Bradford City: half term report

By Andrew Whieldon

It was not until the 31st December last season when Bradford City finally stumbled on to the 24 point mark, following a 3-1 victory over Shrewsbury Town. This season, just fourteen matches in, the Bantams have already reached that milestone. This might not be a very significant landmark in the long term, but for everybody associated with the Bantams it shows the giant strides that Phil Parkinson has made with the club over the course of just under a year.

Fourteen matches into last season, Bradford were floundering in twentieth place, having registered just three wins (20%), and having scored 18. This season the Bantams have won 50% of their league matches, and have scored almost the same amount of goals at home as last season’s total, 16, and are sitting pretty in fifth place, a point off automatic promotion.

Thanks to the blog experimental361 analysis of League Two, we know that Bradford’s attacking potency is the second best in the league. Averaging after ten matches: thirteen attempts on goal and scoring a goal every eight attempts. In defence we have become the meanest in the league, limiting opponents to on average seven per match. This Width of a Post article highlighted how clinical Phil Parkinson’s men have been with set pieces. After ten games the Bantams have scored 68% of their goals from set plays, and conceded just three. So with a third of the season already behind us, where has it gone so right for Parkinson and the Bantams?

I have highlighted three factors which I believe have contributed to our success so far this season. 1) Tactics, 2) Transfers, and 3) Home form.


This season Parkinson seems to have got his tactics spot on, mainly playing with a tried and trusted 4-4-2. There are only a few occasions, away at Rotherham and at home to York when our tactics were not as effective as they could have been. Counting the Rotherham result to be bad day at the office, the York game when we lined up with a 4-3-1-2 has been the only game where I have questioned the formation. It was rectified mid game, and Bradford got a favourable result from that.

In the 4-4-2 we play, is when I feel the Bantams have been most effective. For the first part of the season the midfield four of Reid, Jones, Doyle, Atkinson/Hines has worked well. Reid has been allowed to flourish. Usually we are used to seeing an overlapping left full back, however with a defensively sound Meredith, not usually venturing over the half way line, Reid has that space to attack.

On the other flank, when Hines plays he is a similar player, this time right back McArdle gives license for Hines to attack, and is complimented by Doyle in the quarterback role, with Jones being a busy man, breaking up play and getting forward. When Atkinson is used, usually in ‘higher profile’ matches he brings a lopsided nature to the team, an acts as a third central midfielder, outnumbering the opposition midfield and still bringing width to the team where necessary. Since Jones’s and Reid’s injury, Ravenhill has come in. He adopts a more conservative role and acts as cover for Doyle.

You may not always see him, but you notice Ravenhill when not there, see the Rochdale away match, and he had his best match to date last week against Cheltenham. With a now more conservative central pairing, and Reid injured, McArdle, and Meredith especially, are now allowed to get a bit further forward on the pitch, see the Cheltenham third goal as an excellent example of our new tactics without Reid and Jones working magnificently.

It has also been Phil Parkinson’s ability to bring substitutes on, and make changes when necessary to affect the outcome of the game. Stuart McCall was criticised for not doing just that, and his sides were guilty of conceding late goals.


In the summer Parkinson’s objectives were to build a concentrated side, with the focus on quality over quantity (Bradford have used the least amount of players this season, 18), but importantly also to bring the right player with the right attitude. In previous seasons we have seen our ‘marquee’ signings have a poor attitude, despite having obvious qualities (Doherty, McLaren) in previous years we have also relied on the loan market, bringing in youngsters.

The Man United defenders/Rehman/Taylor dispute sums my point up well. They will probably turn into decent footballers, but they did not have any presence about them, they were boys instead of men, and it was very noticeable. Our only loan signing this season was two matches ago Forsyth, and he is tall, strapping and seems very capable.

This summer big signing was Andrew Davies, magnificent last season, and outstanding again this. I believe this is probably the best defender we have had in the last ten years at the club.

The only mistake I can think of would be the cheap and dubiously awarded penalty given away against McGlashan vs Cheltenham. At right back Rory McArdle, originally bought as a centre half, has been steady away, and not really put a foot wrong. Criticisms have come from some saying play players in the correct positions. But in my opinion he is more solid and effective, and physically taller than Steven Darby. Darby although hardly putting a foot wrong too on the occasions he has played, does not have that aerial prowess McArdle has. He was targeted by the Accrington players as long diagonal balls troubled him.

In midfield Gary Jones has been a revelation. I cannot sing his praises high enough. He does the simple things well, and his work rate is outstanding. Nathan Doyle, a better technician on the ball, does not have Jones’ work rate, and the two complement each other very well.

Hines and Thompson have impressed in patches when on the pitch. Hines is a very good flair player, he has pace and trickery, however confidence seems to be an issue with him, and he goes missing sometimes. In my opinion he is a great impact player coming from the bench. Thompson can count himself unlucky not to have played as many games as he perhaps deserved, and although doesn’t seem to have as much pace, he is bullish, skillful and a very good footballer.

Will Atkinson, who was on loan last season, made the move permanent in the summer, and has been employed in a more central role since the switch. I have a lot of time for Atkinson, and his performances have steadily improved over the season.

