly a boost for City.

Stockport showed glimpses of why they are on track to be League Two champions, but Alexander will be hugely encouraged by how well his side matched up to them. Something to build on, as the games keep coming thick and fast over January. A time where attention also turns to the transfer window and just how the club will reshape the squad.

Expect churn, as Alexander tries to trim the fat whilst no doubt wanting to bring in his own players to add to what he’ll see as missing. It seems inevitable Jake Young will be recalled as soon as the window opens – but there are strong rumours of League One and maybe even Championship interest in the EFL’s top scorer. Given Young can only play for one more club this season, City have a quick decision to make. If they want to cash in, Alexander can’t actually pick him. Do you take the money and use it upgrade on your transfer targets, or do you integrate the 16-goal man back into the squad?

We will soon know, but whatever moves the club plays over the next month, the mission has to still be to close that gap on the promotion frontrunners and make it into the top seven. There’s something symbolic about ending the calendar year playing Stockport, given both clubs’ defining moment in 2023 was a play off defeat at the hands of Carlisle United. But whereas as County have been able to harness last May’s heartbreak and mount an even stronger promotion push, City have suffered an almighty play off hangover and crawled their way through headaches and turmoil.

The Bantams end 2023 a sizeable 17 points adrift of their table-topping visitors – when they finished 2022/23 only three points short of County. Recent form gives renewed hope that 2024 might prove to be the year that a Bradford City promotion finally happens, but to go into January in 11th place – five points and six places worse off than they were after 24 games last season – underlines just how much ground there still is to make up.

This draw and performance is another small step in the right direction, for a club that needs to make some big strides over the second half of the 2023/24 season.



Categories: Match Reviews

Tags: , , ,

13 replies

  1. Really valuable point, draws a line under turmoil of the season so far.

    We go into the transfer window unbeaten in 8 and knowing we’re capable of matching the best in league

    Bodes well

  2. A very enjoyable read.

    City fans have good reason to be optimistic. Personally, I still have reservations but feel another playoff season is not an unreasonable expectation. I will be surprised if Jake Young ever plays for City again.

  3. I don’t often disagree with your assessment Jason, but I’m not sure about this one.

    I thought it was an energetic display from first until last minute proving to doubters (and those of us who’ve been there too many times before to know better), that this ‘new look’ City team is one to be reckoned with.

    This wasn’t one of those nights where we upped our game and played out of our skin on a big occasion to nick an unlikely result against all the odds…

    No, this was more of the same that we’ve witnessed over the past few weeks, only now the team are getting fitter to maintain intensity throughout, the players are understanding and growing into their roles… but the one remaining question was, how would they fare when facing the top teams?

    Well, while it’s still only a single game, and we still shouldn’t get too carried away…

    As Stockport are the best team in our league by a mile (IMO) and we more than matched their quality, I genuinely believe we’ve reached a worthy milestone that provides a good indication of what lies ahead.

    It’s probably unfair on the boys when I say we ‘matched’ them, because the truth is, we outplayed them particularly in the 1st half where apart from a corner in the 3rd minute, they didn’t create anything else and barely came into our half.

    Such was our dominance that they made a double HT substitution to try and wrestle back initiative.

    And this was the biggest indicator that we’ve turned a corner, because despite Stockport being much improved in the 2nd, and more dangerous…

    We didn’t buckle or drop into defensive mode to try and hold on to a point against the league leaders, which would be the case for many a team, ourselves included not so long ago.

    So, it was refreshing to see the boys slug it out, toe-to-toe like heavyweight boxers and going for victory, without fear I might add, against a team who pack the hardest punch.

    Even though the second period was more evenly balanced, albeit end-to-end and edge-of-the-seat stuff… we had the better chances, and I’d say we came out on top of that battle too…

    So, had Smith tucked away when Cook rolled a neat ball across the six-yard box, or their keeper hadn’t pulled off a ‘Lewis-esque’ save, preventing Cook’s goal-bound drive, then few could argue we didn’t deserve the victory.

