Have Bradford City built something bigger than Graham Alexander?

By Jason McKeown

There is a scene in the film adaptation of David Peace’s The Damned United where Brian Clough stands alongside Billy Bremner before the Charity Shield, convinced he has inherited Leeds United on his own terms. Then, as the national anthem ends, Bremner turns and salutes Don Revie in the stands. In that instant, Clough realises there are loyalties and connections that existed long before he arrived, and which he does not fully understand.

At the end of August, Bradford City welcomed Graham Alexander’s former club Burnley to Valley Parade. Asked beforehand about his time at Turf Moor, Alexander declined the invitation to reminisce. His focus, he insisted, was solely on Bradford City.

Yet, moments before kick-off, he made a point of walking over to the packed Burnley end and acknowledging the travelling supporters. It was a brief gesture, but a revealing one. For all the affection that had grown between Alexander and Bradford City, there were chapters of his story written elsewhere.

Less than a month later, that reality has hit home.

***

Preston’s imminent capture of Graham Alexander offered an uncomfortable reminder of where Bradford City still sit in English football’s food chain. Their rise from League Two to the upper reaches of League One has drawn admiration and envy, with their biggest asset lured away by a club offering the very destination the Bantams have spent the last 15 months plotting a route towards: the Championship.

The test now is whether City can respond like an ambitious club on the rise rather than one forced to start again. Has a lasting infrastructure been created to absorb this shock, or is too much of the club’s recent progress tied to the presence of one man?

We are about to find out.

The chair in Alexander’s office is not even cold and conversations about his successor have begun. Names are already being bandied about. Debates have started. At this crucial stage of the season, with everything on the pitch going so well, the need for a swift and decisive appointment is obvious. It would be all too easy for the noise to become a distraction and for City to lose the momentum they have built. These coming days may very well define the season.

The question is not just who Bradford City should appoint, but what type of manager they need right now. And the answer arguably lies in avoiding the trap clubs so often fall into when recruiting a successor: looking for something completely different.

Most managerial tenures end in failure, with a list of perceived shortcomings held up as reasons to change course. Was Stuart McCall too inexperienced, too emotional and too idealistic in 2010? Bring in the shrewd, pragmatic and measured Peter Taylor. Was Derek Adams’ football too functional and too difficult on the eye in 2022? Appoint the more expansive Mark Hughes.

Alexander’s departure is obviously very different. He does not leave behind a catalogue of failures that demand his work be torn up and started again. There is very little to criticise in the job he has done. This is not a rebuilding project and, given everything City have achieved under him, a continuity candidate seems the most sensible way to go.

It’s important to say of Alexander: other ways of delivering success are available. But the timing and circumstances make a dramatic change of direction exceptionally difficult without risking the stability City have worked so hard to create.

An enormous amount of planning has gone into building a squad tailored to Alexander’s demands. The intensity of pre-season in Austria, the emphasis on completing business early in the transfer window and the relentless focus on standards have all contributed to making City the well-drilled, single-minded outfit they have become.

Had Alexander left in the wake of the play-off defeat to Bolton in May, there would have been time to plot a different course. But 11 games into a season that has started so promisingly, a significant shift in direction could jeopardise everything that has been built. Given how hard City have worked to reach this position, that doesn’t feels like a dice worth rolling.

There are drawbacks to this way of thinking of course.

I’m a long-standing believer in long-term planning. Of appointing Bradford City managers with a greater vision than merely collecting the next available three-points. To replace Alexander with the nearest thing to Alexander possible, to keep this promotion push going, is short-termism that might have repercussions down the line. Even if it works, the ceiling of how far a like-for-like replacement for Alexander could take City might be lower than another available manager, who might need more time to get going but offer greater upwards trajectory.

Nevertheless, the opportunity immediately in front of City is too big not to attempt to grasp with both hands. Our modern history is a constant reminder that success is fleeting, and that finishing near the top of League One is an exception rather than our baseline norm. We could accept a backwards step or two in the near-term if it leads to greater long-term progress, but what if a backwards step leaves the club vacating a position they subsequently can’t get back to?

All of which makes it hard to argue for anything but a manager with the same characteristics, football philosophy and preferred style of football as Alexander. Sure, there’s room for tweaks and improvements. Only four League One teams have scored fewer goals so far this season. The central midfield solution is working so far, but doubts remain. Players like Stephen Humphrys might flourish with their copybooks wiped clean again. Tommy Leigh might be checking his Bristol Rovers loan contract to see if there’s a January break clause.