Up front, Parkinson managed to sign Alan Connell, top scorer for champions Swindon. Another very skillful player, he has not yet really been found a role for at the club, despite goals against Wimbledon and Accrington, when played as an striker, he spurned a few guilt edged chances. In the game against York, he was played as the hook, in the hole behind the front two. At this level however I am sceptical of how effective that position is. He is still a very good alternative, and has obvious pedigree.

Home Form

Home form is the reason Bradford are in fifth place. Previous seasons, teams have come to stifle Bradford at Valley Parade. Packing the midfield, and getting ten men behind the ball, has mean that under Taylor, Jackson and to an extent McCall, Bradford have resorted to the long ball tactic.

Over the seasons in League two Bradford has been:

                                W           D             L              F              A             PTS         %

07/08                   10           4               9               30           30               34           43%

08/09                   11           10             2               39           18                32           47%

09/10                    8            8               7               28           27               32           34%

10/11                 10           3              10             27           30                33           43%       

11/12                     8              9              6              34           27                32           34%

Only really since 08/09 has Valley Parade been a fortress, losing two matches. However many of those draws could have been turned into wins. This season the Bantams have won five out of seven home games, scoring sixteen and conceding five, and Phil Parkinson and his players seem to be a lot more attack minded and a lot more convincing in front of goal. But this has been built on a base of defence, solid, uncompromising, and reliable. This trust in our defence has not been there for a long time, from players or fans, but because of this the whole team is much more confident.

Having been a season ticket holder for fourteen seasons, having seen numerous players and managers become part of the revolving door at Valley Parade, this squad of players is probably the best I have seen at Valley Parade. They seem a perfect balance of professionalism and passion, attack and defence, and a manager that is sensible without being too cautious.

Not since McCall have we had a team that is so willing to attack, although exciting, however there was not that defensive base or tactical nouse there. We were too reliant on the individual over the system. With Taylor we were the opposite, system over individual and mechanic and robotic over passion. In full Parkinson has found that perfect balance the club so desperately needed, we play good balanced football, even exciting on occasions.

But none of this would have been achievable had it not been to the dedication, hard work, and unseen hours undertaken by playing and non playing staff alike. For which I and many other fans are truly grateful for. I am not having a knock at past regimes, just complimenting this one. Players have noted that we have the best training facilities in the league, the sport scientists seem to be very professional (look at the pre match warm ups), The chairmen for investing in the one of the biggest playing budgets in the league, and last but not least it has to be down to manager Parkinson and assistant manager Steve Parkin.

One example that springs to mind, just last week following the 3-1 victory over Cheltenham, Parkinson admitted to driving down to watch Northampton lose 4-0 to Barnet on the Friday night. This is commitment and through preparation I have not seen from certain previous Bradford managers.

There is still a long way to go; away form is gradually improving and results against the better teams in the league need to get better. Three of our four losses this season have come against the top seven. Gillingham (1st), Port Vale (2nd), Rotherham (7th). However, as the season unfolds further, Christmas time will be a good indicator of where we should be in May.

But before the Christmas report comes in, the half term report reads A+

Categories: Opinion

Tags: , , , , , ,

6 replies

  1. It’s good that you refer to the Experimental261 analysis – a good and impartial read for many fans which goes beyond the usual player centric debate. However to regard City’s ‘attacking potency’ as the 2nd best in the division is a little misleading. Yes, we are the 2nd best team in creating scoring opportunities (only Burton is better than us) but more than two-thirds of ours come from set pieces which is the highest in our Division. However, importantly the conversion rate of opportunities into goals (which might be regarded as the real measure of ‘potency’) is distinctly average with Port Vale, Gillingham, Exeter and others all having better conversion rates.

  2. Good article and enjoyed reading it, more say in December time?

    Couple of points though:

    Are our training facilities that good? I believe we’re still at Apperley Bridge, which were deemed poor a few years ago, so not sure that much has changed – apart from more access to the school.

    Also, the report of A+ I disagree with. If we were top of the league, yes, but we’re not. We’re not even in auto-promotion spots. Great progress has been made but a couple of losses and we could be mid-table. A score of B+ would be more appropriate I think.

    • I think the point Is A+ look at what the club have done in just under 12months , theres been a rapid improvement on the pitch, off the pitch theres a feeling of optimism from supporters. Parkinson has changed the whole mentality of this football club. Theres a winning mentality at this club now. Look at the following away from home from supporters. So yes I have to agree with Andrew on A+. Theres major tests coming up for the management ,players you dont win promotion in october , but the signs are encouraging.

      • But, a school report is for results and not progress. Yes, we are doing much better than last year but still not the best.

        For example, if a poor performing student usually gets say 35 out of 100, but then their performance improves 100% and gets 70 out of 100, that’s very impressive but still, in real terms, only a B+.

        But a top student who gets 95 out of 100 constantly would be a A+ student. Or would you give them a D- because they’ve not made any progress?

  3. Chopperxxx – yes hopefully Andrew will write another ‘term’ update at Christmas.

    You can take the grade in a number of ways. Me, I would want to base things on where our our expectation levels lie and how we are living up to them. Therefore, Andrew’s A+ is merited on the basis we expect to be top seven and have a great chance of exceeding it.

%d bloggers like this: