
| Bradford City 1 |
| Sarcevic 18 |
| Mansfield Town 0 |
Written by Jason McKeown (images by John Dewhirst)
They let their football do the talking. Perhaps it came from a voice still finding its strength, occasionally wavering and not yet carrying complete conviction. But the message was delivered with calm clarity: Bradford City are not imploding.
After all the midweek noise, the over-the-top criticism and the premature gloom, points were made all over the pitch. Under some pressure, a rot-stopping victory was served up. Given their initial flying start to the season and the vast credit in the bank for the past two seasons, it seemed crazy they needed to issue a reminder of their quality. But that was the ask of them, and it’s what they largely supplied.
It wasn’t a performance to set pulses racing, but it should at least lower the heart rate. Angst gave way to approval. Frowns turned upside down. And sure, with the season still offering up such a small sample size of their true capability, it’s a mood that could all too easily flip again. Only time will judge whether this was a launchpad to better things or a futile attempt to paper over the cracks. For now, definitive conclusions remain out of reach.
What we can say with confidence is that this was much better from City. And the improvement came without any major change to the plan. Graham Alexander chalked up his 75th victory in the Bantams hotseat while sticking to his principles. He’ll take quiet delight in that, especially in view of the questions asked of him after back-to-back losses.
If ever there was a week for channelling Kipling, this was it. While others were losing their heads and doubting everything, Alexander stuck to the path he had set. Turns out the way forward wasn’t to throw out everything he was building.

Because what he is building stood firmer here. Like on Tuesday, they started slow and were indebted to a superb early Jon McCracken save to keep out a Michael Smith diving header. An early Mansfield goal would have invited further panic that the sky was falling, but City showed resilience, grew in stature and soon took control.
Such bravery is great to see. A slightly disgruntled Valley Parade is no place for the faint of heart, and this group showed they are no wallflowers.
Everywhere you looked, City players were standing tall and disproving doubts about their character after the way heads had dropped midweek. None more so than captain Antoni Sarcevic, who shook off a difficult couple of performances to offer a compelling case that he can thrive as an attacking midfielder in this 3-4-3. This was Sarcevic’s best game of the season by some distance, capped off by a lovely acrobatic volley that would prove to be the game’s only goal.
Sarcevic was set up to score by another player under the supporter microscope, Jake Beesley, who in the first half at least led the line really well. Beesley’s assist was slightly ungainly. But no matter. The way he got on the end of a Josh Neufville cross and menaced his way into setting up Sarcevic was just what was needed. If Sarcevic’s goal was the beauty, Beesley proved he can be the beast.
The difference in City’s approach from Tuesday to Saturday was marginal rather than revolutionary. Sarcevic, for example, had looked ineffective as a number 8, often disconnected from Callum Connolly and struggling to influence games. Here, clear efforts were made by the pair to be more intertwined, and there was a greater sharing out of responsibilities.
Sarcevic tracked back to help City defend and make sure Connolly was not outgunned. It demanded high energy from the 34-year-old. He was taken off after 66 minutes having run himself into the ground, and on a yellow card. But it was a hugely effective 66 minutes. If he can play like that every week he can be a difference maker, even if he isn’t able to do it for the full 90.

Meanwhile Beesley’s central targetman style has come under the spotlight, mainly for his failure to get off the mark in a City shirt. But also because the Bantams’ attack has lacked the usual dynamism so far this season.
Under Alexander’s 3-4-3, they’ve typically deployed a central striker to run the channels and pop up across the final third. That’s offered the wide forwards and wing-backs another player to link up with, to work the ball around the opposition and into dangerous positions.
Beesley hasn’t offered this same level of channel running. He operates largely through the middle. He wins high balls, holds it up and lets others get up the pitch to support, but this is a slower approach, enabling opposition players to get back too. Rather than creating overloads out wide and playing at a fast pace, City have lost some of their unpredictability and tempo. And, with it, they have become easier to defend against.
But that began to subtly change here. Beesley was more prepared to run the channels rather than merely stick to the middle part of the pitch. He popped up across the final third and linked up well with others. And at the same time, it seems wide forwards Bobby Pointon and Adam Phillips were urged to tuck inside and get closer to Beesley to feed off his flick-ons. They both looked much more dangerous and involved from those slightly narrower positions.
What it all added up to was a more compact, in-tune Bradford City side. There had been huge, at times alarming gaps on Tuesday night, as Beesley, Sarcevic and Connolly looked too isolated from the wide players. Here the team hunted together, making sure they could interlink in possession whilst closing off space to Mansfield when they didn’t. Everyone’s performance improved because of their closeness to their teammates.