    It was one of those exciting 0-0’s where the scoreline doesn’t come close to telling the full picture, and even though the win eluded us, the performance (and statement made) was hugely impressive.

    Some big tests still to come, not least at Crewe on Monday, but if we maintain this consistency as we have done for weeks, and continue playing like that, then we’ll give ourselves a very good chance come May.

    If the match stats on City’s website are anything to go by, then it would seem to suggest Stockport were the stronger team on the night with 60-40% possession and edging the chances 10-9… although those statistics are not the most reliable.

    However, even if they were and I also factor in my bias and questionable objectiveness, this was one of those games where the stats distorted reality.

    Right from the very first minute, we were at it and obviously determined not to start as slowly as we did last time out.

    Stockport won a corner in the 3rd minute and played it straight into the danger area. That triggered pinball mania as the ball hit defender, found attacker, who hit defender again. Only this time, eventually the ricochet landed favourably for City, who finally cleared the danger.
    That probably counted towards 3-4 of their attempts on goal, but it was also their last real chance of the half.

    We quickly took control of the game and didn’t ease off the gas for a second, completely nullifying their threat, which let’s face it… is a very big one.

    Back in August at their gaff, despite missing a penalty and spurning a golden opportunity that should have bagged the 3 points… I thought they were a different class than us as they played us off the park at times.

    They missed some glaring opportunities, so despite MH and supporters coming away thinking it was a good point, which obviously it was… the gulf in performance horrified me because it suggested we were a long way off being a promotion rival.

    Clearly, a lot has gone on since then and positive change has taken place, but despite impressive performances and an upturn in results of late…

    Thinking back to the existing gulf of only 4-months ago (with pretty much the same players), and the last time we faced a strong, prolific, and highly fancied team for promotion (Notts), I must admit, I was a little worried going into this one.

    But after the 3rd minute pinball drama, we absolutely hammered them into submission while they resorted to launching the occasional hopeful ball forward to try and catch us on the break, though our defence were always alert to any danger.

    At half time, you knew they were gonna come out with a different gameplan and push forward more, so the fear was they’d take control of the game, force us to retreat deeper, until it becomes defence vs. attack and battle to survive.

    That’s not only because we’re talking about a strong Stockport team… it’s been the recurring theme of the past few years… City might have a good half, but they could never back it up over the full 90.

    That’s the most pleasing thing for me, and the biggest indicator we’ve turned a corner and found the right man for the job.

    We’ve had good runs before but not with this level of dominance and consistent intensity levels from start to finish… and what’s more, I don’t think we’re at our best yet.

    Stockport did indeed come out all fired up, and their two half-time substitutions was acknowledgement of our superiority.

    It still took them 10 minutes to gain a foothold in the match, but when it inevitably came, instead of crumble or back off through fear, we kept coming back at them and playing without fear.

    At times, it was end-to-end stuff, and the danger is against such a potent attack and quality team, they could nick it with a moment of magic… but this is what some fans and managers like MH don’t seem to get…

    Yes, it’s a risk and you might lose points, but attacking performances and maintaining pressure on the opponent for the full match, not only gets the crowd on side (and into the game), which is an advantage in itself as it boosts player performance further, but you restrict the opposition to fewer attempts, while increasing your chances of victory.

    Obviously, you can’t prove both scenarios, but my estimate would be that for every point you lose playing aggressive football, you win more than playing defensive. Many of us have been crying out for a positive approach for years.

    But who cares about that right now… the main thing is, we’re looking like a good team again, the players are putting in a shift, and we’re giving ourselves a chance… which is all we’ve ever wanted.

    Kelly was good, looked sharp, and played a big part in an impressive clean sheet. Given we didn’t need to defend until the 55th minute, I’m not sure it was enough to justify the MotM award.