But the next Bradford City manager would do worse than let most things be.

Refine rather than reconstruct. Apply light touches rather than a sledgehammer. At least at first.

The other key quality City need in Alexander’s successor is organisational fit. It’s very clear that the Bantams’ resurgence is a team effort, with key figures working closely together and to a shared purpose. It’s why summer player recruitment drives have been so impressive. Alexander is clear in what he wants – Stephen Gent and David Sharpe go out and find it. Ryan Sparks has a reportedly strong relationship with Alexander, with Stefan Rupp overseeing from a distance.

The dynamic has worked wonderfully well, and any fragmentation from the joined-up vision could cause problems. When Mark Hughes left in October 2023, off-the-record stories of him not being on the same page as the recruitment team began to be drip-fed. History is always written by the winners and some of the accusations thrown towards Hughes may well be unfair, but whatever the finer details it seems people were on different pages in the tricky summer of 2023. The resultant squad build was disjointed and undermined promotion hopes.

City need a manager who will work closely and collaboratively with Sharpe, Gent, Sparks and others. The Brains Trust approach to strategy and decision-making has produced considerable reward. The next manager will have their own ideas for the type of player they want to sign and how to go about that, which is completely fine. But if it translates into disconnected approach, the club could easily undo its fine work.

So a lot to ponder, which makes the decision over the next Bradford City manager about a lot more than who has the best CV. The club has achieved considerable success operating in a very certain way. A manager that steers too far away from this could trigger a bumpy ride.

It is why there is so much on the line. For decades, Bradford City’s fortunes have risen and fallen on individual personalities. One manager arrives and everything changes. Another leaves and everything unravels. The hope among those running the club will be that they have finally built something more durable than that.

***

In The Damned United, Clough’s problem was that he underestimated the power of the structures and relationships he inherited. Leeds United’s problem was replacing Don Revie with a man determined to be Don Revie’s opposite.

Bradford City now face a similar crossroads. Alexander is gone. The challenge is not to tear up the blueprint he leaves behind, but to recognise its value.

The next appointment may tell us whether Bradford City have built something bigger than Graham Alexander, or whether too much of the structure rested on one man.

GREXIT
Graham Alexander may be off, but something bigger remains
Pain
Preston sack Heckingbottom: the phone call Bradford City don’t want right now



Categories: Opinion

Tags: ,

11 replies

  1. No one is indispensable: the show goes on. We have been in this position so many times before and it’s part of the cyclical nature of football. The trick is to get the right replacement and we are now better placed for that than when we brought in Alexander precisely because we got his appointment right. He has left a solid foundation for the next guy to build on and maybe – just maybe – the new manager will bring new ideas and a slightly different approach that can get even more out of the squad. But, yes, here we go again. Alexander did a wonderful job and I hope he always gets a rousing cheer whenever he revisits Valley Parade.

  2. It’s all set up for Clough jnr then!

  3. Its often said that when a mansgerial.change takes place in football that the folloeing reaction is felt with the players.

    A third look forward to it.

    A third are ambilavalent to it.

    A third dread it.

    I imagine thats what is going through our players heads at the moment.

  4. The King is dead, long live the King!

  5. It’s all so very disappointing. GA has tarnished his City legacy in my eyes but he did do a great job and I thank him for that (but through very gritted teeth!!) .

  6. Brentford have shown that success comes from a joined up thinking and long term plan

    It doesn’t seem to matter if they lose a manager or head coach. The show goes on.

    I hope City are set up the same way and am optimistic that we are, since Sharp arrived

    I don’t really fear the Alexanderless future so long as the planning is in place and the right man appointed.

    One final thought. I think Alexander has allowed his heart and probably extra money to rule his head. I hope he doesn’t come to regret it and wish him well

    • Very good point with Brentford, got an incredible record where each time they’ve lost a manager they’ve improved. How many tipped them for relegation when Andrews was appointed only for him to make them look eve better.

      We aren’t at that level of course but if we maintain or improve ourselves it’ll be a good sign.

  7. Plenty of good managers out there. Whether they can be successful isn’t guaranteed.

    Good luck to GA and CL but we move on…

    I don’t accept that managers are embedded to a style of football, if they are then we don’t want them. Any manager who came in and ripped up our current set up would be crackers.

    If we are prepared to pay compensation I’d go for Wellens. I’d also be tempted by Clough. Whether they’d want it is another thing. Same goes for Cleverly.