That’s why City’s first attack was a shot not from a forward player, but Connolly – who was able to get forward more because of the sharing out of defending and attacking responsibilities with Sarcevic. Connolly’s shot was well saved, but it marked the moment City settled down and took control.
Mansfield certainly retreated. They had three shots in those first five minutes when they were on top, but only mustered one more effort over the rest of the half. Nigel Clough had made five changes from their Wednesday night thumping at Reading. It was supposed to be six changes, but number 1 Liam Roberts – who had missed the midweek humbling – was injured in the warm up. That meant their back-up keeper had to unexpectedly continue in goal. One Harry Lewis.
The former Bantam will certainly feel much better about life after his performance here compared to Wednesday. Lewis had little chance keeping out Sarcevic’s wonderful goal, but that early game block from Connolly was excellent, as was the way he kept out a Phillips shot at 0-0. Then after conceding, and in the minutes before the interval, he also made two brilliant saves to deny Pointon and Phillips again.
From City’s point of view, they should have taken both chances. First Beesley had won a free kick that was quickly taken, sending Sarcevic haring towards goal with a City attacking overload. His pass to play Pointon through was maybe slightly overhit, and Lewis kept out his former team-mate by sticking out a leg. A moment later Pointon pressed, set up Sarcevic, who set up Phillips, but the summer signing’s chipped effort was clawed away by Lewis.
And maybe, like against Cambridge on Tuesday, those missed chances might have come back to bite City. They certainly lingered in the mind during a more evenly balanced second half. Perhaps that’s also partly because it was a second half where not much of anything happened.
It was certainly odd. The two sides traded shots straight after the interval. Then 22 minutes passed with neither side having a sight of goal. Mansfield had introduced the dangerous David McGoldrick, but the visitors looked utterly toothless. They did find the back of the net when a free kick was bundled home, but Smith bundled over McCracken at the same time. So the goal was rightly disallowed.
City defended really well throughout. There was no repeat of the howlers of Tuesday night. George Pratt came in for Macaulay Gillesphey and was outstanding. The on-loan Blackburn man did not put a foot wrong, standing up the physical battle and looking accomplished on the ball. On the opposite side of the back three, Matt Pennington made a welcome return and was solid, with Aden Baldwin reassuming his usual high levels after a slight dip.

Not that it was completely plain sailing. Nick Powell came on for Pointon – who had an excellent game – and Alexander switched to a 3-4-1-2 with another sub, Kayden Jackson, playing behind Powell and Beesley. It gave Mansfield more space and they began to push. Nothing that was causing any huge fear – their last shot on target came all the way back in the 43rd minute – but enough to raise tension.
City’s pressing was no longer as effective. With Henry Cartwright – who came on for Sarcevic – sitting alongside Connolly, City retreated and built a wall Mansfield could not break down. As late Mansfield free kicks and corners were swung into the box, the threat of a late sucker punch hung in the air. But because the Bantams had two up top, they discouraged Mansfield from committing too many players forward in search of an equaliser. A special word too for Neufville, who had another terrific game.
City saw it out, and Valley Parade purred with quiet satisfaction. The curious aspect of the afternoon was that both the entertainment and City’s performance peaked in the first half. Swap the order of those two 45 minutes around, and we’d have headed home with a much bigger buzz and positive feeling towards City. In that first half the Bantams successfully raised enthusiasm levels, only for them to creep slightly backwards after the break.
Not every question posed of City had a completely satisfactory answer – Beesley’s second half performance was poor, the Bantams still aren’t clinical enough, and they couldn’t sustain their high intensity for the full 90 minutes. They were up against decent opposition, but equally Mansfield looked like a side that held back from really going for it. Stronger opponents might not let City off for their receding levels of control in those final stages.
But what matters is the result. The improved performance. The greater cohesion. The increased togetherness.
The defeats to Plymouth and Cambridge had knocked them off their stride, but here they got back on the horse and began to rediscover their mojo. City are still not the all-conquering force they threatened to become after beating Sheffield Wednesday and Burnley, but they are also not the cowering mess some painted them as after Tuesday.
Their football did the talking once again. Not loudly enough to settle every argument, but clearly enough to show they are still moving in the right direction.