    For me, that belonged to Gilliead who was absolutely outstanding. He was different class all game. It’s difficult to single out praise as he did so many good things, but there was one moment that typified his performance, and showed us why Stockport couldn’t seize control of the match…

    It was around the 60-minute mark, they were pushing players further forward and trying to force us back. He was helping Halliday out wide and won the ball to prevent a potential attack…

    But instead of panicking and booting the ball to safety while 3 of their players pressed him to force an error or regain possession, he used his skill to cut inside the first man, ran between the other two, then all of a sudden, he found himself free in the middle of the park driving towards their goal and forcing THEM into retreat!

    He didn’t have the confidence (or licence) to do that last year, but he’s always had it in him. I think MH took credit for using him as a midfielder instead of a winger, but I remember him playing for Scunny against us the year before he rejoined, and he played midfield in that game, went on a run from defence, slalomed through our entire team before scoring a super goal.
    He was fab all night, which is why despite most of the team performing well and having a good evening, Gilliead was the standout performer for me.

    To be honest, I thought Halliday was a close second and it was probably the best I’ve seen him in a city shirt, considering the opposition.

    I’m not sure the sponsors should be the ones to choose anyway. I mean, is it too hard to let supporters in the stadium vote through an app?

    I guess it doesn’t really mean anything, but it would be good to see credit going where it’s due.

    I should also give a mention to Odour, who was excellent in spells… the first 15 minutes he caused problems and had a couple of attempts on goal. If he’d have looked up though on the first one, Smith made a good run and the through ball was on, but he never saw it, which was a shame.

    Even though there were long periods where he wasn’t involved in the action, he kept his discipline and defended really well… it’s vital the flair players do their part, especially on big nights like last night… and fair play to him he did.

    All in all, while there weren’t a ton of clear-cut chances or goal mouth action, I think you need to offset that against the quality of the opponent, who scored 8 in a match just a couple of weeks back against a team that beat us.

    I wouldn’t say we cancelled each other out but because of how good they are, we were never gonna blow them out of the water. To dominate the first half and edge the second while creating 3-4 really good chances to score, might sound modest, but it was against a team who are most likely gonna be promoted as runaway champions.

    Yet, out of the two we looked like the table toppers.

    It’s clear we need options for the bench, even accounting for Walker and Patterson, we’re still many short if he refuses to select wingers for whatever reason. And while he’s publicly announced he’s only looking to trim the squad in Jan, I think that to avoid agents exploiting the club should they learn the situation is more desperate than he’s letting on.

    You’re only as good as your bench, and at the moment the bench looks like it’s for emergency purposes only.

    Given the demands in intensity and effort both on/off the pitch, it’s pretty clear KM won’t be able to meet those demands given his life-threatening condition, and I’d say Derbyshire probably doesn’t have the legs to do what GA expects… no fault of player/s or manager.

    But assuming the gaffer has decided Pointon, Chapman, Tulloch, Afoka, Wilson, don’t fit this system… and it’s probably fair to assume Osadebe has played himself out of contention now too, that’s already 8 players not being considered for selection… to be honest you could probably add one of (Platt/Taylor/Stubbs) to that list as well, as I believe all 3 players are competing for one role – the central DC position which Platt currently occupies and we have too many defenders.

    It looked like Smith was hobbling at the end, but we have Young coming back in a few days (I’d assume) so that’s less of a concern.

    Still, I think January could potentially be a lot busier than we’ve been expecting and if Alexander’s player recruitment is on par with the rest of his managerial abilities, then it’s quite possible come the end of Jan our squad will be much improved. At the very least, it’s a no brainer than anyone he signs must have an engine on him and good work ethic.

    Anyway, I really enjoyed yesterday’s performance. It’s a shame we dropped the 2 points to Morecambe because 4 points from these two games would have been a good return.

    While we don’t have the squad depth currently, which sounds crazy given how bloated it is, the 12 (15 with Walker. Patterson, and Young) that we do have, are more than a match for any team in this league – especially if they keep at it like last night (and recent weeks)… but ultimately it’s looking like our season will come down to January recruitment.