    Challinor and Heckingbottom both good options with good records. I wouldn’t go for Rowett and I dont think we could afford him.

    Trueman isnt an option for me as he does a good job where he is.

    Whoever it is they’ve got a good starting point!

  8. Now that I’ve had the necessary time to process it all, fair play to GA & CL for taking the opportunity they have been presented with at a higher level with all the connections associated. They leave with my very best wishes for the future and I’m sure they’ll keep PNE up this season. I did see this coming (or a similar departure by GA & CL) very early this season and commented to the mrs that this was a real fear of mine but hey ho it’s done and dusted! I will refuse to be in anyway bitter and honestly thank them for what we achieved this last three years. It was a great ride!

    Right now that’s said – enough looking back and time to look fowards to our new manager and the possibilities for City’s immediate future. I’m trusting the “brains trust” (well said Jason) have got this covered as best they can with a Plan B for who might suit our set-up and the players we have on our books. I don’t believe they will be wanting something completely different anymore than the majority of us supporters do. It’s not broken so it doesn’t need fixing is hopefully how this will unfold. Heard a fair few manager names thrown about but I personally don’t know how each of them play the game i.e. formation / style so just throwing a name here and there is pointless. We have to trust the powers that they DO know this about any potential new manager before he’s let loose on our winning squad. Yes we might hit the jackpot and get a manager who can add that little bit more to what we already have to get the winning combination for Championship football next season. I honestly do not see a world we we fall apart from this managerial change and implode. I’m a glass half full on this one even before we find out who is taking the hot seat! We’re bigger than any one manager and always will be!!! CTID

  9. I remember going to the promotion celebrations in City Park and seeing Alexander stay behind for a good minute or two, after everyone else had left to go to the team bus, smiling at the still remaining crowd, waving and giving thumbs up. He was soaking it all in and you could see how delighted he was. I wish him all the best but truly hope that next season we are in the championship and give his Preston team a good thumping…

    The last time we lost a manager like this, from a position of strength and taken away by another club, was Parkinson going to Bolton. The hierarchy situation couldn’t be more different, as we’d just got new owners and by all accounts were left with nothing. But, at that time, we got McCall who implemented a very different style to Parkinson, still founded on those good characters (McMahon, Kilgallon, McCardle, Meredith, Darby) but with a focus on playing out from the back. Of course, back then McCall had a summer to work with his team, whereas now, we need someone to come in and manage without the time to make large-scale changes.

    My preferred option, which I was hesitant to first, but reading more about Heckingbottom, I could see how he’d fit well. He also took Barnsley into the championship and they finished 14th with the 23rd largest budget in the division. His record isn’t perfect with a clear pattern of success, possibly overachievement, followed by hitting a brick wall or ceiling.

    However, Heckingbottom has used a back three regularly and showed adaptability at Sheffield United. He’d previously had success at Barnsley with a back four but when he took over at Sheffield United, a team that had had great success with a back three under Wilder, he adapted to this system and turned them into a successful team in the championship, finishing 5th and then 2nd the following season.

    When he has struggled there were also understandable reasons for this, he left Barnsley 21st to go to Leeds but the board had sold his best players in the summer (Winnall, Hourihane and Bree left in Jan 2017 – Roberts, Watkins and Scowen July 2017), . His Sheffield United team struggled in the premier league, but again, in the summer the board didn’t keep his best players, including Ndiaye (Now at Man City) and Berge (Now at Fulham).

    He has initially started well at teams like Hibernian and PNE before a sustained decline, which he couldn’t turn around. It is also true that his best successes came at clubs he was already working at, with the younger players, before stepping up. He initially turned around the fortunes at Hibs and PNE before a sustained decline in results, so this is something to bear in mind and could suggest the players lost faith in him as a manager and his philosophy? Whereas at Barnsley and Sheffield Utd the struggles could be explained by stripping away the best players and coming up against premier league quality in the Sheff Utd case.

    But, as a manager who has had sustained success with a back three, got a promotion from league 1 and the championship, and got a team with the 2nd worst budget to 14th in the championship, after selling 3 of their best players in January, we could do much worse.

    Of course, it is all moot at this point and we may go for someone else expected like Challinor or a curveball none of us see coming.

  10. one of my main concern’s is an exodus of players in January to Preston, but more worrying than that, is keeping hold of David Sharpe!!!

    I genuinely believe his appointment was as important as Alexander’s!!

    if you remember, Alexander wasn’t really breaking any records befor David came!!!

    the success of any club, goes far deeper than just one man!!!