Categories: Match Reviews
The warning signs beneath Bradford City’s rebuild
The Bradford City wheel keeps turning to deliver another night to remember
The growing authority of Bradford City
A statement beginning from a maturing Bradford City side
Not a great game and war of attrition. 3 points deserved. Far too much long ball stuff that by passed the midfield with Beasley getting no service what so ever. Beesley totally isolated with no support being pulled all over the place and shirt pulled off his back with no intervention from the officials. He made the goal and worked his arse off. Absolutely terrible from start to finish from both refs. Should be 12pts and joint top as we deserved to beat Cambridge.
Good result, looking forward to being at Orient for the cup game on Tuesday
That’s fantastic dedication. It’s a long and expensive trip and travel these days is not easy whichever way you go. Let’s hope you are rewarded and we get a good draw in the next round!
Am from Bradford but live & work in London (like many others), so a short trip! Our son has followed City since he was at primary school – he’s now 29, doesn’t have a Bradford accent and was slagged off for being posh at one away game last season!
Highlight of the game was Beesley heading the ball to himself to then assist Sarce. Much needed win and a first win against Mansfield in the league for Alexander at the 4th attempt; we did enjoy a 3-0 win away in whatever the Johnny Paint is now called 😅
The most ironic thing about the win today was that the performance was nowhere near as entertaining as Tuesday’s defeat to Cambridge. Barring the nature of their two goals, Tuesday’s performance was miles better. Still, a win is a win, and with a clean sheet to boot, that’ll do nicely.
This is a rare example where I disagree with the write-up, especially the statement “What we can say with confidence is that this was much better from City”. I thought our performance was some way worse that the (hardly glowing) Cambridge game: the second half especially was very concerning. It was like the bad old days of a League Two game – we were severely lacking in energy and initiative, unable to create even a single half-chance when shooting towards the kop against a poor Mansfield team with two shaky centre backs.
We’ve now scored just 5 goals in 5 league games: all the teams around us in the table have scored pretty much double that or more. Our defenders have scored more goals than our strikers. At the back, our keeper looks increasingly tentative coming for crosses.
This isn’t picking on any individual – a win is a win, and we weren’t helped by poor referee(s). But it was one of the most disappointing halves of football I’ve seen at home for a long time, more akin to some of our poor away performances of last season. I left not feeling reassured that we’re back firing on all cylinders, but with a lingering unease.
After two defeats any win is acceptable, and this one had the bonus of being against one of Clough’s sides, but – if we are being honest – it was not a great performance. A big plus was Pratt’s performance and, on the strength of it, I can’t see Gillesphey getting back in very soon. I will stick my neck out and say with this back three we would probably have got our just rewards against Cambridge. We should have won that match and, personally, I thought we were better on Tuesday than on Saturday, especially in the second half. Nine points is not a bad return from 5 matches by a team still in the gelling stage.
Another example of not getting too low with defeats and too high with the wins.
On Tuesday the 90 minute performance was better than tonight. We created enough chances in that game to win two matches. Yesterday we did enough in the first 45 minutes to win the game, but we were poor in the second half. Over 5 games we have deserved 12 points with one dud performance, but we have 9 which is still a great return.
The one concern is scoring goals.
this brings me onto Sarce. Our best player yesterday and we lost our way when he was taken off. It’s a fallacy that he can’t play in the middle he played almost 200 career games there and the best part of 100 in defensive midfield. At 36 Gary Jones was our box to box midfielder and Sarce certainly has ‘the legs’ for it.
The question is the different way Alexander is asking our central midfielders to play. It will leave more gaps, which is the trade off but one Alexander is willing to take to try and score more goals – our downfall last season. Alexander asked for faith post match yesterday and he has earned that from us.
It will cost us in some games but like yesterday – a goal and two chances put on a plate for pointon and Phillips yesterday. – it will win us games too. The question is whether that is a net positive over 46 games.
There’s no doubt that Sarc is a very good player. But he is getting near the end of his career, legs are going and he has a defender for support. I think he would be just as effective in the role he played last season and the team would be better with 2 energetic midfield players in the middle of midfield.
It’s a fair observation that Jones was our box to box midfielder at 36 and he played lots of games. But, I would suggest that people are seeing or perceiving key differences, for example his tendency to miss around 2 months through injury, the eye test (maybe he doesn’t appear as fast, powerful or like a box to box player) and/or because we know how good he’s been further up the pitch. I’m obviously not a mind reader and not saying all those are accurate but that’s my reading of it. Also, people may remember when Sarce joined us he started out as a central midfielder and it didn’t seem to work, then when he came back he played further up and looked like one of our best players.
My hope is that Morgan plays so well that Sarce has to play further upfield, as I think Morgan will bring more energy and legs, while Sarce will score 10-15 goals further up.