    • What you been drinking and watching,😉 a fair result. We did cancel each other out. Only way goal was going to come as the game went on was a slip or an error, apart from Cook effort. So, 0-0 can’t argue either way any other result.

      • It’s obviously a perspective thing. I’m not saying it was champagne football with chances galore and we should have won 10-0.

        I agree that it’s a good point against an excellent team as the general consensus seems to be, it’s just I saw the game differently but that’s possibly to do with my pre-expectations, the improvement I was looking for since the last time we played them, evidence that we wouldn’t crumble against a top team – because that would have shattered our new belief that we’re doing the right things and moving in the right direction…

        So, while many people were possibly judging the match on it’s merits which is fair enough, I guess I was looking out for different things. Which is probably what excited me more, because now I’m convinced we’ve got a chance this year, when just the other week, I thought the season was over.

        I’ll probably watch it again and focus on the match only, but to be fair, I was aware the shot count wasn’t that high – though probably higher than any game under MH and it wasn’t tiki-taka… but I was pleased with the effort, the running, the intensity, the tracking back, the fact we kept them quiet… but I thought it was a pretty exciting draw.

        I’m not completely off my rocker as GA came out today and pretty much described the FH as I did, one-sided, some decent chances, Odour looked a threat and we had good energy – he was delighted, and I shared that sentiment… Challinor pretty much conceded that we dominated the FH too as he made a double sub and changed formation at HT.

        But yeah, I guess it’s one of those where it depends what you’re looking for. I’m not usually a fan of 0-0’s or even draws, and against any other team I would have expected more, but it was Champions elect who score for fun, and made us look like a non-league team back in August,… so I was over the moon because to me (whether right or wrong), last night was proof GA is the real deal, and that we’re definitely going in the right direction and I haven’t felt that for years.

  4. Good post Jason. I agree about Halliday and the lopsidedness. It more evident than ever when Ridehalgh plays but still there when Richards is on.
    As a team we lack fluidity and seem to get stuck passing in triangles we can’t get out of (I am not just talking about last night). It’s also frustrating that we sometimes have an opportunity to cross but instead pass backwards.
    I agree some of the bench are unlikely to play but disappointed not to see Pointon come on when clearly legs were going. Especially when at one point Oduor looked to have cramp, and I fail to see how we could possibly be compromised defensively by the swap?
    Cook doesn’t look fit to me and I wonder if we would benefit with starting Oliver and bringing Cook on fresh from the bench.
    Things are looking good and It’s great that we have moved on to a different level and have higher expectations.

  5. A very good report, Jason, which puts it in a nutshell. The pithy style is so much more effective than the uncontrolled prolixity we see so often on football forums. In the real world of football a draw against the league leaders, undefeated in 20, on a rain-soaked pitch is a good result. It’s a measure of how far we’ve come in a month that it might, with a slice of luck, have been a home win. I can’t help thinking Chapman is the best bet in the absence of the two first-choice number 10s. He did pretty well last season in Walker’s absence. I think Oliver needs to put himself about more when he comes on, get in the face of the defenders.

  6. Agree entirely with the lack of confidence in his bench. 2 games he has been chasing a goal and Derbyshire doesn’t come on. I’d argue when is he ever going to come on?

    Unfortunately it seems like Chapman’s time is done. I thought Oduor was excellent last night but similarly to Smith his decision making isn’t brilliant and maybe a lacks the experience Walker has.

    Stubbs is the really interesting one. Do we sell him, does he go out on loan, does he stay and try earn a shirt when clearly not fancied. For me he is 25 and potential to be one of the best centre backs in the league and go higher. Taylor while not being the pub player many had him out to be doesn’t have the same quality.

    I think our best XI is pretty set (presuming Young joins Cook) a bench/squad of Doyle, Stubbs, McDonald, Oduor, Pattison, Chapman, Pointon, Oliver, Smith, Taylor wouldn’t leave you looking for much other than cover at wing back.

    But I think Chapman at least will be leaving to make room for incomings. Stubbs (hopefully on loan) and Pointon on loan to get experience potentially too. Dependent on Pattison’s injury cover for Gilliead will be required.

    • I think Stubbs has, apart from a short-term dip in performance, been an outstanding player for us. I really want Platt to do well and he looks a better player since he hasn’t been required to pass the ball around at the back, but his passing is still letting him down.

      Stubbs, for me, is as physical as Platt, better in the air when defending, better in possession, better at passing, is as good at timing his tackles and has at least as much pace as Platt as well a being a better “talker” and organiser than Platt. So, I would be massively dissapointed if Stubbs was loaned out. I want to see Stubbs back in the center of our back-three. I can certainly understand GA’s reluctance to change a consistantly good performing defence because of the “odd” mistake from Platt. However, Platt’s fairly regular giving up of possession, when not under pressure, is starting to add up. Often, fortunately, it doesn’t amount to anything too serious, consequences wise, -Morecambe game apart- but it can’t continue and shouldn’t be allowed to go uncorrected or “unpunished” when we have the quality of Stubbs in our squad.

  7. It looks like last nights game was one of those occasions which has divided opinions. Maybe the points dropped in the previous game has muddied the waters for some, two points from two home games means the gap to the playoff positions has grown and not shrunk. Not ideal I grant you. But given that we were playing the runaway league leaders, a team that had only lost once in twenty games, that for me made it a point gained rather than two lost. I don’t really get the negativity. I watched a game between two teams who went at it hammer and tong, Stockport have quality throughout, and I can see why they are where they are, we barely touched the ball in the first ten minutes; but for all that possession they didn’t do much with it, and our belief grew, we had a game on. And for the rest of the first half I thought our much more direct approach gave us the upper hand.

    The second half started much like the first, but with County’s main threat now sat in the dugout we managed to keep them at arm’s length, while still creating chances of our own. Our team has limitations, with a couple of key players out injured our bench looks alarmingly bare. But Alexander has done a remarkable job given the circumstances and given the players he has at his disposal. That was a gutsy performance, full of running and commitment. My glass is most definitely half full.

  8. The only annoying thing about last night is that Hughes’ early season mismanagement, means we gave our rivals a 10 to 15 point start.

    This was two very good L2 teams, been very respectful of each other and so both defences performed 8/10 – because they knew they had to be ‘on it’ against their opponents attacks.

    At the start of the season, the very impressive Challinor would have bitten your hand off, if you’d told him he’d have two draws with us.

    As we’ve seen with both matches against Stockport plus Wrexham, Mansfield, Gillingham and Swindon – we are as good as anyone in this league. It’s the bonkers performances against Sutton, Walsall and Tranmere that’s given us an issue!!

    Understandably, Stockport and Mansfield, who significantly have had the same manager for a while are just that little bit more confident (as we saw fleetingly last night when they knocked the ball around well) – but otherwise I don’t see them as any better than us.

    We keep going. Cannot see why we won’t end up in the play-off and we carry on and see if we can do what Bolton and Bristol Rovers did in previous season (both arriving in the Top 3 around four or less matches left)

    One caveat though. Walker is a big miss.

  9. Well for me that was a great game of football to watch with both sides slugging it out! I was immensely proud of the lads for giving it their all. I thought we were strong and gave them a match to remember. Tough conditions but we stood firm and had our chances – minimal as they were. I’m a glass half full guy at the best of times but I sincerely see a promotion on the horizon if we can keep up this form! Thank you GA!

  10. I used to love playing in those conditions…from school and Sunday morning under age then, adult up until the day I couldn’t run anymore!

    You knew in the warm up who wasn’t up for it on both teams.

    I know we’re talking about professionals, but it was a joy to watch on Friday, two sets of players having a right go…

    Warmed the cockles of my heart 😁